Renowned Israeli professor says Israel committing genocide in Gaza
Omer Bartov, a professor at Brown University and a former Israeli army soldier, wrote in The New York Times on Tuesday that after deliberating and examining Israel's war, his "inescapable conclusion… [is] that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people".
"Having grown up in a Zionist home, lived the first half of my life in Israel, served in the IDF [Israel Defence Forces] as a soldier and officer and spent most of my career researching and writing on war crimes and the Holocaust, this was a painful conclusion to reach, and one that I resisted as long as I could," he wrote.
"But I have been teaching classes on genocide for a quarter of a century. I can recognize one when I see one," he added.
Bartov is considered one of the world's leading scholars of the WWII Holocaust and an expert on genocide. One of his most well-known books is Anatomy of a Genocide.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Bartov's article comes on the heels of a report by Dutch newspaper NRC, which interviewed seven renowned genocide and Holocaust researchers from six countries - including Israel - all of whom described the Israeli campaign in Gaza as genocidal.
Leading human rights organisations have also reached the conclusion that Israel is committing genocide.
In December 2024, Amnesty International became the first major organisation to conclude that Israel had committed genocide during its war on Gaza, while Human Rights Watch more conservatively concluded that "genocidal acts" had been committed.
UN rapporteur: Tech firms and corporations profiting from Israeli 'economy of genocide' Read More »
Francesca Albanese, the UN's top expert on Palestine, authored two reports last year suggesting that genocide was taking place in Gaza.
Other prominent Israeli academics, including the historian Avi Shlaim, have argued that Israel's war on Gaza constitutes a genocide.
Bartov said his decision was based on identifying the intent of Israeli officials to conduct genocide and action on the ground.
"In Israel's case, that intent has been publicly expressed by numerous officials and leaders. But intent can also be derived from a pattern of operations on the ground, and this pattern became clear by May 2024 - and has since become ever clearer - as the IDF has systematically destroyed the Gaza Strip," he said.
Bartov noted that Israel denies all allegations that it is conducting a genocide in the Gaza Strip, but he said that "the systematic destruction in Gaza not only of housing but also of other infrastructure - government buildings, hospitals, universities, schools, mosques, cultural heritage sites, water treatment plants, agriculture areas, and parks - reflects a policy aimed at making the revival of Palestinian life in the territory highly unlikely".
At least 58,479 Palestinians - mainly women and children - have been killed by Israel's offensive on Gaza in response to the Hamas-led 7 October 2023 attack on southern Israel.
In June, a UN Commission of Inquiry found that Israeli air strikes, shelling, burning and controlled demolitions had damaged or destroyed more than 90 percent of schools and university buildings across the Gaza Strip.
A study earlier this year found that 80 percent of Gaza's water and sanitation infrastructure had been destroyed.
Bartov also criticised some historians who have called critics of Israel's war on Gaza "antisemitic". He said he was concerned about the broader ramifications of this rift "between genocide scholars and Holocaust historians".
"What I fear is that in the aftermath of the Gaza genocide, it will no longer be possible to continue teaching and researching the Holocaust in the same manner we did before," he wrote.
"Because the Holocaust has been so relentlessly invoked by the State of Israel and its defenders as a cover-up for the crimes of the IDF, the study and remembrance of the Holocaust could lose its claim to be concerned with universal justice and retreat into the same ethnic ghetto in which it began its life at the end of World War II," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Why Israel wants to kill the children of Gaza
The western-backed Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip has entered its deadliest phase, and the world continues to slumber on. This summer has marked an uptick in the daily killing of Palestinians - an average of 100 lives massacred each day, most of them already contending with the pangs of hunger amid a man-made mass starvation campaign. The small coastal territory, blockaded by Egypt and Israel with the complicity of the international community, is now the most dangerous place in the world for children, who make up about half the population. As early as 31 October 2023, Unicef described Gaza as "a graveyard for children, a living hell for everyone else". This has been echoed by numerous UN officials, most recently last Friday by the UN refugee agency chief, Philippe Lazzarini, who warned of Israel's "Machiavellian scheme to kill" in Gaza. Missiles and shrapnel rip through the fragile bodies of children in open marketplaces, at water collection points, at aid distribution sites, and while waiting in line for nutritional supplements. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Children are bombed inside displacement tents, burned alive in school shelters and buried beneath the rubble of their homes. Even before they are born, foetuses are blown from their mothers' wombs by the force of bombs. Last week, the decapitated body of eight-month-old foetus Saeed Samer al-Laqqa - documented in footage widely shared on social media - failed to register even a mention in mainstream media. His absence from the headlines is part of the institutional silence that has sustained Israel's genocidal project for more than 21 months. Even when their deaths are acknowledged, the children of Gaza are reduced to little more than casualty figures. But their killing has never been collateral damage: it is a deliberate effort to extinguish a future Israel fears: a generation of Palestinians born under siege, whose survival, memory, and innate human desire for freedom and dignity threaten the foundations of a settler-colonial state built on their erasure. Prison to martyrdom On 12 July, Youssef al-Zaq, barely 17 years old, was killed alongside his niece and nephew, Maria and Tamim, in an Israeli attack on their building in Gaza City. Youssef, once known as the youngest Palestinian hostage, was born in an Israeli prison in 2008. 'Youssef's birth and story exposed the occupation. That's why they didn't want him to stay alive' - Ahmed Sahmoud, Youssef's cousin His mother, Fatema al-Zaq, was arrested in 2007 while attempting to cross into the occupied West Bank and, during the early stages of her captivity, learned she was two months pregnant. "The Israeli occupation tortured his mother so that she would miscarry," Youssef's cousin Ahmed Sahmoud told me. Fatema gave birth to a healthy baby boy, but her arms and legs were shackled during labour, and she received minimal medical care from Israeli prison guards. Youssef spent the first 20 months of his life behind bars. In 2009, he and his mother, along with 19 other Palestinian female detainees, were released in exchange for a video showing Israeli hostage Gilad Shalit alive. "There was a lot of attention on Youssef after he came home," said Sahmoud, a journalist who escaped Gaza last year and now lives in Egypt. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war "The al-Zaq family called him the flower of the family. He was a quiet boy, and very much loved in his neighbourhood," he added. The youngest of eight siblings, Youssef was determined to live a full life and longed to travel. But Sahmoud said the family believes Youssef was deliberately targeted by Israel: "Youssef's birth and story exposed the occupation. That's why they didn't want him to stay alive," his cousin said, citing Israel's history of targeting and killing former Palestinian detainees. "The Israelis resented the fact that Youssef, who was born in their prison, was released. He represented a victory over them, a new lease of life. "I can't explain to you the special place Youssef held in the family," Sahmoud said. "His martyrdom left a massive hole. The Zionist occupation army snuffed out the family's source of light." Dehumanising children Youssef's story should not be the quintessential tale of childhood in Gaza. He was born in a prison and lived the rest of his life in an open-air cage. He witnessed multiple Israeli assaults. He lived through nearly two years of genocide. He died hungry, sharing a single piece of bread with his niece and nephew. He was pulled from the rubble of his home. Death has become a grim constant over the past 21 months. More than 17,000 children have been killed, according to the Gaza health ministry - a severe undercount that excludes the missing and the untold thousands still buried under rubble. Even so, that number means an average of 30 children have been killed by Israel every day since 7 October 2023 - equivalent to one classroom, or one child every 45 minutes. How does one begin to explain, let alone comprehend, Israel's disproportionate and deliberate targeting of children? With its advanced weaponry, surveillance and control over the population registry, these killings are not accidental - they are codified into policy. From the earliest days of this genocide, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu invoked the biblical story of Amalek to justify mass killing in Gaza, including children. In Gaza, children are learning the alphabet through grief and hunger Ghada Abu Muaileq Read More » The killing and maiming of children - still a war crime under international law - has been given full legitimacy, and even encouragement, through the rulings of Zionist rabbis and the rhetoric of Israeli government ministers. With such dehumanising language and fear of the other, these figures openly call for the extermination of Palestinian children and "the women who produce terrorists". They proclaim that "there are no innocents in Gaza", that every Palestinian child is "already a terrorist from the moment of his birth". To that end, Israel has been consistent. Since the settler colony's founding in 1948, the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians has never stopped. Genocide is no longer just an intention; it is official strategy. "Thinning out" Gaza's population is now formal government policy. Social collapse Why the children of Gaza? One million children in Gaza represent a growing youth population - a demographic challenge to an Israeli society that knows, deep down, it does not belong to a land it has drenched in Palestinian blood. Otherwise, why would it persist in violent subjugation and state murder? What kind of twisted psyche boasts of killing children and sees it as a divine right? Who celebrates the murder of innocents and sees their existence as a threat? Targeting children serves another nefarious purpose: a calculated assault on the social reproduction of an indigenous society. Why Israel is waging war on Palestinian children Read More » The goal is to collapse communal bonds and societal structures. There is the fast genocide of bombs and missiles, and the slow genocide of starvation, mass internment, and the decimation of healthcare - creating a petri dish of disease where children are the most vulnerable. From this chaos - designed to break the spirit of liberation and justice - colonial powers exploit the vacuum to expand illegal settlements and plunder natural resources. During the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya, the British confined 1.5 million Kenyans in detention camps and tightly controlled villages rife with disease, starvation, torture, rape and murder. "Only by detaining nearly the entire Kikuyu population of 1.5 million people and physically and psychologically atomising its men, women and children could colonial authority be restored and the civilising mission reinstated," Harvard historian Caroline Elkins wrote. In Algeria, too, in response to anti-colonial resistance from the FLN, the French forcibly rounded up thousands of peasants at gunpoint and relocated them to guarded settlements known as camps de regroupement. The aim was to drain public support from the FLN by isolating the rural population, controlling their movements, and restricting access to resources. By the end of the Algerian War in 1962, some two million Algerians were confined to these camps, suffering from disease and malnutrition. Future freedom fighters From the British to the French to the Israelis, settler-colonial tactics have followed the same brutal logic - even as their scale and cruelty have evolved. Across time and geography, the settler-colonial project has relied not only on physical conquest but also on the erasure of identity, the fragmentation of community, and the suppression of future resistance. To a violent colonising power, a child with a book, a dream, or a memory is more dangerous than any weapon Again I ask: why the children of Gaza? They represent exactly that future - one rooted in knowledge and historical memory. In a society with one of the highest literacy rates in the region, despite decades of siege and bombardment, educated youth are not only symbols of survival; they are agents of liberation. To a violent colonising power, a child with a book, a dream, or a memory is more dangerous than any weapon. Targeting children, then, is not collateral damage. It is strategy. It is part of a broader campaign to destroy hope, overwrite the future, and maintain the machinery of occupation through fear and erasure. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Tunisian group sues French-Tunisian imam for ‘high treason' over visit to Israel
A Tunisian organisation has filed a legal complaint against French-Tunisian imam Hassen Chalghoumi and called for him to be stripped of his Tunisian citizenship following his recent visit to Israel in the midst of its onslaught on Gaza. Chalghoumi, the imam of Drancy's municipal mosque near Paris and the chairman of the Conference of Imams of France, led a delegation of Muslim clerics from Europe to Israel in a visit that claimed to 'build bridges and promote inter-religious dialogue'. The delegation of 15 imams and Muslim leaders from France, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and the UK met with Israeli President Isaac Herzog and visited sites connected to the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attack, including Kibbutz Kfar Aza near the Gaza Strip. The trip was organised by the European Leadership Network (Elnet), a pro-Israel group. During the visit, Chalghoumi told the Israeli president that 'the war that broke out after 7 October is not a war between Israel and Hamas or Israel and Hezbollah but a war between two worlds. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "You represent the world of humanity and democracy.' In a video widely circulated on social media, the imam could also be seen attempting to kiss the hand of the Israeli interior minister, Moshe Arbel, who promptly removed his hand. The gesture and the overall visit sparked an outcry in Tunisia, a country that refuses any form of normalisation with Israel. A local watchdog, the Tunisian Observatory for Transparency and Good Governance, announced in a statement over the weekend that it was filing a complaint against Chalghoumi for 'high treason'. "The actions of the Tunisian national, who led a group of European imams (on a visit to Israel) to express their solidarity and condemn the spirit of resistance are a disgrace and undermine the prestige of the Tunisian state," the watchdog said in a statement. "The explicit normalisation issued by this individual does not represent or honour the Tunisian people and state, in all its components, as his positions on the Palestinian cause are known to all. "Chalghoumi's statements constitute direct incitement against resistance to the occupying entity's aggression […] and a call for blatant and public normalisation with the occupying entity," it added. Senior Saudi journalist urges 'coexistence' in landmark visit to Israeli parliament Read More » The Observatory emphasised the need to initiate legal proceedings before military courts 'against anyone involved in espionage activities with foreign countries or in normalisation with the Zionist entity'. It also demanded that Chalghoumi be stripped of his Tunisian nationality. The visit sparked negative reactions elsewhere in the Arab and Muslim worlds. Al-Azhar, the highest seat of learning in Sunni Islam, strongly condemned it as a 'betrayal of religious and human values'. In a statement, the Cairo-based institution said the participants 'falsely claimed their visit aimed to promote coexistence and interfaith dialogue, while blatantly ignoring the ongoing genocide, aggression and ongoing massacres against the Palestinian people for over 20 months'. The European Council of Imams in Paris also issued a strong condemnation, calling the visit 'suspicious' and asserting that it 'does not represent the position of Muslims in Europe'. Meanwhile, a mosque in the Dutch city of Alkmaar fired its imam after he participated in the trip. The Bilal Mosque said that Imam Youssef Msibih was 'immediately removed' from his position. 'The continuity of colonial practices' A media personality in France who has for years advocated 'moderate Islam' and rapprochement between faiths, Chalghoumi is a controversial figure within the Muslim community, notably due to his commitment to normalisation with Israel. On his social media account, Chalghoumi frequently posts against "Islamism" and warns about the alleged "infiltration and destabilising" goals of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe. Last month, the imam sparked outrage after dancing at an event in Paris organised in support of Israel and Israeli captives. Outrage after French imam danced at 'Israeli music festival' in Paris Read More » During We Will Dance Again, an Israeli music festival that took place on 22 June, Chalghoumi was spotted dancing on a stage surrounded by Israeli flags. The event was organised by TheTruth, an association founded to challenge 'disinformation, denigration of Israel, antisemitism, political Islam', according to its social media accounts. Chalghoumi's participation in the festival amid Israel's assault on Gaza and its attack on Iran caused heated reactions online, with users accusing the imam of 'celebrating genocide'. For French political scientist François Burgat, a renowned specialist on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and political Islam, the 'fabrication' of Imam Chalghoumi as a 'character' is 'a persistent deception' that undermines the 'representation of Muslims in France'. 'The character of Imam Chalghoumi is the expression of the continuity of colonial practices in contemporary France. 'It was not the French authorities who directly initiated this gross manipulation, but rather Franco-Israeli Zionist circles' -François Burgat, specialist in political Islam "Chalghoumi appears, in fact, as the direct descendant, the exact reproduction of these false Muslim elites fabricated from scratch in Algeria by the colonial authorities to pervert the representation of dominated populations,' Burgat wrote. 'In Chalghoumi's case, however, it was not the French authorities who directly initiated this gross manipulation, but rather Franco-Israeli Zionist circles who, with the obvious consent of [the authorities], literally fabricated his character, placing him at the head of an 'Association of Imams of France' created especially for him,' the academic added. 'This persistent deception thus represents one of the most serious attacks on the mechanisms for representing Muslims in France.'
Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Sanctioning the truth
UN rapporteur for Palestine Francesca Albanese retorted to the US decision to sanction her by stating on X that 'the powerful [are] punishing those who speak for the powerless; it is not a sign of strength, but of guilt.' This amounts to the call of 'kill the messenger' adopted by influential actors who refuse to intervene to prevent cruelty and injustice. 'Albanese's campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel will no longer be tolerated,' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted on social media. 'We will always stand by our partners in their right to self-defence.' Independent Italian human rights lawyer Albanese has been in the crosshairs of the US and Israel since she took up the five-year post in May 2022. This intensified this year after her mandate was renewed for another five years. She has referred to Israel's 21-month deadly and devastating military campaign on Gaza as 'genocide' and accused the US of complicity by providing Israel with arms and political cover. In September 2004, she told Modern Times Review, the lack of curbs on Israel displays 'the ineffectiveness of international law and of the multilateral system. It's not just that Israel is not listening to me or my reports only. Israel is not listening to the Inter-national Court of Justice, the Security Council, which ordered a ceasefire, or the Human Rights Council, which requested an arms embargo.' She warned that 'Israel and the United States are bringing the clock back 100 very few states doing what they can to stop it [consequently we are heading toward] a lawless world.' 'The imposition of sanctions on special rapporteurs is a dangerous [and] 'is unacceptable,' UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric declared. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres has been urged to take action against US sanctions in the UN General Assembly or the International Court of Justice. Unpaid Albanese has been chosen along with a dozen other experts by the 47-member Human Rights Council based in Geneva to monitor and report on human rights in Afghanistan, Belarus, Burundi, Cambodia, North Korea, Eritrea, Myanmar and Russia as well as handed a mandate to investigate the occupied Palestinian territories. While special rapporteurs have no formal authority and do not represent the UN, they can inform the International Criminal Court and other institution of rights violations. The imposition of sanctions came in response to her June 30 report submitted to the Council in which she listed more than 30 companies of involvement in 'the transformation of Israel's economy of occupation [into] an economy of genocide.' The report divides countries complicit in the genocide into specific categories such as arms manufacturers, tech firms, construction companies, service firms, banks, pension funds, insurers, universities, and charities. These include Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, Amazon, Palantir, IBM and Danish shipping giant Maersk. Their combined involvement has enabled Israel to wage war on Gaza and repress Palestinians in the West Bank, she wrote. Her report called on national judicial systems and the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate and charge companies and senior executives. UN member states were urged to sanction and block assets of convicted offenders. Rights council president Jurg Lauber regretted the imposition of sanctions and urged UN member states 'to fully cooperate with the special rapporteurs [and] refrain from any acts of intimidation or reprisal against them.' Former European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell wrote on X that for the first time in the world organisation's history, the US has imposed sanctions on a UN mandate holder and argued that Washington's sanctions constitute a 'flagrant violation of [the UN's] Charter.' He said, 'The EU is bound by its history and treaties to defend [International] Law and must ensure the protection of UN mandate holders.' Amnesty International's secretary general Agnes Callamard responded to US sanctions by saying, 'This is a shameless and transparent attack on the fundamental principles of inter-national justice, Special Rapporteurs are not appointed to please governments or to be popular but to deliver their mandate.' Callamard said, Albanese's mandate 'is to advocate for human rights and international law. [This is} essential at a time when the very survival of Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip is at stake.' Callamard accused the Trump administration of continuing an 'assault on international law ...to protect the Israeli government from accountability at all costs.' Irish Labour Party Member of the European Parliament for Dublin Aodhan O Riordan has added his name to those nominating her for the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of her work 'to highlight the destruction of Gaza by Israel.' He castigated the Trump administration for sanctioning her. He was joined by Canadian legislators and more than 300,000 people who signed a petition calling for her nomination. The first woman to be appointed to her post. Albanese, 48, is well qualified to carry out her mandate. She received a law degree from the University of Pisa in Italy and a Master of Laws from the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) at the University of London. She worked for a decade as an expert on rights and migration for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees. She also advised the UN, global governments, and civil society groups dealing with rights issues in the Middle East and Southeast Asia as well as EU missions in Haiti, Guinea Bissau, and Pakistan. She consulted with US non-profit Project Concern, International on protection issues during the 2014 Ebola emergency in West Africa. She is an affiliate of the Issam Fares Institute of the American University of Beirut. To protect Israel from being held accountable, the US has sanctioned ICC prosecutor Karim Khan and four ICC judges. The sanctions ban them from entering the US, block assets they hold in the US, and prohibits and penalises anyone, including US citizens, for providing 'funds, goods or services' to the sanctioned individuals. The latter measure is meant to deprive Albanese of sources in the conduct of her investigations. Since Israel's founding in 1948, US presidents have largely ignored the warnings of predecessors. In his 1796 farewell address the first US President George Washington warned the country to avoid permanent alliances with foreign countries and rely instead on temporary alliances for emergencies. He stated, 'The nation which indulges toward another habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave.' Photo: AFP
