
'Get to work' on northern bypass, Ipswich MP pleads
"It is now incumbent on Suffolk County Council to immediately get to work and produce the plans. "If they do so, I'll work alongside them to get the funding we need from government in the long-term interests of Ipswich, Felixstowe and Suffolk."
Sandy Martin, who brought the motion, said the northern bypass would not only help ease general congestion, but also boost trade at, and stemming from, the Port of Felixstowe, the UK's largest container port."We cannot afford to have Ipswich brought to a complete standstill every time the bridge is shut, we cannot afford as a county to see Felixstowe downgraded," he added."We cannot afford as a country to see the expensive delays and disruptions to this nation's major trade route without any mitigation measures taken."The plans were shelved in February 2020 due to a lack of political support, with councillors and the area's three Conservative MPs at the time divided on the plans.Hundreds of people protested outside the council's headquarters, claiming the scheme would destroy the countryside, increase pollution and would cost the taxpayer millions of pounds without reducing traffic.The project has had a recent resurgence in popularity after Mr Abbott said it was "bypass or bust" amid weeks of diversions and congestion during works on the Orwell Bridge.Many of the same key problems which led to the strong opposition still remained, particularly in relation to how to secure government funding for the project, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
In 2019, funding was reliant on 15,000 new homes being built over and above the numbers local authorities were allocated in their local plans.Conservative councillor Elaine Bryce, who played a key part in opposing the initial scheme, said the amount of development needed to unlock the funding would cause devastation in many of the villages she represented.Andrew Stringer, a Green councillor and the main opposition group's leader, said: "There must be ample opportunity to provide a bridge, tunnel, anything else other than just tearing through one of the most beautiful parts of Suffolk."Council leader Matthew Hicks, who renewed his opposition for the bypass, said: "Suffolk is waiting for a whole series of infrastructure to move forward."Labour has failed, so far, to bring new funding."The motion was backed across party lines with 29 votes for and 12 against, while eight abstained.The authority will now seek further clarity from the government on its priorities.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Royal Albert Hall seat holders seek £500k in High Court over exclusion from concerts
A High Court battle has erupted as three long-standing Royal Albert Hall seat holders launch a lawsuit against the venue's corporation, seeking over £500,000 in damages. They allege the institution has "unlawfully" deprived them of their rights to their seats. Arthur George, who holds 12 seats across two separate boxes, and William and Alexander Stockler, owners of four seats in a single box, claim the Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences – commonly known as the Royal Albert Hall (RAH) – has excluded them from more performances than its rules permit. Their legal representatives are now asking a judge to declare the exclusion practice unlawful. They are also seeking an injunction to prevent the corporation from restricting access beyond the terms stipulated in the Royal Albert Hall Act 1966. They told the High Court on Friday that seat holders have a 'proprietary right to use their seats, or to otherwise sell or give away their tickets'. The trio are asking a judge to rule in their favour without a trial and award an interim payment of £500,000 in damages, ahead of the full amount being decided. The corporation opposes the application, with its lawyers saying the case should proceed to trial. They told a hearing in London that the body had excluded members on other occasions, but this was approved by members by way of a document titled Memorandum and Guidelines. David Satwell, representing Mr George and the Stocklers, told the court on Friday: 'This isn't a breach of contract case, we say this is a wrongful use of someone else's property. 'We say, if you take someone else's property and use it, you are liable to compensate the property owner for that use. 'One of the questions is, 'how would those claimants have used their seats?' 'Would they have gone there, would they have sold them, or would they have not used them at all? 'What a property owner does with their property is a matter for them.' He added: 'If seats have been taken away wrongly, we say you would then have to consider what the value of those seats would have been.' In written submissions, Mr Satwell said: 'It is not disputed by the parties that the corporation has exceeded its power … by granting more exclusive lets than it is permitted to do under that provision, that it has been doing so for a number of years, and that it intends to do so into the future. 'In 2008, the corporation acknowledged to the members that it had, for several years, been exceeding its entitlement … to treat events as exclusive lets.' In written submissions for the corporation, Simon Taube KC said: 'The claimants, who have each been members of the corporation since before 2008, appear not to have voted against the Memorandum and Guidelines until the 2023 AGM.' He added: 'The background to the claim is that in recent years the claimants' relations with the corporation have deteriorated because of the claimants' complaints about various financial matters.' Mr Taube also said: 'The corporation's case, in very brief outline, is that even if the claimants can identify a theoretical interference with their rights, it does not damage the claimants as members and, in any case, the corporation has a defence based on the claimants' consent to or acquiescence in the granting of additional exclusives.' The hearing, before Sir Anthony Mann, is due to conclude on Friday.


BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Porton Down science labs move 'a hammer blow', says Salisbury MP
A Wiltshire MP has criticised the government's decision to go forwards with a plan to move a major science and defence facility from his constituency to Glen, the Conservative MP for Sailsbury, said news on Thursday the UK Health Security Agency laboratories at Porton Down would closes was a "hammer blow" for his government has pledged to bring the UK Security Agency's centres to one site as it creates a large facility aimed at protecting the country from future pandemics. The Wiltshire facility's move was first announced in 2015, but was postponed due to spiralling costs. The government has pledged a "multi-billion pound" investment to make the National Biosecurity Centre (NBC) in Harlow the largest of its kind in Europe by bringing the agency's existing centres in London and Wiltshire to one site. Visiting Harlow, Health Secretary Wes Streeting had said: "Covid-19 taught us how crucial it is to be able to respond quickly to new emerging threats and the new NBC will allow us to do exactly that."But Glen said he was "beyond disappointed" that the government had chosen to go ahead with the move, calling it a "vanity project" which failed to recognise "Porton Down's existing expertise". The MP added what may have been a "marginally good decision to make 10 years ago", was now floored due to the significant increase in costs."In 2015 it was going to cost £525 million, and it would all be done by 2021."Now it's going to cost £3.2 billion, and it will be done by 2035 to 2038."What I was saying to the secretary of state, was pause and think again, refurbish Porton. Stop this mega plan in Harlow, because it's so many years away and it's an enormous waste of taxpayers' money."Glen said he will continue to ask "questions about the cost of the project", and will be working with Wiltshire Council to build up a taskforce to look at what to do with the Porton Down site. Following the announcement, Streeting said that "the transformational investment in the UK's national biosecurity will better protect the British public from future health emergencies, boost the life sciences sector and create new jobs."


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ministers plan to axe toothless water regulator Ofwat as serious sewage leaks rise 60% in a year while bills for homeowners soar
Ministers are planning to axe the toothless water regulator Ofwat after a new report revealed the number of serious pollution incidents caused by water firms rose by 60 per cent in a year. The Environment Agency revealed there were 2,801 sewage leaks, up from 2,174 in 2023, with just three firms behind 81 per cent of the most serious - Thames, Southern and Yorkshire. The agency revealed consistently poor performance from all nine water and sewerage firms in the country despite its expectations for pollution incidents to decrease. Meanwhile, just two companies – Northumbrian Water and Wessex Water – had no serious incidents last year, meeting the Environment Agency's expectations to see a trend to zero serious pollution incidents by 2025. The data comes before the publication of a landmark review of the water industry on Monday, led by Sir John Cunliffe, who will outline his recommendations to the Government on tackling the sector's environmental and financial performance. It also follows a report released by the Public Accounts Committee earlier on Friday, in which the cross-bench group of MPs called the level of pollution 'woeful' and recommended an overhaul of the regulation system. Downing Street said the Government will wait for the final report when asked if there were plans to scrap Ofwat. A No 10 spokesman said: 'We are waiting for Sir Jon Cunliffe's final report next week – you can expect us to set out our response after that on what more we will do to turn the sector around.' Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Tim Farron said: 'if the Government do not commit to this, it would be a dereliction of their duty and a betrayal of millions of customers across the country. 'But the Government must not stop here, and we will continue to hold them accountable. Britain now needs a new, effective regulator, to stop the sewage scandal once and for all.' Environment Secretary Steve Reed called the figures 'disgraceful' and a 'stark reminder' of how underinvestment and weak regulation have led to sewage polluting England's waterways. 'In just one year, this new Government has banned unfair bonuses for polluting water bosses, brought in jail sentences for pollution, and secured £104 billion to upgrade crumbling sewage pipes – one of the biggest infrastructure investments in history,' he said. 'Next week the Independent Water Commission will recommend changes to strengthen the rules so we can clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good.' Every year the Environment Agency records the number of times pollution, including untreated sewage, is released into waterways from water company infrastructure such as pumping stations, pipes and treatment works. The figures, released on Friday, show companies recorded a total of 2,801 incidents, up from 2,174 in 2023. The regulator assesses these incidents into categories, with category 1 (major) and category 2 (significant) considered the most serious in terms of their impact on the environment, such as damage to ecosystems, the loss of wildlife and harm to human health. Last year, 75 category 1 and 2 incidents were recorded, up from 47 the previous year - Thames Water had 33, Southern Water 15 and Yorkshire Water 13. The Environment Agency said it is clear some companies are failing to meet the targets it has set on pollution. It attributed the rise in incidents last year to persistent underinvestment in new infrastructure, poor asset maintenance, and reduced resilience because of the impacts of climate change. But it is understood the agency is still investigating incidents and their causes more closely to understand the major increase from 2023, particularly at Thames, which saw serious incidents double from 14 to 33. An increasing trend in pollution spills from pipes carrying wastewater uphill emerged last year, accounting for 20 per cent of the serious incidents, the watchdog said, adding these affected some protected waters for wildlife and swimming. While water companies report many of the incidents to the Environment Agency themselves, the regulator also carried out more inspections of firms last financial year, reaching more than 4,000. This means it also discovered more non-compliance from firms, with 24 per cent of sites breaching their permits. Alan Lovell, chairman of the Environment Agency, said: 'This report demonstrates continued systemic failure by some companies to meet their environmental targets. 'The water industry must act urgently to prevent pollution from occurring and to respond rapidly when it does. 'We have made significant changes to tighten our regulation of the water industry and ensure companies are held to account. With a dedicated larger workforce and increased funding, our officers are uncovering and acting on failures to comply with environmental law.' Under the Water (Special Measures) Act introduced by the Government last year, the watchdog will have greater powers to take swift action against polluting companies. To boost funding for water regulation, the Environment Agency is also consulting on a new levy on the water sector to recover the cost of enforcement activities, while the Environment Department (Defra) last week confirmed a 64 per cent increase in its funding from 2023/24. A Water UK spokesperson said: 'While there have been some improvements, it is clear that the performance of some companies is not good enough. 'This is finally being put right, with a record £104 billion investment over the next five years to secure our water supplies, support economic growth and end sewage entering our rivers and seas. 'However, fundamental change to regulation is also needed. We hope that the recommendations of the Independent Water Commission next week will ensure the sector continues to get the investment it needs to drive down pollution incidents.'