
World's major courts take growing role in climate fight
- How has climate litigation evolved? -
Andrew Raine, deputy director of the UN Environment Programme's law division, said frustration over the pace of climate action had spurred people, organisations and countries to turn to the courts.
"When political systems fall short, the law is increasingly seen as a tool for driving ambition and enforcing commitments that have been made," he told AFP.
These have been bolstered by increasingly precise and detailed climate science, including from the UN's IPCC climate expert panel.
Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.
While not all have been successful -- and some have tried to slow climate progress -- there have been notable cases in recent years that have pushed states to do more.
Urgenda, an environmental organisation in the Netherlands, notched a win at the Dutch Supreme Court in 2019, with justices ordering the government to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by the end of the following year.
And in 2021, the German Constitutional Court found that the government's failure to sufficiently cut planet-heating pollution placed an unacceptable burden on future generations.
Raine said that litigation was increasingly crossing borders, with 24 cases brought before international or regional courts, tribunals or other bodies.
"This marks a turning point and it reflects the transboundary and shared nature of the climate crisis," he said.
- Why have recent cases been deemed historic? -
Two in particular have been hailed as watershed moments that will help shape how courts, governments and businesses understand and act on their climate responsibilities.
Last year, an advisory opinion by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea said carbon emissions can be considered a marine pollutant and that countries have a legal duty to take measures to reduce their effects on oceans.
The tribunal made clear that the work of defining countries' obligations is not limited to the Paris climate agreement or the UN body that runs climate change negotiations.
Major polluters have argued that the UN framework is sufficient and against courts taking climate decisions.
Another major advisory opinion was issued this month, with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights reaffirming the right to a healthy climate system and acknowledging the rights of nature.
But perhaps the court's most profound statement was to place protection against irreversible climate harms on the same level as international prohibitions on genocide and torture, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, Professor of Law and Director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University.
The court said "massive and serious harm to the climate system through emissions, through deforestation and so on, is absolutely forbidden by international law," he said.
In his view this made it the strongest statement yet by any international court on states' duty to avoid causing severe ecological destruction.
All eyes are now on the ICJ.
What could be the impact?
Vanuatu, one of many low-lying islands threatened by sea level rise, has asked the ICJ to give its opinion on states' obligations to reduce emissions.
But the potentially more controversial request is what -- if any -- legal consequences there might be for major polluters who cause severe climate damages.
"These are questions of global justice," said Rodriguez-Garavito, potentially touching on contentious issues of "reparations for climate harms" to those least responsible for emissions.
While advisory opinions like the ICJ are not legally enforceable, Raine said they carry significant weight.
"They clarify how international law applies to the climate crisis, and that has ripple effects across national courts, legislative processes and public debates," he said.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
21 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Canada says it plans to recognize the State of Palestine in September
Canada plans to recognize the State of Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Wednesday, July 30, a major policy shift that drew an angry response from US President Donald Trump and was rejected by Israel. This makes Canada – a G7 nation – the third country, following recent announcements by France and the United Kingdom, to signal plans to recognize a Palestinian state in September. Carney said the move was necessary to preserve hopes of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a long-standing Canadian goal that was "being eroded before our eyes." "Canada intends to recognize the State of Palestine at the 80th Session of the United Nations General Assembly in September 2025," the prime minister said. With Wednesday's announcement, Carney positioned Canada alongside France, after President Emmanuel Macron said his country would formally recognize a Palestinian state during the UN meeting, the most powerful European nation to announce such a move. Canada's plan goes a step further than this week's announcement by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Starmer said the UK will formally recognize the State of Palestine in September unless Israel takes various "substantive steps," including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza. Two-state solution Carney stressed that Canada has been an unwavering member of the group of nations that hoped a two-state solution "would be achieved as part of a peace process built around a negotiated settlement between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority." "Regrettably, this approach is no longer tenable," he said, citing "Hamas terrorism" and the group's "longstanding violent rejection of Israel's right to exist." The prime minister said a two-state solution was growing increasingly remote, with a vote in Israel's parliament "calling for the annexation of the West Bank," as well as Israel's "ongoing failure" to prevent humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. The peace process has also been eroded by the expansion of Israeli settlements across the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, Carney said. He framed his decision as one aimed at safeguarding Israel's future. "Any path to lasting peace for Israel also requires a viable and stable Palestinian state, and one that recognizes Israel's inalienable right to security and peace," Carney said. Recognition predicated on reforms Carney said the worsening suffering of civilians in Gaza left "no room for delay in coordinated international action to support peace." Asked by reporters if there was a scenario where Canada could change its position before the UN meeting, Carney said: "there's a scenario [but] possibly one that I can't imagine." Canada's intention "is predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to much-needed reforms," Carney said, referring to the body led by President Mahmoud Abbas, which has civil authority in parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Carney said his plans were further contingent on Abbas's pledge to "hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarize the Palestinian state." Partner service Learn French with Gymglish Thanks to a daily lesson, an original story and a personalized correction, in 15 minutes per day. Try for free The PA's Abbas welcomed the announcement as a "historic" decision, while France said the countries would work together "to revive the prospect of peace in the region." Israel and Trump react harshly Israel blasted Canada's announcement as part of a "distorted campaign of international pressure," while Trump warned that trade negotiations with Ottawa may not proceed smoothly. The Israeli embassy in Ottawa said "recognizing a Palestinian state in the absence of accountable government, functioning institutions, or benevolent leadership, rewards and legitimizes the monstrous barbarity of Hamas on October 7, 2023." "Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine," the US president wrote on his Truth Social platform. "That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them."


France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
Dozens killed in Gaza after Israeli forces open fire on crowd seeking food
01:45 31/07/2025 Trump slaps 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports over Bolsonaro trial 31/07/2025 Trump's abrupt reversal on climate policy a 'dreadful blow' to the battle against global warming Americas 30/07/2025 'It's too late: We have not prevented this genocide, but pressure is building to stop it' Middle East 30/07/2025 Tsunami alerts due to Russian quake downgraded in several nations 30/07/2025 Kenya's refugee camps suffer as US slashes aid 30/07/2025 At least 22 killed in Angola fuel hike unrest 30/07/2025 What's behind UK's possible recognition of a Palestinian state? 30/07/2025 Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption 30/07/2025 Gaza faces famine as Israeli bombings continue


France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
Trump slaps 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports over Bolsonaro trial
01:46 31/07/2025 Trump's abrupt reversal on climate policy a 'dreadful blow' to the battle against global warming Americas 30/07/2025 'It's too late: We have not prevented this genocide, but pressure is building to stop it' Middle East 30/07/2025 30/07/2025 Kenya's refugee camps suffer as US slashes aid 30/07/2025 At least 22 killed in Angola fuel hike unrest 30/07/2025 What's behind UK's possible recognition of a Palestinian state? 30/07/2025 Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption 30/07/2025 Gaza faces famine as Israeli bombings continue 30/07/2025 New Benin law offers citizenship to descendants of African slaves