China's first foreign-owned hospital seeks medical tourists
Tianjin: A Singapore hospital operator wants more international patients to seek treatment at its new medical centre in China, as foreign healthcare providers eye medical tourism as a new growth area in the world's second-largest economy.
Perennial Holdings Pte's US$139mil hospital opened earlier this year in the northern city of Tianjin, and is the first fully foreign-owned medical facility in the mainland.
The hospital aims to derive 30% of its revenue during its first year of operation from patients visiting from Russia, the Middle East and South-East Asia – hoping China will become an emerging destination for medical tourism that can compete with established regional rivals Singapore, Thailand and Japan.
Perennial's focus on luring overseas patients to Tianjin came after China last year moved to allow private hospitals to be fully owned by foreign entities, which had previously needed a Chinese business partner.
China's health regulator has since encouraged the Tianjin facility to differentiate itself from the country's public hospitals, hospital president Daniel Liu said in an interview this week.
'Medical tourism has yet to become an industry in China, but it's showing promise. We hope to make the pie bigger,' he said. 'Some specialities in the Chinese healthcare system have grown in the past two decades, to a point that measures up to international standards.'
Private healthcare providers have faced headwinds operating in China as the country's post-Covid economic slump weighed on their main clientele – expats and well-off domestic customers with commercial insurance coverage.
Some private hospitals and clinics have closed shop in recent months, while others have had to lower their prices, according to local media.
China can be appealing to medical tourists in part due to a speedier diagnosis and treatment process. — Bloomberg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Britain's manufacturing contraction eases in July but outlook remains weak
LONDON, Aug. 1 (Xinhua) -- Britain's manufacturing downturn showed signs of easing in July, with the seasonally adjusted Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) rising to a six-month high of 48, according to data released by S&P Global on Friday. The July PMI was slightly higher than 47.7 in June, but the index has now signalled contraction for ten consecutive months. S&P Global noted that risks persist, including fragile domestic and overseas market conditions, subdued consumer confidence, and manufacturers' ongoing concerns about costs. Market conditions remained subdued in July as British manufacturers reported weak spending willingness and low confidence at home and abroad. Rob Dobson, director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said although the UK manufacturing sector is starting to send some tentatively encouraging signals, there's no assured path back to strong growth. Domestic clients are unwilling to spend due to cost rises triggered by higher minimum wages and employer national insurance contributions, while export markets are being buffeted by geopolitical stresses as well as trade and tariff uncertainties. The data also showed that new export orders have decreased over the past three and a half years. Additionally, the sector faced a weak labor market in July. The company attributed this to a combination of weak demand, rising staff costs, and subdued market confidence. Job losses were recorded for the ninth month in a row, with the pace of reductions over the past six months ranking among the sharpest since 2020, when the country was hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Cross-border trade to thrive after high-level consultation
IT took bilateral summitry at the highest level to revive cross-border free-trade arrangement at the Tebedu-Entikong border crossing between Sarawak and West Kalimantan in Indonesia. This deal was one of the highlights of the 13th Malaysia-Indonesia Annual Consultation meeting between Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto in Jakarta this week. Also present were Sarawak Premier Tan Sri Abang Johari Openg and Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Mohd Noor. Sarawak had long sought to revive the free flow of goods since Indonesia unilaterally stopped it in 2016. Sarawak set up an inland port early in 2010 because it seemed to make good economic sense to transport goods from Kuching Port to West Kalimantan via the Tebedu inland port rather than all the way from Java. At its height in 2013, some RM700 million in goods were reported to be traded this way. Numerous Sarawak missions to Indonesia seeking to reinstate the free-trade arrangement since then had been fruitless. It, of course, hardly needs stressing that free trade benefits all who engage in it. It also makes geographic sense for transshipment of goods to and from West Kalimantan via Tebedu and Kuching. Naturally, it also needs to be acknowledged that West Kalimantan has similar aspirations to become a trade transshipment hub with the commissioning of a new deep sea port near Pontianak, the provincial capital. The new port will also be well-served by land adjoining it, which has been earmarked for the development of industries. It so happened that a trade delegation from Sarawak led by Deputy Premier Datuk Amar Awang Tengah Ali Hasan was in West Kalimantan and East Kalimantan, also this week. The main mission was, of course, to deepen the economic relationship not just with West Kalimantan bordering Sarawak but in East Kalimantan where the new Indonesian capital of Nusantara is being developed. Sarawak has already identified several joint-ventures in developing dams in Kalimantan and even major real estate developer Ibraco Bhd was scouting about for possible projects in Balikpapan, the major city adjoining Nusantara. Awang Tengah was reportedly also reviewing localities for setting up a Sarawak trade and tourism office in Pontianak. This comes on the heels of the revival of air connectivity between Kuching and Pontianak next month. There has been much clamour both in Sarawak and West Kalimantan for flights between the two cities to resume after they were stopped during the Covid-19 pandemic. People-to-people exchanges have come back strongly since as witnessed by the daily long queues at the Tebedu-Entikong main border crossing as well as other secondary border posts. All these positive developments must be sustained through regular high-level official exchanges, especially in showing to the Indonesian side that free trade and the free flow of people across our common border is not a zero-sum proposition benefiting only one side. What happened in Jakarta this week also shows that Sarawak and Sabah can and do benefit substantially from close state-federal ties and working in tandem to take the fullest advantage from similarly close Malaysia-Indonesia bilateral ties.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Medicaid, Trump tax cuts 'kick off' 2026 campaign
RESIDENTS of Columbus, Indiana awoke last week to a yellow billboard purchased by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) blaring: "Under Trump's Watch, Columbus Regional Health is Cutting Medical Services." Meanwhile, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), which oversees races for the United States House of Representatives, last month launched a digital ad campaign touting President Donald Trump's tax cuts and blaming Democrats for spiking inflation. As members of Congress return to their home districts for the August recess, the Democratic and Republican parties are launching ad blitzes centred around the tax-cut and spending bill Trump signed into law on July 4, in an unofficial start to the 2026 midterm election campaign. Democrats are focusing their message around access to healthcare while Republicans are countering that the tax provisions will put more money in voters' pockets. The bill makes permanent Trump's 2017 tax cuts and funds his immigration enforcement crackdown, while reducing healthcare and food aid. It devotes US$170 billion to immigration enforcement while cutting US$1.1 trillion from Medicaid and other public health programmes and US$186 billion in food assistance. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that 10 million people would lose their health insurance by 2034 as a result of the bill, and that the tax provisions and increased immigration and military spending would increase the federal deficit by US$3.4 trillion over the next decade. Republican strategists say they have plenty of time to sell the bill's benefits. "We will use every tool to show voters that the provisions in this bill are widely popular," said Mike Marinella, a spokesman for the NRCC. And the party has a cash advantage. The Republican National Committee (RNC) had US$81 million in cash at the end of June, compared with the DNC's US$15 million during the same period. The RNC also enjoys a huge asset in a sitting president who is still holding fundraisers for big-ticket donors. Republicans can only afford a net loss of two of the 220 seats they hold in the House to maintain control. In the Senate, they have a 53-47 advantage. According to a Reuters/Ipsos poll, conducted last month, some 64 per cent of registered voters oppose cuts to Medicaid and food stamps in return for lower taxes for everyone. Democrats are seizing on that sentiment, pushing the idea that Republicans have taken away healthcare to pay for tax giveaways for billionaires. "Republicans threw working families under the bus to fund tax cuts for the wealthy, and we'll never let them — or voters — forget that," said DNC Deputy Communications Director Abhi Rahman in a statement. "This will define the midterms." Republicans say the bill's provisions on tips, overtime and Social Security show the party is focused on issues affecting working families. They also point to a US$50 billion fund the bill establishes to help rural hospitals. Another Republican strategy memo prepared by Trump's pollsters, urges candidates to "lead on kitchen-table issues." Democrats, meanwhile, are trying to tie Medicaid cuts to reduced healthcare access and higher costs. The DNC's website claims that the bill will "cost the poorest 10 per cent of households US$1,600 a year while raising the income of the richest 10 per cent of Americans by US$12,000 a year". Unrig Our Economy, a left-leaning group, is running ads in Iowa, Arizona and Pennsylvania depicting voters voicing frustration at their Republican lawmakers for voting for Trump's bill. "I'm so angry that Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks just voted for the largest cut to Medicaid in history to give tax breaks to billionaires," said one ad in Iowa, featuring a Davenport resident identified as Maria. Protect Our Care, a left-leaning healthcare advocacy organisation, said it planned to spend up to US$10 million on ads in the first half of next year, largely focused on urging Republican lawmakers to restore funding to Medicaid. Climate Power and the League of Conservation Voters spent US$500,000 on an ad pressuring lawmakers in six congressional districts to vote against the bill, claiming that it would increase electricity rates, according to its president, Pete Maysmith.
