West Sacramento Sikh temple president speaks out after judge keeps ICE out of places of worship
WEST SACRAMENTO — A federal judge ruled in favor of a West Sacramento Sikh temple in a lawsuit over President Trump's immigration enforcement policy.
Narinder Singh Thandi is the president of Gurdwara Sahib Sikh Temple Sacramento, of which 50% of the congregation are immigrants, including some who are undocumented.
"They should come pray openly. They should not have any fear of being arrested or not," Thandi said. "Just let people know this is a great country, United States of America, so if somebody is doing something wrong, you speak up. Speak up for your rights. File the complaint."
A judge ruled in favor of his temple and the other religious institutions that were part of the lawsuit requiring the Department of Homeland Security to "avoid enforcement actions in or near places of worship to the fullest extent possible."
The religious institutions suit claims the policy allows immigration enforcement officers to use their "common sense" in deciding whether to enter houses of worship — a change from past policies that sought to avoid enforcement in sensitive places.
Civil rights attorney Jeffrey Kravitz said that the protections are minimal because the judge's order only applies to the religious institutions that filed the lawsuit, not to every house of worship in the country, and as has been a longtime federal law. If an officer has a warrant, they can still go into any house of worship.
"I think people are going to be somewhat happy that this decision was given, but it's not much," Kravitz said. "When you get to the heart of the issue, which is warrants, it makes no difference."
Kravitz said he believes the federal government will file an appeal on this ruling.
"So I'm telling everybody no need to be fear. So enjoy the system, believe in the system, believe in God, thank you very much," Thandi said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
43 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Mexico's Sheinbaum refutes Noem's allegation that she ‘encouraged' violence in LA
MEXICO CITY — It began as a softball question Tuesday to President Trump in the Oval Office: Did he have any reaction to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum's comments about the unrest in Los Angeles ? 'What did she say?' Trump asked. 'She condemned the violence in L.A.,' the reporter responded. 'I do too,' said Trump. He then gave the floor to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. 'Claudia Sheinbaum came out and encouraged more protests in L.A., and I condemn her for that,' Noem said. 'She should not be encouraging violent protests that are going on.' The comments detonated like a cannon across the bow of U.S.-Mexico relations, reverberating on social media and on Mexican news channels. Sheinbaum, who has worked hard to cultivate a constructive relationship with the Trump White House and met Noem in Mexico City in March, didn't hesitate. 'Absolutely false,' she wrote on X. There is no public evidence to support Noem's assertion. In her response on X Tuesday to Noem's comments, Sheinbaum posted a 25-second clip from her remarks Monday at her morning news conference. The president repeatedly condemned violence while addressing the Los Angeles protests against immigration raids. 'We are not in agreement with violent acts as a form of protest,' Sheinbaum told reporters Monday. 'The burning of patrol cars appears more like an act of provocation than of resistance. It should be clear: We condemn violence from wherever it comes.' Sheinbaum added: 'We call on the Mexican community to act in a peaceful manner and not to fall into provocations.' In her response on X to Noem's comments, Sheinbaum also reiterated her support for the estimated 11 million Mexican immigrants in the United States. The president has rejected both violence and raids as a solution to illegal immigration. 'Our position is and will continue being the defense of the honest, hard-working Mexicans who help the economy of the United States and their families in Mexico,' Sheinbaum wrote. 'I am sure that dialogue and respect are the best route toward understanding among our people and our nations, and that this misunderstanding will be clarified.' Special correspondent Cecilia Sánchez Vidal contributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Undocumented migrant framed for threatening Trump is eligible for release
A Mexican man facing deportation after being framed for sending a threatening letter to Donald Trump could be released in the coming days. A Chicago immigration judge ruled on Tuesday that Ramón Morales-Reyes, 54, was not a threat to the public and set his bond at $7,500. 'Today's decision gives us hope that he can be by our side again,' Morales-Reyes's daughter Ana said in a statement via the organization Voces de la Frontera. 'We are so grateful to the judge and to the community for supporting us.' The Department of Homeland Security insists the 54-year-old is still a threat. 'While this criminal illegal alien is no longer under investigation for threats against the President, he is in the country illegally with previous arrests for felony hit and run, criminal damage to property, and disorderly conduct with domestic abuse,' Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. The Independent has contacted Morales-Reyes's lawyer for further comment. Reyes was arrested in May in Wisconsin after initially being thought to be the author of letters containing threats to Donald Trump and immigration agents. 'We are tired of this president messing with us Mexicans – we have done more for this county than you whites – you have been deporting my family and now I think it is time Donald J. Trump get what he has coming to him,' the phony letter read. Homeland Security officials initially celebrated the arrest of Morales-Reyes, who they said was an 'illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump,' while attorneys and family members of the man said the letter couldn't be valid since Morales-Reyes can't speak or write in English. Last week, Wisconsin man Demetric D. Scott admitted to writing the letters under the Mexican man's name, in the hopes of getting him deported to prevent his testimony in a robbery case, according to officials. In an interview with police in May, Scott 'admitted that he wrote everything on the letters' and 'believed the letters were the simplest way to get Morales-Reyes 'off his back,' according to court documents obtained by Wisconsin Public Radio. Scott was allegedly recorded on a call from a Milwaukee County jail detailing the scheme to frame the immigrant to prevent him from testifying about a 2023 robbery in which authorities say Morales-Reyes was the victim. '[I]f he gets picked up by ICE, there won't be a jury trial so they will probably dismiss it that day,' Scott said, per court records. Scott, 52, was charged earlier this month with identity theft, intimidating a witness and two counts of bail jumping over the alleged scheme. The charges add to previous allegations of armed robbery, aggravated battery, second-degree recklessly endangering safety and bail jumping over a 2023 incident in which he allegedly attacked Morales-Reyes with a corkscrew while he was riding a bicycle, leaving him with a lung abrasion. Scott insisted the bicycle had been stolen from him and Morales-Reyes had previously threatened him. DHS said in a statement that Morales-Reyes entered the U.S. unlawfully at least nine times between 1998 and 2005. The 54-year-old immigrant's family says he is in the process of seeking a U visa for survivors and witnesses of violent crime. If Morales-Reyes is unable to post bond, removal proceedings begin on July 10. Homeland Security can appeal the bond decision.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Trump is using the L.A. protests to send a message to his fans
President Donald Trump does not like protests, but he definitely likes to use them for his own ends. Former Trump aides have been vocal for years that the president thinks protests make the country look weak and, by extension, make him look weak. At the same time, he views cracking down on protests as a way of projecting strength. This familiar dynamic has played out in California over the last few days, as the White House made a show of sending the National Guard and then Marines without a request from the California governor to quell protests over his immigration policies. Deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller went even further, calling the protests a "violent insurrection" on social media. It's obvious that Trump has been champing at the bit for a fight like this since returning to the White House. He and his administration believe the public is on their side in this dispute. To them, it's symbolic of everything the president and senior aides think that their supporters hate: undocumented immigrants, urban unrest and Democratic elected officials. On the other side, they see a president using the military to send a message of strength. In his 2022 book, former Defense Secretary Mark Esper said that Trump was so enraged about protests in the summer of 2020 that he asked in a meeting: 'Can't you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?' Just this past weekend, we had Miles Taylor, who was chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security in Trump's first term, on "The Weekend" warning that Trump's sending the National Guard was not only 'the single most significant act' of the administration but also likely a pretext to going further and invoking the Insurrection Act, the 1807 law that allows the president to get around the usual restrictions to having the military enforce criminal law within the country. 'We had stopped Donald Trump in 2019 from invoking the Insurrection Act because we and our lawyers didn't think the way he wanted to do it was legal,' Taylor said. 'In fact, I rushed to the White House as he was planning to make the State of the Union address and he wanted to insert a line about how he was invoking the act and deploying the U.S. military on U.S. soil. We felt like that was a dangerous slippery slope.' Taylor believes the White House knew that the reaction in Los Angeles to last week's extensive immigration raids would be 'protests and then they could use the protest as a response to use the Insurrection Act.' That has not happened yet, but Trump has sent signals that he would like to do it. In the president's memo over the weekend, he invoked a little known federal law in Title 10 of the U.S. Code that gives the commander in chief the power to deploy National Guard units if the U.S. is invaded or there is 'rebellion or danger of rebellion,' or if the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' To understand this moment, you also have to understand Trump's love of theatrics. When he hires a Cabinet official, it's important they are loyal but also, just as important, that they look like they are out of 'central casting.' He loves the joint sessions of Congress speeches because of the pomp and circumstance. He fell in love with the idea of a military parade after watching Bastille Day in France. For him, any opportunity to look tough is one he rarely passes up. And being able to give red meat to his base, which is the lifeblood of his presidency? Those are the fights he seeks out. Subscribe to the Project 47 newsletter to receive weekly updates on and expert insight into the key issues and figures defining Trump's second term. This article was originally published on
