Calls to restore 'unique' aspect of Glasgow shopping centre
Yet, time has taken its toll — and the pendulum no longer serves as a living science experiment in Glasgow City Centre.
For the last several years; it has been dormant, frozen.
It is my first time in Princes Square and as I ride an escalator to the basement level, I'm keen to see what the fuss is all about.
Because after years of inactivity, science-minded Glaswegians have launched a campaign to get the pendulum swinging again.
The pendulum, viewed from above. (Image: Josh Pizzuto-Pomaco) Glasgow City Heritage Trust boss Niall Murphy tells me that he first noticed the pendulum was no longer working while he was at lunch in the gallery last week. After checking the weight, he found it had been deactivated.
Created as an experiment by French scientist Leon Foucault 170 years ago, the pendulum's oscillation over a 24 hour period demonstrates the Earth's rotation. There are at least 130 Foucault pendulums across Europe, including 12 in the UK.
Murphy tells me: 'The pendulum is part of the original set-up in Princes Square. It's one of the small details that make the space feel very special and adds to the sense of place.
'It was made by the California Academy of Science in San Francisco back in the 1980s, around the same time 'Foucault's Pendulum' by Umberto Eco was written, funnily enough. It has travelled a long way to be here.'
Murphy says the shopping centre, which was named as Scotland's favourite building in 2016, is a 'great place' and 'fantastic space' which houses a lot of unique details paying homage to the city's artistic history.
Sitting adjacent to Buchanan Street, the shell of the building was designed in the 1840s, before being renovated and covered with a glass atrium in the late 1980s. The site was sold to property developers M Core in 2024.
'It is a really good example of a postmodern space in the city. Ironically, directly opposite from where the pendulum is in the basement there is a heritage wall,' Murphy notes, 'which highlights all the different and unique features of the building.'
The pendulum was installed in the 1980s, as this photo shows. (Image: Josh Pizzuto-Pomaco) The pendulum is easy enough to find, located at the centre of the building and wedged in between seating for Zibibbo and il Pavone restaurants.
Patrons sip cocktails and nibble on tapas as I peer at the abandoned pendulum, snapping photos from several angles. I must look quite strange.
Ironically, the wall that Murphy mentioned hails the pendulum as a key 'design feature' of the building, with one excerpt stating: 'In 1851, Jean Bernard Leon Foucault, the French physicist, demonstrated a free-swinging pendulum suspended from the dome of the Pantheon in Paris to conclusively prove that the Earth rotates.
'A weight suspended in this manner continues swinging in one direction relative to the sun while the Earth rotates. The northern hemisphere's anti-clockwise rotations produce an apparent clockwise rotation of the pendulum. Magnets have been mounted at the tip of the cable to counteract air resistance and gravity.'
A petition calling on the centre's owners to reactivate the pendulum was created in July 2023, but lay dormant until a surge of interest this week.
Paul Sweeney MSP, who is keenly aware of the importance of retaining Glasgow's heritage, tells me he is backing the petition.
He said: 'Glasgow is lucky to have a Foucault Pendulum in Princes Square, but it is a shame to see it is no longer working.
'Reactivating the pendulum would be tremendous for Glasgow. It would allow Glaswegians to continue to marvel at the remarkable scientific discovery, and it would show a willingness to preserve scientific heritage in public spaces.
'I will be writing to the management of Princes Square to ask them to ensure that the pendulum is in working order and I encourage people to take a few minutes to sign the petition."
Read more from Josh Pizzuto-Pomaco:
Top Scottish universities to review trans policies after Supreme Court ruling
Time to 'reflect and remember' says artist behind Perthshire Covid installation
Glasgow drivers racked up £1.7m in LEZ fines since 2023, figures show
'Troubling direction' or 'targeting exploitation': Gen Z debates Unbuyable bill
In the depths of Princes Square, huddled between tables of people eating lunch and the hurried footsteps of passersby, I gaze at the pendulum, now still. I'm met with a wave of nostalgia.
You see, this is all oddly familiar.
Growing up near Philadelphia, a highlight of the school calendar was a trip to the Franklin Institute, an ornate science centre named after Benjamin Franklin, he of key and kite.
At the heart of the museum, near the IMAX screen and planetarium, hangs a Foucualt pendulum, four stories off the ground. It has swung for more than 80 years, with a 85 foot wire pulling a 180 pound orb from side to side.
It's a memory I have tucked away in the back of my psyche, faint and faded — but the magic remains.
Sadly, that sense of wonder appears to have been lost in some quarters.
The Benjamin Franklin Institute is located in Philadelphia. (Image: Dan Mall/Unsplash) As campaign organiser Ethan Slater wrote on Change.org: 'The motionless Foucault's Pendulum in Princes Square has left a lasting impact on those who frequent the area. Its stillness has deprived people of a captivating spectacle.
'The absence of this intriguing pendulum robs the community of a unique educational and cultural experience, as it once served as a source of wonder and curiosity, especially for students and science enthusiasts.'
This is an issue which goes behind the glass walls of Princes Square.
As Murphy notes, the fate of the pendulum mimics what is taking place across the city, as historic motifs and architectural flourishes are being removed.
The heritage boss tells me: 'There are a lot of details in the building which are all to do with the Tree of Life — a lot of Mackintosh's designs play on this theme.
'Some of these details are being lost — they've been covered over and are disappearing. It's somewhat depressing.
'It's unfortunate, because features like the pendulum add to the sense of place for these buildings. But no one seems to care. We need to fight against this attitude.'
Indeed, apathy is one of the biggest challenges in the battle to maintain the built fabric of Glasgow.
How do we convince Glaswegians that beauty deserves to be protected, that the buildings around us tell a deeper story, one which is lost when they end up gutted or on the scrap heap?
Perhaps, it is as simple as looking up — and embracing the magic and wonder once again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Super Earth in ‘Goldilocks zone' discovered with new alien-hunting tool – now it will search for more habitable planets
Located in the Lyra constellation, the Super Earth planet completes an orbit of its nearby star every 207.5 days ET PHONE HOME Super Earth in 'Goldilocks zone' discovered with new alien-hunting tool – now it will search for more habitable planets Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SCIENTISTS have stumbled across a new Super-Earth that orbits inside its star's habitable zone with a new alien-hunting tool. Searching for Earth-like planets - and Earth-like life - is the ultimate goal for planetary science. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Located in the Lyra constellation, the Super Earth planet completes an orbit of its nearby star every 207.5 days Credit: Alamy 3 An artist's impression of Kepler-725b, a gas giant planet in the same system And finding planets that lie in the Goldilocks zone of their sun-like stars – where the conditions are 'just right' to possibly host life – is key to that mission. An international team of scientists, led by the Yunnan Observatories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), have used a new technique to find these potentially habitable worlds. It's called the Transit Timing Variation (TTV) technique - which looks for changes in the predicted transit times of an exoplanet. If the time changes, it could indicate the presence of other unseen planets in the system that are gravitationally influencing the transiting planet. The technique is a good way to detect smaller planets that would otherwise be difficult to find By analysing the TTV signals of Kepler-725b, a gas giant planet in the same system, the team were able to find its hidden sister planet Kepler-725c, according to a new study published in Nature Astronomy. Researchers said the technique offers a promising alternative in the hunt for "Earth 2.0." Kepler-725c has 10 times the mass of Earth and is located in the habitable zone of the sun-like star Kepler-725. It receives roughly 1.4 times the solar radiation than Earth does. Best-ever sign of ALIEN life found on distant planet as scientists '99.7% sure of astounding biological activity signal' Located in the Lyra constellation, the Super Earth planet completes an orbit of its nearby star every 207.5 days. During part of this orbit, the planet enters its star's habitable zone - meaning it could host alien life. Little else is known about the planet so far. It is the first time it has been used to discover a Super-Earth, a type of rocky exoplanet that is larger than Earth but too small to be considered a gas giant like Neptune. Astronomers have relied on alternative techniques to find exoplanets for decades. Like the transit method, where astronomers track how the light from a host star dims when a planet passes in front of it. Or through radial velocity (RV) observations, which is when scientists watch the slight wobble of a star as it interacts with the gravitational pull of an orbiting planet. However, both of these techniques have their flaws and make it difficult to detect planets with long orbital periods. The transit approach, for example, requires a planet's orbit to align exactly with our line of sight from Earth. Whereas the RV method requires extremely high-precision measurements, which makes it harder to find smaller planets. 3 An artist's impression of the Kepler-725 system - the small planet in the lower right is the newly discovered Super-Earth in the habitable zone Credit: Gu Shenghong All you need to know about planets in our solar system Our solar system is made up of nine planets with Earth the third closest to the Sun. But each planet has its own quirks, so find out more about them all... How old is Earth? Plus other facts on our planet How many moons does Mercury have? What colour is Venus? How far away is Mars to Earth? And other facts on the red planet How big is Jupiter? How many moons does Saturn have? Does Uranus have rings? How many moons does Neptune have? How big is Pluto? How hot is the Sun?
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Scientists use giant magnets to solve a 20-year-old dark matter mystery
Physicists are always searching for new theories to improve our understanding of the universe and resolve big unanswered questions. But there's a problem. How do you search for undiscovered forces or particles when you don't know what they look like? Take dark matter. We see signs of this mysterious cosmic phenomenon throughout the universe, but what could it possibly be made of? Whatever it is, we're going to need new physics to understand what's going on. Thanks to a new experimental result published today, and the new theoretical calculations that accompany it, we may now have an idea what this new physics should look like – and maybe even some clues about dark matter. Meet the muon For 20 years, one of the most promising signs of new physics has been a tiny inconsistency in the magnetism of a particle called the muon. The muon is a lot like an electron but is much heavier. Muons are produced when cosmic rays – high-energy particles from space – hit Earth's atmosphere. Roughly 50 of these muons pass through your body every second. Muons travel through solid objects much better than x-rays, so they are useful for finding out what is inside large structures. For example, they have been used to look for hidden chambers in Egyptian and Mexican pyramids; to study magma chambers inside volcanoes to predict volcanic eruptions; and to safely see inside the Fukushima nuclear reactor after it melted down. A tiny crack in physics? In 2006, researchers at Brookhaven National Laboratory in the United States measured the strength of the muon's magnetism incredibly precisely. Their measurement was accurate to roughly six parts in 10 billion. This is equivalent to measuring the mass of a loaded freight train to ten grams. This was compared to a similarly impressive theoretical calculation. When researchers compared the two numbers, they found a tiny but significant difference, indicating a mismatch between theory and experiment. Had they finally found the new physics they'd been looking for? A better experiment To find a definitive answer, the international scientific community started a 20-year programme to increase the precision of both results. The huge electromagnet from the original experiment was loaded onto a barge and shipped down the east coast of the US and then up the Mississippi River to Chicago. There, it was installed at Fermilab for a completely overhauled experiment. Just this morning, researchers announced they had finished that experiment. Their final result for the strength of the muon's magnetism is 4.4 times more precise, at one-and-a-half parts in 10 billion. And better calculations To keep up, theorists had to make sweeping improvements too. They formed the Muon g-2 Theory Initiative, an international collaboration of more than 100 scientists, dedicated to making an accurate theoretical prediction. They computed the contributions to the muon's magnetism from more than 10,000 factors. They even included a particle called the Higgs boson, which was only discovered in 2012. But there was one last sticking point: the strong nuclear force, one of the universe's four fundamental forces. In particular, computing the largest contribution to the result from the strong nuclear force was no easy feat. Antimatter vs supercomputers It was not possible to compute this contribution in the same way as the others, so we needed a different approach. In 2020, the Theory Initiative turned to collisions between electrons and their antimatter counterparts: positrons. Measurements of these electron–positron collisions provided the missing values we needed. Put together with all the other parts, this gave a result that strongly disagreed with the latest experimental measurement. The disagreement was almost strong enough to announce the discovery of new physics. At the same time, I was exploring a different approach. Along with my colleagues in the Budapest-Marseille-Wuppertal collaboration, we performed a supercomputer simulation of this strong contribution. Our result eliminated the tension between theory and experiment. However, now we had a new tension: between our simulation and the electron–positron results which had withstood 20 years of scrutiny. How could those 20-year-old results be wrong? Hints of new physics disappear Since then, two other groups have produced full simulations that agree with ours, and many more have validated parts of our result. We have also produced a new, overhauled simulation that almost doubles our precision (released as a preprint, which has not yet been peer-reviewed or published in a scientific journal). To ensure these new simulations weren't affected by any preconceptions, they were performed 'blind'. The simulation data was multiplied by an unknown number before being analysed, so we didn't know what a 'good' or 'bad' result would be. We then held a nerve-wracking and exciting meeting. The blinding factor was revealed, and we found out the results of years of work all at once. After all this, our latest result agrees even better with the experimental measurement of the muon's magnetism. But others emerge The Muon g-2 Theory Initiative has moved to using the simulation results instead of the electron-positron data in its official prediction, and the hint of new physics seems to be gone. Except … why does the electron–positron data disagree? Physicists around the globe have studied this question extensively, and one exciting suggestion is a hypothetical particle called a 'dark photon'. Not only could the dark photon explain the difference between the latest muon results and the electron–positron experiments, but (if it exists) it could also explain how dark matter relates to ordinary matter.
BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Stunning aurora filmed from space
This brilliant aurora footage was captured from space following a huge geomagnetic was shared by NASA astronaut, Anne McClain, who is onboard the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft, docked with the International Space Station.
