logo
I spent £5,000 on surgery to reduce the size of my forehead- here's what I look like now

I spent £5,000 on surgery to reduce the size of my forehead- here's what I look like now

Daily Mail​a day ago
A mother felt so self-conscious about her hairline that she spent £5,000 on surgery to reduce her forehead.
Chloe Walker, from Hornchurch, Essex, had always been insecure about the size of her forehead and kept it covered with a fringe since she was around 10 years old.
The 34-year-old thinks she's gone through thousands of bottles of hairspray over her lifetime as she desperately tried to keep the fringe in place.
The mother-of-two said she was living in constant fear that a gust of wind would expose her head and eventually decided to splash out on a £5,000 forehead reduction op in Notting Hill, London.
Chloe, who works as a quantity surveyor, said her forehead was 9cm prior to surgery on 14 July and it is now just 6.5cm.
Chloe, said: 'It has changed my life. I instantly feel happier when I wake up. I've always been self-conscious all my life to be honest.
'I probably didn't really notice the way I looked until I was like 10 or 11. I got a fringe put in and it gave me confidence.
'It got to the point where I was too uncomfortable to go swimming with my kids anymore.
'People are uncomfortable about what they might look like in a swimsuit, I was just worried about if my hair got wet, if my head was on show.
'I want them to remember me as a mum who went swimming with them, went underwater and didn't care.
'Or a mum who wasn't worrying if she didn't have her cap when she went for a walk or a mum who didn't freak out if her hair was blown in the wind.
'[Since the op] I feel free. I feel like I can walk down the street and I'm a free person.
'I am just looking forward to playing with my kids and letting them splash me without worrying, putting my sunglasses on my head, brushing my hair back.
The mother admitted she would even edit photos to make her forehead appear smaller.
Chloe said: 'It was taking over my life to the point where I would try to edit the size of my head on my photos. I'd try to shrink it.
'Even family photoshoots that we've had done. I've edited them and got them printed.
'I got married about three years ago and I still haven't printed my wedding photos. I need to touch them up again. My fringe was stuck to my head so you couldn't really tell.
'I wish I did the surgery before then. I was stressing about it on my wedding day. There was a lot of hairspray on my head. It didn't move.
'I've gone through thousands of bottles of hairspray over 20 years.
'I made sure my photos were on one side so you don't see the other side. I was very self-aware of my angles.'
Chloe said she had considered a hair transplant to bring her hairline forwards but was worried it could fail and said it could take a few years for the hair to grow back.
She has now taken to TikTok to share her surgery story and document her recovery in the hopes her story will help others who are struggling with their appearance.
Chloe said: 'I wanted to help other people who may feel the same as me.
'When I was looking to get this done I kept seeing before and afters but I didn't hear anyone's story, how they felt and the recovery side of it.
'A lot of people are saying my forehead is still big and there's no difference.
'That has bothered me but then I think, 'I know I've had 2.5cm removed so there's not much they could have done and I need to accept this is me now.'
'I have had people say horrible things like, 'oh if I haven't got any paper I'll just write my essay on Chloe's head.' I've been called 'spam-head'.
'Sometimes I look at myself and think, 'oh my god, it's still really big' but I'm thinking, 'no it's smaller than what it was. I need to just embrace who I am now.'
'I was getting to the point where I was a bit self-conscious to go out as much so I needed something instant. I was shutting myself away.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rare ‘brain-eating amoeba' detected in drinking water supplies in Australia
Rare ‘brain-eating amoeba' detected in drinking water supplies in Australia

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rare ‘brain-eating amoeba' detected in drinking water supplies in Australia

One of the world's most dangerous water-borne microorganisms, commonly called a 'brain-eating amoeba ', has recently been detected in two drinking water supplies in south-west Queensland. Both affected towns are about 750 kilometres west of Brisbane: Augathella (population roughly 300) and Charleville (population 3,000). During an analysis of water samples commissioned by Queensland Health, Naegleria fowleri was detected in the water systems of two health facilities, one in Charleville and one in Augathella, as well as in the incoming town water supply at both facilities. The Shire Council of Murweh, which takes in the two affected locations, issued a health notice for residents and visitors on August 7, warning of the detection of N. fowleri in the water supplies. So what is this organism? And how significant is the risk likely to be in these Queensland towns, and elsewhere? It's rare – but nearly always fatal The N. fowleri amoeba is a microscopic organism found around the world. It only lives in warm freshwater, generally between 25 and 40°C. This can include ponds, lakes, rivers, streams and hot springs. If someone is infected with N. fowleri, it causes what's called primary amoebic meningoencephalitis, a serious infection of the brain. Symptoms include a sore throat, headache, hallucinations, confusion, vomiting, fever, neck stiffness, changes to taste and smell, and seizures. The incubation period of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis – the time between infection and symptoms appearing – typically ranges from three to seven days. Tragically, this illness is nearly always fatal, even if someone receives medical attention quickly. Death typically occurs about five days after symptoms begin. Fortunately, though, cases are very rare. In the United States, there were 167 reported cases of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis between 1962 and 2024, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Only four survived. A global review of the disease up to 2018 reported that, of 381 known cases, Australia accounted for 22, the fifth highest number, after the US, Pakistan, Mexico and India. Some 92% of people died. So how does someone get infected? The route of infection is very unusual and quite specific. N. fowleri infects the brain through a person's nose. The amoeba then passes through a protective membrane called the nasal epithelium. This is an important physical barrier and allows the amoeba to travel to the brain through the olfactory nerve, which is responsible for our sense of smell. The infection then kills brain tissue and causes swelling of the brain, termed cerebral oedema. Infections occur in people when infected water travels up their nose. Most cases involve children and young people who have swum in infected waters. The majority of cases occur in males, with an average age of 14. Even water sports in affected waterways can be dangerous. A person is currently in intensive care in Missouri after it's believed they became infected while water skiing. Regarding the recent detection in Queensland water supply systems, the source of the infection has not been reported. It's possible a fresh waterway, or groundwater, which feeds into the affected drinking water systems, was contaminated with N. fowleri, and the amoeba travelled from there. But this will likely be determined with further investigation. How dangerous is N. fowleri in drinking water? First, it's important to note you can't get primary amoebic meningoencephalitis from drinking contaminated water. But any activity that allows infected water to enter a person's nose is potentially dangerous. This can happen during a bath or a shower. Some people flush their nasal passages to clear congestion related to allergies or a viral infection. This has been linked to infections with N. fowleri. If you're going to flush your nasal passages, you should use a sterile saline solution. Even young children playing with hoses, sprinklers or water activities could be at risk. A 16-month-old child was fatally infected following an incident involving a contaminated water 'splash pad' in the US in 2023. Splash pads are water-based recreation activities, primarily for young children, that involve splashing or spraying water. So what's the risk in Queensland? Regarding N. fowleri, Australian drinking water guidelines advise: If the organism is detected, advice should be sought from the relevant health authority or drinking water regulator. The guidelines also provide recommendations on how to disinfect water supplies and control N. fowleri, using chlorine and other chemical compounds. All public town water supplies across Australia are regularly tested to ensure that the water is safe to drink. We don't yet know the exact cause of the detection of the amoeba N. fowleri in these Queensland towns' water supplies. But drinking or cooking with water contaminated with this amoeba will not cause an infection. Any activity that allows potentially contaminated water to go up the nose should be navigated carefully for now in the affected areas. Contamination of a town's drinking water supply from this amoeba is very rare and is unlikely in other Australian town water supplies. How about swimming? To reduce your risk in potentially infected warm, fresh waters, you should keep your head above water while swimming. And don't jump or dive in. You can use a nose-clip if you want to swim with your head under water. The amoeba cannot survive in salt water, so there's no risk of swimming in the ocean. Also, properly maintained swimming pools should be safe from the organism. New South Wales Health advises that the amoeba cannot survive in water that is clean, cool and adequately chlorinated. Ian A. Wright is an Associate Professor in Environmental Science at Western Sydney University.

Booze up: is gen-Z's ‘sensible' relationship with alcohol moving towards hedonism?
Booze up: is gen-Z's ‘sensible' relationship with alcohol moving towards hedonism?

The Guardian

time15 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Booze up: is gen-Z's ‘sensible' relationship with alcohol moving towards hedonism?

Gen-Z have long been hailed as 'generation sensible' – dozens of articles have charted how they drink less alcohol, exercise more, eat healthier and have ditched night clubs for book clubs. But could that be about to change? Recent data has shown the proportion of gen Z – those born roughly between 1997 and 2012 – who are of legal drinking age and have consumed alcohol in the past six months has risen by 7% between 2024 and 2025. Alcopops are apparently all the rage among gen-Z customers, with booming sales of Smirnoff Ice, Bacardi Breezers and BuzzBallz, while last year's 'brat summer' was said to herald the end of the clean living era. The reality, experts say, is more complicated than that. 'We're seeing a generational recalibration, not a simple return to hedonism,' said Ivo Vlaev, a professor of behavioural science at Warwick University. 'This isn't a simple return to the past – it's a complex blend of coping, compensation, identity expression and socioeconomic constraint. The behaviours may look familiar, but the psychology behind them has evolved.' He said the fact that gen-Z came of age during a pandemic, climate crisis and increased concerns over the cost of living was a recipe for 'psychological whiplash'. Key factors at play included a rebound from the restrictions of the Covid era with young people now 'reasserting agency through social behaviours'. Vlaev said research showed that 'when autonomy is suppressed, people later overcompensate with behaviours that signal freedom or control'. There was also an element of 'self-soothing' as a result of rising levels of anxiety, depression and loneliness, as well as the glamorisation of certain drinks and behaviours on TikTok. Financial concerns may have also pushed the younger generation towards 'present-biased decision-making'. 'When the future feels unstable, people are less likely to invest in long-term health and more likely to seek short-term mood boosts, like alcohol or late nights out,' he said. Vlaev also said an element of 'wellness culture' fatigue had probably set in. 'Some gen-Zers are pushing back against the pressure to optimise every aspect of life,' he said. Richard Halstead, chief operation officer of consumer research at drinks market analysis company IWSR, said: 'From a consumer research and data point of view, it does seem there is some pushback on this idea that we're all perfect, having perfect pictures taken of us on Instagram and we're all super in control of our lives. 'Every cultural move has a countercultural move associated with it.' He said gen Z's attitudes towards drinking and socialising was more nuanced than is often portrayed in the media – gen Z were not 'puritans' who abstain from alcohol, but nor did they like booze as much as previous generations. 'The idea that gen Z do not drink at all or that they have turned their backs on alcohol is not supported by data,' he said. 'The idea that they have a different relationship with alcohol compared to previous generations is supported by data.' He said that, for instance, gen-Z were more likely to drink a wider variety of alcohols, and drink out in bars and restaurants. 'Their pattern of behaviour is actually going out for a reason, as opposed to just meeting for a pint in the pub because the pub's there and you've got nothing better to do,' he said. Dr Laura Tinner, a research fellow at the Centre for Public Health at the University of Bristol, said people shouldn't underestimate the power of the alcohol companies themselves, keen to capture a younger audience they feared they were losing. 'It's not necessarily that there has been a swing in the pendulum or a return to previous drinking behaviours, it's more that alcohol companies are continually trying to target young people with their products,' she said. 'They are using the current revival and zeitgeist around 00s and 90s culture to design their products to target young people.' There was also a suggestion that gen-Z were simply older – they are now roughly between the ages of 13 and 28 – so those at the older end of the group were more likely to have access to well paid jobs and disposable income. 'I think we're seeing some tailwinds develop,' said Halstead. 'They're getting older so some are probably in better paying, stable jobs and they've got more opportunity perhaps to do things that people with a bit more money like to do, which is go out and buy a drink and not worry too much about how much it costs you.' What many researchers were interested in was whether the characteristics that make gen Z different from their predecessors will stay with them as they age, with evidence suggesting generations become more and more similar as they get older. 'We've always had a question about whether or not the decline [in drinking alcohol] will persist into adulthood,' said Dr Laura Fenton, a research associate at the University of Sheffield who specialises in youth drinking cultures. 'What makes gen-Z slightly distinct as a generation is their attitude towards risk. They've engaged in fewer [risky pursuits] proportionally compared to people their age 20 years ago – and that extends to sex, it extends to driving, it extends to smoking and drug use,' she said. 'I think the question really is, is their approach to risk going to stay intact?'

Swimmer contracts brain-eating amoeba spreading in water... are YOU at risk?
Swimmer contracts brain-eating amoeba spreading in water... are YOU at risk?

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Swimmer contracts brain-eating amoeba spreading in water... are YOU at risk?

A person has been hospitalized in Missouri after contracting a rare infection caused by a brain-eating amoeba from swimming in a popular local lake. No name or age has been released for the patient, but the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services stated that exposure likely occurred at the Lake of the Ozarks. They had been waterskiing at the popular recreational spot before becoming sick with symptoms related to a Naegleria fowleri infection. Health officials say the patient, currently hospitalized in St. Louis, is only the third person in Missouri to contract the amoeba since the state began keeping records in 1962. The two other cases were reported in 1987 and 2022. Naegleria fowleri is commonly called a brain-eating amoeba because it causes a brain infection that is typically fatal. Official records show 164 people in the US were infected with the disease between 1962 and 2023, of which only four survived. Experts now warn that cases of Naegleria fowleri appear to be becoming more common and expanding to the northern US due to climate change. They say warmer weather creates the perfect breeding ground for the amoeba. Charles Gerba, a professor of microbiology and public health at the University of Arizona, told Live Science: 'What you might see is spikes in these organisms after an extreme weather event. 'So the more nutrients in the water, the more bacteria you'll get. We're seeing it creeping up to states further and further north all the time.' The Missouri lake where the latest case has emerged is a man-made reservoir created in 1931 with the completion of Bagnell Dam on the Osage River. Today, it draws tens of thousands of visitors with dozens of picturesque swimming spots, along with fishing and watersports activities. There had been no prior warnings about the lake being contaminated with bacteria or other harmful organisms and health experts say that despite the recent incident, there is not an elevated risk associated with the body of water. To reduce the risk of infection in warm freshwater health officials have advised swimmers to hold their noses shut, to keep their heads above water, to avoid activities in the water during periods of high temperatures and to avoid digging sediment. The US only suffers a handful of deaths from brain-eating amoebas each year, usually among people swimming in warm water lakes and rivers. Texas is among the states that have suffered the largest burden of brain-eating amoeba cases, with 39 of the 164 cases recorded in the US occurring in the Lone Star state. The single-cell organism, which thrives in warm waters, kills 97 percent of the people it infects as it causes a disease called primary amoebic meningoencephalitis, also known as PAM or amebic meningitis. Initial symptoms include a headache, vomiting and nausea. A person can then suffer cognitive issues and a stiff neck as things progress. It causes severe swelling, and eventually rotting, of the brain and spinal cord. This will almost always eventually lead to death. There are no known effective treatments for PAM. Only several Americans have ever survived after being infected with Naegleria fowleri. This includes Caleb Ziegelbauer from Florida, who was 13 years old at the time he was infected by the microscopic species. Caleb is now walking somewhat but the damage done to his brain means he needs to communicate with facial expressions and has to use a wheelchair. Officials believe the South Carolina child was infected while swimming in a local lake. The incident is not the first case of a Naegleria fowleri infection in South Carolina and there have also been other deaths linked to to the organism over recent years. In June, a 71-year-old woman from Texas contracted an infection and died from Naegleria fowleri after she rinsed her sinuses with tap water from an RV's water system at a campground. And in 2023, a 16-month-old toddler from Arkansas died after coming into contact with the same one-celled organism at a water playground with fountains and jets. The amoeba, which is 1,200 times smaller than a dime, enters the body through the olfactory nerve which connects the upper nose to the brain. What is Naegleria fowleri? Naegleria fowleri is an amoeba that 'literally eats the brain tissue,' according to Dr Anjan Debnath, a parasitic disease expert at the University of California, San Diego. It thrives in warm climates in freshwater including hot springs and lakes. Improper water treatment in pools, private ponds and even tap water can lead to deadly exposure to the amoeba as well. The amoeba travels up the nose where it has a direct route to the brain. Once a person's olfactory nerve in the nose is exposed, symptoms typically come on within one to nine days. Those who are infected will usually die within five days of symptoms first appearing. Early stage symptoms resemble those of the flu. Symptoms as the infection worsens include severe neurological issues like seizures, hallucinations, confusion, and coma. This gives it a short and direct route into the brain. If water containing the amoeba enters the nose, it will likely lead to infection. Ingesting water through the mouth is ok because stomach acid is strong enough to kill the amoeba. The nose is its only route. Once a person's olfactory nerve is exposed, it can take around one to nine days to start experiencing symptoms. They will usually die within five days of symptoms first appearing. 'It's quite rapid, it's very progressive. It literally eats the brain tissue,' Dr Anjan Debnath, a parasitologist at the University of California San Diego, explained. Because of the rare infection, doctors also often misdiagnose symptoms as meningitis - wasting valuable time that could be used to treat the parasite. Dr Debnath describes the infection as taking part in two stages. The first is relatively minor, with the person experiencing a headache and other flu-like symptoms. This means that unless a doctor knows that a person has been swimming in untreated water they may not even suspect the amoeba. Once symptoms reach the second stage, a person will start experiencing severe neurological issues like seizures. A doctor will then likely find out about the infection through a spinal fluid test. America suffers around three cases of the amoeba each year. They will almost always occur over summer, when many families flock to local lakes and ponds for a daytime outing. Dr Debnath still advises against swimming in untreated water over summer, especially in places like Florida and Texas where temperatures get exceptionally high. Because the amoeba only resides in fresh water, swimming in the ocean is generally safe. If families do choose to visit a freshwater beach, anyone entering the water should wear a nose clip to prevent water from entering their nose. Dr Debnath also recommends against kicking up dirt or sand from the bottom of the lake as warmer areas deep down are where the microscopic beings usually lie.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store