logo
Video: Activists ‘shielded a killer' in ICE operation near Boston

Video: Activists ‘shielded a killer' in ICE operation near Boston

A group of activists forced Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Boston agents to abandon a surveillance operation at the home of an illegal immigrant suspect wanted for murder after surrounding the agents' vehicle and blowing their cover.
Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin reported that ICE agents were 'surveilling a murderer's home in their car, when a crowd surrounded their vehicle, blew their cover, and they had to pull off the target.' Melugin explained that the incident took place last Thursday in Somerville, Massachusetts, which is near Boston, and that the murderer was located 'close to a school.'
READ MORE: Pic: ICE raids CBS News anchor's husband's restaurant in DC
'An activist later posted a video, boasting that they got ICE to leave the area, and that they were 'trying to kidnap kids from school,' Melugin tweeted. 'They shielded a killer.'
Following last week's incident, an activist shared a video on social media and appeared to be bragging about stopping ICE's operation in Somerville.
'ICE just tried to abduct a bunch of kids and parents right here at Somerville High School, and so many community members showed up that ICE just left,' the activist said. 'Remember, you are the major power in your community. If you show up with people you trust quickly; you can protect kids, you can protect families. So form information networks, know where ICE is in your community, and show up.'
According to Fox News, ICE officials have started to face growing resistance from sanctuary states and cities, as well as various activist groups across the country. The outlet noted that in addition to activists blowing the cover of the ICE agents who were surveilling an illegal immigrant murderer's home, another activist reportedly tried to prevent agents from arresting an illegal immigrant who had been handcuffed by law enforcement officials.
Addressing the resistance ICE officials have faced in recent weeks, ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Boston acting Field Office Director Patricia Hyde told Fox News, 'I think the lack of cooperation is getting worse and worse, and it's putting law enforcement lives in danger.'
'We're not going away,' Hyde added. 'It might take us longer. It might be harder, but we're not going away, we're here. We know what the American people voted for. We understand that we work for the American people and we're going to be here until we send everyone home.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration pulls $4 billion in federal funding for California high-speed rail
Trump administration pulls $4 billion in federal funding for California high-speed rail

San Francisco Chronicle​

time27 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump administration pulls $4 billion in federal funding for California high-speed rail

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration plans to pull the plug on federal funding to California's high-speed rail project. Following a review of the $4 billion in federal funds allocated to California's bullet train project launched in February, the Transportation Department said it plans to terminate federal funding for the project, according to a report released Wednesday. 'We have $4 billion that has been authorized to go to California to build this project and we don't want to invest in boondoggles,' Transportation Sec. Sean Duffy told Fox News Wednesday. The state will have 30 days to make the case that it has complied with the grant's terms and any corrective action it plans to take before the federal government can terminate funding. The Transportation Department is not asking for the state to repay federal funding previously given for the project, but said it could do so in the future — although any attempts to do so would likely be unsuccessful. 'What started as a proposed 800-mile system was first reduced to 500 miles, then became a 171-mile segment, and is now very likely ended as a 119-mile track to nowhere. In essence, (the California High-Speed Rail Authority) has conned the taxpayer out of its $4 billion investment, with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Drew Feeley, acting administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration, said. The federal government 'cannot continue to commit taxpayer dollars to (the California High-Speed Rail Authority's) Sisyphean endeavor,' Feeley said. California's high-speed rail project is a 'story of broken promises and of waste of Federal taxpayer dollars.' The Trump administration has 'been laying the groundwork for this for month. They're completely hostile, not just to California high-speed rail, but rail in general and public transportation,' state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, told the Chronicle. 'This is a Neanderthal administration that probably thinks public transportation is a communist plot.' Wiener, a staunch proponent of the bullet train, acknowledged the project's challenges. 'We certainly have to do better in California in terms of project delivery, but … it's not a reason to start canceling major, transformative public infrastructure projects. We need to find a way to get these projects done more efficiently and more effectively,' Wiener said. The first Trump administration pursued terminating the project's funding in 2019, but the Biden administration negotiated a 2021 settlement with the state to continue supporting the segment from Bakersfield to Merced. The project's costs — initially estimated to be $33 billion and now expected to cost between $89 billion and $128 billion — have ballooned and its timelines have been repeatedly delayed. Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Democrats have not backed down on funding for high-speed rail in past budgets, despite opposition from Republicans. Newsom has acknowledged for months that Trump would try to claw back money for the project, just as Trump did during his first term. Newsom has promised to fight any efforts to revoke the money. The high-speed rail funding is just one bucket of federal money Trump has threatened to withhold from California, along with federal health care and education funding. 'There still is the rule of law, still the court system, there's still due process,' Newsom told reporters in January when he unveiled an initial version of his 2025-26 state budget proposal. 'You can threaten, as Trump has consistently done ... but ultimately those federal dollars will be recovered.' Since January, California's budget outlook has deteriorated significantly, and the Newsom administration now predicts California faces a $12 billion shortfall, which will make it harder for state officials to backfill any federal funding cuts. Newsom and lawmakers are negotiating over the state budget for the upcoming fiscal year and must reach a deal on how to balance the budget this month to meet constitutional deadlines. Even with the state's difficult financial situation this year, Wiener said he expected the project to move forward because 'it's not about one year, this is about the long-term health and economic strength of California.' Republicans have for years decried the project's skyrocketing costs and lack of progress. President Donald Trump told reporters Feb. 5 that he would personally investigate the high-speed rail project. Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Rocklin (Placer County), introduced legislation on Jan. 6 to make the project ineligible for further federal funding, the same day Newsom drove a symbolic spike in the ground to celebrate the rail line's first 22-mile segment, from the border of Tulare and Kern counties to Poplar Avenue in Wasco (Kern County). Republicans in the Legislature sent a letter to Trump Feb. 13 expressing support for his probe and saying they have a duty to constituents to 'carefully examine the viability of this project.' 'I want to see high-speed rail in America,' Duffy said. 'Why it can't be built in America and why it can't be built within time frames that work for the people that invest in these projects makes no sense to me.' State leaders have focused largely on finishing the stretch of high-speed rail track from Merced to Bakersfield, with the idea of linking it to two other bullet train lines: the High Desert Corridor in Los Angeles, and the privately owned Brightline West route from Las Vegas to Rancho Cucamonga (San Bernardino County). Ultimately, they also want to connect to Caltrain's commuter line on the Peninsula, patching together a network that somewhat resembles the original vision from the mid-1990s. The loss of this funding would 'certainly be a setback, but it is a relatively small percentage of the overall budget of the project,' Wiener said. 'It's not a death knell.'

Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%
Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%

President Donald Trump said he's doubling tariffs on foreign steel to 50%, making the announcement during a May 30 visit to a U.S. Steel facility in Pennsylvania. Trump previously reversed his threat to impose 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum from Canada. Trump bulked up tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum after taking office for a second time, restoring the 25% levy that had been weakened by numerous country exclusions and quotas and thousands of product-specific exclusions. Trump said the higher tariffs will even further secure the steel industry in the United States. "Nobody's going to get around that," he said. While hiking tariffs could help U.S. steel producers, it is expected to increase costs for consumers and American makers of a variety of products − from cars to homes − that use steel. Trump pitched the tariff increase as a way to eliminate competition from foreign steel producers, saying at 25% foreign companies "can sort of get over that fence." The higher tariff goes into effect June 4, Trump said. "At 50% they can no longer get over the fence," he said. Canadian Chamber of Commerce President & CEO Candace Laing said hiking the steel tariffs is "antithetical to North American economic security." 'Unwinding the efficient, competitive and reliable cross border supply chains like we have in steel and aluminum comes at a great cost to both countries,' Laing said in a statement reacting to Trump's announcement. The steel tariffs were among the earliest put into effect by Trump when he returned to office in January. The tariffs of 25% on most steel and aluminum imported to the U.S. went into effect in March, and he had briefly threatened a 50% levy on Canadian steel but ultimately backed off. Under the so-called Section 232 national security authority, the import taxes include both raw metals and derivative products as diverse as stainless-steel sinks, gas ranges, air conditioner evaporator coils, horseshoes, aluminum fry pans and steel door hinges. The total 2024 import value for the 289 product categories came to $147.3 billion with nearly two-thirds aluminum and one-third steel, according to Census Bureau data retrieved through the U.S. International Trade Commission's Data Web system. By contrast, Trump's first two rounds of punitive tariffs on Chinese industrial goods in 2018 during his first term totaled $50 billion in annual import value. Trump was in Pennsylvania to tout what he described as a "partnership" between U.S. Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel, which he said would strengthen the steel industry in the U.S.. Nippon plans to invest billions in U.S. steel production as part of the deal, Trump said. "There'll be no layoffs and no outsourcing whatsoever, and every U.S. steel worker will soon receive a well deserved $5,000 bonus," Trump said. Trump later told reporters that the deal isn't final. "I have to approve the final deal with Nippon and we haven't seen that final deal yet," Trump said after returning from the rally. Trump previously opposed a bid by Nippon to purchase U.S. Steel, but said that over time the 'deal got better and better.' Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump doubling tariffs on foreign steel

Trump accuses China of 'totally' violating preliminary trade deal
Trump accuses China of 'totally' violating preliminary trade deal

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump accuses China of 'totally' violating preliminary trade deal

President Donald Trump accused China of violating a tariff agreement with the United States in a social media post on May 30, after his Treasury Secretary said negotiations had "stalled." "Everybody was happy! That is the good news!!! The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" he said in the post on his social media platform Truth Social. Two weeks ago, the United States and China agreed to dial back triple-digit tariffs for 90 days while they negotiated an agreement. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News on Thursday that talks 'are a bit stalled' but they continue. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer declined to respond to reporters' questions at the White House about the progress of trade negotiations with China or whether tariffs would return to 145%. The temporary truce was reached after Trump slapped sky-high tariffs on imports from China into the U.S., and China retaliated in kind. In the post, Trump inaccurately claimed that he saved China from "grave economic danger" caused by his tariffs by agreeing to trade discussions. "We went, in effect, COLD TURKEY with China, and it was devastating for them. Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, 'civil unrest,' Trump claimed in the Truth Social post. Reporter Bart Jansen contributed This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump lashes out at China, says country 'totally violated' tariff deal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store