Gen Z shows more interest in SIPs, but millennials prefer protection tools like health & term insurance: Survey
India's
Gen Z
is more inclined toward investment tools like SIPs (Systematic Investment Plans) and stocks, while a higher percentage of Millennials prefer protection tools like health and term insurance, highlighted a survey by Insurance aggregator Policybazaar.
The report also noted that Gen Z still lagging awareness and understanding of insurance products.
According to the findings, 19 per cent of Gen Z reported investing in SIPs, compared to 14 per cent of Millennials. Stocks were also more popular among the younger group, with 15 per cent investing in stocks, as against 13 per cent of Millennials.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You
Mobility Scooter | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
However, when it comes to protection tools like insurance, Gen Z seems less involved. Only 19 per cent of Gen Z considered purchasing term insurance, much lower than 35 per cent among Millennials.
The report stated "Gen Z focuses more on investment tools like SIPs and stocks, while a higher percentage of Millennials prefer protection tools like health and term insurance"
Live Events
The survey, conducted in May-June 2025 on 4,620 respondents across India, compared the insurance awareness and investment habits of Gen Z (18-28 years) and Millennials (29-43 years).
Health insurance
, however, is the most considered insurance product for both groups, 61 per cent of Gen Z and 63 per cent of Millennials have either purchased or thought about purchasing it.
A major gap is seen in confidence levels. While Gen Z feels relatively confident in their understanding of health insurance (32 per cent very confident), they lack similar confidence in term insurance. In contrast, Millennials showed greater confidence in understanding term insurance products.
One positive trend among Gen Z is their belief in buying insurance early. About 78 per cent believe that the ideal age to get health insurance is before 30, compared to 44 per cent of Millennials. Similarly, 72 per cent of Gen Z feel term insurance should be bought before the age of 30.
The survey also found that both generations prefer online sources to learn about insurance. Gen Z leans heavily on YouTube (46 per cent) and shows a growing interest in using generative AI, while Millennials rely more on Google Search (40 per cent).
Still, half of all respondents said they weren't taught about insurance in school. Yet, 85 per cent of Gen Z and 75 per cent of Millennials believe it is important to teach insurance concepts at the school level.
While Gen Z's early investment habits reflect financial awareness, the gap in insurance education and understanding shows there is still a long way to go in building a financially secure and insurance-aware generation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Adopt risk-based supervision, zero-trust approach to curb cyberfrauds: RBI
The Reserve Bank on Monday made a case for adopting risk-based supervision , zero-trust approaches and AI-aware defense strategies to tackle online frauds and boost cybersecurity resilience in the financial sector. The central bank flagged that phishing and social engineering attacks are evolving through generative AI-powered methods, such as deepfakes and contextual frauds. "The expanding scale of digital financial services, cloud-based infrastructure and interconnected systems across sectors has exponentially increased the cyberattack surface," said the RBI's bi-annual the Financial Stability Report (FSR). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Undo It further said given the systemic interconnectedness of financial entities and technology service providers, ensuring cyber resilience is critical to maintaining trust, stability and business continuity. As organisations increasingly depend on third party service providers for their business operations, vulnerabilities in the supply chain could pose systemic risk. Live Events Furthermore, the RBI said the overreliance on a few major IT and cloud service providers has created dependency and vendor lock-in problems leading to concentration risks. Vulnerability in one system can quickly propagate across networks, affecting multiple entities, the report said. "In this context, cybersecurity resilience will depend on the Security Operations Center (SOC) efficacy, risk-based supervision, zero-trust approaches and AI-aware defence strategies," it said. Graded monitoring mechanisms, the use of behavioral analytics for threat detection, hands-on training, continuous learning and simulation-based exercises such as through Continuous Assessment-Based Red Teaming (CART), scenario-based resilience drills and uniform incident reporting frameworks are vital for enhancing the resilience of the digital ecosystem, it said. The Financial Stability Report (FSR) reflects the collective assessment of the Sub-Committee of the Financial Stability and Development Council (FSDC) on the resilience of the Indian financial system and risks to financial stability. The RBI also said regulators are aligned with these efforts, focusing on digital fraud prevention, secure digital lending, and mutual fund reforms. The FSDC and its sub-committee continues to play a vital role in building a resilient and secure financial system. The report further said the rapid growth of digital transactions, though instrumental in enhancing convenience and efficiency, has been accompanied by a significant rise in financial frauds.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump responds to Elon Musk's latest comments on ‘big beautiful bill': 'He got a little bit upset, and that...'
elon musk donald trump US President Donald Trump has responded to Elon Musk 's recent criticism of the " big beautiful bill ", maintaining a positive view of the Tesla CEO despite disagreeing with his comments. Trump called Mus a 'wonderful guy' and that 'he got a little upset' highlighting that 'the EV mandate is a tough thing for him.' "I think he's a wonderful guy. I haven't spoken to him much, but I think Elon is a wonderful guy, and I know he's going to do well always,' Trump told Fox News' Maria Bartiromo, referring to Musk, on Sunday (June 29). 'He's a smart guy. And he actually went and campaigned with me and this and that. But he got a little bit upset, and that wasn't appropriate,' Trump added. Trump suggested that Musk's dissatisfaction stemmed from the proposed cuts to the Biden administration's EV tax credits. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like New Launch: 2/3/4 BHK Luxury in Panvel L&T Panvel Enquire Now Undo 'Look, the electric vehicle mandate, the EV mandate, is a tough thing for him. I would, you know, I don't want everybody to have to have an electric car,' Trump explained. What Elon Musk said about 'big beautiful bill' Trump's praise followed a renewed attack by Musk on Saturday (June 28). He posted on X that the pending bill 'will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country. Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Elon Musk's relationship with President Donald Trump appeared to sour earlier this month following a series of sharp criticisms leveled by Musk against Trump's proposed tax bill on X. Musk characterised Trump's bill as a "MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK." On June 5, Musk further claimed significant influence over past election outcomes, asserting in an X post, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' He later retracted his comments and expressed regret on 'some of my posts about President DonaldTrump last week,' The bill is currently awaiting a Senate vote. OnePlus Bullets Wireless Z3: Why This Neckband Still ROCKS in a TWS World! AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘If India removes tariffs, then cheap…': GTRI warns of huge risks to lowering duties on US farm goods amidst trade deal talks; here's what could go wrong
GTRI cautions that permanent reduction of agricultural tariffs would be both irreversible and strategically unsound. (AI image) India-US trade deal talks: Under the proposed India-US trade agreement, India must maintain its agricultural policy stance, as lowering import duties on US farm products could pose risks to national food security, according to GTRI. The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) cautions that permanent reduction of agricultural tariffs in the India-US free trade agreement (FTA) would be both irreversible and strategically unsound. GTRI warns that eliminating tariffs could result in subsidised US grains overwhelming Indian markets during global price downturns. Historical evidence shows that global grain prices plummeted between 2014 and 2016, with wheat prices falling under $160 per tonne, devastating African farmers. "India must retain policy space to manage food stocks, support rural incomes, and respond to global shocks. In today's geopolitically unstable world, food security must remain sovereign," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava was quoted as saying by PTI. Also Read | India hardens stance on farm sector concessions as India-US trade talks stretch Why lower duties for US farm products could be devastating As negotiations continue in Washington, there is increasing pressure to reduce tariffs on major US agricultural exports including rice, dairy, poultry, corn, almonds, apples, and genetically modified soy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Iraq: New Small Electric Car For Seniors. Prices Might Surprise You. Electric Cars | Search Ads Undo American products including rice, dairy, poultry, and GM soy receive substantial subsidies, creating an uneven playing field for Indian farmers. Reducing tariffs on US agricultural imports could jeopardise India's food security by subjecting small-scale farmers to subsidised imports and market fluctuations, warns GTRI. India needs to maintain tariff flexibility to safeguard over 700 million rural livelihoods and avoid previous trade agreement mistakes, it says. Ajay Srivastava highlighted that India's dairy import protocols, particularly the stipulation against feeding animals with meat, blood and internal organs of other animals, effectively prevents US dairy products from entering the market. The US considers these regulations excessive. However, from an Indian perspective there are concerns about consuming butter produced from cows that have been fed meat and blood of other cattle. "India may never allow that. India's dairy sector is built on millions of smallholders with one or two cows or buffaloes. Opening it to subsidised US imports could destroy livelihoods," Srivastava said. A relaxation in poultry import regulations would severely impact domestic producers, considering India's disconnected cold storage infrastructure and inadequate SPS (sanitary and phytosanitary) implementation. Also Read | Trade war: 'Not planning to extend tariff pause after July 9', says Donald Trump; India's trade team extends US stay The US expresses dissatisfaction with India's regulations on genetically modified (GM) food, describing them as ambiguous and lacking scientific basis, which impedes American biotechnology exports. "India, however, is cautious due to strong public opposition to GM foods and concerns about environmental risks. It also notes that major regions like the EU are GM-free, and adopting GM crops could affect soil health and hurt India's exports," he added. Importing genetically modified corn and soymeal through "controlled" mechanisms, including coastal crushing of GM soy seeds for meal exports, poses significant risks to India's agricultural sector. India's decentralised supply chain infrastructure makes it vulnerable to GM traits seeping into domestic agricultural systems, which could lead to cross-contamination of local crops and negatively impact exports to markets sensitive about GM products. The GTRI founder noted that whilst the US views India's requirement for non-GM and GM-free certificates across 24 products as unwarranted, even for non-commercially modified crops, India maintains this stance to ensure product traceability and preserve consumer trust. Additionally, he pointed out that substantial subsidies underpin US agricultural exports. In certain years, agricultural subsidies surpassed 50 per cent of production costs: rice (82 per cent), cotton (74 per cent), canola (61 per cent), wool (215 per cent). The US seeks to export various subsidised products to India, including apples, almonds, corn, dairy, poultry, and ethanol. Also Read | Big remittance cheer for NRIs! US Senate draft of Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' reduces remittance tax to 1% from 3.5%; details here "If allowed in duty-free, these subsidised goods would undercut Indian producers and distort markets," he said, adding, "India uses tariffs, ranging from 0 per cent to 150 per cent, to support its farm sector, which employs over 700 million people". Whilst agriculture in the US operates on corporate principles, Indian agriculture remains fundamental to people's sustenance. Import duties are crucial for protecting small-scale farmers, controlling price fluctuations, and maintaining food security. "The US itself imposes steep tariffs on products like tobacco (350 per cent) and uses complex non-ad valorem duties to shield its farm sector -- a reality often ignored in trade talks," he said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
