
Declassified 1993 CIA study on the possibility of war between India and Pakistan
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has recently declassified a National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) prepared by it in 1993 to evaluate the possibility of war between India and Pakistan in the 1990s. The document was cleared to be released in February 2025 and is now available on US government websites. With India and Pakistan locked in yet another confrontation, which may bring the two countries to war or at least on the brink of it, it is interesting to notice that many of the postulates mentioned in the three-decades-old dossier still hold true.
While the NIE gave a low probability of a conventional war taking place between the two countries in that period of time, it rates the possibility of war between India and Pakistan as about 1 in 5. It also pointed out that war could still happen due to a variety of factors, one of which could be a 'spectacular terror outrage that one side believed the other directed or abetted'.
'Indian security personnel are fighting an insurgency (in Jammu and Kashmir) that appears to have no end. Firing incidents along the Line of Control are common, particularly in the spring when militants begin their seasonal infiltrations across the Line of Control. In our judgment, Indian security forces can prevent Kashmir's secession or its acquisition by Pakistan, but these forces will not be able to defeat the insurgency in this decade,' the NIE says.
It goes on to say that Kashmiri militants have the staying power to tie down substantial numbers of Indian security personnel. 'New Delhi will continue efforts begun last spring to establish a dialogue with Kashmiris with the goal of ultimately holding state elections. New Delhi hopes that divisions among the militants and war weariness among Kashmiris will work in its favor. These efforts to restart the political process in the war-torn state probably will falter because Kashmiri moderates have been weakened by New Delhi's tough security policies and because Kashmiri hardliners are intransigent,' the report says.
It mentions that Pakistan uses the Kashmir issue as a foreign policy bludgeon against India. Whenever discontent in Jammu and Kashmir erupts, Islamabad highlights the problem and demands international action favourable to Pakistan's interests in the dispute, the report says.
pointed out that war could still happen due to a variety of factors, one of which could be a 'spectacular terror outrage that one side believed the other directed or abetted'. (Express Photo)
'New Delhi and Islamabad are unlikely to stop supporting secessionist and other militants in each other's territory. Pakistan has had a more aggressive campaign than has India. Pakistan wants the secession of Kashmir and has a receptive audience there. India has supported ethnic separatists in Pakistan, but the effort has been comparatively small. India has no desire to annex Pakistani territory. Both sides will be wary that extremist attacks could invite military retaliation or US sanctions,' says the report.
'War is probably not on the horizon'
The NIE says that despite these flashpoints, overall, the possibility of war between India and Pakistan is about 1 in 5 for the following reasons:
Leaders on each side will fear the other's nuclear weapons potential and thus will be cautious about risking a conflict that could escalate to the nuclear level.
Key Indian and Pakistani leaders are deeply concerned that a fourth war cannot be kept limited.
The likely deployment of nuclear-capable missiles and development of nuclear warheads before the end of the decade will increase bilateral tensions but should, in the long run, provide a more credible deterrent, particularly for Pakistan.
Military leaders will exercise caution because they know they cannot achieve victory at an acceptable cost. Both militaries will remain ill-equipped for war. Budget constraints, supply disruptions, and the burden of internal security duties will continue to undermine readiness.
India outnumbers Pakistan in almost every category of military capability – a disparity not likely to change in this decade. India, however, has no overriding strategic interest in initiating a war with Pakistan.
Pakistani military leaders probably believe that another conflict with India could well destroy the Pakistan military, if not the state.
'But war may still break out'
The NIE also gives out arguments in support of its hypothesis on why war could still break out between India and Pakistan. It states that Pakistani war plans call for pre-emptive strikes against Indian forces if Pakistani leaders are convinced an all-out attack is imminent because Pakistan lacks the strategic depth to absorb such an attack.
The report says war could also take place under the following conditions:
If India's military leaders were convinced – rightly or wrongly – that Pakistani units were preparing another conventional assault on Kashmir, they probably would order armoured strike units into wartime positions in Punjab and Rajasthan. That, in turn, would prompt Pakistani counter moves.
A spectacular terrorist outrage that one side believed the other directed or abetted.
An Indian military cross-border action, for example, to close infiltration routes along the Line of Control or to punish Pakistan for supporting terrorism.
The NIE also touches upon the two incidents, which had taken place a few years earlier, that brought the two countries to the brink of war.
'Indo-Pakistani crises of 1987 and 1990 were symptomatic of the deep suspicions each side harbors about the other's intentions. In early 1987, India's BRASSTACKS military exercises precipitated a high-stakes game of military brinkmanship.
'Diplomatic intervention by Pakistan's martial law ruler defused tensions and allowed both sides to step back from the brink. Two years later, Pakistan staged its own major exercise, 'Strike of the Believers' (Exercise Zarb-e-Momin),' the NIE says.
The NIE says the 1990 crisis stemmed from India's deployment of additional troops to Kashmir. 'The Pakistan Army's subsequent preparations for a major summer training exercise – probably intended to send a message to New Delhi – and Indian assessments of unusually large Pakistani force deployments in late April caused alarm in New Delhi. India then deployed armored, artillery, and infantry units closer to the border,' it says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
11 minutes ago
- News18
Who Is Paul Kapur? Trump's Indian-Origin Pick As Key Diplomat For South Asian Affairs
Last Updated: Paul Kapur is a South Asia security expert and professor at the US Naval Postgraduate School, known for his work on nuclear policy and regional strategy. Paul Kapur, US President Donald Trump's nominee for South Asia, said India and the United States share common interests like a free and open Indo-Pacific, which is not dominated by China, along with expanding trade, tech sharing, and access to energy. Speaking at an event, Trump's Indian-origin nominee also said that he would 'pursue security cooperation where it is beneficial to the US interest, seeking opportunities for bilateral collaboration in trade and investment". 'We will promote long-standing security interests with India, Pakistan through the pursuit of peace and stability and fight against terrorism," Kapur said. WHO IS PAUL KAPUR? Security expert Paul Kapur was nominated by Trump as the Assistant Secretary of State for South Asian Affairs in February this year. If his nomination is confirmed, Kapur would succeed Donald Lu, who completed his term on January 17, 2025. Paul Kapur is known for his extensive research on South Asian security and nuclear policy, and works as a professor in the Department of National Security Affairs at the US Naval Postgraduate School. Additionally, Paul also played a key role in shaping US foreign policy on South and Central Asia. Kapur studied for his BA at Amherst College and did his PhD at the University of Chicago. According to some media reports, Kapur has authored multiple influential publications on South Asian security, nuclear policy, and international relations. His books include Jihad as Grand Strategy: Islamist Militancy, National Security, and the Pakistani State (Oxford University Press, 2016), Dangerous Deterrent: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation and Conflict in South Asia (Stanford University Press, 2007), India, Pakistan, and the Bomb: Debating Nuclear Stability in South Asia (Columbia University Press, 2010), and The Challenges of Nuclear Security: US and Indian Perspectives (Palgrave MacMillan, 2024). Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!


Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
India needs better regulatory framework to attract investments: Swiss diplomat
Switzerland's State Secretary for Economic Affairs Helene Budliger Artieda has said a good regulatory framework and cut in red tape in India is important to attract Swiss investments. She said businesses here have raised concerns about bureaucratic hurdles. India and the four European nation bloc EFTA has signed a free trade agreement on March 10, 2024, which is expected to come into force from October 1. Under the pact, India has received an investment commitment of USD 100 billion in 15 years from the grouping while allowing several products such as Swiss watches, chocolates, and cut and polished diamonds at lower or zero duties. Also Read: India is a preferred place for Swiss businesses: State Secretary for Economic Affairs Live Events The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) members are Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland. She said for USD 100 billion investments, "we need to have the best framework conditions and this was part of the business roundtable meeting in the presence of Minister Goyal". "That will be important that red tape will be cut as much as possible. Even in Switzerland, companies always complain that there is too much red tape. It will be very important that India creates a good framework for Swiss investments to come in," she told reporters here after meeting Goyal on June 10. The Indian minister was here on a two-day official visit to meet businesses to attract investments into India. On the issue of Swiss government suspending the most favoured nation (MFN) status clause in the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Switzerland, Artieda said there has been some misunderstanding on this. "But it really has no connection whatsoever... I think it's important to know that both India and Switzerland share a double taxation treaty and that treaty is valid and that means there will not be any issue," she said. In a statement in December 2024, the Swiss government announced the suspension of the MFN clause in the DTAA between India and Switzerland, potentially impacting Swiss investments in India and leading to higher taxes on Indian companies operating in the European nation. She also said implementation of the trade agreement will help increase exports of Swiss watches and chocolates in India. Also Read: Govt may help MSMEs register products abroad: Piyush Goyal Swiss companies will have the advantage of preferred access to markets in India for both watches and chocolates due to this pact. Further she added that Switzerland is confident of achieving the USD 100 billion investment commitment in 15 years in India. "I am very confident we will achieve that," she said. India-EFTA two-way trade was USD 18.65 billion in 2022-23 (of this, USD 17.14 billion with Switzerland) compared to USD 27.23 billion in 2021-22. The trade deficit was USD 14.8 billion in the last fiscal year. In 2024-25, India's imports from EFTA bloc increased to USD 22.5 billion from USD 22 billion in 2023-24. Exports stood at USD 1.96 billion in the last fiscal year, up from USD 1.94 billion in 2023-24. Switzerland is the largest trading partner of India in the bloc, followed by Norway. EFTA countries are not part of the European Union (EU). It is an inter-governmental organisation for the promotion and intensification of free trade. It was founded as an alternative for states that did not wish to join the European community. India is negotiating a comprehensive free trade agreement separately with the EU -- the 27-nation bloc. India has received about USD 10.83 billion in foreign direct investments (FDI) from Switzerland between April 2000 and March 2025. It is the 12th largest investor in India. The FDI inflow was USD 931.88 million from Norway, USD 29.41 million from Iceland and USD 105.93 million from Liechtenstein during the period.


NDTV
14 minutes ago
- NDTV
Is America Still Worth It?
What do Sundar Pichai, Amartya Sen, Indra Nooyi, Raghuram Rajan and Arvind Krishna have in common? Apart from being global icons of Indian stock, they all polished their brains at top American universities. A PhD from MIT launched Raghuram Rajan into the upper echelons of global economic thinking, from the IMF to the RBI. Sundar Pichai's Stanford and Wharton degrees were stepping stones to becoming Google's boss. Indra Nooyi earned her MBA from Yale before reshaping PepsiCo. Arvind Krishna, who heads IBM, trained at the University of Illinois, while Nobel laureate Amartya Sen's ideas on justice and welfare economics were sharpened at Harvard. Each one is a testament to how American classrooms have shaped Indian minds that now influence the world. And it doesn't stop there. Walk through the halls of Harvard or UC San Diego, and you will find Indian names carved into the very architecture of academia. There's the Lakshmi Mittal South Asia Institute at Harvard, funding cutting-edge research on the subcontinent. Or the Narayana Murthy Fellowship at Wharton, encouraging the next generation of entrepreneurial leaders. And in sunny California, the Tata Institute for Genetics and Society is helping scientists rethink the future of human biology. Indian students and philanthropists aren't just attending US universities - they are investing in them, expanding them, and in many ways, helping define their future. But the question is what do aspiring Indian students do now in the face of American universities being under siege - not just by budget cuts or what some might call culture wars, but by a calculated political offensive? The Trump administration insists it is punishing campuses for alleged antisemitism (read pro-Gaza demonstrations) and so-called "anti-white racism" (a swipe at diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives). But at its core, this is an attack on academic freedom and free expression - two pillars of higher learning that have long defined American intellectual life, no matter which of the two main parties the previous presidents belonged to or which ideological belief they subscribed to. But Trump is being Trump. He isn't making history, he's reversing it. His actions are damaging the very institutions that have been central to America's global prestige: its diplomacy, its alliances, its prestigious campuses, its free press and its cultural and scientific soft power. He isn't rebuilding a fallen empire; he's dismantling the decades-old edifice of high learning. Indian Students To Suffer And nowhere is the collateral damage felt more acutely than in the homes of Indian families who once viewed a US degree as the surest ticket to global success. President Trump's strategy is clear. By targeting elite institutions like Harvard and Columbia - places symbolic of intellectual independence and academic brilliance - the administration is striking fear into the wider academic ecosystem. Going after big names guarantees headlines while sending a chilling message to smaller, less protected universities: fall in line or face the consequences. The effects of this political theatre are already being felt on the ground. In a move that seemed bureaucratic on the surface but has far deeper implications the Trump administration has quietly instructed US embassies worldwide - including in India - to halt all student visa interview appointments. Officially, the freeze is linked to enhanced social media vetting. Embassies are now required to comb through years of online activity before granting a visa. Applicants must submit their handles dating back to 2019, with the State Department stating it will 'use all available information' in its assessments. What kind of content might raise a red flag? No one knows. But in an age where political expression and youth activism are often lived online, the message is clear: be careful what you post or risk your academic future. For thousands of Indian students, many of whom spend lakhs of rupees preparing for admission exams, shortlisting universities and securing funding, the disruption is more than an inconvenience. It is a psychological blow. Indian families plan years in advance for these opportunities. When visa appointments disappear and bureaucratic fog descends, it isn't just a delay - it is a dream deferred. The Pivot Away From The US In 2023, Indian students overtook Chinese nationals to become the largest international student group in the US, with more than 3.3 lakh enrolments. They are widely seen, even by US officials, as a pillar of the international student community: academically rigorous, culturally adaptable and socially responsible. And they are not just participants; they are contributors. International students often pay higher tuition fees, making up a crucial slice of universities' operating budgets. They are also overrepresented in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, often staying on to fuel the US innovation economy. And yet, their value is being dangerously overlooked. Harvard, in particular, has become a lightning rod. The Trump administration's attempt to block it from enrolling international students - now temporarily halted by court order - has caused widespread alarm. In Indian living rooms and WhatsApp groups, parents and students alike are beginning to ask the unthinkable: is the US still worth it? Many are already pivoting. A recent analysis in the Indian media estimated a 28% drop in Indian enrolments in the US for 2025, with students increasingly turning to the UK, Europe, Australia, and Canada. These countries may not offer the same cultural dominance or depth of alumni networks, but at least for now, they don't appear to be waging war on their own universities. Understand The Nuance What makes this all the more worrying is the broader ignorance outside the US about what's really happening within its academic institutions. International policymakers and even journalists often fail to grasp the nuance of the crisis. Few have sought the views of the faculty themselves - the professors and researchers who navigate complex institutional politics, face differing levels of protection based on gender, race or visa status and are now working under a cloud of fear and uncertainty. Trump's assault on higher education is not just a domestic issue. It's a global disruption. By weaponising immigration policy and framing liberal education as a threat to national identity, the US risks alienating the very people who once upheld its intellectual dominance. It is no longer just about visas and protests - it is about whether the American classroom remains a space for free thinking and global talent. And if it isn't, others are ready to fill the void. China, for all its surveillance and control, is investing heavily in its research universities. The UK is relaxing visa rules to court more Indian and African students. Even countries like Germany and the Netherlands are angling to offer English-language programmes and attract top talent from Asia. America's loss may well be their gain. The Shift Is Already Underway In the years to come, the world may see fewer Sundar Pichais, Indra Nooyis, Raghuram Rajans and Arvind Krishnas emerging from America's famed campuses. But perhaps we will see more Dr. Manmohan Singhs, Shashi Tharoors, and Rahul Bajajs - exceptional minds shaped by the equally esteemed institutions of the UK. Ultimately, Donald Trump's most lasting legacy may not be a law or a border wall, but the slow, silent exodus of brilliant young talent - students who once saw America as the ultimate destination, and are now looking elsewhere. That shift is already underway. An Opportunity For India As elite American universities come under political siege, India should seize the moment at home. With US campuses facing clampdowns on academic freedom, student expression and international mobility, India has a chance to position itself as a credible alternative. By investing heavily in research ecosystems, innovative education models and globally competitive institutions, India can attract not only its own aspiring scholars but also foreign talent disillusioned with the West's shifting academic climate. This isn't a far-fetched dream. India already boasts an expanding network of top-tier institutions - from the IITs and IIMs to the Indian Institute of Science and Ashoka University - and a vast pool of English-speaking faculty and students. What's needed now is visionary policy, generous research funding and a reimagining of education as a pillar of soft power. If the US is seen as closing its gates to ideas and talent, India can be the country that opens them, not just for Indians, but for the world.