logo
‘Missing middle' housing plan in Montgomery County faces backlash

‘Missing middle' housing plan in Montgomery County faces backlash

Washington Post6 days ago
The Montgomery County Council is preparing to vote Tuesday on a proposal to allow more multiunit housing along certain corridors, part of a years-long effort in the pricey Maryland community to create more affordable homes for a broader spectrum of its residents.
In a county of 1 million residents that features sprawling McMansions in some of its tree-lined neighborhoods, the plan to create more 'missing middle' homes is facing mounting criticism from residents who are concerned it will taint their communities and damage their quality of life.
The proposed change, part of a larger package of bills titled More Housing Now (New Options for Workers), will enable duplexes, triplexes, townhouses and apartments to be built on lots previously zoned for single-family homes. The intention is to create more housing that middle-income residents can afford and to diversify the kinds of housing available in the county, according to the bill's sponsors, Andrew Friedson (D-District 1) and Natali Fani-González (D-District 6).
For years, county leadership and planning experts have wrestled with ways to create more units for those in the center of the income scale. Following recommendations from the county's planning board and discussions with the public, the two council members developed this solution.
'We are not creating enough housing for enough people to make it affordable and accessible to middle-class families, to middle-income workers, to ordinary people,' Friedson said. 'Firefighters and police officers, and teachers and nurses — the people that we need in our community who can't live here who we want to live here.'
To ensure the units are financially attainable for those targeted groups, a minimum of one unit for every three units built must meet workforce housing requirements under the proposal. That means prices must be within reach for people earning up to 120 percent of the area's median income, which is $157,500 for a family of two and $196,500 for a family of four as of April, according to a county report. For larger properties, at least 15 percent of units must meet that benchmark. Duplexes are exempt from the requirement, according to the proposal's sponsors.
Finding ways to address the missing middle housing gap has gained traction in cities and suburbs across the country over the past several years, meeting with significant backlash in some of those communities. In Northern Virginia, an effort to build missing middle homes in Arlington County has been tied up in a years-long legal dispute, with a state appeals court recently ruling that the plan to eliminate single-family zoning in some areas can move forward.
While a number of housing advocacy groups and local nonprofits support the change in Montgomery County, some residents living around the affected corridors have launched an aggressive opposition campaign. They argue that duplexes, triplexes and apartments in their exclusively single-family-home neighborhoods will strain resources such as parking, stormwater management, schools and roads. Many also say the process to develop this zoning change feels fast-tracked and lacking in public feedback, contending that the change won't actually lead to more housing that's affordable for working-class people.
The concerns all boil down to uncertainty, said Howard Schoenholtz, who has lived in Bethesda for more than 30 years and is the spokesperson for the Montgomery County Communities Coalition, a consortium of local groups. Residents, particularly those living around the affected areas, fear that more housing density could transform the quaint nature of their communities and stress resources and the environment, Schoenholtz said.
'What people care about is 'What's going to happen to my neighborhood,'' he said. And, with this proposal, 'there's a whole lineup of 'ifs.' If one of these owners decides to sell, and if they sell to a developer, and if the developer wants to spend the money.'
Those worries spiral into images of quiet suburban, tree-lined streets suddenly stacked with small apartments and a few lone single-family homes — its occupants fighting with their new neighbors for parking spots and school resources.
Fani-González said she knew the plan would be controversial and acknowledged that there is a level of uncertainty a proposal like this one will create for residents. About 2,500 lots are eligible for a zoning change under the plan, she said. But it's impossible to know how many duplexes, triplexes or apartments could result over time, she said.
The plan was born out of discussions with planning experts and a lot of community feedback, the proposal's sponsors said in interviews. The corridors were chosen deliberately because of their proximity to jobs and public transit, Friedson said.
Creating more missing middle housing is critical to chipping away at the county's affordable housing shortage, Fani-González and Friedson said.
'We must, as government, use every single tool out there to increase the amount of housing that we have,' Fani-González said. 'It's time for us to open up single-family neighborhoods and give people choices.'
To ensure the added density doesn't strain resources, Fani-González said, the zoning change requires the property owner to submit an application to the county planning board, which would review how roads, stormwater management and other infrastructure in those areas would be affected before the change is approved.
Kimblyn Persaud, who lives in Wheaton, said she doesn't just worry about the added density. She's also concerned about who will be adding to that density. Persaud, who is the founder and executive director of EPIC of MoCo, an organization that encourages residents to get involved in government, predicts that developers will jump at the chance to create more units on small lots if there's a significant profit margin.
In her eyes, that would lay the groundwork for gentrification.
'Anything new is going to cost more than it costs now,' Persaud said.
She and her neighbors are already feeling the sting of rising taxes and cost of living expenses in the county, she said. Some of them purchased their homes several years or decades ago when property was cheaper. A developer calling and offering a high price for their properties to make multiunit homes may be the thing that pushes them to leave the county, take the earnings and find somewhere more affordable to live, she said.
But that trend of people being priced out of Montgomery County is already happening, said Carrie Kisicki, a 26-year-old Silver Spring resident and Montgomery advocacy manager with the Coalition for Smarter Growth, who is in favor of the change.
More units, and especially units in larger complexes that will have the price restrictions under the zoning change, will help increase inventory and the variety of homes affordable to younger and middle-income residents, she said.
'The zoning status quo isn't working, either for affordability or for the environment,' Kisicki said. 'We need to be looking at both the subsidized affordable housing investments but also thinking more expansively about what affordability means when so many people in our communities are experiencing struggles with housing affordability that don't always fall into the traditional categories we think about.'
One of the proposal's most outspoken critics is County Executive Marc Elrich (D), whose office has no authority over zoning change proposals such as this one. He echoed the community concerns and said he wished the county would stick to the current master planning process for residential zoning so residents can have some predictability.
'People put a lot of effort into deciding where they're going to live,' Elrich said.
This proposal erodes any faith residents had in their government to protect those decisions and guarantee certainty, he said.
'It's not what people want,' Elrich said.
The council vote is scheduled for 2:30 p.m. on Tuesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can a county fire a sheriff behind closed doors? Advocacy group threatens to sue for access
Can a county fire a sheriff behind closed doors? Advocacy group threatens to sue for access

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Can a county fire a sheriff behind closed doors? Advocacy group threatens to sue for access

An open government advocacy group is threatening to sue a California county that is preparing to discuss firing its elected sheriff behind closed doors. San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus, who serves one of the wealthiest communities in the country, has faced calls for her removal since an explosive November report from a retired judge found that she likely violated the county's policy on nepotism and conflicting relationships. The report alleged that, by 2024, Corpus had 'relinquished control' of the department to a subordinate. That led to a ballot measure last year that voters passed to empower the county Board of Supervisors to remove her from office, which they voted to do in June. Corpus appealed, leading to the scheduled August evidentiary hearing. As part of the removal proceedings, Corpus' legal team asked that the removal hearing take place behind closed doors. 'The county should decline,' wrote First Amendment Coalition attorney Aaron Field in a letter to the county Board of Supervisors. 'Barring the press and public from the removal hearing as Sheriff Corpus has requested would violate the First Amendment right of access to public proceedings, undermine a panoply of compelling public interests in administering the removal hearing transparently and needlessly shut San Mateo citizens out of a key phase of a process.' The hearing is scheduled to begin Aug. 18 and is expected to last about 10 days. CalMatters originally filed a request to open the June removal hearing to the public, a request that was denied. The First Amendment Coalition is making the same request for the August removal hearing. Corpus' removal — and her fight against it, including unsuccessfully filing for a restraining order to stop the proceedings — has roiled her department and the community for nearly a year. Several cities in her county have given her administration no-confidence votes, and the unions representing both her deputies and her sergeants have called for her removal. A San Mateo County spokesperson said the county had received the First Amendment Coalition's letter and would announce a decision soon. 'The county has consistently expressed its view that this should be a fully transparent process, including having the August appeal hearing for her removal from office be open,' said San Mateo County spokesperson Effie Milionis Verducci. 'However, the sheriff has blocked it.' The sheriff's department is still in turmoil, most recently when Corpus put a San Mateo County sheriff's sergeant on leave. That sergeant had testified extensively in a second county investigation into Corpus. The union representing San Mateo County Sheriff's sergeants objected, alleging the sergeant was put on leave as retaliation for his testimony. Corpus denied that her actions had anything to do with the report in a statement posted to the sheriff's office website. 'His temporary administrative leave is entirely unrelated to any comments or cooperation he may have provided in the Keker report,' Corpus said in the statement. Duara writes for CalMatters, where the article first appeared. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Elon Musk's SpaceX Moves Bitcoin For The First Time In 3 Years: Is A Sell-Off Incoming?
Elon Musk's SpaceX Moves Bitcoin For The First Time In 3 Years: Is A Sell-Off Incoming?

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's SpaceX Moves Bitcoin For The First Time In 3 Years: Is A Sell-Off Incoming?

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. SpaceX has reportedly moved parts of its Bitcoin holdings after a long period of dormancy. Cryptocurrency intelligence platform Arkham said Tuesday on X that a wallet linked to the Elon Musk-led space exploration and technology company had moved about 1,300 BTC worth over $153 million, marking the first time the wallet has been touched since June 2022. 'SPACEX JUST MOVED BITCOIN FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 3 YEARS,' Arkham wrote. 'They sent 1.3K BTC ($153M) to a fresh address this morning.' Don't Miss: 7,000+ investors have joined Timeplast's mission to eliminate microplastics— — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. The report has raised questions about the purpose of the transfer, with moves like this typically indicative of a wallet custody adjustment or an impending sell-off. SpaceX did not immediately respond to a Benzinga request for comment. According to Arkham data, the SpaceX-linked wallet still holds nearly 7,000 BTC worth over $830 million. Meanwhile, at last look, the transferred 1,300 BTC has not moved from the recipient address. The recent asset movement comes as SpaceX's lucrative government contracts have reportedly come under scrutiny from the Trump administration following Musk's row with President Donald Trump. Meanwhile, amid this uncertainty, the firm is seeking to raise over $1 billion to secure a $400 billion valuation. Trending: Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . SpaceX's Bitcoin Exploration Musk first disclosed that SpaceX had added Bitcoin to its balance sheet in July 2021, without revealing how much the firm had invested in the asset. But reporting from blockchain sleuths suggests that the firm purchased nearly 26,000 BTC for about $860 million in 2021 at an average price of $33,000 per coin. Sometime down the line, however, the reporting suggests that the firm reduced its holdings to just over 8,000 BTC. This aligns with Wall Street Journal findings in August 2023, indicating that the firm had sold the asset. Similarly, Tesla purchased over 43,000 BTC worth $1.5 billion in February 2021, according to Securities and Exchange Commission filings. The firm cited a need 'for more flexibility to diversify and maximize returns' on its cash as the reason for its decision. Like SpaceX, Tesla has also significantly reduced its Bitcoin holdings to just over 11,500 BTC, worth $1.4 billion at last his firms have significantly reduced their Bitcoin holdings in recent years, Musk in 2022 said that he intended not to sell his holdings. He said this while discussing inflation concerns. 'It is generally better to own physical things like a home or stock in companies you think make good products, than dollars when inflation is high,' he said on X at the time. 'I still own & won't sell my Bitcoin, Ethereum or Doge fwiw.' Recently, Musk has stoked speculation that he has been quietly accumulating the asset by liking a post suggesting so. He has also said his proposed political party, the 'America party,' would 'embrace Bitcoin,' slamming fiat as 'hopeless' in the wake of his disillusionment with the government's decision to pass the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill." The act's provisions could add over $3 trillion to the national deficit in the next decade, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office in May. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Image: Shutterstock This article Elon Musk's SpaceX Moves Bitcoin For The First Time In 3 Years: Is A Sell-Off Incoming? originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Want a free E-ZPass transponder? Delaware's giving them away in August
Want a free E-ZPass transponder? Delaware's giving them away in August

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Want a free E-ZPass transponder? Delaware's giving them away in August

Delaware motorists have the opportunity to receive a free E-ZPass transponder during a month-long promotion this August. The Delaware Division of Motor Vehicles and E-ZPass Delaware are offering the free devices to anyone who opens a new individual E-ZPass Delaware account between Aug. 1 and Aug. 31, 2025. The offer does not apply to commercial accounts. Delaware E-ZPass account holders pay lower toll rates than out-of-state drivers or those using toll-by-plate. To help drivers estimate costs more accurately, the Delaware Department of Transportation will update its online toll calculator on Aug. 1. The update will reflect new rates for the state's three toll roads and pricing for vehicles with additional axles. To open an account, customers can visit call 1-888-397-2773, or visit an E-ZPass location in person. These include the E-ZPass Service Center in Dover and toll plazas in Dover, Middletown (Biddles Corner) and Newark. Walk-in service at toll plazas is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Toll fee increases set for August This free transponder event comes as tolls on several of Delaware's major roads are set to rise. Beginning Aug. 1, new rates will apply to I-95 in Newark, the US 301 Mainline and State Route 1 at Biddles Corner and Dover. On I-95 in Newark, the toll for two-axle vehicles will rise from $4.00 to $5.00 for both cash and E-ZPass users. At US 301 Mainline, the toll for two-axle E-ZPass users will increase from $4.00 to $5.00, while toll-by-plate customers will pay $7.00, up from $5.60. Toll amounts for interchanges along US 301 will vary. Drivers on SR 1 at Biddles Corner and Dover will see the following changes: Delaware E-ZPass holders: Weekday toll: $1.50 (two-axle vehicles) Weekend toll: $4.00 Cash and non-Delaware E-ZPass users: Weekday toll: $2.50 Weekend toll: $6.00 Can I use my Delaware E-ZPass outside of the state? Yes, the transponder works in the E-ZPass network, which includes Delaware and 18 other states. The 18 other states are: New Jersey Pennsylvania Maryland New York Massachusetts New Hampshire Maine Rhode Island Virginia West Virginia North Carolina Geogia Florida Kentucky Ohio Indiana Illinois Minnesota DMV fee increases to begin in October The Delaware Department of Transportation has also announced increases to DMV fees beginning on Oct. 1, 2025. Changes include a 1% increase to the document fee applied to vehicle transactions. Additionally, a new annual registration fee for alternative fuel vehicles will go into effect, affecting more than 48,000 registered vehicles in the state, according to DelDOT. MORE FEE INCREASES: Toll increases announced for Delaware Memorial Bridge. What drivers need to know State officials estimate that these increases will generate an additional $107 million annually to support infrastructure improvements across Delaware. For more information on toll rates or DMV fees, contact DelDOT Community Relations at 302-760-2080 or email dotpr@ You can contact staff reporter Anitra Johnson at ajohnson@ This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: How to get a free Delaware E-ZPass. Are tolls and DMV fees increasing? Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store