logo
Te Pāti Māori meeting tonight to decide candidate for upcoming Tāmaki Makarau by-election

Te Pāti Māori meeting tonight to decide candidate for upcoming Tāmaki Makarau by-election

RNZ News09-07-2025
A by-election for the Tāmaki Makarau seat has been sparked by the death of Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp two weeks ago.
Photo:
Supplied/ Te Pāti Māori
Te Pāti Māori will meet on Thursday night to decide who will run in the upcoming Tāmaki Makarau by-election.
The selection hui will take place at Hoani Waititi Marae at 6pm for Tāmaki electorate members only, with the successful candidate announced on Friday.
The hui is not open to the public.
The by-election was sparked by the death of Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp two weeks ago.
Former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara
announced on social media this week she would seek the party's nomination for the seat.
Another putting their name forward is
youth worker Te Kou o Rehua Panapa
, whose candidacy was announced on the Opaea Marae Facebook page, the marae where Kemp was laid to rest.
"In dedication to our beloved Mareikura, Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp, and with the full support of her whānau, we are proud to offer our support to Te Kou o Rehua Panapa, who will be standing as a candidate for Member of Parliament in Tāmaki Makaurau,"
the post
read.
"A dedicated kaimahi to our Mareikura, Te Kou has worked alongside her for many years, serving the people of Tāmaki with unwavering commitment and aroha. Te Kou will carry her legacy forward, committing his kaupapa to continuing and completing the important mahi she began."
In a video to posted to Instagram, Toitū te Tiriti kaikōrero Eru Kapa-Kingi ruled out running for the seat after receiving messages from people encouraging him to do so.
"Just to make it absolutely clear to everyone, I will not be running for the Tāmaki seat in the upcoming by-election," Kapa-Kingi said.
"Still not for me, still my focus at the moment is my whānau and the wellbeing of my baby boy and being a present pāpā and showing up and building my 'hāwaikī itī' i roto i taku whare, i waenga i taku whānau."
He was "still on the kaupapa" just in "different" ways, he said.
Kapa-Kingi was number nine on the party list for the 2023 general election, and number 10 in 2020. He was once a parliamentary staffer for Te Pāti Māori and is a teaching fellow at the University of Auckland's Faculty of Law.
His mother, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi is currently MP for Te Tai Tokerau.
A potential candidate could be the party's lawyer, Tania Waikato, who told RNZ's
Mata
programme she was
talking to "more than one" political party
about running for Parliament in 2026.
Tania Waikato speaking to RNZ's Mata programme.
Photo:
MATA / RNZ
The Tauranga-based lawyer said she had previously been hesitant about running, but seeing the "disgusting" debate around the suspension of three Te Pāti Māori members prompted her to put her hat in the ring.
"I'm going to probably be the most difficult to understand and difficult to predict politician that you have ever seen, because I do things in accordance with what my tīpuna tell me. And I will never align myself to any particular organisation or any particular kaupapa if my tīpuna are not saying to me, 'That is tika'.
"That is what I will always do regardless of where I am, so it makes me difficult in some ways because I have a higher power to answer to. And I will not compromise that," Waikato said.
Labour's
Peeni Henare previously held the seat
, before being beaten by Kemp in the 2023 election by a slim margin of 42 votes.
Henare had held the seat since 2014, beating out the then-Māori Party's Rangi McLean.
RNZ understands Labour's internal nomination process is underway and will close on Friday.
The Prime Minister is yet to announce the date for a by-election.
However, the Speaker of the House published the notice of vacancy in the Gazette on Wednesday, meaning the Governor-General will issue a writ within 21 days of 9 July, instructing the Chief Electoral Officer to conduct the by-election.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disregard for indigenous rights comes straight from the top
Disregard for indigenous rights comes straight from the top

Newsroom

time6 hours ago

  • Newsroom

Disregard for indigenous rights comes straight from the top

Opinion: Earlier this week, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said he 'fully agrees' with a letter the Minister of Regulation David Seymour wrote to Dr Albert K Barume, the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples. Barume recently criticised New Zealand for breaching international human rights standards relating to Indigenous peoples. Among other things, Seymour's letter to Barume called these criticisms 'an affront to New Zealand's sovereignty'. This is significant, but the timeline of how we got here is a bit complex, so here's some background. A special rapporteur is a person, appointed by the UN, who has expertise in a particular area of human rights and has a responsibility to investigate, advocate for, and encourage countries to uphold those rights. First, what is a special rapporteur and how does this role relate to NZ? One high-profile special rapporteur you may have recently heard of is Francesca Albanese, who has a specific mandate relating to human rights in Palestine. Barume holds an equivalent position relating to the rights of Indigenous peoples around the world, including Māori. Barume's criticisms, contained in a letter to the New Zealand Government, reportedly addressed a range of things, all broadly related to the Government's failure to uphold both te Tiriti o Waitangi and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). We don't know all the details of the letter but the part that seems to have annoyed Seymour relates to the Regulatory Standards Bill. Alongside his comment about New Zealand's sovereignty, Seymour called the letter 'presumptive, condescending, and wholly misplaced'. Remember, there has been virtually unanimous condemnation of the Regulatory Standards Bill by te Tiriti experts, as well as by the Waitangi Tribunal. So, you can decide for yourself whether Seymour's comments are accurate. Didn't the coalition agreements say something about UNDRIP? Yes. The NZ First and Act coalition agreements with National both mention the New Zealand Government should no longer recognise UNDRIP. However, an Official Information Act request last year revealed nothing had been done about it – there was no correspondence with the UN and no express withdrawal of the government's endorsement of UNDRIP. In any case, the rights of Indigenous peoples now carry weight on their own, as they are a recognised set of norms in international law. How did the PM get involved? In comments to reporters this week, the Prime Minister said that Seymour shouldn't have sent the letter because this was Foreign Minister Winston Peters' job. But while initially appearing to criticise Seymour for not following the right process, Luxon then said he 'completely agrees' with Seymour's letter to Barume. He called Barume's letter 'bunkum' and said the special rapporteur's comments were 'completely without substance'. Remember that Barume is appointed as a world-leading expert on these matters, so again, you decide who might be right here. To summarise so far, Seymour – in his capacity as the Minister of Regulation – wrote to a UN official criticising him for criticising New Zealand for breaching Indigenous peoples' rights, and then the Prime Minister publicly agreed with Seymour's comments. Indigenous rights scholar Tina Ngata has pointed out the message from New Zealand that we reject Indigenous peoples' rights therefore isn't a matter of Seymour going rogue. It is a message that comes straight from the top. This matters and is something we should all be embarrassed about. How did the UN find out about this so quickly? This week, an annual meeting was held at the UN by a group called the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (known as EMRIP). On the same day Luxon made his comments, New Zealand had its speaking slot at EMRIP. The Prime Minister's comments were reported by members of the New Zealand delegation to the group, such as Auckland University professor Claire Charters (members are independent, not part of the government). So, the UN, and therefore the rest of the world, heard about it the same day it happened (credit again to Tina Ngata for highlighting this). What's the bigger picture here and what happens next? As much as this might seem like just an egg on your face moment for the government, the broader implications are pretty serious. We all know by now about this Government's willingness to repeatedly disregard its Treaty obligations here at home, with the Waitangi Tribunal conducting an unprecedented number of urgent inquiries in 2024, all of which found breaches of te Tiriti and its principles. But this is bigger. The statement made by Seymour, and later endorsed by the Prime Minister, that the letter from the special rapporteur 'is an affront to New Zealand's sovereignty' will weaken our standing internationally when it comes to human rights. This is because the affront to sovereignty line is one wheeled out any time a country commits human rights abuses and gets told off. Israel and the US, for example, are currently using it in response to Francesca Albanese's criticisms of human rights abuses in Palestine. So, when New Zealand says the same thing, we undermine any moral authority we might have had to call out other countries over other things. This is one of the things Claire Charters pointed out this week when she spoke to EMRIP. It's bigger than just te Tiriti. We'll probably hear more about this in the next few weeks, but sadly it may not persuade the Government to do anything differently. We have seen over and over this term how willing the coalition is to disregard Māori rights. The only difference is that this time it has happened on a global stage.

New Zealand looks to learn from China's technology innovations
New Zealand looks to learn from China's technology innovations

RNZ News

time8 hours ago

  • RNZ News

New Zealand looks to learn from China's technology innovations

From left: Dr Liang Zheng from Tsinghua University, professor Michael Witbrock from the University of Auckland and Suzannah Jessep, chief executive of Asia New Zealand Foundation Photo: RNZ / Liu Chen New Zealand's politicians and business leaders are looking to tap into China's science and technology expertise. Artificial intelligence, robotics, electric vehicles and new forms of energy were frequently referenced by speakers and panelists at the 11th China Business Summit in Auckland on Friday. The event coincided with Technology Minister Shane Reti's announcement of a new institute to advance technology to be created in the country's largest city. Zheng Liang, deputy director of the China Institute for Science and Technology Policy at Tsinghua University, outlined the three stages of China's science and technology development. Initially, China just adopted technology from Western nations before integrating practice from around the world for indigenous innovation, he said. After entering the third stage, China was now striving for breakthroughs in more fundamental research and development, Liang said, adding that AI and electric vehicles were just some of the achievements. "What has made this happen [is] continuous investment in research and development in the past four decades," Liang said. He said ongoing policy support, China's openness to the world and successes in developing an internet economy also drove China's breakthroughs in AI. Liang highlighted China's use of AI in agriculture to help with harvesting, in healthcare to help with diagnosis and treatment, in pharmaceuticals to help with administration and stock control, in tourism to create virtual experiences, as well as in education manufacturing and governance. "I think New Zealand ... [can] do [something] similar," Liang said, pointing to agriculture and tourism specifically. Liang said the two countries complemented each other and could work together. "Maybe China could [provide] some practices [and] experiences, and New Zealand can [offer] the new potential scenarios [in terms of] how to adopt this kind of technology and experience," Liang said. One of Zheng Liang's slides, which outlined some reasons for China's AI breakthroughs. Photo: RNZ / Liu Chen Michael Witbrock, a professor of computer science at the University of Auckland, said New Zealand had "serious AI capability". "We can't replicate the power of AI research of China or the United States or the European Union," Witbrock said. "But we can - and we do - have the capability to significantly contribute to its development and, therefore, be part of determining our future and the future of our fellow humanity. "I hope you'll join us in helping us to build an AI capability in New Zealand ... and to direct it into technology as well for our economic advantage and for hopefully China's economic advantage as well." Witbrock expected growing pains while the country embraced AI but said it was better to face up to challenges. "New Zealand in the past has had a history of facing up to social reality and social change and doing the right thing and doing a thing which has, at those times, actually were periods of great innovation and great growth for New Zealand culture," he said. "I think we can do this again for AI and it's going to happen," Witbrock said. "The sooner we face up to it, the sooner we start to work out [such things as] how does economy work, how does resource allocation work, how do people get what they need to live their lives, the better we'll do. "In that transition period, there are enormous short-term gains for the country as well by ... exploiting ... the economic benefits of those productivity gains." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon speaks with summit chair and moderator Fran O'Sullivan on Friday. Photo: RNZ / Liu Chen Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said China's advancement in technology was "impressive" and "inspiring". "There are some real areas of expertise ... that's coming through some world-class universities, amazing research programmes and then obviously being able to convert that technology," he said. "We need to adopt a lot more technology and science innovation into our system as well because that tells me how we're going to get some of those productivity gains that we're so desperately looking for." Chinese Ambassador Wang Xiaolong speaks at the China Business Summit on Friday. Photo: RNZ / Liu Chen Chinese Ambassador Wang Xiaolong also highlighted China's success in satellite technology, quantum communications and computing, new energy solutions and AI. He said China valued its ties with New Zealand - "a consistent position that remains unchanged". Wang said China was ready to work with New Zealand to benefit people in both countries and to "inject more stability and certainty into this turbulent world".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store