logo
False SA school calendar goes viral – from a known fake news website

False SA school calendar goes viral – from a known fake news website

News242 days ago

A viral article and subsequent post claiming that South Africa's Department of Basic Education has 'revamped' the 2025 school calendar is false. The department has confirmed the post is fake and urged the public to verify information through official government channels.
The fabricated article failed multiple generative AI tests. It claims that new term dates have been introduced, and that 'South African students rejoice' as a result. It uses a stock image, originally posted on the photography website Alamy in 2015, to depict overcrowding in rural classrooms, which has appeared in dozens of legitimate education articles.
Official response: the calendar is unchanged
In a public statement, the Department of Basic Education (DBE) said: 'We have become aware of an online article claiming that the school calendar for 2025 has been changed. This is fake news. The annual school calendar is set in advance and gazetted by the national Minister of Basic Education.'
The DBE confirmed that the school calendars for 2025, 2026 and 2027 are available on its official website at www.education.gov.za.
The official 2025 calendar, published in the Government Gazette, was confirmed in 2023. It outlines the following term dates:
Second viral hoax from the same website
The article is the second fake story from the same website to gain traction this month - again forcing a government department to step in. Earlier this week, News24 debunked the same site's false claim that South Africa was facing '14 hours of daily load shedding".
These articles are also replicated across copycat websites, which follow the same formula to publish unverified content about schooling, grants, and public sector jobs - hoping one will break through into public discourse.
In the context of AI-populated websites, many articles are obviously fake. However, when shared via WhatsApp and social media without obvious giveaways, such as poor spelling or irrelevant images, many users repost them without pausing to verify the facts.
The danger behind the shares
The site's apparent goal is to generate traffic for ad revenue, rather than undermine government operations. But the impact is far-reaching. The Department of Basic Education notes that school calendars are critical planning tools for teachers, learners, and families. Disinformation about term dates disrupts planning, causes confusion, and undermines trust in official communication channels.
Any change to the national school calendar would require a formal notice signed by the minister and published in the Government Gazette. The Department of Basic Education advises the public to verify school calendars and related information via:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's winning at the Supreme Court. Justice Jackson warns about `troubling message'
Trump's winning at the Supreme Court. Justice Jackson warns about `troubling message'

USA Today

time17 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump's winning at the Supreme Court. Justice Jackson warns about `troubling message'

Trump's winning at the Supreme Court. Justice Jackson warns about `troubling message' Jackson, one of the court's most liberal justices, wrote that her colleagues may be unintentionally showing preferential treatment for the Trump administration. Show Caption Hide Caption Ketanji Brown Jackson lights up stage at Broadway musical "& Juliet" Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson treated "& Juliet" fans to a special performance for one night only! WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump is on a winning streak of getting quick assistance from the Supreme Court after lower courts have put the brakes on his policies. That's prompted one of the three liberal justices to write that the court is sending a 'troubling message" that it's departing from basic legal standards for the administration. 'It is particularly startling to think that grants of relief in these circumstances might be (unintentionally) conveying not only preferential treatment for the Government but also a willingness to undercut both our lower court colleagues' well-reasoned interim judgments and the well-established constraints of law that they are in the process of enforcing,' Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote. Jackson was dissenting from the conservative majority's decision to give Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration. Once again, she wrote in a dissent joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, "this Court dons its emergency responder gear, rushes to the scene, and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than extinguish them." A district judge had blocked DOGE's access to 'personally identifiable information' while assessing if that access is legal. Jackson said a majority of the court didn't require the administration to show it would be 'irreparably harmed' by not getting immediate access, one of the legal standards for intervention. "It says, in essence, that although other stay applicants must point to more than the annoyance of compliance with lower court orders they don't like," she wrote, "the Government can approach the courtroom bar with nothing more than that and obtain relief from this Court nevertheless." A clock, a mural, a petition: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's chambers tell her story In a brief and unsigned decision, the majority said it weighed the 'irreparable harm' factor along with the other required considerations of what's in the public interest and whether the courts are likely to ultimately decide that DOGE can get at the data. But the majority did not explain how they did so. Jackson said the court `plainly botched' its evaluation of a Trump appeal Jackson raised a similar complaint when the court on May 30 said the administration can revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans living in the United States. Jackson wrote that the court "plainly botched" its assessment of whether the government or the approximately 530,000 migrants would suffer the greater harm if their legal status ends while the administration's mass termination of that status is being litigated. Jackson said the majority undervalued "the devastating consequences of allowing the Government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending." The majority did not offer an explanation for its decision. More Supreme Court wins for Trump In addition to those interventions, the Supreme Court recently blocked a judge's order requiring DOGE to disclose information about its operations, declined to reinstate independent agency board members fired by Trump, allowed Trump to strip legal protections from 350,000 Venezuelans and said the president can enforce his ban on transgender people serving in the military. Jackson disagreed with all of those decisions. The court's two other liberal justices – Sotomayor and Elena Kagan – disagreed with most of them. More: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson can throw a punch. Literally. The court did hand Trump a setback in May when it barred the administration from quickly resuming deportations of Venezuelans under a 1798 wartime law. Two of the court's six conservative justices – Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito – dissented. Decisions are expected in the coming weeks on other Trump emergency requests, including whether the president can dismantle the Education Department and can enforce his changes to birthright citizenship.

Harvard Taught This British Student About Democracy. Now Trump May Force Him Out.
Harvard Taught This British Student About Democracy. Now Trump May Force Him Out.

New York Times

time37 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Harvard Taught This British Student About Democracy. Now Trump May Force Him Out.

In mid-April, as he hit his stride in his first year at Harvard, Alfred Williamson felt a stirring of unease. The Trump administration's latest threats against his university were now focused on blocking international students from attending it. Mr. Williamson, from Wales, consulted his American friends: Should he be worried? 'They said, 'There's no way he would do that,'' Mr. Williamson, 20, recalled in an interview. 'They said it was just a scare tactic. But they were wrong.' Five weeks later, just after the end of the spring semester, Mr. Williamson, now at a summer abroad program, picked up his phone and saw a pileup of missed calls and messages. The threat his friends had dismissed had become a searing reality: The federal government had effectively blocked Harvard's ability to enroll foreign students — abruptly thrusting Mr. Williamson and others into an excruciating limbo. As anxious messages pinged on his phone, Mr. Williamson scrolled through texts from worried family members ('I hope you're OK') and from classmates unmoored by uncertainty ('What are we going to do?'). He spoke to one close friend who called him in tears, devastated at the potential loss of financial help from Harvard — money that had not been matched by British universities and that had put college within reach. A judge has issued temporary restraining orders pausing the Trump administration's efforts. But Mr. Williamson and thousands of other international students are still dogged by uncertainty, wondering what will come next. In the country's raging debates over immigration, someone with Mr. Williamson's profile — a white, British man in the United States to study science — would not usually be the focus of debate. But like all kinds of students from all over the world, he, too, has been swept up in the Trump administration's fight over higher education. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

China's Quiet Win: Outmaneuvering U.S. for Africa's Future Leaders
China's Quiet Win: Outmaneuvering U.S. for Africa's Future Leaders

New York Times

time37 minutes ago

  • New York Times

China's Quiet Win: Outmaneuvering U.S. for Africa's Future Leaders

When students in Africa pine for an education overseas, the United States is often not top of mind. For many, it is China. The Trump administration's recent tightening of visas for international students has raised fears that the United States could lose its status as a top destination for higher education. But for tens of thousands of students in Africa, that shift was already happening. Over the past decade, applicants across the continent have traded prestigious academic institutions in countries like Britain and the United States for Chinese alternatives, attracted by government scholarships, affordable tuition, lower living costs and easier access to visas. Africa is home to the world's youngest and fastest-growing population at a time when many of the world's wealthier regions — particularly in the West and Asia — are aging rapidly, making it difficult to find enough workers to keep their economies growing. Africa lacks enough universities to educate its own students, but China has mounted an effort to recruit them as the United States reduces its diplomatic, military and humanitarian engagement on the continent. The Chinese Communist Party sees educating the next generation of African leaders as part of a broader plan to boost China's soft power and promote its economic and political model in the developing world. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store