Federal Election Commission dismisses complaint that Ted Cruz violated campaign finance law
The Brief
The Federal Election Commission cleared Sen. Ted Cruz of any campaign finance violations in connection with his podcast.
The podcast's marketer, iHeartMedia, made nearly $1 million in payments to pro-Cruz PAC Truth and Courage.
Both iHeart and the PAC said the money was payments for an advertising agreement.
WASHINGTON - The Federal Election Commission has dismissed a complaint filed against Sen. Ted Cruz accusing him of violating campaign finance laws.
The backstory
A complaint filed last year against the senator accused him of wrongdoing after the company that distributed his podcast donated nearly $1 million to a political action committee that supported his reelection.
The company in question, iHeartMedia, produces and markets Cruz's podcast, "Verdict with Ted Cruz." The company has been doing so since 2022.
Those filing the complaint accused Cruz of trying to go around campaign finance laws that limit a corporation's donation to a political candidate to $5,000 by having iHeartMedia donate the money to the Truth and Courage PAC.
Truth and Courage owns Cruz's podcast and was in charge of producing it before iHeart took over.
Between March 2023 and August 2024, the podcast received payments totaling more than $961,000 from iHeart. Those deposits were listed as other federal receipts and not as contributions.
The PAC said they were payments for advertising revenue paid by iHeart.
The commission said there was not enough evidence to indicate that Cruz directed the money to the PAC and noted that he was limited to just hosting the show.
Cruz has said he doesn't make money from the podcast.
What they're saying
"Though the PAC's election activities may have been funded by the payments, that does not transform the iHeart payments into contributions, since the payments from iHeart to the PAC were not themselves made for the purpose of influencing a federal election," the commission said in their ruling.
By the numbers
The filing states the PAC spent more than $840,000 in support of Cruz and another $533,000 to oppose Cruz's 2024 opponent, Colin Allred.
The Source
Information in this article comes from the Federal Election Commission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
32 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Detained Columbia protester asks judge to order his release after government misses appeal deadline
NEW YORK (AP) — Lawyers for Mahmoud Khalil on Friday asked a federal judge to order the release of the Columbia University protester from an immigration lockup, saying the Trump administration missed an appeal deadline. In a letter to U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz in New Jersey, the lawyers said Khalil has satisfied all the court's requirements, including posting a $1 bond, while the lawyers for the government missed a 9:30 a.m. deadline the judge set Wednesday . In response to the letter, the judge gave the government until 1:30 p.m. Friday to formally reply to the request to free Khalil. The lawyers also say the government has declined to provide information about plans for Khalil's release and hasn't shown any other grounds for his continued detainment other than the reasons Farbiarz has already dismissed. 'The deadline has come and gone and Mahmoud Khalil must be released immediately,' his lawyers said in a statement provided by the American Civil Liberties Union, which is among the groups representing him. 'Anything further is an attempt to prolong his unconstitutional, arbitrary, and cruel detention.' Lawyers and spokespeople for the Justice Department and Homeland Security didn't immediately respond to emails seeking comment. The Trump administration vowed Wednesday to appeal Farbiarz's ruling, in which the judge determined that Khalil had shown his continued detention was causing irreparable harm to his career, his family and his free speech rights. He previously ruled that expelling Khalil from the U.S. on those grounds was likely unconstitutional. Khalil, a legal U.S. resident, was detained on March 8 at his apartment building in Manhattan over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. His was the first arrest under President Donald Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against the war in Gaza . U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil must be expelled from the country because his continued presence could harm American foreign policy. Khalil's lawyers say the Trump administration is simply trying to crack down on free speech. Khalil isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. The international affairs graduate student served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists. He wasn't among the demonstrators arrested, but his prominence in news coverage and willingness to speak publicly made him a target of critics. The Trump administration has argued that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country as it considers their views antisemitic. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
40 minutes ago
Detained Columbia protester asks judge to order his release after government misses appeal deadline
NEW YORK -- Lawyers for Mahmoud Khalil on Friday asked a federal judge to order the release of the Columbia University protester from an immigration lockup, saying the Trump administration missed an appeal deadline. In a letter to U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz in New Jersey, the lawyers said Khalil has satisfied all the court's requirements, including posting a $1 bond, while the lawyers for the government missed a 9:30 a.m. deadline the judge set Wednesday. In response to the letter, the judge gave the government until 1:30 p.m. Friday to formally reply to the request to free Khalil. The lawyers also say the government has declined to provide information about plans for Khalil's release and hasn't shown any other grounds for his continued detainment other than the reasons Farbiarz has already dismissed. 'The deadline has come and gone and Mahmoud Khalil must be released immediately,' his lawyers said in a statement provided by the American Civil Liberties Union, which is among the groups representing him. 'Anything further is an attempt to prolong his unconstitutional, arbitrary, and cruel detention.' Lawyers and spokespeople for the Justice Department and Homeland Security didn't immediately respond to emails seeking comment. The Trump administration vowed Wednesday to appeal Farbiarz's ruling, in which the judge determined that Khalil had shown his continued detention was causing irreparable harm to his career, his family and his free speech rights. He previously ruled that expelling Khalil from the U.S. on those grounds was likely unconstitutional. Khalil, a legal U.S. resident, was detained on March 8 at his apartment building in Manhattan over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. His was the first arrest under President Donald Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against the war in Gaza. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil must be expelled from the country because his continued presence could harm American foreign policy. Khalil's lawyers say the Trump administration is simply trying to crack down on free speech. Khalil isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. The international affairs graduate student served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists. He wasn't among the demonstrators arrested, but his prominence in news coverage and willingness to speak publicly made him a target of critics. The Trump administration has argued that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country as it considers their views antisemitic.
Boston Globe
44 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Detained Columbia protester asks judge to order his release after government misses appeal deadline
The lawyers also say the government has declined to provide information about plans for Khalil's release and hasn't shown any other grounds for his continued detainment other than the reasons Farbiarz has already dismissed. Advertisement 'The deadline has come and gone and Mahmoud Khalil must be released immediately,' his lawyers said in a statement provided by the American Civil Liberties Union, which is among the groups representing him. 'Anything further is an attempt to prolong his unconstitutional, arbitrary, and cruel detention.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Lawyers and spokespeople for the Justice Department and Homeland Security didn't immediately respond to emails seeking comment. The Trump administration vowed Wednesday to appeal Farbiarz's ruling, in which the judge determined that Khalil had shown his continued detention was causing irreparable harm to his career, his family and his free speech rights. He previously ruled that expelling Khalil from the U.S. on those grounds was likely unconstitutional. Khalil, a legal U.S. resident, was detained on March 8 at his apartment building in Manhattan over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. Advertisement His was the first arrest under President Donald Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against the war in Gaza. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil must be expelled from the country because his continued presence could harm American foreign policy. Khalil's lawyers say the Trump administration is simply trying to crack down on free speech. Khalil isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. The international affairs graduate student served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists. He wasn't among the demonstrators arrested, but his prominence in news coverage and willingness to speak publicly made him a target of critics. The Trump administration has argued that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country as it considers their views antisemitic.
