Select Committee Announces Support Of Law Changes That Will Prevent Councils From Restricting Harmful Pollution Of Water
'The damage these changes would cause must not be underestimated. This is not only an attack on the health of our environment but also democracy as the proposals seek to give greater power to polluting industries and write local government out of regulating harmful pollution of freshwater,' says Choose Clean Water spokesperson Tom Kay.
'It beggars belief when you consider that the National-led Government came to power claiming to be champions of localism - they've thrown that out the window completely.'
For freshwater, two parts of the Environment Select Committee report are most significant; the proposals on Section 70 of the Resource Management Act and changes to farm plans, including more Ministerial control.
Currently, Section 70 says that councils cannot allow pollution that would cause 'significant adverse effects on aquatic life' as a permitted activity. This means regional councils cannot allow for potentially polluting activities to happen without them going through a consenting process to assess whether they can avoid, remedy, or mitigate their impacts, even where an environment they want to operate in might already be polluted.
The Coalition parties support doing away with this and allowing polluting activities to go ahead, as long as the place those activities are occurring is already polluted and as long as there will be some reduction in that pollution over time.
'But it doesn't make sense. It is laughable that the report suggests you could grant a consent for an activity to add pollution to a place or continue polluting it now as long as it reduces its pollution by a bit, later. Why would we say 'We'll make a waterbody really sick now so we can nurse it back to health over decades'!? Make it make sense.'
Even with standards for these permitted activities, campaigners regional councils will struggle to ensure they are sufficient to reduce or avoid 'significant adverse effects on aquatic life' and will face significant lobbying to minimise any standards.
'This opens the door to more and worse pollution. Pollution that harms aquatic life inevitably has an impact on human lives, either directly due to illness or through impacts on livelihoods or taking away the things with love about the places we live in.'
The Coalition parties in the select committee also support changes that would bypass regional councils' role in controlling pollution through farm plans.
Farm plans have been a largely unsuccessful attempt to reduce the impact of farming on the country's freshwater over the last decade or more. In regions where they have been used, like Canterbury, they have been found to be unable to stop the degradation of communities' waterways and drinking water sources.
'Not only is the value of farm plans in controlling pollution highly questionable,' says Kay, 'the Select Committee's proposal is to give Government the ability to support farm plans written and audited by polluting industries rather than regional councils, and to allow the Minister for the Environment to make the decision on which industry groups can play this role. This keeps regional councils at arms length from attempts to control pollution through farm plans, effectively writing them out as regulator.'
'This Government has demonstrated it has close and inappropriate relationships with some industry bodies. Having a Minister be responsible for such a decision opens the door to undue influence and allows for industry to capture the whole process around farm plans. We're watching it happen now. This proposal effectively writes local government out of their regulatory role of controlling pollution.'
'It has never been clearer that the National-led Government is working for the polluters and not for the public. Our communities will pay for this through the impact on our quality of life, our drinking water sources, our opportunities to swim or fish, our pride in our beautiful environment, and our ability to be involved in local decision making.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
7 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Opinion: New Zealand needs more doctors, but is a new medical school the solution?
New Zealand desperately needs more doctors, especially general practitioners. However, the government's own analysis shows that its flagship solution — building a brand-new medical school in Waikato — is deeply flawed. The government said a Waikato Medical School would be a cheaper, faster route to training more doctors. However, the detailed business case — which is meant to ensure government projects deliver value for money and was released nearly a week later — shows this decision was based on misleading assumptions and omissions. Firstly, the government's pitch hinges on the Waikato school being a four-year graduate-entry programme, supposedly cheaper than the current six-year degrees at Otago and Auckland universities. What they conveniently omit is that students must first complete a minimum three-year bachelors degree before even starting. The government claimed running costs will be cheaper because of a shorter degree but had never considered trialling the four-year graduate model at Otago or Auckland, where infrastructure and proven teaching expertise already exist. Why build an entirely new institution rather than simply expanding existing, successful schools? Furthermore, the government modelled its plan on an Australian programme, assuming it would increase the number of GPs working rurally here. That's a risky assumption. The business case estimated that 38% of Waikato graduates would become general practitioners, compared to 23% if intake was increased at Auckland and Otago, and 33% through a joint rural training programme. This is speculation and contradicted by Prof Warwick Bagg, Dean of the University of Auckland's medical school, who said current programmes already had around 35% of graduates working as a GP eight years after graduation. There are also questions around what impact Waikato will have on Otago's existing rural programme and what effect it will have on placements already aligned with the university. The Waikato medical school was pitched to National as a political "gift" and the government has cherry-picked facts and overlooked other options. For example, Otago and Auckland universities could expand their intakes now, producing more doctors faster in proven, established environments that require only increased funding — not costly new infrastructure. Christopher Luxon's government is out of touch, prioritising pet projects, instead of focusing on the delivering what New Zealand needs. Rather than chasing a political headline, the government could look to support and expand the medical schools we already have. Our health system and patients deserve no less.
Otago Daily Times
7 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: sea lions, health and Trump
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including what comes around for the killers of sea lions, funding our public health system, and a simple solution to Trump. You don't see them in the supermarket queue Several days ago three sea lions were shot at the Waitaki River mouth. To the person/persons responsible for this act, do you go fishing in the vicinity of the river mouth? Were you getting annoyed because the sea lions were catching more fish than you and you decided to do something about them? When you approached the sea lions and stood with your loaded weapon, feeling only anger towards them, why didn't you stop, admire, consider what the consequences of your actions would be and walk past? The sea lion's world is the ocean and this is where they get their food. They take only what they need to survive. You don't see them down the seafood aisle at a supermarket. Your actions have taken away something special from the coast for reasons known only to you. However, what goes around comes around. Carrying the cost In its first days, National gave landlords a $3 billion tax break. Soon after, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced $14.7b in tax relief over four years—then borrowed $12b to cover the revenue shortfall. Despite this, Willis speaks of "balancing the books" while reframing the narrative to blame the previous government. The reality is that her early decisions created a $17.7b revenue black hole, forcing cuts across essential programmes. These cuts disproportionately harm those on low incomes, people at risk of discrimination, and the most vulnerable in our communities. Jobs have been lost, projects scrapped, and hopes for pay equity abandoned — all because of reckless tax and borrowing choices. Willis' approach prioritises short-term political gain over long-term stability, leaving ordinary New Zealanders to carry the cost. RUCs and reasons Why have a tax specifically for roads at all? We don't do it for other government services such as health, education. The only difference is private industry benefits directly from roads, and use and damage roads more. Scrap RUCs on all vehicles below X tonnes. That makes the majority of private motor vehicles RUC-free; eliminates the need for further public sector staffing, systems and policing. It still ensures the private sector mostly pays their way. The 80/20 rule. Roading is less than 3% of total government spend. Why further bloat and complicate the public service unnecessarily. Is it a jobs scheme for the usual suspects? Lights, revisited Back up the bus, my train of thought has proven to be off track. My previous tale (Letters ODT 22.7.25) may have been a tad too thoughtless. Some sod has turned a sod, well several sods. There is now one worksite in Tomahawk which has broken ground, digging to lay solid foundations. There is one new street light beside the work site, which surely completely justifies the turning on of all 22 new street lights. Although I have yet to hear evidence of workers working by the streetlight. I still wake up early each morning, look out the kitchen window, and ponder the extravagance of lighting fields of green. If we assume 200W of power for each light then 200 x 21 (leaving out one semi useful light) gives us 4.2kW of power running all night. The Aurora website has handy hints for saving power. I know the new lights are LED (an Aurora website recommendation for power saving) but how about switching off the ones not needed? If we want a health system, fund it properly In the last two months I have had to be taken twice to the Dunedin Hospital emergency department. In each case I could certainly see, after the event, that it was not strictly necessary, but that did not seem to be true at the time. On each occasion, the treatment that I experienced was the best I could possibly have expected or wished for. When I tried to thank all the staff that had helped me, on the feedback comments I found that many of the responses that had been received were very critical, almost always in similar ways. For example, 'I had to wait (some long time) to get any help", or "I had to leave before any special treatment had been given to me". We really ought to ask ourselves how a critically under-resourced (and yet extremely good) service can be expected to operate in the way we would like. If we are not prepared to fund our public health service adequately, what do we think will happen? I simply want to acknowledge just how special the doctors, nurses, and other staff are. With friends like these who needs enemies Donald Trump demonstrates a mind-boggling lack of ability to assess character and human values in people. He has befriended two of the world's most dangerous, cruel and evil leaders: Putin and Netanyahu. Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of historical events, they in no way exonerate these heads of state for the atrocities they are now committing. Both dictatorial despots are responsible for the mass killing of thousands of innocent men, women and children and the annihilation of large parts of their countries . Putin invaded Ukraine supposedly only interested in military targets. In his deranged mind he keeps blaming Ukraine. The only plus is that Trump may have realised Putin was playing him for a fool. Netanayhu continues to blast the life and livelihoods out of the Palestinians in the Gaza strip on the pretext of eliminating Hamas and getting them to release Israeli hostages The clumsy method of doing this (indiscriminate bombardment and shelling) is entirely consistent with the "asleep at the wheel" state of the supposedly sophisticated Israeli military allowing Hamas to invade in the first place. Blaming Hamas for the current trickle of aid and food getting to Gaza, the killing of citizens at aid stations , and the malnutrition crisis just demonstrates how mentally deranged and dishonest Netanyahu and his entourage are . Both Putin and Netanyahu are responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Neither of them want peace — they are intent on bludgeoning their target country to submission. Simple solution If Donald Trump is really serious about getting criminality out of Washington DC, there is one simple, effective and incredibly popular action he could take. Five-letter word beginning in L. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
Otago Daily Times
17 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Primary sector and tourism driving growth
The South has had some great news recently, with Southland and Otago emerging as the top-performing regions in the country in Kiwibank's recent report. Much of this success can be attributed to the primary sector and tourism, which are driving the economic recovery. This positive trend coincides with farmer confidence surging to its highest level in eight years. Federated Farmers' Confidence Survey indicates a remarkable shift in sentiment, driven by farm profitability at its highest level ever recorded. Additionally, 23% of farmers are forecasting increased production over the next 12 months. This in turn means more economic activity in our region, spurring more opportunities and job growth. There's been further big news for productivity with the biggest building consent reform in decades set to eliminate system blockages and speed up the delivery of new homes and infrastructure. Making it easier and more affordable to build is an important part of this government's economic growth plan. In another excellent move for progress, the government's second RMA Amendment Bill has passed into law, bringing in sweeping changes to many of the handbrakes on New Zealanders' lives, helping to drive economic growth, and laying the groundwork for job creation. The Resource Management Act (RMA) has been holding New Zealand back for decades. We're making it quicker and simpler to boost housing supply, reduce red tape, and consent renewable energy for the primary sector. Productivity and growth translates into more job and business opportunities, as well as increased funding for the public services that enhance our quality of life, including healthcare and education. On education, the government's proposing to replace NCEA with a new national qualification. One of the changes put forward is to create new subjects and standards to support stronger vocational pathways. Many employers in our region are involved with vocational training, and it would be great to get your perspective during the consultation period which is open until September 15. I've had some great feedback about the two new seasonal work visas that were announced last week. Much of Southland's prosperity centres around agriculture and tourism. The success of these seasonal industries is essential for our local economy and the many businesses associated with them.
