Congress, wake up! Trump, Musk and DOGE are trampling on the Constitution
Have you read the U.S. Constitution? Outside of a high school history class I suspect most citizens haven't bothered. It's a shame, because it is America's chief governing document. All government authority over the people, granted to it by the people themselves, starts with the Constitution. Unfortunately for America, most of the members of Congress assume many of you haven't read it. Truth be told, I'd guess many of them haven't read it either. But by all accounts, they're counting on things staying that way.
Please permit me to give you a terribly brief refresher: Article I creates the legislative branch (Congress), Article II creates the executive branch (President), and Article III creates the federal judicial branch (Supreme Court and inferior courts). There are seven articles, and there have been 27 amendments. Each of the three branches of government have been granted specific powers unique to each one. Just as importantly, each branch has been given powers to check the other branches. Congress gets to make public policy, but if challenged the Supreme Court can decide whether it's constitutional. The Supreme Court gets to decide the constitutionality or legality of certain actions under the law, but has no power to create public policy from whole cloth (someone tell the court that). The president can neither establish public policy nor resolve legal challenges like the Supreme Court, but administers the executive branch charged with carrying out the laws set by Congress.
Maybe you've noticed that our three branches of government aren't functioning quite like they should. In particular, I'm gravely concerned about the Congress — which remains, as ever, asleep at the wheel — and an overeager executive trying to exercise powers it doesn't have.
Gerth: Republican AGs bully Costco over DEI, but can they prove discrimination? | Opinion
In the first month of the Trump administration we've seen a flood of executive orders, some of which are clearly unconstitutional, but I'm especially concerned about the administration's so-called 'DOGE' initiative. Who can really argue with the spirit of making government more efficient? Goodness knows the federal government is full of bloat that frustrates and slows its response often when we need it the most. When government agencies feel compelled to spend enormous sums of taxpayer money on subscriptions to Politico Pro for analysis of the very government they run, the truth about the scope of government becomes self-evident. As Kentucky's own Supreme Court Justice Brandeis once famously wrote, 'sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.' Bring on the sunlight. Eliminate the bloat where you find it.
But sunlight can't shine from behind cloud cover. The president has famously chosen the world's wealthiest human to run the DOGE initiative. We don't know the names of the staff working under Mr. Elon Musk. Have they been vetted for security? Are they federal employees or contractors? At least one shouldn't have passed a standard google search by HR before being hired, desiring to 'normalize' racist hate. Yet he was hired all the same and given unknown access to information affecting all Americans, including those against which he wished to direct and normalize hate.
These staffers have unprecedented access to government and citizen information, and Mr. Musk surely does as well. Mr. Musk also has notorious ties to both the Russian and Chinese governments. Are we OK with his position and access to U.S. government data when he's cozy with two of greatest international villains whose interests are overtly anti-American?
Mitch McConnell: Kentuckians can't afford the high cost of Trump's tariffs | Opinion
Meanwhile, Congress has shown nary an ounce of interest in answering any of these questions. Nineteen states have filed suit to stop DOGE's questionable activities, but curiously Kentucky isn't among them. Thankfully, a judge has, for the moment, hit the brakes long enough to make sure DOGE efforts are by the book.
Seeking out spending with which this administration disagrees is its prerogative, and simply seeking out excess government spending is something I wish every administration would conscientiously do. But these things must still be done above board, right? No one is above the law, and that certainly includes any arm of the executive branch.
I'm fine with a decades overdue review of government waste and bloat, but do Kentucky's members of Congress genuinely feel not an iota of unease about the legality of DOGE's actions? Not one whiff of concern about the security risks posed by an unelected, conflicted bureaucrat with nigh on unlimited access to government records? I'm old enough to remember when Congressional Republicans used to hate those folks and declare them part of the 'deep state.' If Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Barrack Obama or a President Buttigieg and a horde of George Soros hires was doing all this (and rest assured they did or would have) the Republicans in Congress would be having a come apart. Conversely, the Democrats in Congress would take their predicable turn at silence.
Is it too much to ask that members of Congress exercise consistency regardless of what party occupies the White House? One might hope Republicans, who presently control the Congress, would want to assert institutional independence for the sake of our constitutional order, or at least realize the political risks of this administration setting 'a new floor' for the next Democratic one.
In the last few days a handful of ambitious folks have expressed interest in running for the Senate seat currently occupied by Sen. Mitch McConnell should he not run. Some of these are people for whom I have a lot of respect. But so far, they've all fallen over themselves to mention their Trump credentials instead of any desire to exercise the constitutionally independent duties of the office. If that tune doesn't change, I don't have much hope Congress will either.
Agree or disagree? Submit your letter to the editor here
Whitney Westerfield is an evangelical Christian, a three-term Republican state senator and attorney from Christian County. He and his wife live in Western Kentucky and have five children.
This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Trump, Musk need to stop trampling over our Constitution | Opinion

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
8 minutes ago
- CBS News
Rallyers in Denver demonstrating against ICE arrests march down the middle of Lincoln Street
A large gathering that started out at the Colorado State Capitol to rally against the growing numbers of deportations of people in Colorado and the country illegally became a march down a Denver street on Tuesday evening. Demonstrators march down the middle of Lincoln Street in Denver on Tuesday night. CBS Hundreds of protesters first gathered at the Colorado State Capitol at the start of the evening. By 6:15 p.m. they started a march down the middle of Lincoln Street. The march made it temporarily impossible for all lanes of traffic to get through. The White House has directed Immigrations and Customs Enforcement to step up daily arrests. CBS News reports the goal is to make 3,000 arrests a day nationwide. Protesters have also taken to the streets in other cities, including Dallas and San Francisco, and Los Angeles is in the midst of a fifth day of protests over federal immigration raids. On Monday evening in California, tensions boiled over following a day of peaceful demonstrations. President Trump has doubled the number of National Guard troops being sent to patrol the city to 4,000 -- a number that Los Angeles city officials say vastly outnumbers the protesters -- and has said they will remain there indefinitely. There were security concerns leading up to Tuesday's demonstration in Denver, but everything has been peaceful so far. Groups have been protesting ICE for months now, but their message is even louder given the recent events in L.A. In a protest in Aurora on Monday organizers said they want to show solidarity with what's happening in California. Organizers say they're demanding an end to what they call targeted raids in immigrant communities that are tearing families apart. Some people in Denver called for ICE to be abolished altogether, while others want state and local law enforcement to stop cooperating with federal immigration agents. Many in Colorado held signs and chanted against immigration enforcement. One protester said she knows the pain of deportation personally. "My dad was deported a couple years back and I know how it feels to have family separated and struggle with that. And I don't want anybody else to go through that. Because I know my mom suffered. I suffered, and it's really traumatic and I don't want anyone to feel that way," she said. Denver police, Colorado State Patrol, and other agencies say they're monitoring the protest and are ready to respond if necessary.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Associated Press
12 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Takeaways from New Jersey's primaries: GOP nominee's win is also a victory for Trump
NORTH BERGEN, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey primary voters have chosen their GOP nominee — and President Donald Trump notched a win in his endorsement belt — in one of two high-stakes governor's races being held this year. While officials from both parties say November's general election will hinge on local, pocketbook issues, the outcome will also be closely watched as a harbinger of how both parties might fare in next year's midterm elections, and as a test of both Democratic enthusiasm and how the GOP fares without Trump on the ballot. Here are takeaways from Tuesday's primary results: Trump notches a decisive win 2025's off-year elections have been rough for Republicans and Trump. The president went all in on Wisconsin's state Supreme Court race this spring, backing conservative Brad Schimel, even as polls showed Schimel lagging his Democratic-backed rival. Schimel went on to lose by a whopping 10 points, even after billionaire Elon Musk and groups he backed poured $21 million into the race. This time, Trump's chosen candidate, Republican front-runner Jack Ciattarelli, easily won the nomination. 'Jack Ciattarelli is a WINNER, and has my Complete and Total Endorsement – HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN,' Trump wrote in a social media post announcing his endorsement last month. 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, ELECT JACK CIATTARELLI!' After losing in 2021 to term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy by the slimmest of margins, Ciattarelli is hoping his third try for the office will be the charm. The endorsement was a blow, in particular, to Ciattarelli rival Bill Spadea, a conservative radio host who ran by vowing to enthusiastically back the president's agenda. Ciattarelli, he complained in one ad, 'did more than disagree with the president. He disrespected him. Me? I've been a supporter of President Trump since he came down the escalator.' He said voters should feel free to flout Trump's advice: 'I've disagreed with him in the past. It's ok for you to disagree with him now.' Trump alluded to the name dropping during a tele-rally he held on Ciattarelli's behalf. 'Other people are going around saying I endorsed them. That's not true,' he said. Another primary all about Trump Candidates on both sides of the aisle vowed to tackle pocketbook issues, from high property taxes to grocery prices, to housing and health care costs. But Trump loomed large. On the GOP side, most of the candidates professed their allegiances to the president. Ciattarelli said in ads that he would work with Trump and end New Jersey's status as a sanctuary state 'on Day One.' (Currently, the state's attorney general has directed local law enforcement not to assist federal agents in civil immigration matters.) He also pledged to direct his attorney general to end lawsuits filed against the Trump administration, including one challenging Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship. Democrats featured him heavily, too. In one ad, Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill — who won the Democratic primary for New Jersey governor on Tuesday — featured an armada of pickup trucks waving giant Trump flags and warned that, 'Trump's coming for New Jersey with Trump-endorsed Republican Jack Ciattarelli.' 'We've gotta stop them,' it said. In another, she tells viewers, 'I know the world feels like it is on fire right now,' and vows to 'stand up to Trump and Musk with all I've got.' Past insults forgotten Back in 2015, Ciattarelli labeled then-candidate Trump a 'charlatan' who was unfit for the office of the presidency and an embarrassment to the nation. 'Instead of providing the kind of leadership that appeals to the better angels of our nature in calling us to meaningful and just action, Mr. Trump preys upon our worst instincts and fears,' he wrote. When Ciattarelli ran in 2021, he distanced himself from Trump, without the outward insults. Trump nonetheless complained about the treatment on Spadea's radio show last year, saying Ciattarelli 'made some very big mistakes' and would have won had he sought Trump's support. But like Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and so many others, past insults gave way to alliance. Trump offered his enthusiastic backing in a tele-rally, and in his endorsement, said that, 'after getting to know and understand MAGA,' Ciattarelli 'has gone ALL IN, and is now 100% (PLUS!).' A changing state November's presidential election offered warning signs for Democrats in the state. While Trump lost to Democrat Kamala Harris, he did so by only 6 points — a significantly smaller margin than in 2020, when President Joe Biden won by 16 points. 'New Jersey's ready to pop out of that blue horror show,' Trump said in the tele-rally held for Ciattarelli last week. Trump also made stunning gains in several longtime Democratic strongholds, including New Jersey's heavily Latino Passaic County. He carried the city of Passaic and significantly increased his support in Paterson, which is majority Latino and also has a large Muslim community. Indeed, 43% of Latino voters in the state supported Trump, up from 28% in 2020, according to AP VoteCast. November's election will serve as a crucial test for Democrats and whether they can regain Latino support — both in the state and nationally. Strategists, unions, organizers and politicians so far were pivoting away from immigration and focusing on pocketbook concerns in their appeals. 'At the end of the day, if you're worried about paying your bills and being safe at night, everything else is secondary,' Rep. Josh Gottheimer, one of the Democratic candidates, told the AP. 'I think that is front and center in the Latino community.' One exception was Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who was arrested while trying to join an oversight tour of a 1,000-bed immigrant detention center. A trespass charge was later dropped, but he sued interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba over the dropped prosecution. In one of his final campaign ads in Spanish, he used footage from the arrest to cast himself as a reluctant warrior, with text saying he is 'El Único,' Spanish for 'the only one,' who confronts Trump.