‘No deal': Putin met a tougher Trump in Alaska than the one he steamrolled in Helsinki seven years ago
Putin — on what was once sovereign Russian land — after three years of isolation brought on by his unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, hoping he could charm, cajole and flatter Trump into taking his side over that of Volodymyr Zelensky.
Trump arrived first, and the two leaders met on a red-carpeted tarmac for a handshake. It was there that Putin got his first surprise.
As the leaders walked towards waiting reporters and photographers, a noise above drew the Russian leader's attention. He looked up to see something that on any other day, in any other place, would have meant very bad things for him: The belly of an American B-2 bomber, a machine built to kill him by dropping nuclear weapons on Moscow without detection by Soviet (later Russian) air defense systems.
Trump then pulled Putin into his waiting limousine for a shared ride to their talks, bypassing the armored car that had been brought from Moscow for the Russian president's use.
Next, the one-on-one meeting Putin had expected became a three-on-three session with him and two of his aides across from Trump, his special envoy Steve Witkoff, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Only after that could Putin expect to have Trump sit down with a group of Russian business leaders who he'd brought with him, expecting the American leader to be swayed with the promise of investment and business opportunities in the same way other foreign leaders have curried favor with Trump.
It never happened.
After nearly three hours of talks, Trump and Putin walked out to face hundreds of reporters who'd gathered in expectation of a joint press conference.
Speaking first, Putin appeared optimistic about the talks as he said he and Trump had come to 'agreements' and described Ukraine — the sovereign nation he invaded and has been pillaging since March 2022 — as Russia's 'brotherly nation' and claimed Russia wants to end the conflict.
Through a translator, the Russian strongman repeated oft-used lines about addressing what he calls the 'primary roots, the primary causes of that conflict' — meaning his desire for Ukraine to end any ambitions to integrate with the West by joining the European Union or NATO — and said any settlement in the conflict must 'consider all legitimate concerns of Russia and to reinstate a just balance of security in Europe and in world on the whole.'
But moments later, Trump torpedoed Putin's claim to have reached an agreement, telling reporters instead that there were 'many points that we agreed on' during the talks but there were still 'a couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there.'
'So there's no deal until there's a deal,' Trump summed it up.
The president stressed that any future deal would have to receive assent from the Ukrainian government as well as America's NATO allies, and said he'd be 'calling up ... the various people that I think are appropriate,' as well as Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky to read them in on what transpired behind closed doors today.
Trump added that the meeting, in his estimation, had been 'very productive' and included 'many points' that had been agreed to, and said there was a "good chance" of reaching some sort of accord going forward.
A second meeting has been floated in recent days by Trump but has not been confirmed.
Putin suggested to Trump in English: 'Next time in Moscow,' which the president said he could 'get a little heat' for but added he could see it 'possibly happening.'
Trump thanked the reporters for attending and he and Putin quickly left the stage.
Within the hour, both leaders' aircraft were wheels up and bound for home.
There were no fireworks, there was no grand bargain rolled out, and it wasn't clear what — if anything — the two leaders had actually agreed on at all.
And while some commentators were casting the lackluster result as a win for Putin because Trump hadn't rolled out the sanctions he has spent weeks threatening, the Russian leader most likely wasn't smiling as his plane climbed away from Alaska.
That's because he failed to do what he'd done in Helsinki, where he'd charmed and flattered Trump into taking his side over America's own intelligence services.
He'd even failed to bring Trump back to his previous anti-Ukraine worldview, that which was on display in February when he and Vice President JD Vance got into an Oval Office shouting match with Zelensky before throwing him out of the White House.
Instead, he had to watch as Trump reaffirmed that the final settlement in the war he'd started would have to pass muster with Zelensky, the man who he'd hoped to kill in the opening days of the war.
The years between Helsinki and Anchorage — and the months between February and now — have seen Trump go through trials (literally) and tests.
For better or worse, he's no longer the neophyte, easily flattered naif who Putin made a fool of in Finland all those years ago. And though he's long had an uneasy relationship with both Zelensky and NATO, the months since that disastrous bilateral meeting have seen him grow more and more frustrated with Putin and better understand the European desire to avoid rewarding attempts at military conquest on their soil.
It wasn't a perfect result, but Trump is learning. And now, Putin knows that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Woke Star Wars icon debated moving out of USA after Trump win
Star Wars icon Mark Hamill has revealed that he once considered leaving the United States following the election of former President Donald Trump. The 73-year-old actor, best known for playing Luke Skywalker, told The Times that he briefly weighed a move overseas, narrowing his options to two English-speaking European countries: England or Ireland. He even left the final decision up to his wife, Marilou York. 'She's very clever,' Hamill said. 'She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country.' That son of a b*tch, I thought. I'm not leaving.' Hamill credits York with changing his perspective and ultimately keeping him in the U.S. Despite his frustrations with the political climate, the Life of Chuck star says he remains optimistic. 'I still believe there are more honest, decent people than there are the MAGA crowd,' Hamill explained. 'If I didn't, I'd move back to England.' The BAFTA winner remains as outspoken about politics, but has abandoned Facebook and Twitter for the social media platform BlueSky. 'The bullying, the incompetence, the people in place,' he said. 'The only way I can deal with it without going crazy and wanting to open my veins in a warm tub is to look at it like a thick, sprawling political novel, The Book of Boba Fett actor explained. 'It's entertaining in a way because this could actually be the end. Our status in the world has been crippled and that will reverberate for decades. Making Canada a 51st state? Do you know how offensive that is? And then taking over Greenland and renaming the Gulf of Mexico. The distractions are hilarious.' Hamill is not the the only celebrity to consider relocating to another country in the wake of the 2024 election. Angelina Jolie, 50, is reportedly looking to make the move, according to Page Six. The outlet claimed she was prepping the six bedroom/10 bathroom estate once owned by famed director Cecil B. DeMille for sale. The Oscar winner told British Vogue in 2021 she choose the sprawling two acre property for her and her kids because 'I wanted it to be close to their dad, who is only five minutes away,' referring to her ex-husband Brad Pitt. 'She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country.'' he said of the conversation with wife Marilou York. 'That son of a b*tch, I thought. I'm not leaving'; Pictured in Los Angeles in November 2024 A source told People the Maria star plans to relocate as soon as her youngest children, twins Knox and Vivienne, turn 18 in July 2026. 'She's eyeing several locations abroad. She'll be very happy when she's able to leave Los Angeles,' they contended. Rosie O'Donnell, 63, has moved to Ireland with her youngest child who is non-binary and has autism. 'It was something I needed to do for myself and for my child, and for my own sanity,' she told People. Ellen DeGeneres, 67, and her wife Portia de Rossi, 52, have moved to England permanently. The couple are concerned about efforts to reverse the rights of same-sex couples to marry. 'Portia and I are already looking into it, and if they do that, we're going to get married here,' according to the BBC. CNN has reported a record number of Americans have applied for British citizenship in the first quarter of 2025. However who want to leave have found it's not feasible due to work and financial constraints.
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
What's at stake when Zelensky meets Trump at the White House with Starmer and EU allies in tow
European leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, will join Volodymyr Zelensky for a high-stakes meeting with Donald Trump at the White House on Monday. The prime minister will travel to Washington alongside several European leaders in a show of solidarity with the Ukrainian president, whose last visit to the Oval Office ended in a disastrous clash with Mr Trump. The summit comes just days after the US president met Vladimir Putin in Alaska, in which it is understood that the Russian president demanded that Ukraine cede the Donetsk and Luhansk regions as a condition for ending the war. Mr Trump is said to have privately endorsed the proposal, a move that Kyiv has strongly resisted. Ukraine's leader has warned that Russia 's refusal to halt hostilities before agreeing to a settlement would complicate any attempt at securing lasting peace. Speaking ahead of his trip, Mr Zelensky said: 'Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war.' Downing Street said Sir Keir and other leaders 'stand ready to support this next phase of talks' and will stress that their backing for Ukraine will continue 'as long as it takes.' Who is going to Washington? European leaders confirmed to be attending include: Sir Keir Starmer, UK prime minister Emmanuel Macron, French president Friedrich Merz, German Chancellor Alexander Stubb, President of Finland Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission Mark Rutte, Nato Secretary General Giorgia Meloni, Italy's prime minister The Ukrainian president will travel with a strong backing after participating in a coalition call on Sunday afternoon, hosted by the UK, France, and Germany. The so-called 'coalition of the willing' aims to provide security guarantees, including policing any future peace deal with troops on the ground in Ukraine. What will be discussed on Monday? The talks are expected to cover territorial questions, including Russia's demand for Ukraine to cede Donetsk and Luhansk. They are also expected to address security guarantees for Ukraine, which could be backed by US air power. The role of Nato and European allies in enforcing a settlement is likely to be discussed, alongside sanction pressures on Russia. European leaders want to also ensure Ukraine is at the table for all negotiations. Speaking alongside Mr Zelensky in Brussels, Ms von der Leyen said: 'With regards to any territorial questions in Ukraine, our position is clear: international borders cannot be changed by force. 'These are decisions to be made by Ukraine and Ukraine alone, and these decisions cannot be taken without Ukraine at the table.' European powers also want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Mr Trump, Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future. What are Russia's demands? At the Alaska summit, Mr Putin reportedly insisted Ukraine must surrender Donetsk and Luhansk in full, abandon its Nato aspirations and declare neutrality. He offered to freeze the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, sources close to the meeting told The Independent. Around 88 per cent of the Donbas is under Russian control. This includes almost all of the Luhansk region and 75 per cent of the Donetsk region. Russia controls nearly 44,600 square miles or 19 per cent of Ukraine in total, including the Crimean peninsula, according to open-source maps of the battlefield. Mr Zelensky has rejected the idea of handing over territory, insisting talks must be based on current front lines and begin with a ceasefire. Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said Mr Putin agreed to allow the US and its European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee at his meeting with the US president on Friday. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato," Mr Witkoff told CNN. He added that it 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that' and called them 'game-changing.' Article 5, at the heart of the 32-member military alliance, states that an armed attack against one or more of the members shall be considered an attack against all members. Sir Keir commended Mr Trump's commitment to providing security guarantees to Ukraine, following a meeting of the coalition of the willing on Sunday afternoon. What happened the last time Zelensky met Trump? Their previous Oval Office meeting in February ended in a dramatic confrontation. A planned mineral deal signing ceremony collapsed as Mr Trump and Vice President JD Vance accused Mr Zelensky of being 'ungrateful' and 'gambling with World War III'. Mr Zelensky pushed back, insisting there could be 'no compromises with a killer' – a reference to Mr Putin. The meeting was cut short, the joint press conference cancelled, and Mr Trump declared afterwards that Zelensky could 'come back when he is ready for peace', and temporarily suspended aid to Ukraine.
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Zelensky returns to Washington, this time with Europe at his side
It has to be a tribute to Volodymyr Zelensky 's resilience, as well as an acknowledgement of Donald Trump 's still-pivotal role as the would-be peacemaker, that he is prepared to risk another encounter at the White House. That meeting, six months ago, has gone down in the annals as one of the most disgraceful episodes in modern-day diplomacy, with a national leader humiliated in front of the cameras in a grilling that the US president said afterwards would make good television. Lessons have clearly been drawn from that dire encounter, not just by President Zelensky himself, and maybe President Trump, who mended fences at an informal tete-a-tete at the Vatican, but also by the Ukrainian's many European supporters. Joining Mr Zelensky in Washington will be the heads of the EU and Nato, and a clutch of European leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer. That all these highly placed individuals are prepared to meet, as they did in various configurations on Sunday, and travel at such short notice to Washington at the height of Europe's holiday season, shows how high the stakes are, as seen not just by Ukraine, but by Europe. And they are certainly a great deal higher than they were in February, given both the situation on the battlefield and what would appear to be the new level of understanding between Mr Trump and Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, following their summit in Alaska. Whatever format is applied to the meeting, or surely meetings, in Washington, there are lessons that it must be hoped Mr Zelensky has taken to heart, should he find himself again one-to-one with Trump in the Oval Office. They include using a translator – whether or not he thinks he needs one – and ignoring media questions before any talks have taken place. What he chooses to wear, on the other hand, should be for him to decide, not for the White House to dictate. In the end, though, the presence of so many high-level Europeans may be the best guarantee that Mr Zelensky is not treated as a lone leader of a peripheral state who can easily be imposed upon. And there are already intimations of a little more transatlantic flexibility on two key points. After Alaska, Mr Trump appeared to follow Putin's script for an actual end to the war, rather than an immediate ceasefire. The Europeans now appear to have followed, with the ceasefire demand now replaced by the longer-term, if more complex, aim of ending the war. It would also appear that security guarantees – a consistent requirement of Ukraine and slightly less consistent on the part of the Europeans – may be back on the agenda, although vague as to what form they might take and whether the US would underwrite them. With Nato membership for Ukraine one of Russia's reddest of red lines, this could help square that circle. The choreography in Washington alone will itself challenge complaints that the US and Russia were intent on cobbling together an agreement over the heads of Ukraine and Europe. This does not mean that the visitors should not be wary that Washington may listen and not hear. The Europeans must do their utmost not to make cracks show, and stick to what appears to be their simple and limited script. In particular, that means Ukraine's full participation in any peace process. There must also be no dilution of their stance on what the Trump White House is calling 'land swaps' and might more accurately be called territorial concessions. The European position appears to be that no borders may be changed by force, although the last word must rest with Ukraine, which is quite right. Mr Zelensky has at times hinted at a readiness at least to broach such a possibility, while at others – including at Sunday's joint press conference with Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels – insisting that sacrificing land would be out of the question as it would contravene Ukraine's constitution. In the end, though, the benefits for Ukraine of ending the war may have to be set against any territorial losses. Domestically, this will be one of Mr Zelensky's toughest calls. Internationally, there are diplomatic formulas that can cope with continuing territorial ambiguities. The emotive issue of Ukraine's abducted children must also be factored into any discussions. If it is true that the US first lady, Melania Trump, has taken up their cause, then their return may not be as remote a prospect as once seemed. Above all, the principle of 'nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine' is not just a slogan; it is an entirely practical requirement. There can be no peace that does not reflect the assent of Ukraine, as it will simply not endure. The torrent of recent developments has opened the question of whether, for all Moscow 's official intransigence, there is enough now in play, as between the US, Russia and Ukraine, for some modest progress towards peace. A very cautious 'Yes' may be the best answer that can be hoped for out of Washington on Monday.
