
NHL 2024-25 midseason predictions: Fan picks for Stanley Cup winner, awards and more
By Sean Gentille, Shayna Goldman, Jesse Granger and James Mirtle
Is 2025 the year for Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl and the Edmonton Oilers? Plenty of The Athletic's NHL readers seem to think so.
We asked you for your thoughts on the top contenders for the Stanley Cup, the leading candidates to win individual awards and some of the league's biggest disappointments, and more than 2,500 of you filled out a 12-question ballot.
Advertisement
To share and break down the results, we brought in NHL senior writers James Mirtle and Sean Gentille, analytics know-it-all Shayna Goldman and goaltending expert Jesse Granger.
(Note: Some fan comments have been edited for length and clarity.)
You can find our staff's season predictions from October here and awards predictions here. You can find our predictions from November here, December here and January here.
"I picked the Stars to win at the season's start, but the Mikko Rantanen trade has changed that."
"I don't think there's one team head and shoulders above anyone for Stanley Cup favorites. Could be anyone this year."
Gentille: The fact that the Panthers are stuck in the 'other' group is a testament to how uneven they've been this season. I think they'll be fine, for the record.
Goldman: I feel like Colorado didn't get enough credit for revamping its entire goalie situation. But after the Rantanen trade, it makes a lot of sense to see its stock drop (despite how well Martin Necas is fitting in). It will be really interesting to see what they do in the weeks leading up to the deadline.
Granger: The Jets' reputation as playoff underperformers is showing up here in a big way. Winnipeg has inarguably been the best team in the league to this point. They're scoring the most goals, have the best goalie by a wide margin and are on another eight-game heater. Yet, it's hard to blame the 89.3 percent of fans who placed their vote elsewhere.
Mirtle: I'm with the 'could be anyone' voter … this is going to be a wild postseason.
Gentille: Given how much you folks like the Western Conference, this makes plenty of sense. Someone from the East would have to make it far enough to lose, and the Hurricanes just added a superstar to the mix.
Granger: West Coast bias for the win!
Goldman: The Canes are the one team that really fixed its (original) fatal flaw, so that separation makes sense in both categories from the other Eastern Conference teams.
Mirtle: A 51 percent chance of making the final is quite an endorsement of Carolina. Meanwhile, the Capitals have been the hottest team in the league of late and still haven't earned a lot of traction, even with Logan Thompson, who is a big advantage if he keeps playing the way he has.
Gentille: Feels like too large of a gap between Chicago and San Jose. Both teams are brutal, of course, but I think the Sharks' goaltending might give them the edge in the tank battle.
Goldman: Even with the Sharks goaltending situation, it feels like they are doing a better job of staying in some games … I'm sticking with the Blackhawks.
Advertisement
Granger: If the Sharks continue to give Yaroslav Askarov a bigger share of the starts, San Jose's goalie situation might feel different in a few weeks.
Mirtle: Someone thinks the Rangers are going to concede a nearly 20-point lead with less than 30 games to go? They could play the Hartford Wolf Pack roster and that's not happening. Or are they just mad at their team? And who's under 'and more' here!?
Editor: Every club in the league except the Avalanche and Lightning received at least one vote. Probably from rival fans who just hate the teams.
"Look at the struggles in Nashville after it added big pieces to its roster, only to see the team sputter."
"The Sabres continue to underperform and disappoint."
"The Rangers quit for six weeks and tried to save their season once it was too late."
Gentille: The Preds are a disappointment, for sure, but their depth issues at center were always going to be a problem. I saw a team that could make the playoffs, but beyond that, eh. The Rangers have gotten their act together, to an extent, but it's still hard to pick anyone else.
Goldman: The Predators were the trendy answer to open the season, but the two problem children of the NHL, the Canucks and Rangers, should be leading this race.
Granger: I agree with you both, and the results at the top, but at the same time I can't help but feel like in truth, no one is more disappointed than fans of the Sabres. Maybe next year?
Mirtle: Maybe if we called it the biggest perennial trainwreck the Sabres would win something?
"The best surprise is between Washington and Columbus."
"Honorable mention to the Flames, who are a big surprise too, but I don't think anyone had Washington leading the league at any point this season."
"I wanted to vote Washington for best surprise, but it's hard to beat Columbus with all it's been through and how low its expectations were for the season."
Advertisement
Gentille: The Caps were a playoff team that added a bunch of legitimate pieces in the offseason. The Blue Jackets, on paper, seemed like one of the few worst teams in the league. Come on.
Goldman: The least surprising part is that the Blue Jackets have morphed back into the Broken Jackets. But if they can power through all of these injuries, they're going to emerge as the true No. 1 here.
Granger: The Blue Jackets have been a revelation. It's not just that they're winning more games than we expected, but it's how they're doing it. Columbus is one of the more exciting teams to watch and can fill the net with pucks at a rate I don't think anyone saw coming.
Mirtle: How is Calgary not getting more love here? I saw a lot of folks had them bottom five coming into the season, and they have a real shot at the playoffs.
"Kirill Kaprizov would have won the Hart had he not gotten injured."
"Kaprizov would be the Hart winner if he weren't injured so much this year."
"If Draisaitl doesn't win the Hart, it'll be a travesty."
"Zach Werenski is the engine for the most surprising team in years, the Blue Jackets. … By the truest definition of the Hart, he is the most valuable player for a team picked to finish near the bottom of the league."
"Hellebuyck should win the Hart but I don't think the writers will give it to a goalie."
"Goaltending is such an underappreciated position. If Hellebuyck keeps up this level of play and doesn't win the Hart ... I don't think a goalie will ever win it again."
Gentille: This would be as good a season as any for a defenseman to win the Hart. Unfortunately, that's illegal.
Goldman: The Kaprizov points are so true because he was leading this race earlier this season. Draisaitl is the guy, but this is Quinn Hughes erasure.
Granger: I'm encouraged to see Hellebuyck with the third-most votes, but it's still not enough. He's the best player at the most important position, and he's putting up historically great numbers.
Mirtle: Nathan MacKinnon has been a one-man show a lot of nights lately for Colorado and leads the league in scoring, so if the voters are going to stay anti-non-forwards, he makes a ton of sense — if he can keep it up without Rantanen.
Gentille: Mark Scheifele is right behind Draisaitl and William Nylander in goals and couldn't even sniff the top 10. Tough break. I don't disagree, but it's a tough break.
Goldman: The fact that Scheifele and Kyle Connor play together definitely hurts their case — it makes the line better that there are two scoring threats, but it's a lot tougher to win this race when you're not the bona fide scorer of that line.
Advertisement
Granger: It's hard to disagree with the voters here. It's Draisaitl's to lose.
Mirtle: Nylander is second in goals before Friday's matchups and wayyy down the list. What really stands out about his season is who he's played with: Some of his top linemates include Max Domi, Max Pacioretty and Pontus Holmberg, who have combined for 10 goals. Maybe we need some sort of award for scoring 50-plus because you have no one to pass to?
"When will the Norris be split into an offensive and defensive award?"
"NHL needs a defensive defenseman award to separate the offensive Norris winner from defensemen who are great at defense."
"A shame shutdown defenseman get overlooked."
"They need a new award for best defensive defenseman."
"I think the Norris Trophy winner is a complete toss-up. At the moment, Makar has more offensive production than Hughes, but it flip-flops depending on the night. … Werenski is a serious dark horse here as well."
"Werenski is my runner-up candidate for the Norris, but I can't vote for him over Hughes."
"Werenski plays tougher minutes than the other Norris contenders."
Gentille: Brutal category here. Hughes is my guy, at the moment, and I would've liked to see a few more votes for Werenski, but I can't argue with any of it. Any of the three could win, and it'd be deserved.
Goldman: The top three are spot on, but Werenski deserves more credit here.
Granger: This is the most entertaining of the trophy races this season, with three superstars who appear to be neck and neck.
Mirtle: Appreciate the love for a potential Rod Langway Award. Let's keep up the complaining!
GO DEEPER
Mirtle: Why the NHL needs a new award to better recognize defensemen
"Aleksander Barkov appears to have taken over Patrice Bergeron's crown as year-over-year Selke favorite."
"It kills me to vote for Barkov or any Panther to win ... but seems like a done deal."
"I'm not an Oilers fan but people need to realize that Draisaitl is playing amazing defensive hockey while scoring at an amazing rate … he needs to get Selke votes."
Advertisement
Gentille: Barkov won this outright despite, like, 20 other plays getting votes. Sounds right.
Goldman: Even if Reinhart deserves more hype in this race, he will never get it over Barkov because he plays wing.
Granger: The fact that 'other' came in second place by a good margin tells you how subjective this trophy is, and why Barkov will likely get the nod due to reputation. Not that he doesn't deserve it, but that's how this award typically goes.
Mirtle: I feel like Anze Kopitar's incredible season, as the fifth oldest forward in the league, deserves more of a shoutout. He should be right in the thick of this one. (By the way, did you know that he's 23rd in all-time scoring adjusted for era?)
"Logan Thompson deserves a better fate than second for the Vezina, but that's likely where he'll end up."
Gentille: Thompson is playing for second here, but that $35.1 million contract is a nice consolation prize.
Goldman: It's Hellebuyck's to lose, but this isn't the only award he should be getting a lot of votes for.
Granger: Thompson has been brilliant. He's posted a save percentage of .940 or higher in more than half of his starts, which is ridiculous, but he just doesn't play enough to keep up with Hellebuyck, who is on his own planet right now.
Mirtle: Third and fourth in goals saved above expected entering Friday's matchups? Mackenzie Blackwood in Colorado and Lukas Dostal in Anaheim. Just saying!
"What Spencer Carbery is doing with the Capitals lineup is spectacular and completely deserving of recognition."
"Carbery oversaw the integration of even more pieces and it's all come together, so far, in Washington. One of the biggest reasons he deserves the Jack Adams."
"Carbery should be a lock for Jack Adams. Not sure there even needs to be a vote at this point."
"If Dean Evason doesn't get Jack Adams for what he's doing in Columbus this season, it should go to Carbery in Washington. Both are doing incredible in their respective cities."
"Love what Carbery has done in Washington this year, but if the Blue Jackets manage to squeeze in (the playoffs), how do you not give it to Evason?"
Advertisement
Gentille: Carbery should be the wire-to-wire pick here, and he should've gotten more votes last year, too.
Goldman: Carbery definitely could have won this last year. But I think there is a really good conversation to have about him versus Evason, considering just how well the Blue Jackets have played this season.
Granger: I agree Carbery is the pick here, but I do appreciate some fans throwing votes on Rod Brind'Amour. When it comes to this award, he's a victim of his consistency and longevity. His teams are always so good, I think we take his contributions for granted.
Mirtle: I propose we get "The Carburetor" to stick as a nickname. He's certainly found the right mix in Washington. (And Toronto's power play has yet to recover without him.)
"Lane Hutson should be a close runner-up for the Calder!"
"Hutson deserves the Calder … amazing talent."
"If Hutson doesn't win the Calder, it will be a scandal."
"Hutson is overrated by Canadiens fans."
"Macklin Celebrini will win the Calder but Dustin Wolf SHOULD win."
"I think Wolf deserves the Calder, but Celebrini will win it."
"Celebrini is the real deal."
"Celebrini is damn impressive this year, but you can't ignore what Hutson is doing in Montreal."
"Matvei Michkov has already been going through a bit of a rookie wall which I believe Hutson and Celebrini will both hit soon and their play will fall off down the stretch, whereas Michkov will be used to dealing with it and has adapted to playing through the pain so to speak."
Gentille: Certainly seems like Hutson peaked a bit too early.
GO DEEPER
Settling the great NHL U23 prospect debate: Should Hutson, Bedard rank higher?
Goldman: Goalies never get the hype they deserve against forwards. I'm not disagreeing with Celebrini as the No. 1 pick, I just think Wolf is right up there with him.
Granger: Wolf has lived up to all of the hype, and then some. His 19 goals saved above expected are the fifth most by a goalie 23 years old or younger since Evolving-Hockey started tracking the stat in 2007.
Advertisement
Mirtle: Wolf is also sixth in the entire NHL in goals saved above expected before Friday's matchups, ahead of a bunch of the biggest names in the game. Celebrini is 56th in points per game among forwards before Friday's matchups; Hutson is 45th in ice time among D before Friday's matchups. This one should be wayyy closer than this, especially if Wolf continues to start more frequently and Calgary makes the postseason. But what a rookie class this year. They've all been so fun to watch.
(Top photo of Leon Draisaitl and the Oilers celebrating a goal: Andy Devlin / NHLI via Getty Images)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Chicago Sky Announce Change After Two Straight Losses
Chicago Sky Announce Change After Two Straight Losses originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Chicago Sky now own a 2-6 record during the 2025 WNBA season after Tuesday's 85 to 66 loss to the New York Liberty. Advertisement Tuesday's defeat marked the second consecutive game that the Sky lost by 19 points or more, and the fifth time they have lost by 13 or more points this season. In last Saturday's defeat against the Indiana Fever, the Sky lost 15-year veteran point guard Courtney Vandersloot for the season. She suffered a torn ACL just under five minutes into the contest. On Tuesday, new Sky head coach Tyler Marsh replaced Vandersloot in the starting lineup with Rachel Banham, a nine-year veteran who played a season-high 27 minutes in the loss. Chicago Sky guard Kia Nurse (11).Patrick Gorski-Imagn Images Banham mustered just three points and five assists on 1-for-6 shooting in the defeat. Backup guard Kia Nurse played 20 minutes off the bench and scored eight points on 3-for-6 shooting. Advertisement Before Friday's game against the 6-3 Atlanta Dream, the Sky announced that they had made a change to their starting lineup. Instead of starting Banham, Marsh opted for Nurse. "our starting 5️⃣ tonight," the Sky announced. Nurse is a seven-year veteran who has made stops with the Liberty, Phoenix Mercury, Seattle Storm and Los Angeles Sparks. This season for the Sky, she is contributing 7.5 points, 1.6 rebounds and 1.3 assists per game. After starting the first seven games of the 2025 campaign, Nurse came off the bench for one game against the Liberty. However, she is back in the starting lineup for Friday's Commissioner's Cup contest against the Dream. Advertisement Chicago will look to move up in the Eastern Conference standings with a win against Atlanta on Friday. Tipoff is set for 7:30 p.m. ET at Gateway Center Arena in College Park, Georgia. Related: Chicago Sky Coach Admits Two Problems Amid Losing Streak Related: Calls Mount for Chicago Sky to Sign Player Released by Indiana Fever This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 13, 2025, where it first appeared.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Hockey Canada sex assault trial ends as Crown lays out why each player should be convicted
As the Crown wrapped up its closing arguments Friday at the high-profile trial of five professional hockey players accused of sexual assault, they ended with the complainant's own words from her marathon nine days on the stand. The jury has heard — in graphic detail — her allegations about what took place inside a London, Ont., hotel room in 2018. The jury has heard — in graphic detail — her allegations about what took place inside a London, Ont., hotel room in 2018. 'They were objectifying me, they were literally in there laughing at me,' the woman had testified. 'Literally any one of those men could have stood up and said, 'This isn't right.' And no one did ... They didn't want to think about if I was actually OK, or if I was actually consenting.' After hearing nearly six weeks of evidence and a full week of closing arguments from the five defence teams and the Crown, it's now up to Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia to decide the guilt or innocence of Alex Formenton, Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote, in a judgment set to be delivered July 24. The prosecutors and defence lawyers shook hands as the trial finally came to an end Friday afternoon at the London, Ont., courthouse, after having originally started in April as a jury trial, but is now a judge-alone case . Carroccia thanked the lawyers for the 'very professional manner' in which they handled the case, 'which we all know has garnered a lot of public attention.' A pair of stills from videos showing the dance floor inside Jack's Bar in London, Ont., on the night of June 18-19, 2018, show the complainant with world junior team members Dillon Dubé, circled left, and Michael McLeod, right. All members of the 2018 Canadian world junior championship team — and most of them playing in the NHL by the time of their arrests last year — the five men stand accused of sexually assaulting the then-20-year-old complainant in a room at the Delta Armouries hotel in London in the early hours of June 19, 2018, while the team was in town to attend the Hockey Canada Foundation's annual Gala & Golf fundraising event. The complainant had met McLeod at Jack's Bar and returned to his room where they had consensual sex, only for multiple men to come in afterward, some prompted by a group chat text from McLeod about a '3 way.' The Crown has alleged that McLeod had intercourse with the complainant a second time in the hotel room's bathroom; that Formenton separately had intercourse with the complainant in the bathroom; that McLeod, Hart and Dubé obtained oral sex from the woman; that Dubé slapped her naked buttocks, and that Foote did the splits over her head and his genitals 'grazed' her face. Prosecutors have argued that the men failed to take reasonable steps to confirm the woman's consent to each act, and that she never made an 'affirmative, voluntary choice.' A screenshot of a group chat involving members of Canada's 2018 world junior championship team. The Crown contends the complainant either didn't voluntarily consent, or her consent was cancelled by the fact she was scared and intimidated to be in a hotel room full of men she didn't know while she was intoxicated as well as naked after having had sex with McLeod. The defence, meanwhile, has argued that the complainant was consenting throughout the night and fabricated her version of events as she tried to make stick her allegations from a $3.5-million sexual assault lawsuit filed against Hockey Canada in 2022, which the sports organization quickly settled for an undisclosed sum. The prosecution further alleges that through the use of a group chat, the players created a false narrative that the complainant was the aggressor and repeatedly demanded to have sex with men in the room — a Crown argument that has faced resistance from the judge. The Crown has also asked the judge to reject some of the testimony of their own player witnesses, something Carroccia described as 'interesting' on Friday. 'Effectively, what you're saying is where it doesn't help the Crown, don't accept it, and where it does help the Crown, accept it,' the judge said. On Friday, the prosecution finished its closing arguments by outlining its case for a conviction against each accused man. 'This is a unique case where, in the Crown's submission, no matter which facts you accept amongst the sometimes challenging puzzle of evidence, there is a clear path to conviction for each of the five accused,' Crown attorney Heather Donkers told Carroccia. 'Mr. McLeod is the one who orchestrated this whole sordid night,' Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham said Friday. Michael McLeod arrives at court with his lawyers. 'Knowing that (the complainant) had expressed no interest in, or willingness to engage in, sexual activity with anyone other than him, he then begins a campaign to bring men into the room to do that very thing.' McLeod is the only accused man facing two charges — sexual assault and being a party to a sexual assault, for allegedly encouraging his teammates to engage in sexual activity with the complainant when he knew she wasn't consenting. In a 2018 police interview, he told a detective he received oral sex from the complainant and engaged in intercourse with her again before she left the hotel room, but omitted the fact he texted a players' group chat to come to his room for a '3 way,' as well as messaging others directly. The Crown argued Friday that McLeod is one of three men the complainant testified she performed oral sex on while she was on a bedsheet on the ground, although she herself did not identify McLeod as one of the three. The Crown said there were no words spoken between McLeod and the complainant at that time to confirm her consent. The Crown also asked that Carroccia accept that another instance of oral sex happened while McLeod was on the bed. To this, the judge pointed out that court heard testimony about the complainant getting up on the bed and placing McLeod's penis in her mouth without him actually doing anything — evidence that Donkers described as ambiguous and not an indication of consent. 'You can't possibly be saying that a woman who puts a man's penis in her mouth is not communicating that she wishes to,' Carroccia said in response. This led to a back-and-forth between the judge and Crown attorney. 'That is what I'm saying,' Donkers replied. 'Otherwise, there would never be a sexual assault that involves oral sex.' 'That's not true,' Carroccia shot back, saying Donkers misunderstood the point. The judge then put it in the form of a question: 'If a man does nothing and a woman takes his penis and puts it in her mouth, he's committing a sexual assault without asking her if that's OK?' Donkers apologized. She explained the Crown position that doing the act doesn't communicate consent, but agreed that if the judge were to find it was 'one-directional entirely,' that may raise a doubt as to whether that particular allegation had been proven. Donkers did not address at all the allegation involving intercourse, deferring instead to the Crown's brief written arguments. McLeod had told police he had hopped in the shower and the complainant came in with him and they had sex. In court, the woman testified about being tired by that point and that she felt it was a 'continuation' of the other sexual acts in the room — 'I didn't look at it as something I really wanted to do, just felt like one last thing I needed to do to go.' The Crown argues in its written materials that there is no evidence McLeod took any steps to ascertain the complainant's consent. As for being a party to sexual assault, Cunningham argued that McLeod can still be found guilty as long the judge concludes that a sexual assault happened in the room, regardless of whether any specific person is convicted. For example, she referred to the complainant's testimony of multiple men slapping and spitting on her. The whole reason the men knew to come to the room was because of McLeod, Cunningham argued, and he ensured throughout the night that the sexual activity could continue by calming the complainant down when she became upset, or by telling other players in the room not to take out their phones to record anything. McLeod made two cellphone recordings of the complainant; in one, she says 'I'm OK with this,' while in another, she says 'It was all consensual.' Cunningham argued the videos cannot be used as evidence of consent. 'They are also not evidence of any reasonable steps taken to sincerely ascertain valid consent in law,' she said. 'At their highest, they're the kind of token, lip-service, box-checking that the Court of Appeal says is not a reasonable step.' The first video doesn't actually establish to what the complainant was consenting and with whom, Cunningham said, while the second video was taken after the sexual activity and, the Crown highlighted, consent can't be given after the fact. The complainant herself testified she was just saying what she thought the men wanted to hear. The only accused man to testify in his own defence, Hart told the judge that in response to the complainant's demands for intercourse while she was on the ground, he asked for a 'blowie, meaning blowjob,' she said 'yeah' or 'sure,' moved toward him, helped pull down his pants, and performed oral sex about 30 seconds to a minute. Carter Hart outside court with his lawyers. Should the judge accept his account, Donkers argued he should have taken more steps to confirm the complainant's consent, given her obvious vulnerability. He could have taken her aside, asked for her name, her desires, her limitations, or whether this was something she truly wanted. In response to that, Carroccia pointed out the testimony of the Crown's witnesses about the complainant demanding to have sex. 'You just said to me he could have talked to her to find out more about her wants,' Carroccia said, 'but if I accept the evidence from your own witnesses, she was saying what her wants were, correct?' Donkers said that the witnesses testified about the complainant demanding intercourse, not oral sex. While Hart could only recall that instance of oral sex, he later said it was possible it happened again , after the Crown pointed out in cross-examination that McLeod told police he saw Hart receive oral sex twice. The complainant herself testified about giving oral sex to about three men in quick succession, though she never identified Hart to the police, nor that she performed oral sex on him twice. Players Brett Howden and Tyler Steenbergen identified Hart and McLeod as two of the three, while Dubé identified himself to police as the third. Howden testified he believes he saw Hart receive oral sex twice while in the room. 'So I should accept their evidence that Carter Hart probably got oral sex twice, but then find they're mistaken about Dillon Dubé?' the judge asked. 'If they're watching Carter Hart getting oral sex twice, they blink and miss Dillon Dubé? I just don't follow that argument.' Donkers countered that they might not have noticed Dubé because it happened so quickly. Formenton told police in 2018 that he followed the complainant into the bathroom after she had been demanding to have sex with men. There's a lack of evidence as to whether there was any conversation in the bathroom between the two, but Donkers argued that again, no steps were taken to confirm the complainant's consent before they had vaginal intercourse. Alex Formenton and his lawyers. But Carroccia had a question: What to make of Howden's testimony that he recalled that in response to the complainant's demands, Formenton said something along the lines of not wanting to do it front of everybody, and then he followed the complainant into the bathroom. 'Not so ambiguous, is it, in those circumstances?' Carroccia said. 'It's consistent with what she's offering, what she said, if I find that that was the sequence of events.' The judge reminded Donkers that Formenton doesn't have to prove that scenario, but rather the onus is on the Crown 'to disprove that that's what happened.' Donkers said the Crown doesn't have to prove or disprove 'any particular fact and issue beyond a reasonable doubt, what we have to prove is he's guilty of sexual assault.' 'I know that, Ms. Donkers,' the judge replied. While the Crown has argued that the defence has engaged in myth-based reasoning when questioning the complainant's behaviour in the room, Formenton's lawyer Hilary Dudding countered that, in fact, the prosecution was doing that. The Crown's reasoning 'really implies that for a woman to be assertively asking for sex in a group scenario is so inherently bizarre and odd that it requires some explanation other than that woman is consenting,' Dudding said. 'It's stereotypical thinking about what types of sex people like and don't like, what a woman might choose or not choose.' Dubé acknowledged in his 2018 police interview that he briefly received oral sex from the complainant, but omitted the fact that he slapped her naked buttocks. He did admit to slapping the complainant once or twice to a Hockey Canada investigator in 2022, in a statement that was excluded from the trial due to the 'unfair and prejudicial' way it was obtained. The complainant testified that multiple men were slapping her buttocks and that it hurt. The Crown argued that Carroccia should find Dubé slapped her twice — while she was on the ground after giving him oral sex, as witnessed by Steenbergen and on the bed while she was performing oral sex on McLeod, as witnessed by Howden. Dillon Dubé outside court. Dubé told police the oral sex happened in quick succession as the complainant performed on him, Hart, and McLeod — 'No chance for subjective consent,' Donkers said, but even if there was, it was cancelled by the complainant's fear of being in the room. Donkers argued that Dubé only mentioned getting oral sex to police because he 'knew he could try and portray that as consensual, based on comments he says (the complainant) was making about sex,' while he didn't mention the slapping because he knew that went too far as there is 'absolutely zero evidence' that the woman consented to that. 'He could not have had any legitimate belief she had communicated a willingness to be touched on her buttocks, gentle or hard, it does not matter,' Donkers said. 'That belief would have had to come from the myth that just because she had agreed to other things or appeared to agree to other things, that she would be OK being slapped. That is not a defence in law.' It's undisputed that Foote did the splits over the woman, Donkers said, but what's disputed is whether he was naked from the waist down, over which part of her body he did the splits, and whether his genitals touched her face. Court heard that the spits was a 'party trick' Foote often did, including on the dance floor at Jack's earlier that evening in June 2018. Cal Foote, centre, with his lawyers. Steenbergen partially witnessed Foote doing the splits, but couldn't tell if he was clothed below the waist, while Hart was adamant that Foote was wearing clothes and he did not physically touch the complainant, whom Hart said was laughing. The complainant 'viscerally testified' about someone doing the splits 'and having a penis in my face,' Donkers pointed out, although the complainant wasn't able to identify Foote. Given that this was a hotel room full of men 'amped up from a night of drinking' and who knew sexual activity with the woman was the focus in the room, it is 'abundantly clear' that Foote was called to the room to engage with the woman sexually as well, and specifically by doing the naked splits over her body, Donkers argued. 'This extraordinary event of June 19 for them called for extraordinary measures, not just an ordinary party trick they had seen as early as the night before at Jack's,' Donkers said. Cal Foote does the splits at Jack's Bar in London on the night of June 18-19, 2018, while teammates Brett Howden (on the far side of Foote, in white with a lighter-coloured backwards ball cap) and Dillon Dubé (in white on the near side of Foote) clear space on the dance floor. But even if the judge were to accept Hart's version that Foote did the splits while clothed and didn't touch the complainant, the judge should still conclude it was a sexual assault, Donkers said — even though the complainant maintained she was touched. 'It's reasonable to assume that in (Hart's) version of events, she thinks the touching is about to happen and in vulnerable circumstances of a sexual nature,' Donkers said. In the excluded statements from the Hockey Canada 2022 investigation that cannot form part of Carroccia's decision, both Formenton and Dubé said they witnessed Foote doing the splits, with Formenton specifying he wasn't wearing pants. 'So she's laying on the ground parallel between the beds,' Formenton said. 'I remember he takes pants off, top clothes still on, does splits over her upper body.' The players were 'compelled' to sit for an interview with Hockey Canada. But they weren't told Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

an hour ago
Hartenstein back in starting lineup for Thunder for Game 4 of the NBA Finals vs. Indiana
INDIANAPOLIS -- Oklahoma City went back to the lineup it used throughout the first three rounds of the playoffs on Friday night, returning Isaiah Hartenstein to the starting five for Game 4 of the NBA Finals against Indiana. Hartenstein started alongside MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, Lu Dort and Chet Holmgren. The Hartenstein-Holmgren pairing gives the Thunder a pair of 7-footers in the opening five, and Oklahoma City was 12-4 in the Western Conference playoffs when starting that lineup. That fivesome was also 9-4 when starting games together in the regular season. The Thunder had Hartenstein coming off the bench for the first three games of the finals, with Cason Wallace starting in his place. Indiana took two of those three games. 'We have a lot of optionality that we draw on, almost nightly,' Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said earlier in the finals. 'If you followed our team throughout the season, I think you know that flexibility and adaptability is the only constant. We're never staying the same. I know we started the same lineup in the playoffs, but our rotation night to night in these series has been incredibly variant. We think that's a strength of our team.' The change comes after Indiana scored 50 points in the paint in Game 3, after managing only 34 in each of the first two games of the series.