UK PM hosts Zelensky on eve of US-Russia summit
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, right, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer depart 10 Downing Street, in London. Photo: Reuters
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday met with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in London in a show of support on the eve of a key US-Russia summit from which Kyiv and its European allies have been excluded.
Starmer greeted the Ukrainian leader with a warm hug and handshake on the steps of his Downing Street residence, only hours after Zelensky took part in a virtual call with US President Donald Trump.
Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet on Friday at an air base in Alaska.
A stepped-up Russian offensive, and the fact Zelensky has not been invited to the Anchorage meeting, have heightened fears that Trump and Putin could strike a deal that forces painful concessions on Ukraine.
But Starmer said on Wednesday there was now a "viable" chance for a ceasefire in Ukraine after more than three years of fighting. (AFP)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
43 minutes ago
- AllAfrica
China's AIIB isn't too young to act and invest responsibly
In June 2025, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) marked its tenth anniversary at its annual meeting. Outgoing president Jin Liqun gave opening remarks, invoking Chinese President Xi's original vision of the Bank to become a true multilateral institution and celebrating its commitment to 'integrity, transparency, inclusiveness, and a results-oriented approach.' Unfortunately, the bank's track record reveals a different story. As representatives of Accountability Counsel, we attended the same meeting to advocate for the Bank to be more responsible when its financing contributes to negative impacts on local communities. In particular, we called for much-needed reforms to the AIIB's accountability mechanism, called the Project-Affected People's Mechanism, so that the AIIB can easily hear directly from local communities and facilitate action to either prevent or remediate harm. The AIIB's project financing has been linked to involuntary displacement, loss of livelihood and environmental destruction in Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and elsewhere. And yet, the AIIB's official channel for hearing about and addressing such concerns–its accountability mechanism–is broken. That's most clearly evidenced by the fact that the AIIB's accountability mechanism has yet to accept a single case as eligible. In response to our concerns, we were asked to be patient. As a 10-year-old bank, AIIB was still young, still growing up and not ready to be compared to other multilateral institutions. It is understandable that the bank will make mistakes and that it will need to continually evolve. What is unacceptable is that while AIIB takes its time to mature, people and the planet bear the consequences. As a part of its operating model, the AIIB skirts responsibility by shifting its legal and institutional responsibility onto peer institutions. AIIB's 'lean, clean, and green' model moves money quickly and with little oversight. The bank has financed more than US$60 billion during its first 10 years, a significant portion of which was committed through co-financing agreements with other multilateral development banks. As part of these agreements, the AIIB delegates the implementation and monitoring of environmental and social standards to the co-financing institution. As of 2024, AIIB claims that for 113 projects, worth $23.3 billion – including large infrastructure projects like hydropower, metro rail, airport extensions – it does not bear the responsibility to prevent or remediate harm to local communities. This statistic is a part of a worrisome pattern of the AIIB evading its obligations to local communities and the environment. Even when AIIB is the sole financier and therefore solely responsible for overseeing the implementation of its own environmental and social standards, its own accountability mechanism has never once independently reviewed whether the bank is following its own rules, nor whether its rules are adequate to prevent, mitigate and remediate environmental and social harms. Here, too, AIIB delegates its responsibility down to clients and project implementers, requiring them to resolve issues so that the AIIB does not have to. Even worse, under the guise of localization, AIIB requires communities whose lives, livelihoods, and environments are at risk from AIIB's investments to try to first seek redress from the project implementers who've contributed to the harm in the first place. This is the case, despite AIIB staff's own admission, project-level redress channels don't always exist and vary widely in effectiveness. This year, AIIB has an opportunity to prove that it is ready to enter its next decade as a responsible investor. The policy of the AIIB's accountability mechanism is undergoing an official and public review, with a draft policy published just days after the AIIB's Annual Meeting concluded. Improvements to that policy would be proof that the AIIB is ready to be accessible and accountable to the communities it impacts. An independent expert has already published a list of policy improvements, a majority of which are yet to be adopted. We're calling for the AIIB to adopt three concrete improvements: The AIIB's accountability mechanism should allow communities to directly file complaints to it without first attempting other avenues. Because of current access barriers, communities are either unable to or choosing not to raise complaints, leaving the bank vulnerable and unaware of unsustainable aspects of its projects. The AIIB's accountability mechanism, its president and its board should have the power to call for an investigation into whether a project complies with AIIB's environmental and social standards. The AIIB is responsible for compliance with its own rules, so it should be able to initiate an independent investigation even if no complaint is filed. The AIIB's accountability mechanism policy should be reviewed every five years to ensure that it is maturing alongside the bank. This is standard practice to ensure that AIIB's policies and practices don't become outdated. If the bank adopts these changes, we will applaud the bank's evolution towards responsible investing. If the bank does not adopt these changes, we will have proof that the bank cares more about itself than its mission. The AIIB does not have to be the same as other multilateral development banks; indeed, its promise lies in new approaches it can bring to improve upon past development practices. Regardless of its approach, however, the AIIB does have to be responsible for its impacts–both positive and negative–on people and the planet. As of its 10th anniversary, the AIIB has not exercised that responsibility. Instead, AIIB has acted like a ten-year-old child, wanting praise without responsibility. Radhika Goyal and Margaux Day are with Accountability Council, a San Francisco-based independent watchdog organization that advocates for people who have been harmed by internationally-financed projects such as dams, mines and oil pipelines.
HKFP
an hour ago
- HKFP
China says it opposes European sanctions over Iran nuclear programme
China said Friday it opposed invoking sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme after three Western nations told the UN they would reimpose them if no diplomatic solution was found by the end of August. European sanctions on Iran were eased after a 2015 deal in return for curbs on Tehran's nuclear programme. But on Wednesday, foreign ministers from the E3 group — Britain, France and Germany — threatened to reimpose them in a joint letter to United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the Security Council. China said Friday it 'opposes invoking' sanctions and 'believes that it does not help parties build trust'. Reimposing sanctions was 'not conducive to the diplomatic effort for the early resumption of talks', Beijing's foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said in a statement. Iran said Thursday it was working with China and Russia to stop the return of the sanctions. European countries have stepped up warnings to Iran about its suspension of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. That came after Israel launched a 12-day war with Iran in June, partly seeking to destroy its nuclear capability. The United States staged its own bombing raid during the war. Wednesday's E3 letter sets out engagements that the ministers say Iran has breached, including building up a uranium stock to more than 40 times the permitted level under the 2015 deal. 'The E3 remain fully committed to a diplomatic resolution to the crisis caused by Iran's nuclear programme and will continue to engage with a view to reaching a negotiated solution,' the ministers said. 'Tools to respond' The 2015 deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, effectively collapsed after US President Donald Trump withdrew from it in 2018 during his first term and restored sanctions. European countries attempted to keep the deal alive. The agreement, which terminates in October, includes a 'snapback mechanism' allowing sanctions to be restored. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said the return of sanctions would be 'negative' but that the predicted economic effects 'have been exaggerated'. 'We will try to prevent it,' he told state TV on Thursday. 'If this does not work and they apply it, we have tools to respond. We will discuss them in due course.' Last month, Araghchi sent a letter to the UN saying the European countries did not have the legal right to restore sanctions. The European ministers called the claim 'unfounded'. 'Any moves taken by the Security Council now should help reach new agreements in talks, instead of the opposite,' China's Lin added on Friday.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Ukraine-Russia land swap, security guarantees ‘largely agreed', Trump says after Putin summit
land swap and security guarantees to end the Ukraine wa r have been 'negotiated' and 'agreed', US President Donald Trump has said following talks with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska. In an interview with Fox News soon after the summit on Friday , Trump said the points 'were negotiated' and 'largely agreed on', but one 'big thing' of disagreement remained. 'I think [Putin] wants to see it done,' Trump said, refusing to say what the outstanding issue was. Trump also accused his predecessor, Joe Biden, of pushing China and Russia together, countries that he said should have been 'natural enemies.' 'He did something that was unthinkable. He drove China and Russia together. That's not good,' he said. 'It's the one thing you didn't want to do because they're basically natural enemies. Russia has tremendous amounts of land. China has tremendous amounts of people, and China needs Russian land.
