In a hotter future, what comes after coral reefs die?
This is not a far-off scenario. Scientists predict that the rise of 1.5 Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) will be reached within a decade and that beyond that point, many coral simply cannot survive.
It is important to accept this and ask what next "rather than trying to hold onto the past", said David Obura, chair of IPBES, the UN's expert scientific panel on biodiversity.
"I wish it were different," Obura, a Kenyan reef scientist and founding director of CORDIO East Africa, a marine research organisation, told AFP.
"We need to be pragmatic about it and ask those questions, and face up to what the likely future will be."
And yet, it is a subject few marine scientists care to dwell on.
"We are having a hard time imagining that all coral reefs really could die off," said Melanie McField, a Caribbean reef expert, who described a "sort of pre-traumatic stress syndrome" among her colleagues.
"But it is likely in the two-degree world we are rapidly accelerating to," McField, founding director of the Healthy Reefs for Healthy People Initiative, told AFP.
When stressed in hotter ocean waters, corals expel the microscopic algae that provides their characteristic colour and food source. Without respite, bleached corals slowly starve.
At 1.5C of warming relative to pre-industrial times, between 70 and 90 percent of coral reefs are expected to perish, according to the IPCC, the global authority on climate science.
At 2C, that number rises to 99 percent.
Even with warming as it stands today -- about 1.4C -- mass coral death is occurring, and many scientists believe the global collapse of tropical reefs may already be underway.
- What comes next -
Obura said it was not pessimistic to imagine a world without coral reefs, but an urgent question that scientists were "only just starting to grapple with".
"I see no reason to not be clear about where we are at this point in time," Obura said. "Let's be honest about that, and deal with the consequences."
Rather than disappear completely, coral reefs as they exist today will likely evolve into something very different, marine scientists on four continents told AFP.
This would happen as slow-growing hard corals -- the primary reef builders that underpin the ecosystem -- die off, leaving behind white skeletons without living tissue.
Gradually, these would be covered by algae and colonised by simpler organisms better able to withstand hotter oceans, like sponges, mussels, and weedy soft corals like sea fans.
"There will be less winners than there are losers," said Tom Dallison, a marine scientist and strategic advisor to the International Coral Reef Initiative.
These species would dominate this new underwater world. The dead coral beneath -- weakened by ocean acidification, and buffeted by waves and storms -- would erode over time into rubble.
"They will still exist, but they will just look very different. It is our responsibility to ensure the services they provide, and those that depend on them, are protected," Dallison said.
- Dark horizon -
One quarter of all ocean species live among the world's corals.
Smaller, sparser, less biodiverse reefs simply means fewer fish and other marine life.
The collapse of reefs threatens in particular the estimated one billion people who rely on them for food, tourism income, and protection from coastal erosion and storms.
But if protected and managed properly, these post-coral reefs could still be healthy, productive, attractive ecosystems that provide some economic benefit, said Obura.
So far, the picture is fuzzy -- research into this future has been very limited.
Stretched resources have been prioritised for protecting coral and exploring novel ways to make reefs more climate resilient.
But climate change is not the only thing threatening corals.
Tackling pollution, harmful subsidies, overfishing and other drivers of coral demise would give "the remaining places the best possible chance of making it through whatever eventual warming we have", Obura said.
Conservation and restoration efforts were "absolutely essential" but alone were like "pushing a really heavy ball up a hill, and that hill is getting steeper", he added.
Trying to save coral reefs "is going to be extremely difficult" as long as we keep pouring carbon into the atmosphere, said Jean-Pierre Gattuso, an oceans expert from France's flagship scientific research institute, CNRS.
But some coral had developed a level of thermal tolerance, he said, and research into restoring small reef areas with these resilient strains held promise.
"How do we work in this space when you have this sort of big dark event on the horizon? It's to make that dark event a little brighter," said Dallison.
np/mh/phz
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
3 days ago
- News.com.au
Donald Trump pushes to shut down climate data-collecting NASA satellites
Donald Trump's administration is moving to shut down two key NASA satellite missions which monitor planet-warming greenhouse gases, in its latest hit to climate science. The missions – which include a freeflying satellite known as OCO-2 and an instrument attached to the International Space Station known as OCO-3 – measure carbon dioxide levels and crop growth around the world, providing critical information to scientists and farmers. But funding for the missions, collectively known as the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, has been scrapped under the President's budget request for fiscal year 2026, starting in October. NASA told AP the missions were being terminated 'to align with the President's agenda and budget priorities'. If decommissioned, OCO-3, would be switched off and remain mounted to the International Space Station. However, freeflying OCO-2 – which already has enough fuel to last through 20240 according to CNN– would be relocated to a lower orbit, where it would remain for years before it eventually burnt up in the Earth's atmosphere. The US Republican-controlled Congress is yet to make a decision on Mr Trump's budget request but David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who managed the mission, has confirmed the decommissioning planning for both missions is already underway. Dr Crisp told NPR that NASA employees are working on 'Phase F' plans – where teams work out how to end a mission. 'What I have heard is direct communications from people who were making those plans, who weren't allowed to tell me that that's what they were told to do. But they were allowed to ask me questions,' he told the outlet. Other sources also confirmed the decommissioning planning to CNN. Dr Crisp said the missions are 'national assets' and are more accurate than any other systems. He said they have led scientists to discover the Amazon rainforest emits more carbon dioxide than it absorbs and can help monitor drought by detecting the 'glow' of photosynthesis in plants. 'This is really critical. We're learning so much about this rapidly changing planet,' he told AP. Anna Michalak, a climate researcher at Carnegie Science and Stanford University, also pointed out the missions have helped other countries. 'It's not just that these are the only two NASA-funded missions,' she told CNN. 'It's that these have been the most impressive, inspirational missions in this space, globally, period.' Dr Crisp is hoping Congress will vote to maintain funding. However, with Congress currently in recess, a budget may not be adopted before the new fiscal year. In the meantime, the former NASA scientist is among those calling on outside partners, including from overseas, to fund OCO-3, attached to the International Space Station. 'We're going out to billionaires. We're going out to foundations,' he told AP. 'But … it's a really, really bad idea to try and push it off onto private industry or private individuals or private donors. It just doesn't make sense.' A NASA spokesperson told CNN if Mr Trump's proposed budget passes, it 'will be implemented upon the start of the next fiscal year'. US to rewrite its past national climate reports The news comes as the Trump administration announced last week it is revising past editions of the nation's premier climate report. The decision, announced by Energy Secretary Chris Wright on CNN, followed the government's revocation of the Endangerment Finding, a scientific determination that underpins a host of regulations aimed at curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Asked why previous editions of the National Climate Assessment were no longer available online, former fracking company CEO Mr Wright told the network: 'Because we're reviewing them, and we will come out with updated reports on those and with comments on those.' First published in 2000, the National Climate Assessment has long been viewed as a cornerstone of the US government's understanding of climate science, synthesising input from federal agencies and hundreds of external experts. Previous editions warned in stark terms of mounting risks to America's economy, infrastructure, and public health if greenhouse gas emissions are not curtailed. But in April, the administration moved to dismiss the hundreds of scientists working on the sixth edition. Under the Global Change Research Act of 1990, the government is legally obligated to deliver the climate assessment to Congress and the president. Mr Trump's administration and Congress have pressed forward with their pro-fossil fuel agenda – dismantling clean energy tax credits through the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' and opening more ecologically sensitive lands to drilling. Last month's proposed revocation of the Endangerment Finding by the Environmental Protection Agency was accompanied by the release of a new climate study from the Department of Energy, authored by climate change contrarians. The study questioned whether heat records are truly increasing and whether extreme weather is worsening. It also misrepresented the work of cited climate scientists, according to several who spoke to AFP, and suggested that rising atmospheric carbon dioxide could be a net benefit for agriculture.

ABC News
6 days ago
- ABC News
Climate change and extreme heat play a role in decline of tropical bird population, study finds
Climate change is responsible for a nearly 40 per cent decline in the average abundance of tropical bird species since 1950, a new study has found. The joint study from the University of Queensland and Barcelona Supercomputing Centre in Spain, published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution, found severe weather events had combined to reduce fertility, alter breeding habits, and kill both young and mature birds. The study used open-source bird data to map the population of 3,000 bird species worldwide between 1950 and 2020. Using statistical modelling and noting how those bird populations changed after abnormal weather events, the authors were able to specifically assess climate change's impact on species. They found a 25-38 per cent decline in the overall abundance of tropical species, largely due to prolonged and extreme heat. Professor James Watson from the University of Queensland, one of the report's authors, said while the impact of gradual climate change was well understood, extreme events had been largely ignored. "This piece of science showed that it's actually the biggest factor causing declines in tropical birds around the world," he said. The paper found tropical species were more sensitive to events like heatwaves, droughts and floods than those that live in milder climates. Professor Watson said the team had a number of theories as to why. "If you look broadly at tropical regions, most species have very small ranges. They're highly specialised," he said. "When you go further away from the tropics, a lot of species have much wider ranges … so they're available to adapt to different kinds of climates." The study found birds that live in dry, tropical savannas, which stretch across much of northern Australia, are at particular risk due to the volatility of water sources. Through climate change, these areas are seeing increasingly frequent and severe heatwaves and dry spells, as well as increased fire activity, according to the report. Dr Golo Maurer — the director of Birdlife Australia's Conservation Strategy, based in Cairns — said birds of all varieties struggled to cool themselves in extreme heat. "Birds can't sweat, so they're struggling to shed heat. They pant, but that contributes to water loss," Dr Maurer said. "They start at a higher temperature than we do, which allows them to live in warmer climates. "But once you push on beyond 42 degrees, they're really struggling." Birdlife Australia coordinates thousands of volunteer citizen scientists, whose work is partly responsible for the datasets that studies like this rely on. Dr Maurer said teams out in the field were working on Birdlife Australia's own report into species abundance in Far North Queensland and had noted similar concerning population drops, particularly amongst smaller varieties. This, he said, is because smaller birds are unable to store energy as effectively, must feed more frequently, and are therefore unable to hide themselves away during extreme heat events. It means species like the endangered Carpentaria grasswren have changed their behaviour to come out in the middle of a hot summer day in order to find water, putting them at serious risk of overheating. Dr Maurer said some population declines in wet tropics species are so concerning, Birdlife Australia has recommended some species' have their threat classification upgraded. "Certain species now just live in a fairly narrow band along mountain ranges where they are finding the right temperatures. "The famous golden bowerbird, for instance, the smallest of the bowerbirds … seems to have been abandoned some areas, so they're not coming down the mountain anymore." The study also found that other human activities, such as land clearing, hunting or the degradation of habitat, had also combined to reduce bird abundance by between 10 to 20 per cent globally. However, it found some of the places most severely impacted by population declines were outside the physical reach of humans. "In two relatively undisturbed rainforests in Panama and the Amazon, abundance declined by over 50 per cent for the majority of bird species between 1977 and 2020," the report said. In order to give at-risk bird species a fighting chance of surviving already "baked-in" climate change, Professor Watson said it was essential to protect as much habitat as possible. "The only way these species in the tropics are going to survive these extreme events is if they have healthy populations," he said. "Every single bird that we see out there has adapted to natural climate change events in the past, which means they have the internal mechanics to adapt to rapidly changing climates in the future."

ABC News
6 days ago
- ABC News
Western Australia's 'catastrophic' bleaching event leaves parts of the spectacular Ningaloo Reef white and grey
Even the pristine "hope spot" of Ningaloo could not escape the state's worst ever coral bleaching. The striking red earth meets a sparkling turquoise sea at Ningaloo. ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) It's the colours that tell you where you are. A sparkling turquoise sea washes into the red earth. More than 500 species of fish and more than 250 species of coral can be found in Ningaloo's waters. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) Bob beneath the surface and you'll find a rainbow palette of life. More than 500 species of fish, and more than 250 species of coral lighting up the seabed. But now, Ningaloo is using its treasured hues to send out an SOS. The reef's distress call is captured in stark images taken by ocean photographer Brooke Pyke earlier this year. "Everything was just completely white," she says. A large formation of coral that has suffered from bleaching. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) The grooves of this brain coral are a stark white after bleaching. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) Bleached pillar coral found in Ningaloo. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) Ningaloo and other WA reefs escaped major bleaching in previous global marine heating events but not this time. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) Brooke has been working in the diving industry for more than a decade. She remembers her first dive at the World Heritage-listed Ningaloo Reef — some 1,200 kilometres north of Perth, off Western Australia's remote north-west coast. "The vibrancy of the colours, the diversity of coral species, the beautiful fish that live amongst all those organisms was just so, so vibrant and so full of life," she says. This is a snapshot of what Ningaloo looked like before the major bleaching event. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) Lettuce coral and other coral species pictured in Ningaloo before the major bleaching event. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) "To see it now … it's just skeletons of what it was before. "It's some of the worst coral bleaching I've ever seen." Ocean photographer Brooke Pyke has been capturing the coral bleaching. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) Brooke Pyke says the bleaching that's occurred at Ningaloo is some of the worst she's ever seen. ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) 2024 was the warmest year on record for global oceans, culminating in the fourth-ever global coral bleaching event, which has circumnavigated oceans in a wave of ongoing coral mortality. It hit Ningaloo late last year. "In around December 2024, we started to notice that water temperatures were abnormally high," says molecular ecologist Dr Kate Quigley. "By the end of February, we were seeing some locations along the Western Australian coastline, including Ningaloo, as high as four degrees warmer than they should be. "For a coral, it is the difference between having a normal temperature versus having a raging fever." 'Unprecedented' damage to previously untouched corals Throughout this year, scientists from the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) have been surveying the damage to WA's reefs, and a clear picture has now emerged. "There is no doubt the reef has suffered the worst heat stress, and indeed coral bleaching, that we've ever had in Western Australia before," AIMS research scientist James Gilmour says. "It's unprecedented." Dr James Gilmour says the level of bleaching is "unprecedented". ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) Last summer brought the longest, largest and most intense marine heatwave on record for WA. Coral bleaching and mortality is expected when heat stress exceeds eight weeks. During this event, some reefs in WA suffered for 20 to 30 weeks. Until this year, WA's north-west reefs had mostly evaded major bleaching, making them "hope spots" for Dr Gilmour. This time, virtually no WA reefs went unscathed. While the full impact is still being investigated, experts at the AIMS-led WA Coral Bleaching Group have so far reported bleaching and mortality across a 1,500-kilometre area. The Rowley Shoals, a group of three coral atolls off the coast of Broome, had never bleached before. AIMS believes this event killed up to 90 per cent of corals at the Mermaid and Clerke reefs there. Rowley Shoals pictured in 2012. ( Supplied: AIMS/Nick Thake ) Rowley Shoals pictured in April 2025. ( Supplied: AIMS/Anna Cresswell ) Their surveys at Ningaloo in May recorded up to 60 per cent of bleaching and mortality at some sites, with the Tantabiddi and Jurabi areas hit hardest. The scale has eclipsed Ningaloo's other major bleaching event, which occurred after a significant La Nina in 2011. The Tantabiddi reef, pictured in May 2025. ( Supplied: AIMS/Declan Stick ) Coral bleaching in the Tantabiddi reef. ( Supplied: AIMS/Declan Stick ) "It's really a wake-up call to us here," Dr Gilmour says. "Climate change, and global warming, has caught up with Western Australia's coral reefs." This year was the first time two World Heritage reefs on opposite sides of the country were bleaching simultaneously. "There is no doubt that this is the worst that WA has experienced and when you combine it with the Great Barrier Reef, it's the single worst bleaching event in Australia's history," Dr Gilmour says. "The severity, the extent and the duration of this event, is unprecedented." WA's coral reef has historically been more resilient to marine heatwaves. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) Corals are animals, and the heat makes them sick. Warm waters make the coral sick and it's on a scale scientists haven't seen before. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) "That warm water causes the animal to start to lose its relationship with its little symbiotic algae inside of it," Dr Quigley explains. "Over time, the animal can starve. And if the warming is too severe or stays too severe for too long, the animal can actually die." That's what is happening now in some of the worst hit areas. The water at Ningaloo is crystal clear. And Dr Quigley, who is a senior research scientist at the philanthropic Minderoo Foundation, guides me around a section of the reef. Pointing at the seabed as we glide through the water, Dr Quigley is bobbing up every so often to say things like, "see this bommie — that's probably 500-years-old", or, "that's a good sign" when we see a happy-looking coral. But other times she doesn't need to bob up — I can make out the muffled word through her snorkel under the water. "Dead." These coral aren't a bleached-white colour anymore, but more of a grey, with algae growing all over. "When you get that amount of warming for that long, that's going to translate to a lot of mortality," Dr Quigley says. "We're kind of all waiting with bated breath on those exact [mortality] numbers. "But given what we know about the relationship between coral health and warming, it's unlikely to be good. "This has not just been a bad bleaching event, it has been an absolutely catastrophic bleaching event." Molecular ecologist Kate Quigley has come to Ningaloo to survey the damage. ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) Kate Quigley took 7.30 on a tour under the water at Ningaloo. ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) Kate Quigley is concerned about what the results of coral testing will show. ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) A healthy reef doesn't just make for pretty pictures. It's critically important for both ecological and economic reasons, and vital for industries like fisheries and tourism. Just ask anyone who works in the tourist town of Exmouth, synonymous with snorkelling and swimming with whale sharks at Ningaloo. Craig Kitson has lived here for 25 years and runs a glass-bottom boat tourism business. Craig Kitson says the level of coral bleaching has the potential to hurt his business. ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) "We're seeing patches where we've lost about 90 per cent of the coral," he says. "Definitely it has the potential to affect our business. I mean, our business is centred around looking at coral and fish." While some operators would prefer not to draw attention to the bleaching, Craig sees it as vital. Bleached coral at Ningaloo as seen from a drone. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) "From my perspective, I think it's more important than ever that people come and connect with this place," he says. "We tell everyone that comes on board that they're now an ambassador for the reef and they need to go forward and tell people, and the way they vote and the way they live their lives is really important and it's crucial for the next generations." Massive and branching coral in Ningaloo before bleaching. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) Massive and branching coral in Ningaloo after bleaching. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) 'How many wake up calls?' Federal Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilson and WA Greens MP Sophie McNeill have travelled to Ningaloo for an in-water briefing by AIMS researchers about the bleaching event. "While Ningaloo is hanging on to life and there's still beauty and wonder here, people should come and see it, we know that if we don't act, there is no future for this reef," Whish-Wilson says. "How many wake up calls do we need?" The Greens say this year's coral bleaching event shows the need for stronger environmental protection laws and an ambitious 2035 emissions reduction target. While Australia is not among the world's top CO2 emitters, it is one of the biggest fossil fuel exporters. Up the coast from Ningaloo, in WA's Pilbara, leading LNG exporter Woodside Energy was recently given the green light to continue operating its North West Shelf gas plant until 2070, something Senator Whish-Wilson says "beggars belief" at a time when Australia's reefs are "suffocating". Woodside says research shows its LNG exports help displace coal in Asia, leading to lower global emissions. A different report, released last year, cast doubt over the environmental benefits of gas compared with coal. WA Greens MP Sophie McNeil and Senator Peter Whish-Wilson. ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) In a statement, Federal Environment Minister Murray Watt told 7.30 the impact on Ningaloo "underlines the need for Australia and the world to take urgent action, including reaching net zero emissions". "That's what the Albanese Government is doing by setting ambitious 2030 emissions targets and driving up investment in renewables," he said. "Following the consideration of rigorous scientific and other advice, a proposed decision to approve the North West Shelf development has been made, subject to strict conditions, particularly relating to the impact of air emissions levels." Mr Watt said the project is also required to be net zero by 2050. The 2050 target comes from the 2015 Paris Agreement, where world leaders pledged to try to prevent temperatures rising more than 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels. The West Australian state government introduced legislation to tackle climate emissions in 2023, but the Climate Change Bill was shelved ahead of the state election. Woodside Energy was given the green light to continue operating its North West Shelf gas plant until 2070. ( ABC News: Charlie Mclean ) In an attempt to revive the debate, the WA Greens have re-introduced Labor's climate Bill to WA parliament's upper house, with amendments including a renewable energy target. "Critically, we've put a 2030 target in it because WA is the only state without one," McNeill says. "It is communities like the ones here in Exmouth that will suffer because of the impact of global warming." WA's Environment Minister Matthew Swinbourn was unavailable for an interview, but in a statement to 7.30 said this event "underscores the risks our environment faces from the effects of global climate change". He said the state government was "taking some time to review" its previously proposed climate change legislation, in light of new federal regulations which require big polluters to reduce their emissions over time. "We are focused on ensuring that our approach aligns with the most effective measures available to drive down emissions and support our transition to a decarbonised economy," he said. Coalition members are divided on whether Australia should even be pursuing net zero, with Federal WA Liberal Andrew Hastie calling out what he sees as "moral hypocrisy". He says Australia is exporting coal and gas to some of the world's biggest emitters, like China, India and Japan, at the same time as pursuing a costly decarbonisation journey that risks energy reliability. His stance is at odds with WA state Liberal leader Basil Zempilas, who sees no need to drop the 2050 target. A 'resilient, hope spot' Back in Exmouth, Dr Quigley and her team are selectively breeding corals to enhance their heat tolerance in the face of escalating ocean temperatures. Dr Quigley says that while they have seen encouraging results, there is "no silver bullet". "What we need is climate action now." Kate Quigley is breeding heat-resilient corals to cope with more freqent marine heatwaves. ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) Kate Quigley says the best way to protect the reefs is to take action on greenhouse gas emissions. ( ABC News: Mitchell Edgar ) While bleaching does not always mean death for reefs, scientists say they need 10 to 15 years to fully recover, and that rising global temperatures mean the frequency and intensity of these events are likely to increase. Despite the bleaching Dr Gilmour says Ningaloo is still among the healthiest reefs on the planet. Scientists say corals need 10 to 15 years to recover from bleaching fully. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) The intensity and frequency of coral bleaching events are likely to increase. ( Supplied: Brooke Pyke ) "The reef is very resilient, nature is very resilient," he says. "But if you keep hitting it with impacts, then it can't recover." Just off the coast from where we are, we can see humpback whales breaching in the distance and soon after we've finished filming, we spot a manta ray gliding by a group of sea turtles. Ningaloo, Dr Gilmour says, remains his "hope spot". Credits: Reporter: Rhiannon Shine Photos and videos: Mitchell Edgar, Brooke Pyke, Australian Institute of Marine Science (Declan Stick, Anna Cresswell, Nick Thake) Digital production: Jenny Ky Editor: Paul Johnson Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV