New acquisition, healthcare segment fuelling Sunningdale Tech: non-exec chairman Koh Boon Hwee
The company purchased Sanwa Group for an undisclosed sum on Aug 7, with the deal expected to grow Sunningdale's revenue to S$850 million.
Sunningdale's non-executive chairman Koh Boon Hwee liked this acquisition in particular as it allows a Singaporean company to remain in the hands of a Singapore business.
'I actually prefer that outcome rather than having it being sold to a non-Singaporean entity. I'm hopeful that the combination will allow both companies to continue to grow together,' Koh told The Business Times.
The acquisition makes sense for Sunningdale as Sanwa's main business segment is industrial, adding on to the former's precision consumer, automotive and healthcare segments. While Sanwa has an automotive segment in its revenue stream, the products are different from Sunningdale's.
This means there is no overlap of product offerings, giving Sunningdale an expanded product range in the automotive segment.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'On top of that, it brings us from 17 plants to 23 plants, and I think that's very helpful for our combined customer base,' said Koh. These plants are spread out over nine markets and most continents, which gives flexibility to Sunningdale's customers, he added.
With the world unlikely to return any time soon to a global trade system that allowed goods and people to move more easily across borders, it was fortunate that Sunningdale acquired its first US plant back in 2020. The footprint of that facility has trebled since the purchase, standing it in good stead as customers there decide if they should onshore some of their production.
'The fragmentation (means that) the trading system we have been used to for the last 30 years isn't going to come back; so I have to adapt Sunningdale to this new reality,' said Koh.
The acquisition of Sanwa was financed by internal resources and a 'small bank loan', he added, without Sunningdale having to turn to fundraising from external parties.
Integrating the company with Sunningdale is not expected to take too long, as the intention is to retain most of its employees.
Besides this acquisition, Sunningdale is also growing its healthcare segment, which has seen double-digit growth annually for the last six years, from 10 per cent of revenue in 2018 to about 30 per cent currently. The goal now is to expand the segment to more than 40 per cent in the next four years.
The consumer and automotive segments will also enlarge in tandem, but due to their mature nature and reliance on macroeconomic conditions, they cannot grow as fast as healthcare, noted Koh.
Sunningdale has also continued to grow organically since delisting.
Growth and exits
Based on filings pulled by data platform Handshakes, Sunningdale's 2024 revenue stood at S$722.7 million. The company breached S$700 million in 2021, and revenue has been above this mark since then. Earnings too have hovered around S$35 million for 2023 and 2024, with net profit margins hovering between 4 and 5.7 per cent between 2020 and 2024.
The variance in earnings is due to Sunningdale's customers' product road maps, where old products may be wound down more quickly than new products are ramped up, said Koh.
'But because we are highly diversified, our business actually hasn't been that cyclical. Our growth is steady,' he noted, adding that there has not been much volatility in Sunningdale's revenue. Its team has been disciplined on costs, and ensures that no one customer accounts for more than 10 per cent of its revenue.
This growth has continued despite foreign exchange headwinds, which have resulted in Sunningdale taking a 5 to 6 per cent hit in revenue. This is the main challenge the company faces – but it is on track to still expand about 1 to 2 per cent this year.
Koh does not rule out a return to the SGX as part of providing a liquidity event for Sunningdale's investors, which includes its employees. But currently, plans are still open-ended, as the company has no shortage of private investors.
'There are advantages to being a private company. We are in no hurry,' said Koh.
Sunningdale also would not turn down investments from parties such as 65 Equity Partners if they are open to it. But Koh noted that while SGX is an option, especially amid moves to make the local bourse more attractive, any pressure to return might not work.
'The conditions have to be correct, you can't pressure companies to do things they don't want to do.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
9 minutes ago
- Business Times
How investors should prepare for a weaker US dollar
[SINGAPORE] The first half of 2025 saw the worst performance of the US dollar (USD) in over 50 years. This comes on the back of an extended, multi-year period of USD strength. By its peak in January this year, the US dollar had risen almost 50 per cent in inflation-adjusted terms against a trade-weighted basket of currencies of major US trade partners from the low in July 2011. The outlook for a structurally weaker USD in the coming years means that investors are likely to have to unlearn the lessons of the past 15 years, and plan accordingly. Before we discuss the implications of USD weakness, let's examine its drivers. The starting point is its overvaluation. According to the Bank for International Settlement's measure, even after the sell-off so far this year, the USD real effective exchange is trading around the previous peak level of February 2002. The second driver is the USD's reserve currency status. For decades, the USD has been seen as the world's pre-eminent reserve currency because of the US' deep capital markets, strong regulatory infrastructure and predictable policymaking institutions. However, the latter two factors have clearly been eroded quite significantly over the past six months. This is not to say the USD's reserve currency status is really under threat – there is no clear competitor – but its advantage is slowly being chipped away. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The third driver is the US' balance of payments position. The US' net international investment position has deteriorated sharply in recent years. Here, former US president Joe Biden's fiscal stimulus following the Covid pandemic played a significant role by creating excess domestic demand, resulting in a wider current account deficit. This means the US has to attract huge amounts of capital inflows from abroad just to stop the USD from weakening. Implications of a weaker USD Against this backdrop, what would a weaker USD mean for investors? There are three angles to look at here: portfolio construction, managing foreign exchange (FX) risk practically, and the emotional aspect of the impact of FX movements on returns. The first question is the easiest to answer. We can summarise the impact of a weaker USD as 1) typically positive for most investments and 2) particularly, the outperformance of non-US assets over US assets. Therefore, the first defence against USD weakness is to be invested, especially in equities and gold. A weaker USD also argues for reducing exposure to US equities, and indeed we have trimmed our US equity allocation in our globally diversified portfolio. The arguments in favour of this approach are high valuations, the extremely high weight of US stocks as a percentage of global market capitalisation and the uncertain impact of US import tariffs on corporate profitability. After all, the tariffs will be 'paid for' by an uncertain mix of i) exporters who will have to reduce prices; ii) US producers who will have to absorb some of the tariffs, thus hurting profit margins; and iii) consumers who will have to pay increased prices. However, the US is still the world's biggest equity market and the source of a lot of innovation. Meanwhile, US equities generally do better in a weak USD environment than in a strong USD environment. Therefore, we retain a significant allocation to US equities in our portfolios. We have also increased our allocation to non-US equities, primarily via a larger allocation to Asia ex-Japan equities. Should we hedge USD exposure? The second question is whether to hedge the USD currency exposure emanating from your portfolio. For equities, we generally do not think this makes sense as a lower USD should boost US corporate earnings as overseas profits get translated into a weaker currency. For USD bonds and USD-denominated deposits, it is more difficult to answer. Naturally, the potential returns for bonds are generally lower than for equities, and therefore currency fluctuations can really make a big difference to returns in your own currency. However, you also need to factor in the hedging cost, which can be significant. Therefore, hedging USD bond exposure is certainly something to consider. But you should approach it in a measured fashion, perhaps taking advantage of short-term bouts of USD strength to increase hedge ratios. An obvious aside is that it makes sense for any deposits to be diversified across different currencies and not just in USDs. Managing emotions The final part of managing currency fluctuations is how to manage your emotions. I think we all understand that a diversified foundation portfolio, which includes overseas investments, is important and that this comes with currency risks. There will be times when the portfolio is doing well in one currency, but not in another, especially over shorter periods of time. The way I manage this is to look at my portfolio over time in terms of different currencies, such as the USD, GBP and SGD. This gives several perspectives of the performance of the portfolio. Of course, if there is an equity bear market, then all three versions of the portfolio are likely to be lower in value, but it does give some sense as to how much of the movement is due to pure FX movements. This may keep you from over-reacting to portfolio fluctuations measured in one currency. It also highlights where you might have an excessive currency exposure that you should be managing over the longer term. As with all aspects of investing, these decisions are very personal. The key is to try to decipher short-term fluctuations and long-term trends. A weaker USD environment is something we have not been used to for a long time and will have significant implications for different asset classes. However, tweaks to your investment style are in order – by slightly reducing your exposure to USD-based assets – rather than a massive overhaul. The writer is chief investment officer at Standard Chartered Bank's wealth solutions unit

Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Singapore companies' debt surge in 2024: Sustainable or risky gamble?
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Corporates, including property companies, issued $4.1 billion more in Singdollar debt than a year earlier, while statutory board issuance rose $6.1 billion. SINGAPORE – Companies in Singapore borrowed more to fund their businesses in 2024, taking advantage of favourable conditions and stronger investor appetites. The corporate debt market grew in 2024, with new debt issuances jumping 34 per cent year on year to $308 billion, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) noted in an Aug 8 report. Short-term non-Singdollar debt with maturities of one year or less led the surge, making up almost 60 per cent, or $182 billion, the largest segment of new corporate borrowings. Growth in Singdollar bond issuance was broad-based across financial institutions (FIs), corporates and statutory boards, supported by favourable interest rates as well as tighter credit spreads, meaning the extra interest investors demand for lending to riskier borrowers has become smaller, showing they see those borrowers as safer. Corporates, including property companies, issued $4.1 billion more in Singdollar debt than a year earlier, while statutory board issuance rose $6.1 billion. Analysts said the increases reflected both a rebound in economic activity and the continued attraction of Singapore's debt market. While the share of Singdollar issuance by FIs fell 9.9 per cent year on year, they were particularly active in the non-Singdollar market, where their share rose 23.7 per cent and issuance volumes jumped $92 billion. Debt was issued in a range of currencies, including US and Australian dollars, British pound, euros, yuan and Hong Kong dollars, to fund business needs. Global names also chose Singapore for sizeable US dollar-denominated bond sales, with IBM International Capital, for instance, raising US$5.5 billion (S$7 billion), and PepsiCo US$1.75 billion. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDR 2025: New govt-funded traineeship scheme for ITE, poly, university graduates Singapore NDR 2025: CDCs to spearhead new effort to match job seekers to roles nearer to home, says PM Wong Singapore NDR 2025: US baseline tariff of 10% on Singapore offers 'little comfort', says PM Wong Singapore NDR 2025: More avenues for S'poreans to be heard, get involved will be opened up, says PM Wong World European leaders to join Zelensky for Ukraine talks with Trump Sport Third time's the charm as Aaron Liang dethrones Samuel Kang en route to national squash title Asia Mandarin with Taiwanese characteristics: Taipei leverages language as soft power tool Asia 'Rats from the sky': Urban India finds itself divided on pigeons On the whole, total outstanding debt arranged by FIs in Singapore registered a 9 per cent year-on-year increase to $617 billion as at end-2024, MAS data showed. Ms Ellyn Tan, a partner for financial advisory at professional services firm Forvis Mazars, said 2024 marked a turning point for many businesses, as the economy moved further away from pandemic-era disruptions. 'For companies that made it through, raising funds became essential, whether to bounce back or to pursue growth,' she said. But she cautioned that the rise in debt warrants closer scrutiny. 'The key question is whether this increase is funding expansion or just refinancing older loans. An overall increase can signal growth, but we need to assess if these are truly 'good loans'.' Each loan carries its own risk profile, Ms Tan added. Borrowing to fund working capital due to longer collection cycles, for example, may be only a temporary fix. 'At some point, the problem will catch up with the company,' she warned. OCBC Credit Research said corporate debt levels in the Singdollar bond market remain generally sustainable. Main risks include repayment pressures from weaker operating conditions and currency mismatches between assets and liabilities. 'Within the Singdollar credit market, we have seen resilient issuers,' it said, citing how they have a lack of direct exposure to trade tariffs, stable Singapore-based operations, and strong banking relationships. It added that while some issuers are exposed to weaker overseas markets such as China, performance from local assets has so far offset foreign losses and currency impacts from a stronger Singdollar. OCBC noted that debt issuance sentiment was strong globally in 2024, particularly in the US, European Union, and Asia ex-Japan markets. Favourable corporate earnings, investor appetite for yield amid still-elevated rates and tight credit spreads spurred activity. Credit spreads across major markets remain substantially tighter than their 10-year averages, it said. The rebound in the corporate debt market comes amid higher interest from investors looking to diversify capital. UOB head of debt capital markets Carolyn Tan said recent new issues have been 'well-subscribed with extensive investor coverage' as investors sought yields in the fixed income markets. 'With lower Singdollar interest rates, we have recently seen a flurry of issuance from corporates, real estate investment trusts and financial institutions tapping the Singdollar bond market, across both senior bonds and perpetual securities,' said Ms Tan. Senior bonds are debt instruments that have priority over other types of debt when it comes to repayment if the issuer defaults or goes bankrupt. Perpetual securities, or perpetuals, have no fixed maturity date. Apart from institutional investors, a 'good amount of liquidity is also coming from private banking and wealth banking investors', she noted. Ms Tan of Forvis Mazars noted that while corporate bonds offer higher returns than government bonds, they also carry higher risks. 'Most corporate bonds are raised to fund growth projects, but there's no guaranteed fail-safe project. Every investment carries its own risks,' she said. OCBC expects retail interest in corporate bonds to remain selective, with investors favouring well-known, high-quality companies. They noted that in Singapore, retail interest in corporate bonds is capped by limited supply, with most seeking safety in sovereign bonds, such as US Treasuries or Singapore government securities. However, they noted that options for retail investors are becoming more accessible, with the latest Astrea 9 private equity-backed bond launched by Azalea Investment Management seeing record retail demand in August.


AsiaOne
18 hours ago
- AsiaOne
I bought a freehold property in Singapore and regret it - here's the big mistake I made, Lifestyle News
A lot of Singaporean homebuyers, particularly those of the older generation, have a clear preference for freehold status. Perhaps it's due to a sense of permanence — that their children or grandchildren will be sheltered by the fruits of their labour. Or perhaps its simply decades of reinforcement, and being told by their parents, friends, family, agents, etc. that freehold is superior to leasehold. But more Singaporeans are beginning to look past freehold status these days, and two homeowners recently shared why they regret paying the freehold premium: A freehold option that turned out to be the lower performer after decades TY and her husband made their first private home purchase in the 2010s, after selling their 4-room flat in Bedok Reservoir. As they wanted a unit they could move into right away, they sought resale condos in the east. They soon fell into a state of "analysis paralysis", however, as they couldn't easily decide between the condos on their shortlist: "I think our mistake was having too many cooks, because we were taking advice from my brother-in-law, who is a landlord, my colleague who had just bought her place, and my friend who was also our agent. We also didn't moderate our expectations, we wanted our ideal property to fulfil too many requirements — be close to the office, be close to my son's school, be close enough for my parents to get to without a car, the list was quite long." The long process of "watch and wait" caused the couple to lose out on their top options, and when they eventually decided to make their move, they were on the lower end of the list where many compromises would be required. They eventually narrowed down their choices to either Casa Merah in Tanah Merah, which had just been completed at the time, or to Changi Court, which was much older but closer to TY's workplace. It's worth noting that the couple had misgivings about both these developments, but they had already found themselves in a worse position by waiting; so they decided to push ahead rather than keep waiting again. TY says their initial decision, and the one recommended by her friend and agent, was Casa Merah. However, the couple noted that prices for Casa Merah would have been high as it was just a year old at the time (it received its TOP in 2009). According to TY, their intended unit would have cost around $1 million for just under 1,000 sq ft. Conversely, the unit they ended up buying — at Changi Court — was about the same size but cost only about $860,000. And while it was on a lower floor, the surroundings are low rise, so it makes very little difference. However — and this is where TY feels they made a mistake — their rationale was that Changi Court was cheaper, comparable in size, and also freehold. Casa Merah, the alternative, was on a 99-year lease that started in 2006. However, the couple accepted certain compromises: the facilities at Changi Court were older and smaller, there were a lot more tenants in the mix (likely due to the presence of the SIA Training Centre and SUTD right next to the condo), and a drastic lack of nearby amenities — there wasn't even a coffee shop nearby, to the point where "we would have to prearrange buying snacks and supper because we knew there would be no options nearby, once we crossed 9pm." While there is an MRT station just outside their condo, Upper Changi MRT station is on the Downtown Line, making it much harder to get to the airport than Tanah Merah MRT, which would be a direct connection. Nonetheless, TY says they felt they had a good deal, as they were confident the freehold status and lower initial price would pay off. Fast forward to today though, and TY says recent checks with agents suggest a value of around $1.35 million for the couple's Changi Court unit. This is roughly a 3.3 per cent ROI. After checking on Casa Merah, the couple determined that the appreciation of similar-sized units there… is almost the same at 3.2 per cent.* *We have not independently verified these numbers. This is a major disappointment for the couple, as despite tolerating the lack of amenities and older facilities, there wasn't much difference in gains. In fact, with the completion of the mixed-use Seneca Residence near Tanah Merah MRT, Casa Merah may even have stronger upside potential now, as there are going to be retail shops and a mall nearby. In the end, TY says, "We should have picked the most practical one instead of choosing just because it's freehold, and it would have made life easier. Now that we're older and wiser, we will keep our eye on practical things when we choose our next house." The couple do have plans to move again in the near future, but their next choice will be somewhere with East-West Line connectivity, as they don't drive. Freehold premiums aggravated losses from buying at a bad time SP purchased his freehold property, which is located close to Great World City, at a difficult time. There was no indication at the time — around 2010 — that the subsequent years would see a slew of cooling measures. From the last property peak in 2013, the market remained soft all the way till about 2017. For more details on this, you can see this article. SP isn't too distressed by that though, as it's just a matter of luck and timing, and he acknowledges it happened across the board. However, he does feel his choice to buy in a prime area like Great World, where most properties are freehold, may have aggravated his losses: "At the time, I had just sold my previous condo, and I am single, so I just need a two-bedder. Since I can buy smaller, one advantage I usually have is that I can get a better location. This time I went for a new launch at Great World because it was convenient, and because I would be living closer to my parents." While he doesn't want to disclose the project in question, SP says the unit he purchased was 775 sq ft, and was "around $2,100 psf," which would have been considered pricey by 2010 standards. He notes that opting for a leasehold condo would have meant buying outside of the city core, so "it's not so much that I wanted freehold, but I wanted an area where freehold was what I could get." In hindsight, SP now wishes he had picked a cheaper and less-central location, with room for upside growth. He does admit he was "over-optimistic" as the Singapore property market up to that point had been booming; the market saw a sharp spike in the recovery from the Global Financial Crisis. This meant the sale proceeds from his previous two-bedder exceeded expectations and easily funded his next purchase. Amid this sea of confidence, it was a shock when, later on, the developer announced a steep discount to sell off remaining units; and while SP doesn't recall how big the discount was, he blames it as the main reason for his condo's poor showing. The discount compounded the issues to come in the 2013 to 2017 period, when prices stayed low under cooling measures. Nonetheless, SP held on over the years: "When I buy, I buy with the expectation that I can stay there forever if necessary, precisely because of what I'm experiencing now. So I was prepared for it, but it still hurts." Also, after the first few years of moving in, SP realised he had overrated the facilities. The condo is small, almost boutique, with only 105 units. So when SP visited friends who lived in other projects, he "got a sense of how compact my place really is, and even mass market condos have better pools and better landscaping." The opening of Great World MRT station (TEL) is expected to help now; but it's taken a very long time since SP's purchase, opening only in 2022. He's hopeful that this will mark a turnaround, but notes that for now, prices are barely above what he initially paid some 15 years ago. SP says that he's in no hurry to move, as location-wise, it's still at least a very central and convenient project. This will likely be the last condo he buys, however, as if he moves, he will likely downgrade to a resale flat to prepare for retirement. [[nid:719800]] This article was first published in Stackedhomes .