
Families devastated as neighborhood cancer surge is traced to radioactive waste from first atomic bomb
The findings have been published this week in JAMA Network Open by researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and provide the clearest evidence to date linking radioactive contamination in Coldwater Creek, a tributary of the Missouri River north of St. Louis, to long-term cancer risks in nearby residents.
'Our research indicates that the communities around North St. Louis appear to have had excess cancer from exposure to the contaminated Coldwater Creek,' said Marc Weisskopf, professor of environmental epidemiology and physiology at Harvard and corresponding author of the study.
Weisskopf's team found that individuals who lived within one kilometer of the creek as children between the 1940s and 1960s were significantly more likely to develop cancer later in life.
They believe the cancer is a result of ionizing radiation exposure from the creekbed, soil, and water.
The source of the contamination dates back to one of the darkest and most secretive chapters in US history: the Manhattan Project, the clandestine federal initiative that developed the world's first nuclear weapons.
Mallinckrodt Chemical Works, operating in downtown St. Louis, was responsible for processing uranium used in the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945.
But after the war, barrels of radioactive waste were moved to open-air storage sites near Coldwater Creek, where they remained for years, exposed to rain, wind, and runoff.
Those toxins, including uranium and thorium, leached into the soil and water, contaminating the surrounding environment and putting thousands at risk, especially children, who played in the creek, dug in the dirt, and breathed in radioactive dust kicked up during gardening or construction.
Now, decades later, the health toll is becoming undeniable.
The Harvard study, based on a cohort of 4,209 individuals who lived in the Greater St. Louis area between 1958 and 1972, found that 24% reported having cancer.
Among those living closest to the creek, that number rose to 30%.
'Our study found that children in the 1940s to 1960s who lived near Coldwater Creek… had a 44% higher risk of cancer compared to those living further than 20 kilometers away,' said co-author Michael Leung, a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard's Department of Environmental Health, to Fox News.
The types of cancer reported include leukemia, thyroid, breast, and colon cancers are consistent with illnesses linked to radiation exposure.
For many in North St. Louis County, the revelation is both vindicating and heartbreaking.
Families who grew up splashing in Coldwater Creek or building homes nearby have lost loved ones to aggressive cancers - often with no explanation, until now.
The Harvard study suggests those deaths were not random but the byproduct of wartime secrecy, industrial negligence, and decades of environmental inaction.
While the researchers acknowledged limitations in their study, including its sample size and reliance on self-reported outcomes, the statistical signal is clear enough to prompt renewed concern and action.
The study comes at a pivotal moment. Last month, Congress passed an expanded version of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) as part of President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' offering financial relief for Americans harmed by nuclear testing and contamination - including, for the first time, residents near Coldwater Creek.
'These findings may have broader implications - as countries think about increasing nuclear power and developing more nuclear weapons,' Weisskopf warned.
'The waste from these entities could have huge impacts on people's health, even at these lower levels of exposure.'
Local families, activists, and health officials have long urged the government to take the cancer clusters seriously.
In July 2023, an investigation published by The Associated Press, The Missouri Independent and MuckRock showed that the federal government and companies responsible for nuclear bomb production and atomic waste storage sites in the St. Louis area were aware of health risks, spills, improperly stored contaminants and other problems but often ignored them.
The federal government formally acknowledged the contamination at Coldwater Creek in the 1980s, but efforts to clean up the area have been slow and piecemeal.
Now, armed with hard scientific evidence, those affected are hoping for accountability.
'We hope these findings will support public health measures for affected communities, as well as ongoing efforts to remediate the creek,' Leung said.
While nuclear workers had direct exposure, people who live near contamination sites worry about uncertainty. Many who grew up in the area weren't told about the risks for decades.
In 2007, Chapman and Karen Nickel were so concerned about cancer and other unusual illnesses in their St. Louis County neighborhoods that they formed Just Moms STL.
In 2019, the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry issued a report that found people who regularly played in Coldwater Creek as children from the 1960s to the 1990s may have a slight increased risk of bone cancer, lung cancer and leukemia.
The agency determined that those exposed daily to the creek starting in the 2000s, when cleanup began, could have a small increased risk of lung cancer.
The government's sloppy handling of nuclear contamination over decades has understandably made people doubt official promises that conditions are safe now, said Arjun Makhijani, a nuclear expert and president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research.
'There is zero trust,' he said.
People in the St. Louis area are concerned that more illnesses are caused by the contamination and some are pushing for legislation to compensate those who are sick. Others have sued those responsible for the waste.
Several people with serious illnesses, or whose loved ones are sick, met recently at Nickel's house.
Jim Gaffney, now in his 60s, grew up in the 1960s playing in Coldwater Creek - his childhood home backed up to the waterway.
'I was always in the creek,' Gaffney said. 'Told not to, but we had seven kids. Mom couldn't watch us all. We just thought it was fun. We built mudslides and everything. I'm sure I got exposed.'
He and his wife, Susie, loved the neighborhood so much that when they got married, they moved into a home there. Their children grew up playing in a park that backs to the creek, Susie Gaffney said.
'We had no warnings. We had no fears,' she said.
Jim Gaffney was diagnosed with Stage 4 Hodgkin lymphoma in 1981 and given little chance to survive. A bone-marrow transplant saved his life, but the toll of the radiation, chemotherapy and the disease has been enormous.
'Now I've got hypertension, heart failure, I've had at least five bladder tumors removed since ´95. I'm still here, but it's not been easy,' he said.
The Gaffneys' son Joe has battled thyroid cancer since 1998 when he was 18.
Tricia Byrnes swam in Weldon Spring quarries as a teenager. Eight years ago, her 15-year-old son was diagnosed with a rare cancer of the thymus, a small organ near the heart. She wonders about a connection.
Byrnes she became so frustrated with the lack of acknowledgement about the health risk at Weldon Spring that she successfully ran as a Republican for the Missouri House, where she is pushing for federal compensation for those who believe their illnesses are connected to contamination.
She said it's infuriating that the federal government not only allowed the contamination that made people sick, but didn't do enough to contain it.
'What the hell is wrong with people?' she asked.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires
LOS ANGELES, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Wildfires that devastated parts of the Los Angeles area in January indirectly led to hundreds of deaths in the ensuing weeks, far exceeding the official toll of 31 fatalities, according to a study released on Wednesday. The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA, estimated 440 "excess deaths" were attributable to the fires from January 5 to February 1, using models that compared predicted mortality under normal circumstances to actual numbers documented during that period. The additional deaths likely reflect a mix of factors, including increased exposure of people with heart and lung disease to poor air quality from smoke and toxins released by the fires, as well as healthcare delays and disruptions, the study said. The findings "underscore the need to complement direct fatalities estimates with alternative methods to quantify the additional mortality burden of wildfires and of climate-related emergencies more broadly," the researchers wrote. Two wind-driven wildfires that erupted during the first week of January on opposite sides of Los Angeles damaged or destroyed nearly 16,000 structures combined - laying waste to much of the seaside district of Pacific Palisades and the foothill community of Altadena. Together, the blazes scorched 59 square miles (152 sq km), an area larger than Paris. The official tally of people who perished as a direct result of the fires stands at 31, after the most recent set of human remains were unearthed in Altadena in July, six months after the fires. Governor Gavin Newsom in February requested nearly $40 billion in wildfire aid from Congress. Some estimates put economic losses from the fires at more than $250 billion, making the conflagration one of the most costly natural disasters in U.S. history. The JAMA study acknowledged some limitations, saying the data may need to be revised upward in the future and the research did not reflect any fire-attributable deaths beyond Feb. 1.


Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
NFL confirms major loophole in new ban on smelling salts and other ammonia inhalants
NFL players gripping their contraband smelling salts like winning lottery tickets can relax: the league won't ban the inhalants. The players' union sent a memo to members clarifying the NFL ban, which strictly applies to teams providing smelling salts and any other ammonia inhalant during pregame activities, games and halftime on the sideline or in the locker rooms. Now NFL players will be out of pocket for the inhalants, which can cost around $6.50 per dose. 'The NFL Players Association is aware of the memo issued by the league Tuesday regarding the use of smelling salts and ammonia capsules,' read the memo, which was obtained by The Associated Press. 'We were not notified of this club policy change before the memo was sent out. To clarify, this policy does not prohibit player use of these substances, but rather it restricts clubs from providing or supplying them in any form. The NFL has confirmed this to us.' The league's recent edict on inhalants cited a Food and Drug Administration warning that such treatments could potentially mask symptoms of head trauma. But just try telling that to NFL players and even coaches, who use smelling salts for the rush of energy and mental stimulation they provide. While crashing an NFL Network broadcast at 49ers training camp in Santa Clara on Tuesday, San Francisco tight end George Kittle claimed the NFL was banning players from using stimulating inhalants. 'I honestly came here to air a grievance,' Kittle said. 'Our team got a memo today that [said] smelling salts and ammonia packets were made illegal in the NFL. 'I've been distraught all day,' he continued. ;I considered retirement. We have to figure out a middle ground. Somebody help me out.' Kittle was then asked how often he uses the stimulant, replying: 'I'm an every drive guy. I miss them already.' Smelling salts are also popular across multiple sports and with power lifters. Users are advised to take a 'whiff' of the product for enhanced alertness and energy. The stimulant has previously been endorsed by Joe Rogan , who spoke at length about smelling salts during a podcast episode three years ago. Rogan initially tried the product himself - along with comedian Theo Von - and struggled to deal with the intensity that they provided. However, Rogan encouraged his producer to try the stimulant. He said: 'You should take a hit! It's not that bad. It's not painful'. Rogan later posted a clip onto his Instagram with the caption: 'Our first experience with smelling salts. The great and powerful @theovon and I took a whiff of @jujimufu's good stuff. 'Shoutout to my friend @worlds_strongest_gay for the introduction to these fine olfactory stimulators. Holy s*** was that intense'. In a report by ESPN last year, Dr. Joseph Estwanik of the American College of Sports Medicine also warned of the dangers that the stimulant can cause. He explained: 'The claim is that smelling salts arouse your consciousness and focus, but how many of us in our daily lives think it's appropriate during a tough day at work to open a bottle of ammonia and start sniffing the fumes?' 'Ammonia's intended use is for cleaning. Giving a highly trained elite athlete ammonia to help them perform at their peak is like throwing a drowning man a cup of coffee.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
What every parent needs to know about the 'back-to-school necklace' trend
The new school year is just weeks away, and as parents comb through their to-do lists, a disturbing trend called a 'back-to-school necklace' has circulated on the internet. The trend refers to a noose as a 'necklace' and expresses the suicidal thoughts some kids have on the heels of going back to school. The dark meme seems to resurface at the end of the summer each year, and although some regard it as a joke about dreading school, experts warn of the negative connotations of the trend. Dr. Chelsea Hetherington, a developmental psychologist, wrote in Family Education that jokes about suicide can trivialize the issue and impact students who are struggling with mental health. 'The 'back to school necklace' trend is just one of many ways that teens might joke about suicide and self-harm without recognizing the consequences,' Heatherington argues. The disturbing meme often pictures a noose with the caption, 'Guys look it's a back to school necklace' or 'Back to school necklace. Only $4.99.' Experts warn that parents should be on alert for this phrase and teach their children that joking about harming themselves has serious implications. Samantha Westhouse, a psychotherapist and maternal-infant health social worker, told Parade that parents can facilitate open dialogue by asking their children and teens if they've heard of the meme. The meme pictures a noose with captions like 'Guys look its a back to school necklace' or 'Back to school necklace. Only $4.99' 'It's always important to refrain from judgment so your child feels comfortable sharing how they are feeling,' she said. Emily Cavaleri, a school social worker and child and family therapist, told the publication that if a student refers to a 'back-to-school necklace,' there's a chance that they're struggling with their mental health. 'Whether your child is seriously contemplating suicide or they use this phrase as a cry for help, signs you may see [include] spending time alone, acting withdrawn, irritability, crying easily and often, sleeping more than usual, difficulty sleeping, loss of interest in things they used to enjoy, giving away belongings, and overall, a change in behavior,' she added. Although many kids and teens may use the meme as a form of dark humor, youth suicide is a serious problem. Suicide is responsible for more deaths than any major medical illness for those ages 10 to 24 years old, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. Data cited by the AAP found that roughly 7-8 percent of adolescents attempt suicide every year, with around 17 percent reporting suicidal thoughts. Around 157,000 individuals in this age group receive emergency medical care a year for self-harm. The United States Surgeon General declared a mental health crisis for children and teens in 2021, citing stressors like gun violence and the impact of social media on young people's lives. Heatherington suggested that parents should be aware of the signs indicating mental health struggles in their kids and keep an open dialogue on the subject.