logo
Has India offered Trump zero tariffs? What we know and why it matters

Has India offered Trump zero tariffs? What we know and why it matters

Al Jazeera16-05-2025

United States President Donald Trump said on Thursday that India had offered a trade deal that proposed almost 'no tariffs' on US goods, as the South Asian nation seeks to avert higher import and export costs.
India disputed Trump's claim. But New Delhi is looking to clinch a trade deal with the US within the 90-day pause announced by Trump on April 9, on so called reciprocal tariffs for major trading partners. On May 8, the White House secured a trade agreement with the United Kingdom, two days after India inked a similar pact with it.
India's equity benchmarks jumped about 1.5 percent following Trump's comments. The Nifty 50 edged up 1.6 percent while the BSE Sensex gained 1.48 percent, reaching their highest levels in seven months.
India was one of the first countries to begin trade negotiations with the US following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the White House in February, with both sides agreeing to finalise a bilateral deal this year.
Last month, meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance visited India and met with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, hailing what he called 'very good progress' on a trade agreement between Washington and New Delhi.
'It is very hard to sell in India, and they are offering us a deal where basically they are willing to literally charge us no tariffs,' Trump said in a meeting with executives in the Qatari capital Doha. 'They're the highest and now they're saying no tariff.'
In a statement soon after to local news agencies, India's Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar pushed back against Trump's claim, saying 'nothing is decided till everything is.' He added that 'any judgement on it would be premature' until a 'mutually beneficial' agreement is reached.
Trump didn't provide further details of New Delhi's apparent offer, and the Indian Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't immediately respond to media requests for comment.
The US is India's largest trading partner, with bilateral trade totalling some $129bn in 2024. India ran a $45.7bn surplus with the US last year, mainly in the form of pharmaceutical products, electrical machinery and jewellery.
Having long complained that India's tariffs were too high and hurt US businesses, Trump pledged to impose 'reciprocal' tariffs of 27 percent on India. Those tariffs are currently on hold until early July.
A 10 percent base tariff continues to apply to India and many other nations during the pause.
India's average tariff rate is 17 percent, compared with 3.3 percent by the US, as per a report by the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
In recent weeks, India has made overtures to placate Trump's public disapproval, including lowering import duties on US goods like bourbon whiskey – down from 150 to 100 percent – and Harley-Davidson motorcycles – from 50 to 40 percent.
As part of ongoing trade talks, New Delhi has also proposed zero tariffs on car parts, on a reciprocal basis and up to a certain amount, Bloomberg reported earlier this month.
A delegation of Indian officials is set to visit the US later this month to try and move talks forward. The Reuters news agency reported that India's trade minister, Piyush Goyal, might visit too.
Trump's recent comments come days after India threatened to impose retaliatory tariffs linked to higher US duties on steel and aluminium, a sign that New Delhi is adopting a more bullish approach in its negotiations with Washington.
For now, though, trade talks are thought to be progressing well.
Reuters reported that New Delhi has offered to reduce duties to zero on 60 percent of US imports in a first phase deal, while also offering preferential access to nearly 90 percent of the merchandise India imports from the US.
In theory, this would bring the average tariff differential (the variation in tariff rates countries impose on each other) between India and the US down by 9 percentage points, significantly lowering trade barriers in the world's fifth-largest economy.
Preferential market access – or lower import entry requirements into the US compared with other countries India trades with – is being considered for key goods such as jewellery, textiles and agricultural products like bananas and grapes.
'Preferential market access for India would mean better terms of trade for these goods compared to America's other trading partners,' an Indian government official who preferred not to be named told Reuters.
To make the deal more attractive for Washington, India has also offered to ease export regulations on several high-value US imports, the first official said. These include aircraft, electric vehicles, medical devices, and hydrocarbons.
Beyond tariffs, India has also asked the US to treat it on par with other top US allies such as the UK and Japan in terms of access to critical technology sectors like artificial intelligence, biotech, and semiconductors.
India's expectation of being exempt from tariffs is at odds with the deal struck between the US and UK, in which only certain goods, based on mutual interest, had tariffs removed – as opposed to across-the-board withdrawals.
Elsewhere, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last week hinted that Washington might be looking to secure 'purchase agreements' for specific products with China, as part of ongoing trade negotiations with Beijing.
As such, recent trade deals suggest that Trump's tariff strategy amounts to carve-outs on particular goods, as opposed to broad free trade agreements. Looking ahead, comments from Indian and US officials hint at a similar arrangement.
Domestic issues also stand in the way of a free trade deal. India has long used tariffs to shield agricultural markets from cheap imports. Farmers have expressed fears that Modi would weaken those protections as part of a deal with Trump.
Then, at the geopolitical level too, India is in a tricky position. While Washington sees New Delhi as a counterbalance to Beijing's growing clout, India imported $113.45bn from China last year. By contrast, it imported just $40bn from the US.
What's more, China recently warned the UK over its trade deal with the US. It accused the UK of aligning with the US in a move that could compel British companies to exclude Chinese products from their supply chains.
China has warned it is ready to hurt countries that fall in line with the US in order to pressure Beijing.
For its part, India has recently shown willingness to engage in trade deals after years of scepticism. Last week, it inked a pact with the UK that will substantially lower duties on many goods.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Supreme Court clears greater path for ‘reverse discrimination' claims
US Supreme Court clears greater path for ‘reverse discrimination' claims

Al Jazeera

time28 minutes ago

  • Al Jazeera

US Supreme Court clears greater path for ‘reverse discrimination' claims

The United States Supreme Court has issued a ruling that will make it easier for people to claim workplace 'reverse' discrimination based on identities such as being white or heterosexual, in a victory for conservatives who have long pushed back against laws that protect minorities. The nation's highest court ruled unanimously on Thursday in favour of an Ohio woman named Marlean Ames, who said she was passed over for a promotion at work because she is straight. The decision reverses a previous ruling by a lower court stating that plaintiffs from some majority groups must show 'background circumstances' to demonstrate that their employer is 'that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority', rather than minority groups that have historically faced discrimination in the US. 'We conclude that Title VII does not impose such a heightened standard on majority group plaintiffs,' wrote liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. 'Therefore, the judgment below is vacated, and the case is remanded for application of the proper prima facie standard.' The Thursday ruling could affect lawsuits in 20 different states and the District of Columbia, striking a blow to a previous practice wherein members of groups who have not historically been on the receiving end of discriminatory practices had to clear a higher bar when pushing claims of workplace civil rights violations. Conservatives in the US have argued for years that steps to address the legacy of discrimination against ethnic and racial minorities, such as considering race in academic admission or job recruitment, themselves constitute a form of discrimination against white people. Ames previously stated that she was 'pushed aside' at her job at the Ohio Department of Youth Services in favour of LGBTQ employees. She sued for damages in 2020, alleging that her rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, originally passed during the civil rights struggle for Black people in the US, had been violated. The state's Republican Attorney General Dave Yost defended the department's actions in court papers, stating that department leaders had said Ames lacked the vision and leadership for the job for which she was rejected.

World reacts to Trump's travel ban, hits several nations mired in conflict
World reacts to Trump's travel ban, hits several nations mired in conflict

Al Jazeera

time2 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

World reacts to Trump's travel ban, hits several nations mired in conflict

Donald Trump has signed an executive order banning citizens from 12 countries from entering the country in a move he said was to protect the US from 'foreign terrorists', mirroring a contentious policy from his first term as United States president. As part of Trump's intensified crackdown on immigration, a cornerstone of his previous time in the White House and on the campaign trail, he announced on Wednesday that nationals from 12 countries – Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen – will be banned. Seven countries will also be subject to partial restrictions, which will mean they will no longer be able to apply for immigrant or non-immigrant temporary visas. However, some temporary work visas will still be allowed. Trump cited an attack in Boulder, Colorado, where a man threw a petrol bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators, as proof of the need for immigration curbs. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted,' Trump said in a video message from the Oval Office posted on X. 'We don't want them,' he added. This latest travel ban follows Trump's executive order during his first term, in which he banned nationals from seven Muslim-majority countries, also known as the 'Muslim ban,' in 2017. Seven of the countries on the new list of those banned also have Muslim-majority populations and several are beset by ongoing conflicts. Despite the new suspensions, the ban will not apply to existing visa holders, foreign diplomats, athletes and their teams, among other exemptions. The ban is expected to come into effect on June 9 at 12:01 am EDT (04:01 GMT). Here's how the world has reacted to the ban. The AU, which has seven of the 12 nations on the travel ban list, said the ban would harm 'people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and broader diplomatic relations' that were built with the US over past decades. 'The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the US administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned,' the bloc said in a statement. President of Oxfam America, Abby Maxman, said the decision was not about 'national security'. 'It is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' Maxman said. The Somali ambassador to the US, Dahir Hassan Abdi, said in a statement that Mogadishu 'values its longstanding relationship with the United States'. '[Somalia] stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' Abdi said. Interior minister Diosdado Cabello described the ban as a 'great risk for anyone, not just Venezuelans'. 'They persecute our countrymen, our people, for no reason,' he said. Venezuelan migrants in the US have been targeted by the Trump administration for deportation to El Salvador, many on unproven allegations of being gang members.

Which countries are on Trump's travel ban list, and who will be affected?
Which countries are on Trump's travel ban list, and who will be affected?

Al Jazeera

time5 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Which countries are on Trump's travel ban list, and who will be affected?

United States President Donald Trump signed a presidential proclamation on Wednesday banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the US. Heightened restrictions on entering the US have been put in place for nationals of seven more countries. The travel ban is Trump's latest move in the immigration crackdown that he promised on the campaign trail before last year's presidential election. Trump said the measures would help to 'protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors'. Here is what we know about the travel ban so far: The 12 countries whose nationals are fully restricted from travelling to the US under Trump's travel ban are:The seven countries subject to partial restrictions are: Citizens from the 12 countries subject to a full ban on travel to the US will face a complete suspension of immigrant and non-immigrant visas. Citizens from the seven countries which have been placed under partial restrictions will no longer be able to apply for immigrant visas or non-immigrant temporary visas covering permanent immigration, student visas and tourism visas including B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M and J. They will still be able to apply for some temporary visas, however. Unlike an executive order, a presidential proclamation is not legally binding but generally signals a policy shift. The new rules apply only to people outside the US at the time of the proclamation and who did not yet hold a valid visa at the time of the proclamation. Yes. The new suspension and restrictions will not apply to: A total of 363,549 people from the 19 listed countries entered the US in the fiscal year 2022 – the most recent year on record for arrivals – according to data from the Department of Homeland Security. Some 250,234 of these people were from Venezuela, which is subject to partial restrictions only. A further 66,563 of these people were from Haiti, which now faces a complete travel cited security threats and 'foreign terrorists' as grounds for the ban. In a video posted on Wednesday on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump said the recent attack in Boulder, Colorado 'has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas'. On June 1, police arrested a man who threw incendiary devices towards a group of people attending a rally for the release of captives taken from Israel on October 7, 2023 and held in Gaza. The FBI said it was investigating the incident as 'an act of terror'. Suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman was charged with a federal hate crime, as well as an array of state charges, according to an affidavit by the US Department of Justice. Soliman is an Egyptian national who has also lived in Kuwait. Neither of these countries is on Trump's list of banned countries. In a Truth Social post, Trump blamed '[former US President Joe] Biden's ridiculous Open Border Policy' for allowing Soliman into the country. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, said the suspect in the Boulder incident had overstayed a tourist visa, without naming Soliman. A fact sheet published by the White House stated a specific justification for the exclusion of each country on the new travel ban list. These justifications included that large numbers of citizens had overstayed their visas, that the countries had a poor record of cooperating with the US to receive their citizens back if they had overstayed in the US, or that the countries were affected by war. According to the most recent figures from the US Department of Homeland Security, nationals of Chad had the highest overstay rate, at 49.5 percent of those arriving in the US on a visa. Others with high overstay rates were Equatorial Guinea (22 percent), Eritrea (20 percent) and Yemen (19.8 percent). On his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order, calling on his state department to identify countries 'for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries'. He referred to this order in his video announcement of the travel ban. The travel ban will take effect on June 9 at 12:01am EDT (04:01 GMT). Yes, Trump enacted a travel ban – dubbed the 'Muslim ban' as all but one of the countries on the list at that time were Muslim-majority – during his first term in 2017. In his Wednesday Truth Social video, Trump said: 'In my first term, my powerful travel restrictions were one of our most successful policies and they were a key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil.' That earlier ban went through several revisions. It was upheld by the US Supreme Court in 2018. In 2021, Biden repealed this ban, calling it 'a stain on our national conscience'. Yes. In his Truth Social video announcement, Trump said 'the list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made. 'Likewise, new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world.' Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the US, said in a statement that Somalia is ready to work with the US. 'Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' he said. Trump's proclamation described Somalia as 'a terrorist safe haven' and stated: 'Somalia lacks a competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures.' Diosdado Cabello, Venezuelan interior minister and close aide of President Nicolas Maduro, said: 'The truth is being in the United States is a big risk for anybody, not just for Venezuelans … They persecute our countrymen, our people for no reason.' Trump's proclamation stated: 'Venezuela has historically refused to accept back its removable nationals.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store