logo
‘Missing middle' housing plan in Montgomery County faces backlash

‘Missing middle' housing plan in Montgomery County faces backlash

Washington Post5 days ago
The Montgomery County Council is preparing to vote Tuesday on a proposal to allow more multiunit housing along certain corridors, part of a years-long effort in the pricey Maryland community to create more affordable homes for a broader spectrum of its residents.
In a county of 1 million residents that features sprawling McMansions in some of its tree-lined neighborhoods, the plan to create more 'missing middle' homes is facing mounting criticism from residents who are concerned it will taint their communities and damage their quality of life.
The proposed change, part of a larger package of bills titled More Housing Now (New Options for Workers), will enable duplexes, triplexes, townhouses and apartments to be built on lots previously zoned for single-family homes. The intention is to create more housing that middle-income residents can afford and to diversify the kinds of housing available in the county, according to the bill's sponsors, Andrew Friedson (D-District 1) and Natali Fani-González (D-District 6).
For years, county leadership and planning experts have wrestled with ways to create more units for those in the center of the income scale. Following recommendations from the county's planning board and discussions with the public, the two council members developed this solution.
'We are not creating enough housing for enough people to make it affordable and accessible to middle-class families, to middle-income workers, to ordinary people,' Friedson said. 'Firefighters and police officers, and teachers and nurses — the people that we need in our community who can't live here who we want to live here.'
To ensure the units are financially attainable for those targeted groups, a minimum of one unit for every three units built must meet workforce housing requirements under the proposal. That means prices must be within reach for people earning up to 120 percent of the area's median income, which is $157,500 for a family of two and $196,500 for a family of four as of April, according to a county report. For larger properties, at least 15 percent of units must meet that benchmark. Duplexes are exempt from the requirement, according to the proposal's sponsors.
Finding ways to address the missing middle housing gap has gained traction in cities and suburbs across the country over the past several years, meeting with significant backlash in some of those communities. In Northern Virginia, an effort to build missing middle homes in Arlington County has been tied up in a years-long legal dispute, with a state appeals court recently ruling that the plan to eliminate single-family zoning in some areas can move forward.
While a number of housing advocacy groups and local nonprofits support the change in Montgomery County, some residents living around the affected corridors have launched an aggressive opposition campaign. They argue that duplexes, triplexes and apartments in their exclusively single-family-home neighborhoods will strain resources such as parking, stormwater management, schools and roads. Many also say the process to develop this zoning change feels fast-tracked and lacking in public feedback, contending that the change won't actually lead to more housing that's affordable for working-class people.
The concerns all boil down to uncertainty, said Howard Schoenholtz, who has lived in Bethesda for more than 30 years and is the spokesperson for the Montgomery County Communities Coalition, a consortium of local groups. Residents, particularly those living around the affected areas, fear that more housing density could transform the quaint nature of their communities and stress resources and the environment, Schoenholtz said.
'What people care about is 'What's going to happen to my neighborhood,'' he said. And, with this proposal, 'there's a whole lineup of 'ifs.' If one of these owners decides to sell, and if they sell to a developer, and if the developer wants to spend the money.'
Those worries spiral into images of quiet suburban, tree-lined streets suddenly stacked with small apartments and a few lone single-family homes — its occupants fighting with their new neighbors for parking spots and school resources.
Fani-González said she knew the plan would be controversial and acknowledged that there is a level of uncertainty a proposal like this one will create for residents. About 2,500 lots are eligible for a zoning change under the plan, she said. But it's impossible to know how many duplexes, triplexes or apartments could result over time, she said.
The plan was born out of discussions with planning experts and a lot of community feedback, the proposal's sponsors said in interviews. The corridors were chosen deliberately because of their proximity to jobs and public transit, Friedson said.
Creating more missing middle housing is critical to chipping away at the county's affordable housing shortage, Fani-González and Friedson said.
'We must, as government, use every single tool out there to increase the amount of housing that we have,' Fani-González said. 'It's time for us to open up single-family neighborhoods and give people choices.'
To ensure the added density doesn't strain resources, Fani-González said, the zoning change requires the property owner to submit an application to the county planning board, which would review how roads, stormwater management and other infrastructure in those areas would be affected before the change is approved.
Kimblyn Persaud, who lives in Wheaton, said she doesn't just worry about the added density. She's also concerned about who will be adding to that density. Persaud, who is the founder and executive director of EPIC of MoCo, an organization that encourages residents to get involved in government, predicts that developers will jump at the chance to create more units on small lots if there's a significant profit margin.
In her eyes, that would lay the groundwork for gentrification.
'Anything new is going to cost more than it costs now,' Persaud said.
She and her neighbors are already feeling the sting of rising taxes and cost of living expenses in the county, she said. Some of them purchased their homes several years or decades ago when property was cheaper. A developer calling and offering a high price for their properties to make multiunit homes may be the thing that pushes them to leave the county, take the earnings and find somewhere more affordable to live, she said.
But that trend of people being priced out of Montgomery County is already happening, said Carrie Kisicki, a 26-year-old Silver Spring resident and Montgomery advocacy manager with the Coalition for Smarter Growth, who is in favor of the change.
More units, and especially units in larger complexes that will have the price restrictions under the zoning change, will help increase inventory and the variety of homes affordable to younger and middle-income residents, she said.
'The zoning status quo isn't working, either for affordability or for the environment,' Kisicki said. 'We need to be looking at both the subsidized affordable housing investments but also thinking more expansively about what affordability means when so many people in our communities are experiencing struggles with housing affordability that don't always fall into the traditional categories we think about.'
One of the proposal's most outspoken critics is County Executive Marc Elrich (D), whose office has no authority over zoning change proposals such as this one. He echoed the community concerns and said he wished the county would stick to the current master planning process for residential zoning so residents can have some predictability.
'People put a lot of effort into deciding where they're going to live,' Elrich said.
This proposal erodes any faith residents had in their government to protect those decisions and guarantee certainty, he said.
'It's not what people want,' Elrich said.
The council vote is scheduled for 2:30 p.m. on Tuesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops Before 2025 Ends
5 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops Before 2025 Ends

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

5 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops Before 2025 Ends

Many luxury SUVs are getting big price cuts as 2025 comes to an end. Dealers have more cars than buyers, and many models are changing or getting replaced. According to Lauren Fix from Car Coach Reports, high prices and slow demand mean better deals for Americans searching for a luxury SUV. Discover More: For You: Rising loan rates and expensive insurance make owning a luxury SUV even harder this year. Electric SUVs have the sharpest price drops, but gas-powered models are not immune, especially those facing a redesign. Waiting until late in the year could help buyers find bigger discounts as dealers try to move outgoing models. Here are five luxury SUVs with the largest price drops expected before the end of 2025. BMW iX The BMW iX is dropping in price quickly as new electric models and tech updates come out. According to Kelley Blue Book, the BMW iX xDrive50 can lose $51,000 in value over five years, keeping only $37,000 of its original price. Dealers are discounting the iX to clear space for new versions and match slow demand from buyers. Fix notes that struggling sales and a high starting price are leading to strong incentives on the iX. Americans shopping for this SUV in late 2025 could see lower prices and special finance offers from dealers. Patience may pay off for those waiting until the model year ends. Check Out: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 'Overproduction and weak consumer interest in all-electric luxury SUVs, including the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV,' Fix said. Large price drops are common as electric SUV demand slows and new features make older models feel outdated. Earlier this year, when Mercedes-Benz rolled out massive discounts on 2025 high-end EVs, the EQE SUV price was slashed by $8,000. Fix added that high lease returns put even more pressure on dealers, making it easier to bargain for a good deal. Many buyers pick newer technology, which means current models are often discounted by the end of the year. With these developments, it'll be smart to watch out for extra incentives, stacked on top of already lowered prices, before 2025 ends. Cadillac Lyriq The Cadillac Lyriq sees regular markdowns, with more cars than buyers available at most dealerships. According to GM Authority, current deals include low-interest loans, cash rebates and lease offers with extra perks. Buyers can find a $2,000 incentive if they own a vehicle from another luxury brand, plus loyalty bonuses from Cadillac. Fix points out that Cadillac is lowering prices to keep up with new, cheaper rivals offering longer range. As a result, late 2025 could bring even deeper discounts for those ready to buy or lease. Big rebates and extra cash back help buyers get more value for a new Lyriq. Audi Q8 e-tron Audi's Q8 e-tron is about to be redesigned, and dealers are eager to sell the current version. According to Kelley Blue Book, it can lose more than $50,000 in value over five years, leaving a resale price of nearly $23,000. This full-size electric SUV is getting marked down as stores look to avoid old inventory stacking up before new versions launch. Fix explains that strong competition from other electric SUVs adds to the downward price pressure. Watch for deep discounts at stores hoping to clear the Q8 e-tron before the next big update. Buyers can use this timing to ask for better deals and incentives. Genesis GV60 The Genesis GV60 is losing value fast because it is less well-known and faces heavy competition. Kelley Blue Book lists cash-back deals, with special bonuses for groups like first responders, college graduates and military members. Dealers have also advertised extra incentives for those choosing a Genesis over other luxury brands. Fix shares many Americans pick more established luxury names, giving power to those willing to make a switch. Newer electric SUVs with better features cause GV60 prices to stay low through deep discounts and rebates. Waiting for year-end clearance could help buyers save even more. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on 5 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops Before 2025 Ends

I Asked ChatGTP What Trump's China Deal Means for the Middle Class — Here's What It Said
I Asked ChatGTP What Trump's China Deal Means for the Middle Class — Here's What It Said

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I Asked ChatGTP What Trump's China Deal Means for the Middle Class — Here's What It Said

Rapidly shifting pieces have been synonymous with President Trump's trade policy — China included, according to AP News. Chinese producers sell more than $400 billion worth of goods in the U.S. annually, per Reuters. In order to help orient ourselves within all the changes right now, here's what ChatGTP said President Trump's latest deal with China means for middle-class finances. Check Out: For You: Tariff Reductions Are Partial, Short-Term Relief Tariffs aren't gone, but middle-class households face partial relief because of tariff reductions. A deal slashed U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, according to Time Magazine. However, an average American family would still face a net hike of $2,300 to $2,800 a year in additional tariff-related costs. Trending Now: Consumer Prices Are Still Elevated Consumers continue to pay higher for everyday items, including electronics, clothing and appliances due to residual tariff burdens. Tariffs work like regressive taxes with those in the middle-class paying a larger share of income, per Bloomberg. Inflation and Reduced Purchasing Power Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases tied to tariffs could hit 1.3% to 2.3%, depending on whether all planned tariffs take effect, per Barron's. This is equivalent to a loss of $1,900 to $3,800 in real purchasing power per household annually. Uncertainty Hinders Business and Hiring Amidst pronounced uncertainty, businesses and consumers alike may be less inclined to make big changes or commitment. 'The stop-start nature of tariff implementation slows corporate investment, especially in manufacturing — limiting job growth and wage pressure. Consumer confidence can waver amid this uncertainty,' ChatGPT said. Risk of Retaliation and Spillover Any potential repercussions don't end just because tariffs end. Chinese retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports could hit middle-class related industries, including autos, agriculture and manufacturing, leading to layoffs or price hikes. 'Ongoing tit-for-tat risks mean future prices and employment could shift again,' ChatGPT explained. So, What Are Your Next Moves? ChatGPT had four suggestions for what to do right now: Budget for inflation in your essential expenses, including groceries, clothes and electronics. Lock in rates for mortgage and loans sooner rather than later as uncertainty may affect financial markets. Track CPI and Fed signals. These reflect tariff-driven inflation trends. Diversify income streams to guard against local job or wage hits. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGTP What Trump's China Deal Means for the Middle Class — Here's What It Said Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump Fired Off A Sexist Trope At A Faith Luncheon. It Shows He's An ‘Unhappy Man,' Expert Says.
Trump Fired Off A Sexist Trope At A Faith Luncheon. It Shows He's An ‘Unhappy Man,' Expert Says.

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Fired Off A Sexist Trope At A Faith Luncheon. It Shows He's An ‘Unhappy Man,' Expert Says.

President Donald Trump fired off a sexist trope about women when he rambled on and on about his so-called Big Beautiful Bill during a faith luncheon at the White House earlier in July. During Trump's speech at the White House Faith Office luncheon with business leaders, he went on a tangent about the giant bill he'd signed into law, which favors the wealthy and is expected to cause millions of people to lose their health insurance. The president complained about the Republicans who'd initially pushed back on the legislation and claimed the bill would 'perhaps' prevent an economic depression that, he bizarrely reasoned, wouldn't be good for 'unattractive' men married to women. 'You people, so rich, so beautiful, so nice to look at, will be totally busted,' he said. 'And let's see how long your wife stays with you ... she'll stay with you for about three weeks and she'll say, 'Darling, I can't take it anymore. I can't take it anymore, darling, I'm leaving you.'' 'I said to one guy — he's a very, very unattractive man — but he's smart and he's rich, and I said, 'You better hope we get this thing passed because your wife will be gone within about two minutes,'' Trump continued. 'He said, 'You're right.'' The crowd erupted in laughter. Trump has made a few public quips about women marrying for money in recent months. Back in May — again making an assumption about his audience — the president inexplicably warned graduating cadets about 'trophy wives' in a commencement address at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He said that trophy wives often don't 'work out' as he told the story of the late real estate developer William Levitt and his eventual professional downfall. Geralyn Fortney, a licensed professional counselor and regional clinic director with Thriveworks who specializes in women's issues, previously told HuffPost that narratives about women marrying men for financial benefits is a 'long-standing sexist trope.' 'It dismisses the fact that everyone, even women who marry men of privilege, is capable of marrying for love,' she said. 'This is a long-standing sexist trope that discredits women as incapable of love without strings attached, and also makes us believe that women are unable to have success on their own!' As it relates to Trump's speech on Monday, Kari J. Winter, a professor of American studies at the University at Buffalo, said that the president — in addition to 'incessantly sexualizing women' — seems to 'have a core belief that women marry only for money.' 'Like a crude, cliched commercial that uses women's bodies to sell cars or booze or whatever, Trump conjures absurd, non-sequitur images of patriarchal marriage to sell his disastrous economic policies,' she told HuffPost in an email. 'He is literally telling men that they need his economics to keep their marriages afloat.' Trump's worldview is 'transactional and misogynistic' — and he's unhappy, Winter says. Winter, whose expertise includes gender, feminism, race and class, doesn't think Trump is consciously pushing a trope — she believes his 'worldview is fundamentally transactional and misogynistic.' 'In these remarks, he is addressing men despite the presence of women in the audience, and he assumes that they share his belief that wealth is the only way to attract and keep women,' she said. 'In his repetitive use of the 'trophy wife' trope, we can see that underneath his arrogance and delusions of grandeur is an unhappy man who does not believe that he is worthy of love.' 'Maybe he doesn't even believe that love is a thing,' she continued. Winter admitted that she laughed out loud when she first heard Trump's remarks at the faith luncheon — but not because his speech was funny. She laughed because his comments were 'spectacularly awkward, inarticulate and idiotic.' 'We expect incoherent word salads from Trump, but the rambling offensiveness of his remarks continues to exceed expectations,' she said. When asked to share her thoughts about the audible laughs Trump received from business leaders in attendance at the luncheon, Winter said: 'Some wealthy people will pander to anything as long as they get tax breaks at the expense of the poor and middle class.' 'The enormous economic violence encoded in Trump's big, b*shit bill shows how morally bankrupt his rich supporters are,' she wrote before later adding, 'History bears witness to the fact that many people cloak themselves in the garbs of religion in order to provide cover and permission for their most hateful, violent impulses.' 'They should be ashamed of themselves, but they appear incapable of shame so we as a society need to find a way to hold them accountable,' Winter added. Related... Trump Mocked For Claiming 'Big Beautiful Bill' Helps Ugly Rich Guys Stay Married 'South Park' Goes Scorched-Earth On Trump In Shockingly NSFW Season Premiere Stephen Colbert Absolutely Torches Corporate Bosses Amid New Trump Settlement Claim

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store