
African asylum seekers in the GTA face systemic barriers and need better supports: new report
The African refugee crisis first emerged in the spring of 2023 when hundreds of asylum seekers and refugee claimants, most of whom came from eastern Africa, arrived in the GTA and had nowhere to go and no support. Dozens ended up sleeping on the pavement outside Toronto's Central Intake site at 129 Peter St. in the hope that they might get a bed in a city-run shelter.
This situation was further exacerbated by the City of Toronto's now-reversed decision to turn away African refugees from its emergency shelter system and refer them to federal programs. This move was heavily criticized in a scathing report by Ombudsman Toronto, which found that the city's actions lacked fairness and caused harm, and that it erred in its decision-making and implementation process.
The challenges experienced by African refugees continued into 2024. Tatiana, an asylum seeker from Congo, landed here that year and also had no place to live and no other option but to live on the street.
In those early days, Tatiana told CTV News Toronto that she felt 'overwhelmed, stressed, traumatized,' anxious feelings she said were heightened by the fact that she could not express herself in French, which is her mother tongue.
About two years ago, the United Way of Greater Toronto began tracking the experiences of those who were directly affected by this crisis.
The stories of 29 African asylum seekers, one of whom is Tatiana, as well as nine service providers, are shared in a report by the not-for-profit titled Understanding the Experiences of African Asylum Seekers in Peel, York Region, and Toronto.
United Way Greater Toronto asylum seekers report
The United Way Greater Toronto relewsed a new report on July 15 about the lack of supports for African asylum seekers in the region.
'We did some reflection with our partners at the City of Toronto, the Region of Peel, York and the community to say how did we get here and what happens after. What do we learn from this crisis that we can take to the next wave, the next emergency and really prevent that reactive approach all the time,' Adaoma Patterson, the organization's director of community impact, told CTV News Toronto.
'We heard primarily Black-led organizations and leaders raise the cry and the alarm to say that this needs attention. … The City of Toronto has now identified a Black-mandated and -led shelter that is part of their plans.'
Among other thgns, the report recommends strengthening programs and services, investing in frontline organizations, especially Black-led agencies, advancing policy changes, creating accountability mechanisms, and increasing advocacy so that what happened in 2023 doesn't repeat itself ever again.
In response, the United Way Greater Toronto is also making an initial $400,000 investment in two community-led initiatives, which it says will support 200 African asylum seekers, helping at least 50 secure stable housing.
As for Tatiana, her situation improved after she connected with a non-profit organization named Passerelle – I.D.E., which was one of several groups and individuals on the ground at the Peter Street site helping asylum seekers and refugee claimants during the crisis and beyond.
Tatiana said the non-profit, which offers a range of programs and services to Black and racialized francophone newcomers, has provided her with the help she needed to get settled in Canada and plan her future.
'I am so happy to live here because I can express myself, and when I don't understand, I have the support,' she told CTV News Toronto through a translator.
Leonie Tchatat, Passerelle's founder and CEO, said it can be traumatizing for refugees who only speak French, but are forced to immerse themselves in services that are mostly offered in English.
'Most of the work that we're doing is to really help these newcomers and install themselves, settle in Toronto, by offering culturally adapted core government services,' she said.
Toronto refugees
A woman is seen surrounded by luggage and other personal belongings outside a shelter intake office in Toronto on July 11, 2023.
City of Toronto says it is 'committed' to supporting those seeking refuge
The City of Toronto, meanwhile, said it is 'committed to ensuring that everyone seeking refuge in our city, including African asylum seekers, are treated with dignity and has access to the supports they need to begin rebuilding their lives.'
'(We continue) to work closely with community partners to provide emergency shelter and wrap-around supports, including access to health care, mental health services, harm reduction, and housing help,' spokesperson Russell Baker said in a written statement.
It noted that as of July 6, emergency accommodation and wrap-around support services have been provided to more than 3,700 refugee claimants and that 'work continues to create a dedicated refugee shelter system designed to better meet the specific needs of refugee claimants, including African asylum seekers, with culturally responsive services and settlement supports.'
The city added that this work includes establishing smaller refugee houses, like L'Agapanthe, a transitional home operated by La Passerelle-I.D.É., which recently opened to provide dedicated support to Francophone refugee claimants of African descent.
Toronto's first Black-led and Black-mandated shelter, which is part of the Homelessness Services Capital Infrastructure Strategy is also in development, the city said.
'We acknowledge that systemic barriers, including anti-Black racism, continue to exist within institutions across Canada. The City is committed to working with community partners and stakeholders to identify and remove these barriers, and to ensure equity, inclusion and safety are central to our services and supports,' Baker said.
Refugees outside 129 Peter
Refugee claimants and asylum seekers gather outside Toronto's Central Intake centre at 129 Peter St. on Oct. 5. (Ken Enlow/CP24)
Toronto says all levels of government need to help address African refugee crisis
The city added that while it Toronto is a 'welcoming and inclusive city,' it cannot 'meet this challenge alone.'
'(We continue) to advocate for sustainable, long-term funding, and a coordinated regional response from all orders of government to manage the growing demand for emergency shelter and ensure new arrivals are welcomed with dignity,' it noted.
With files from CTV News Toronto's Allison Hurst
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline
Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline
Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. Article content While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Article content Article content Article content Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. Article content Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Article content Article content Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Article content The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. Article content The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. Article content Article content The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. Article content George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses.


Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline
Article content Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. Article content While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Article content Article content Article content Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. Article content Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Article content 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Article content Article content Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Article content Article content The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. Article content Article content The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. Article content The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. Article content The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs