
Disability expert slams 'barbaric' cuts that could 'push people into poverty'
A disabled inclusion and accessibility specialist has labelled the Labour government's new plans to cut disability benefits as 'barbaric' and said many disabled people are now scared for their lives.
Plans announced in March by Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Liz Kendall, detailed how the Labour government want to slash the welfare budget by £5billion. Specifically, they have proposed an overhaul of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) - a benefit payed to working aged disabled people between 16 and 64 to help them with extra costs of living. Shani Dhanda joined two other two other people with disabilities in a special episode of the Mirror's podcast Back from the Brink to share how the shock announcement has them, amongst thousands across the country, feeling fearful for the future.
Central to the changes is a reform of the way people are assessed when applying for PIP which will make it much harder for people to qualify for support. The move has ignited fierce public and political backlash as well as fear among disabled communities. Many rely on PIP as a financial lifeline, covering cruicial needs such as mobility aids, specialist transport, and support services.
Shani Dhanda, a broadcaster and expert in Inclusion and Accessibility argues that this simply isn't a viable reason and calls the cuts "worrying". She said: "What's quite puzzling is the government are trying to get more disabled people into work, but cutting a benefit that has nothing to do with employment isn't going to really help that. That's why I think is is really barbaric, this approach that the government are proposing. The reason it's so detrimental is because whether or not you are in work, you still face these unavoidable extra costs."
The disability charity Scope estimates that disabled people face an average of £1,010 in extra costs every month compared to non-disabled people. PIP is non-means-tested, meaning income, savings and employment status do not affect eligibility. Instead, assessments focus on how a person's condition impacts their ability to perform everyday tasks and move around.
Currently, claimants must score 8 points to qualify for the standard rate and 12 for the enhanced rate across two categories: daily living, activities such as preparing food or managing money, and Mobility, related to travel and movement. However, under Labour's proposed reforms, the assessment criteria will change dramatically. Individuals will be required to score at least 4 points in a single daily living activity to qualify for that component — even if they achieve the required 8 points across multiple areas. As a result, many who currently qualify could lose support.
If these prosed changes are to go ahead, the government's own impact assessment predicts that over 370,000 disabled people will lose the daily living component of their PIP. The health component of Universal Credit for those unable to work will also be frozen. The overhaul comes, the government claims, as part of their efforts to promote more people into work.
She added: "Disabled people are already living in high rates of poverty and destitution. This is only going to push hundreds and thousands of more people into poverty. And then when you think about how you get out of poverty, it's your ability to earn more money. But that's already difficult as a disabled person."
In fact, the government's own impact statement, published by the Department of Work and Pensions, predicts that the move will push 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,00 children. Some analyses estimate this figure could be as high as 400,000. In total, around 800,000 people will be affected by these PIP changed with average loss of £4,500 per year.
Dhanda, who predicts that these cuts could severely reduce the quality of life for many, continued: "What they're doing is just making eligibility much much harder but there are so many people that that need this just in order to go about daily life, daily things that most of us take for granted like eating, heating our homes, having adequate shelter, having the aids and the tools that we need to live our lives with health conditions."
She said: "A lot of people are feeling very worried, very hopeless for their future and are really shocked that it's coming from a Labour government. I'm receiving messages from people who are talking about wanting to end their lives. They cannot see a way out because they're already either in crippling debt or just not able to meet their costs every month."
For some, the impact of losing PIP is already a lived reality. Kerrie Kent, 42, survived a life-threatening heart infection in 2021 that left her with long-term health issues. Yet, in January this year, her PIP was stopped despite no improvement in her condition. She said:" I just felt like the rug had been pulled from underneath me."
Kerrie, who has has multiple open heart surgeries, survived multi-organ failure and now has a paralysed foot, continued: "I had to buy a wheelchair, I had to buy walking sticks. Things like osteo-treatments, I have to have them in order to free up the movement in my foot and try and relieve some of the pain. The scar tissue damage that I have on my chest because it's been open seven times now, causes extreme back pain."
She continued: "There's extra therapies that I have to pay for. I can't clean the house. I would like to do things like that but I can even carry the bucket up the stairs because I'm not allowed to carry any kind of weight. So all of these things that ultimately contribute to me just trying to be normal, it helped greatly [receiving PIP]."
The mum of one has been told in no uncertain terms by her doctor that she is unable to work for more than a few hours a week or risk worsening her health. She explained: "You know, that support that is really, a very small amount, [it] actually just helped me so, so much. It's horrible that it's been taken away. And I now will have to foot the bill for all of those other medical things that I need to purchase on a monthly basis. And I don't really have anywhere else to turn with that.
"They're just targeting the most vulnerable in our society. No one I know wants to be on PIP, I didn't want to be on PIP. No-one wants to be at the point where they are claiming that. For me it was complete desperation and I'm lucky that I can work for the 23 hours a week that I do, but I know so many other people that don't have the privilege to be able to do that. They want to support themselves, but they can't."
Noah Rees, a former aspiring rugby player, suffered catastrophic injuries after falling several feet headfirst onto concrete at age 19. Breaking his skull, spine and ribs and puncturing both lungs, the now 24 year-old says he spends every spare moment he has in rehabilitation. He is worried that losing his PIP could completely disrupt his recovery and everything he has worked so hard for. He explained on the Back from the Brink special: "I've been improving a lot recently as well. My physicians and and physiotherapists, they said there will come a time when you plateau and, and this was about five years ago."
Now working towards competing in the Paralympics in the decathlon, the fall from a walk way in his home town of Brighton on a day out with friends resulted in him losing all movement on the left side of his body. He has worked painstakingly to learn to walk and talk again and improve his mobility over the years. The change to the rules could see him lose access to vital therapy and support that have helped him come this far.
He explained: "When I got [PIP] it was not enough to live independently and do physio. It's like, I still live at home I'm 24, ideally I wouldn't but for me it was either live independently or improve [my condition] and I chose to improve so hence why I'm here.
"I think when you live with a disability, it obviously takes away your freedom and your independence and having a little bit of money to use as you like it, as you're allowed, it's very freeing and it gives you that little bit of independence as opposed to when you don't have it, you're stuck in a wheelchair in a room, unable to do what most people can do."
Earlier this month, 42 Labour MPs warned Prime Minister Kier Starmer in a letter that the proposed cuts are 'impossible to support'. A vote on the proposal is expected in June. With widespread uproar and members of his party uniting against the cuts, many are urging Starmer to make a U-turn before a crisis occurs.
The government said in a statement to the Mirror: "We're determined to create a welfare system that supports people into work and out of poverty. Our Plan for Change will change people's lives for the better. That's why we're creating a sustainable welfare system that genuinely supports sick and disabled people into work while always protecting people who need it most."
Listen the the full special episode, Back from the Brink- Disability Cuts: A Crisis in the Making, now wherever you get your podcasts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
SNP urge Labour to abandon disability cuts after winter fuel U-turn
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said on Monday that nine million pensioners in England and Wales will be in receipt of the payment this year after a cut was announced in the first weeks of the Labour Government last summer. The initial decision was met with heavy backlash and forced the Scottish Government to delay the implementation of its own devolved benefit. John Swinney's administration later announced a similar payment for pensioners which would be tapered and see those on the highest incomes receiving £100, compared to £305.10 for those on the least. Monday's announcement will result in cash being sent to the devolved administration at Holyrood. But now, the SNP have pushed for a different approach on welfare reform, after the UK Government also announced a £5 billion cut to benefits earlier this year. 'The Chancellor must now abandon her devastating cuts to disabled people – and scrap the two-child benefit cap,' SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said. 'This screeching U-turn was inevitable and lessons must be learnt from the damaging mess the Labour Government caused by robbing pensioners of their winter fuel payments.' He added: 'It must be swiftly followed by an end to all Labour Party austerity cuts – scrapping the planned cuts to disability benefits and abolishing punitive welfare policies, including the Labour Government's two-child benefit cap and bedroom tax. 'At the spending review on Wednesday, the Labour Government must end its austerity cuts for good – and not impose even more cuts to families and public services.' Scottish Greens social security spokesperson Maggie Chapman, meanwhile, said: 'Cutting the Winter Fuel Payment was one of the first acts of this Labour government. Elected on a promise of 'change' they brought in sweeping austerity that harmed older people across the UK at a time when the cost of living remains sky high. The MSP added: 'There is no doubt that the damage has already been done, families will have lost loved ones, and illnesses will have been caused over the winter months because of the brutal decision by Rachel Reeves and the Labour Government. 'Labour's cutting of the Winter Fuel Payment, refusal to end the two-child benefit cap and regressive austerity measures are forcing people into poverty in Scotland and across the UK.' Chapman went on: "The reinstatement of the Winter Fuel Payment for some is a welcome move, but we must go further, the Labour government must end the two-child benefit cap which hits working class families the hardest, and they must reverse their cruel austerity policies. 'Poverty isn't inevitable; it's a political policy, a policy which Rachel Reeves has forced upon hundreds of thousands of people across the UK. If Keir Starmer has any shame, he would finally call an end to her disastrous time as Chancellor.'


Glasgow Times
39 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
HMRC gives out £632m Tax-Free Childcare to families
Nearly 826,000 working families saved up to £2,000 per child with Tax-Free Childcare in the 2024 to 2025 tax year. The money helps families pay for their childcare, as part of the government's Plan for Change to put more money in people's pockets. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) is encouraging those yet to sign up for Tax-Free Childcare, to do it now and give their summer plans a financial boost. Latest figures from HMRC show in March 2025, 54,020 families in London used the scheme to save on their annual childcare bills, an increase of 8,100 families compared to the previous March. Parents! 👪 Could you be missing out on up to £2,000 a year to help with childcare costs? Find out what you're entitled to here. 👇 — HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) May 23, 2025 Working families who sign up to Tax-Free Childcare can boost their annual budget by up to £2,000 per child up to the age of 11 or up to £4,000 up to the age of 16 for a disabled child. Parents can use the scheme to help towards the cost of approved childcare whether that's nursery for younger children, or for older children – wraparound or after school care clubs during term time or holiday clubs for the long summer holidays ahead. Myrtle Lloyd, HMRC's director general for customer services, says: 'Summer can be an expensive time if you have children. Whatever you're planning, Tax-Free Childcare can give your plans a welcome financial boost. Go to to start saving today.' How does tax-free childcare work? For every £8 deposited in a Tax-Free Childcare account, the government tops it by £2, which means parents can receive up to £500 (or £1,000 if their child is disabled) every three months towards paying for their childcare costs. Once families have opened a Tax-Free Childcare account, they can deposit money and use it straight away or keep it in the account to use it whenever it's needed. Any unused money in the account can be withdrawn at any time. Martin Lewis discussed it on his podcast last month, where he said: "Tax free childcare is where you can put money into an account held at and for every 80p you put in the state adds 20p on top, up to a maximum free money of £500 pounds coming from the state per quarter - with double for disabilities. And this is tax free childcare for children under the age of 11." Recommended reading Families could be eligible for Tax-Free Childcare if they: Have a child or children aged 11 or under. They stop being eligible on 1 September after their 11th birthday. If their child has a disability, they receive up to £4,000 a year until 1 September after their 16th birthday The parent and their partner (if they have one) earn, or expect to earn, at least the National Minimum Wage or Living Wage for 16 hours a week, on average Each earn no more than £100,000 per annum Do not receive Universal Credit or childcare vouchers Visit to check eligibility and register for Tax-Free Childcare. Tax-Free Childcare can be used alongside the free childcare hours subject to eligibility.

South Wales Argus
41 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Abergavenny mosque plan could be put on hold at meeting
Monmouthshire council's ruling cabinet agreed in May to grant a 30-year lease to the Monmouthshire Muslim Community Association who plan to use the vacant building as a mosque and cultural centre. It would be the county's first mosque. However three councillors have 'called in' the decision meaning it will be reviewed at a special meeting of the council's place scrutiny committee. The nine member, cross party committee, will have to decide whether to accept the cabinet's original decision to grant the lease or if they agree there were flaws in the decision making process they can ask the cabinet to look at the decision again. The committee also has the power to refer the decision to the full council, which would then have to look at how the decision was made and decide whether to accept it or send it back to the cabinet to reconsider. If the cabinet does have to take the decision again it must do so within ten working days and will be asked to consider the comments made but can stick by its original decision, amend it or overturn it. Conservative councillors Louise Brown and Rachel Buckler, who represent Shirenewton and Devauden in the south of Monmouthshire, and Llanelly Hill independent Simon Howarth called the decision, made by the Labour-led cabinet, in for review. Their request highlights three grounds for doing so which are a claimed 'lack of proper scrutiny/due process and community consultation', how the building was marketed and their concerns over 'best value' at the £6,000 a year lease. When the cabinet agreed to grant the lease it was stated the accepted bid was the highest scoring on the application process that was intended to explore opportunities to maximise social benefit and generate a financial return from an otherwise empty building. The cabinet was also told 30-year leases were common and the cabinet had declared the building, that was last used as a pupil referral unit, as surplus in November when it granted the council's landlord services permission to market the building as available to lease. It was built by Scottish American philanthropist Andrew Carnegie, though it closed as a library in 2015 when the service transferred to the town hall. Councillors were also told commercial uses, which could be allowed under the restrictions of the building's covenant, had been considered and the agreed rent was said to be in the context of 'significant investment' required, from the lease holders, in the 120-year-old grade II listed building. The call in also states 'community engagement is required' as no planning permission is needed as there is no change in the use class of the building. The special meeting will take place, at Monmouthshire County Hall in Usk, on Wednesday, June 11 at 5.30pm.