Israel and Iran agree ceasefire after attack on US air base
Just hours later, US president Donald Trump announced a ceasefire agreement had been reached on his social media platform Truth Social – although it took some time for both Iran and Israel to confirm.
READ MORE: Ellie Gomersall: Banning a protest group as authoritarian as it gets
At around 11pm UK time, Trump posted: "CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE! It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED!"
Around an hour later, a senior Iranian official told the Reuters news agency that it had agreed to the ceasefire, which was proposed by the US and mediated by Qatar.
Shortly before 6am UK-time, Iranian state television said the ceasefire had officially begun – but there was no word from Israel on whether it accepted the deal until just over an hour later.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said in a statement that it has agreed to the proposal, adding that Israel would respond "forcefully" to any violations from Iran.
The statement added that Israel had agreed to the deal after "achieving the objectives" of its attacks, claiming that the "immediate existential threat" of Iran's nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles had been removed.
READ MORE: I was at the protest for Palestine Action – here's what happened
The UK Government has welcomed the news. Speaking on the Tuesday morning media round, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden told BBC Breakfast that it was "good news, if the ceasefire holds".
He said: 'I welcome the Israeli statement. It's obviously a fragile situation in the Middle East.
'A number of people have been killed overnight in missile strikes, but I think the whole world will hope that the ceasefire will hold and that Iran will come forward with a credible plan that shows that it will not pursue the development of a nuclear weapon.'
At the time of writing, there has been no official statement from either Foreign Secretary David Lammy or Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is heading to the Netherlands on Tuesday for a two-day Nato summit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour needs to ‘pick things up' after ‘tough' first year in power, Khan says
Labour needs to 'really pick things up' after a 'tough' first year in government, Sir Sadiq Khan has insisted. The London Mayor said Labour supporters would be 'delusional' if they did not recognise the difficulties the party had had since winning power in July 2024. After taking Labour into power at Downing Street for the first time since 2010, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has seen his party's popularity slump in the polls, amid criticism over issues such as welfare reforms. 'It's been a tough first year,' Sir Sadiq conceded. Speaking at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, he insisted that Labour supporters 'need to have the humility to recognise' that 'otherwise we are being delusional'. The London Mayor, who was one of the most powerful Labour politicians until Sir Keir became Prime Minister, added: 'Those people that say it has been a great first year… I think they are letting the party down. 'It hasn't been a great first year. There have been great things that have happened in this first year, around the rights for renters, around the rights for workers, around energy security, and I could go on. 'But as first years go, it has not been a great first year.' However, he said the 'good news' is his party has 'got another four years to make sure we turn this around'. The London Mayor – who is a Liverpool FC supporter – said if Labour was in a football match, they would be 'two-nil down' But continuing his analogy, he said that only 15 or 20 minutes of the match had gone, with minutes still to play and to 'win this game'. He said: 'It is really important now we really pick things up because I think we are two-nil down. 'But the great news is we have turned it round before, we have won games before where we're two nil down, we can do it again.' His comments came as he said that many people who backed the party last year had 'lent us their vote'. Sir Sadiq said: 'They didn't sprint toward Labour at the ballot box, they lent us their vote, gave us the benefit of the doubt.' After over a decade out of power at Westminster, he also said that the party had 'lost the memory of running things'. Sir Sadiq said: 'It has taken some time for the Labour Party, the Labour Government, to understand how the machinery of government works.' But he added: 'There are some really, really good people in the cabinet, there is a good back office team as well. So I have got confidence we will turn it round.' He added: 'With Keir and the team we've got in Number 10, and across Whitehall, Westminster, we've got a great team. 'They are not performing to the level I know they can perform at. I'm not being critical of them, I think they themselves would admit they can do much more. 'So I am hoping the next three, four years you will really see the best of this government.'
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Farage is not selling out, he is just preparing Reform for government
There's a whisper on t'internet that Nigel Farage has sold out. It's based on things he's said – ie 'it's impossible' to deport every illegal alien – or the dissenting views of individual Reformers. Vanessa Frake, his new justice adviser, recently opined that it's impractical to ban all trans women from all prisons, contra the position of Farage himself. Journalists said Reform must be divided; the Tories, that Reform has turned wet. 'Men belong in men's prisons,' wrote Rob Jenrick. 'End of.' In a sign of how far the Overton window has shifted, even Labour is now attacking Farage as soft on crime. Its latest ad says he 'wants to make it easier to share revenge porn online', as if Nigel had secreted a camera into Rupert Lowe's bedroom and uploaded the grim results on YouTube. What is going on? The fuss around Frake needs to be contextualised: she was speaking for herself, and there's nowt wrong with that. Reform is a start-up. The whole premise is to offer a platform to those who hate machine politics but still want to serve the public. Such people, completely new to this business, are going to be opinionated; they will speak their mind. Isn't that what we want? Voters complain that politicians are robotic, yet the minute one of them demonstrates free will, commentators leap on it as evidence of civil war. Moreover, pluralism of thought is inevitable in any organisation growing this fast. A year ago, Reform was a one-man band. Today it has around 230,000 members, 450 branches and over 850 councillors, with competitive elections under way to staff the board. Farage could've banked winning 10 councils and moved on: instead he has set them a task, chiefly to save money, and invited voters to judge the national party on how local officials, operating beyond his direct control, do. That's brave; a hostage to fortune. But it reflects Farage's personal transformation from spoiler vote to potential PM. If he's moderating his rhetoric, it's probably not just because it's necessary to win. I think that Farage believes he will win. This is a man of conscience on the cusp of power, being careful not to over-hype expectations of what a Reform government can actually achieve. Consider past mistakes. Rishi Sunak said 'stop the boats', and didn't. Keir Starmer said 'smash the gangs', and he still hasn't. The failure to deliver promises on immigration has done as much damage to the country as mass migration itself, fuelling perceptions of elite failure – or lies – and eroding faith in democracy. The Left assumes that when Farage says Britain is on the verge of 'social collapse', of disorder and riots, this is what he wants to happen, but the opposite is true. He means it as a warning. Instinctual conservatives like Farage abhor revolution, and it's precisely because he has long operated on the interzone between centre and radical Right that he knows the anger that's out there and the potential for violent upheaval. Hence a Reform government, far from being fascist, might be the last chance to do the things that quell nativist anger. Saving our system from itself is the historic role Farage played in the late 2000s, when the rise of Ukip drained support from the BNP, channelling it into the safer waters of euroscepticism. He is the last gasp of the 20th century, defending its liberality and patriotism, and has an old-fashioned reading of British identity rooted in history and constitutionalism, not race or religion. 'I haven't fought the change,' caused by immigration, he once said, 'provided it comes with integration.' I'm sure that to him, men like Zia Yusuf – Reform's former chairman, Muslim and stinking rich – exemplify a British Dream that stretches from the beaches of Dunkirk to Ibiza, the freedom not to be told what to do, the right to have a laugh. To populist critics, however, Yusuf is a suspicious character who kept dragging Reform back to an illusionary centre-ground – compromise and betrayal – and Nigel's tolerance of him epitomised a lack of intellectual rigour. Farage might be tougher than the establishment on immigration, they say, but he's out-of-date. Doesn't see how bad things have got, doesn't get the existential threat posed by Islam. Lowe has speculated that he was driven out of Reform, in part, because the leadership didn't want him talking about 'mass deportation'. Spying an opportunity, the Tories are triangulating against Reform, suggesting Farage has embraced full communism by seeking to expand child benefit or nationalise industries. Arguably this illustrates their own, very unconservative addiction to economic dogma. Farage has evolved with circumstances – this is an insecure age that demands more babies, more manufacturing – and out of loyalty to constituencies that have been loyal to him. In short: if Scunthorpe wants its steel protected, he'll do it. The alternative is to offer the working class a dry lecture on supply and demand and what the country cannot afford. A bitter pill given Westminster earmarked £7bn to relocate Afghan refugees to the UK. Indeed, the basic problem the Conservatives have with trying to attack Farage from the Right is that we can remember what they did in office. Even if the Tories dumped Kemi and brought in Jenrick, who Farage has said will 'almost certainly' end up to the Right of him on immigration, Farage will turn to him at that first debate in 2029 and ask: 'Why did your party open the borders and refuse to leave the ECHR?' Jenrick has undergone a genuine conversion on these points, but my gut tells me the Tories are essentially a liberal party that occasionally says conservative things, whereas Reform is a conservative party that occasionally says liberal things. I am therefore more willing to give Reform the benefit of the doubt. The physical comparison between the slimline Jenrick and old Nigel, in a blazer, beneath a halo of cigarette smoke, would also be significant. Farage embodies his conservatism. So does Donald Trump. Trump, too, has said things at odds with his base – on abortion or war – and several Republicans ran against him from the Right in presidential primaries. They lost. Ultimately, politics is about vibes, and you are never going to convince the voters that Nigel Farage is a globalist cross-dressing as a nationalist.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Lisa Nandy criticised over pro-trans ‘protect the dolls' T-shirt
Lisa Nandy has been criticised for wearing a trans rights T-shirt with the slogan 'protect the dolls'. The Culture Secretary posted the images to her social media page after joining the Pride march in her Wigan constituency. But critics slammed the decision as a 'disgrace' and said a government minister should not be promoting a slogan 'designed to centre trans-identifying men at the expense of women and girls'. 'Doll' is a slang term from the 1980s for biological men who 'pass' as women. Trans people who do not look as feminine are referred to as 'bricks'. The slogan has previously been criticised as both misogynistic, as it compares women with dolls, and transphobic, as it excludes those who do not succeed in looking like the gender they identify with. The term has seen a revival in recent months after a number of celebrities including Pedro Pascal, Madonna and Tilda Swinton were photographed in a £75 designer T-shirt emblazoned with the slogan. Pascal's appearance in the T-shirt prompted a backlash on social media, with commentators saying that the 'creepy' slogan 'dehumanises' women and treats them like toys. It was later used on placards used by activists protesting against the Supreme Court ruling that trans women are not legally women. Campaigners' message 'dehumanises' women Fiona McAnena, the director of campaigns at human rights charity Sex Matters, said: ''Protect the dolls' is the latest vacuous trans-activist slogan designed to centre trans-identifying men at the expense of women and girls. 'No elected representative of the public – let alone a government minister – should be promoting the slogan of campaigners who are calling for men to be able to identify into any space for women, even those needed most such as toilets, changing rooms, refuges and prisons. 'The Secretary of State with responsibility for civil society should know better than to align with a movement which calls for the law to be flouted. This is naive at best. What's more, this is not a benign demand. Some people are now displaying more aggressive versions of this, like 'Arm the dolls'.' Ms Nandy's T-shirt appeared to have been made for the local event as it also contained the words 'pride in Leigh'. She posted the pictures on her Facebook page alongside a message saying: 'Had a fantastic time at the 10th anniversary of #WiganPride today! Amazing turnout for the parade & celebrations. Proud to live in such a welcoming, inclusive town.'
