Uber dials up new fights with plaintiffs lawyers
As it grapples with a slew of lawsuits from passengers, ride-hailing giant Uber is again taking aim at members of the plaintiffs bar, accusing an attorney in one case of misusing confidential information and suing another group of lawyers for allegedly filing fraudulent personal injury claims.
In a lawsuit, opens new tab filed on Monday in federal court in Los Angeles, Uber said a group of lawyers had conspired with medical providers to create and submit artificially inflated medical bills.
Uber's complaint alleged 'unscrupulous personal injury attorneys" were sending clients to medical providers for unnecessary or unrelated medical treatment in a kickback scheme designed to generate fraudulent injury claims.
"As this lawsuit shows, we won't hesitate to act when we uncover misconduct on our platform," said Adam Blinick, who leads Uber's state and local public policy team for the United States and Canada.
Uber said 'fraud and legal abuse raise costs for everyone.'
Igor Fradkin, an attorney named as a defendant in the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In a separate case, Uber asked a U.S. judge last week to stop a lawyer from allegedly using and sharing confidential corporate information produced in a series of lawsuits by passengers alleging they were sexually assaulted by the ridesharing service's drivers.
Uber accused, opens new tab lawyer Bret Stanley of misusing internal policy materials in the litigation in connection with other cases Stanley is pursuing against the company over vehicle crashes.
In a filing, Uber said it was "facing the risk of competitive harm from the repeated improper disclosure" of protected business materials. The company has denied any wrongdoing in the lawsuits.
Stanley, in a statement to Reuters, disputed Uber's allegation that he breached a so-called protective order in the litigation, and said he will respond to the claims in court this week.
Uber's fights with plaintiffs lawyers go back years.
A federal judge in Manhattan in 2016 faulted Uber for authorizing what the court called an 'intrusive and clandestine' effort to dig up dirt on a plaintiff and his lawyer in a price-fixing lawsuit.
More recently, Nevada's highest court in January rejected an effort by Uber and a political action committee called Nevadans for Fair Recovery to cap the contingency fees that lawyers can earn in civil lawsuits in the state to 20% of the amount their clients' recover.
Uber was a key backer of the ballot initiative, which would have amended Nevada law and taken effect in 2027. Opponents said the fee cap would have been the most restrictive in the country. The state high court in its ruling said the ballot initiative suffered from "misleading and confusing" language.
Uber is also a plaintiff in at least two other lawsuits filed this year against attorneys and firms in federal courts in New York and Florida alleging personal-injury related fraud.
The American Association of Justice, a trade group for trial lawyers, accused companies of targeting their adversaries in the plaintiffs' bar out of desperation.
'When bullies can't win on the merits, they resort to intimidation tactics against those who dare to stand up to them," the group told Reuters.
There are other recent examples of companies turning the tables on the lawyers who sued them.
Manufacturing giant 3M in June accused several attorneys in a lawsuit in federal court in Kentucky of pursuing fraudulent claims in the hopes of pressuring the company to settle. An early hearing in that case was scheduled for Thursday.
In March, plaintiffs law firm Simmons Hanly Conroy defeated a lawsuit in federal court in Chicago by plastic pipe maker JM Eagle that accused it of 'systemic fraud and misconduct' over hundreds of asbestos personal injury cases.
Simmons Hanly said in a statement at the time that the firm would "not be intimidated by unwarranted legal attacks designed to smear its reputation and derail its pursuit of justice for victims of asbestos exposure."
-- Lobbying activity related to President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" tax-and-spending bill, his shifting tariffs and other administration moves helped fuel a banner second quarter for some law and lobbying firms in Washington.
Ballard Partners, which has ties to the Trump administration, appeared to be the biggest winner. The firm said its federal lobbying revenue for the second quarter of 2025 rose more than 300% compared to the same period last year, and was up 47% from the first quarter, reaching $20.6 million.
-- French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte turned to Alexandria, Virginia-based law firm Clare Locke for their defamation lawsuit in Delaware alleging right-wing influencer Candace Owens has waged a lie-filled "campaign of global humiliation" against them by repeatedly claiming that Brigitte Macron is a man.
Lead counsel Tom Clare did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding his firm's involvement. Clare in a press release said that this "lawsuit is about bringing that truth to light and seeking justice for the Macrons by holding Ms. Owens to account."
Owens did not respond to Reuters' request for comment regarding the Macrons' lawsuit.
Clare Locke was founded in 2014 by Clare and his wife, Libby Locke, both of whom were formerly partners at Kirkland & Ellis. The firm was co-counsel to Dominion Voting Systems in the voting machine vendor's lawsuit against Fox Corp that netted a $787.5 million settlement in 2023.
-- In the year leading up to its merger with U.S. law firm Kramer Levin, global firm Herbert Smith Freehills recorded its highest-ever revenue and profits. The firm increased revenues by 4% to 1.358 billion pounds ($1.84 billion) and grew profits by 9.5% to 486.9 million pounds ($659.26 million) in the fiscal year that ended April 30, it said on Thursday.
The firm in June combined with New York-founded Kramer Levin as part of an effort to expand in the U.S. legal market. Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer has 2,700 lawyers globally.
Other large global firms with UK roots pointed to their U.S. growth when they reported financial results this week. Linklaters on Tuesday said U.S. profits grew by 57% last year, and Clifford Chance on Wednesday reported an 18% increase in U.S. revenue.
Read more:
New law firms bank on 'boutique' edge
Clock ticks for Jackson Walker, US Trustee in ethics case involving ex-judge
Litigation funders get a boost in budget bill drama, court wins
($1 = 0.7386 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Texas Roadhouse under fire from a Trump-aligned legal group
Texas Roadhouse is under fire from a Trump-aligned legal group accusing it of discriminating against white men. Conservative lawyers are arguing that the 600-store steak chain has allegedly given women and people of color preferential treatment in hiring. A complaint by America First Legal (AFL) — a group founded by the White House's deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller — will likely get the ball rolling on a company investigation by America's federal job discrimination watchdog. 'Texas Roadhouse's policies are a relic of an era where DEI contaminated American culture with the false belief that good intentions make discrimination okay,' Will Scolinos, counsel for the group, wrote. 'It is past time for Texas Roadhouse to join other companies in clearing DEI off Americans' tables for good.' AFL's filing is part of a broader conservative push to dismantle corporate DEI programs — one that's already triggered rollbacks at major companies like Ford, John Deere, and Tractor Supply Co. At the center of AFL's latest challenge are Texas Roadhouse's updates to Wall Street. The company promoted its hiring initiatives and leadership summits in its financial records. AFL claimed both programs were illegal because they are exclusionary of white men. Still, Texas Roadhouse — which groups women and nonwhite employees together in its diversity disclosures — has fallen short of creating actual diversity in the boardroom. The AFL notes that 50 percent of its board is white and male, and the complaint doesn't focus on the restaurant chain's broader workforce. To consumers, Texas Roadhouse, a Kentucky-based chain, has a reputation for high-performing restaurants and rowdy atmospheres. In 2024, the company overtook Olive Garden, claiming the top revenue spot among American restaurants. Olive Garden had held the revenue crown among restaurants for seven straight years. Texas Roadhouse didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2017, during President Donald Trump's first administration, Texas Roadhouse settled a $12 Million government complaint, alleging the company avoided hiring restaurant workers over 40. AFL has filed similar complaints against major corporations including IBM, Target, Cracker Barrel, and the Los Angeles Dodgers. The group's efforts — along with those of other conservative legal organizations — appear to be making headway. Since Trump returned to the White House, multiple billion-dollar companies including Meta, Walmart, Target, and Disney have scaled back or rebranded diversity programs. McDonald's, for example, announced in January that it would stop setting hiring goals tied to race and gender. The company has faced multiple legal challenges, including over its 40-year-old HACER scholarship program, which has awarded more than $33 million to 17,000 students. The scholarship initially required applicants to have at least one Latino or Hispanic parent. In February, the company settled legal complaints about the program, changing language to say applicants 'must demonstrate their impact and contribution to the Hispanic/Latino community through their activities, leadership and service.' AFL did not respond to request for comment about the direction of its ongoing lawsuits.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump says he will impose a 100% tariff on computer chips
President Donald Trump has said that he will impose a 100% tariff on computer chips, raising the prospect of higher prices for electronics, cars, household appliances and other essential products dependent on the processors powering the digital age. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook on Wednesday. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' The announcement came more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his administration's most onerous tariffs. The Republican president said companies that make computer chips in the US would be spared the import tax. During the Covid-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of cars and contributed to higher inflation. Investors seemed to interpret the potential tariff exemptions as a positive for Apple and other major tech companies that have been making huge financial commitments to manufacture more chips and other components in the US. Big Tech already has made collective commitments to invest about $1.5 trillion in the US since Trump moved back into the White House in January. That figure includes a $600 billion promise from Apple after the iPhone maker boosted its commitment by tacking another $100 billion on to a previous commitment made in February. Now the question is whether the deal brokered between Cook and Trump will be enough to insulate the millions of iPhones made in China and India from the tariffs that the administration has already imposed and reduce the pressure on the company to raise prices on the new models expected to be unveiled next month. Wall Street certainly seems to think so. Apple's stock price gained 5% in Wednesday regular trading sessions before rising another 3% in extended trading after Trump announced some tech companies won't be hit with the latest tariffs while Cook stood alongside him. The shares of AI chipmaker Nvidia, which also has recently made big commitments to the US, rose slightly in extended trading to add to the $1 trillion gain in market value the Silicon Valley company has made since the start of Trump's second term. The stock price of computer chip pioneer Intel, which has fallen on hard times, also climbed in extended trading. The chip industry's main trade group, the Semiconductor Industry Association, has so far declined to comment on Trump's latest tariffs. Demand for computer chips has been climbing worldwide, with sales increasing 19.6% in the year-ended in June, according to the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics organization. It is not clear how many chips, or from which country, would be impacted by the new levy. Taiwanese chip contract manufacturer TSMC - which makes chips for most U.S. companies - has factories in the country, so its big customers such as Nvidia are not likely to face increased tariff costs. The AI chip giant has itself said it plans to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in US-made chips and electronics over the next four years. 'Large, cash-rich companies that can afford to build in America will be the ones to benefit the most. It´s survival of the biggest,' said Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at investment advisory firm Annex Wealth Management. Trump's tariff threats mark a significant break from existing plans to revive computer chip production in the US that were drawn up during the Biden administration. Since taking over from Biden, Trump has been deploying tariffs to incentivize more domestic production. Essentially, the president is betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for mobile phones, TVs and refrigerators. By contrast, the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that Biden signed into law in 2022 provided more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry. The mix of funding support, tax credits and other financial incentives were meant to draw in private investment, a strategy that Trump has vocally opposed. The Commerce Department under Biden last year convinced all five leading-edge semiconductor firms to locate chip factories in the US as part of the program. The department said the US last year produced about 12% of semiconductor chips globally, down from 40% in 1990. Any chip tariffs would likely target China, with whom Washington is still negotiating a trade deal. 'There's so much serious investment in the United States in chip production that much of the sector will be exempt,' said Martin Chorzempa, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Since chips made in China won't be exempt, chips made by SMIC or Huawei would not be either, Chorzempa said, noting that chips from these companies entering the US market were mostly incorporated into devices assembled in China. 'If these tariffs were applied without a component tariff, it might not make much difference,' he said.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rival copies Hertz with giant laser tunnel that makes up fake damage costing hundreds of dollars
Damage scanners are taking over more rental car return lots — and customers aren't happy. Since Hertz rolled out AI scanners in April, it has faced backlash for charging almost $1,000 for tiny scuffs. Now Sixt, a premium rival with 100 locations in the US, has in recent weeks begun using a similar tool called Car Gate. Already, it is creating problems. One customer told The Drive he returned a Mazda CX-50 at Atlanta's Hartsfield Airport only to be billed $605.82 for wheel damage. Documents sent to the renter showed that the damage occurred before the rental period. 'They were using the wrong photo,' Badi said. 'After escalating to management, they dropped the claim entirely.' Sixt scans each rental car when the driver picks it up and again when return it — with a powerful computer highlighting even the slightest damage. There are fears Avis will adopt similar tech. Meanwhile, Enterprise — America's biggest rental firm, which owns National and Alamo — is testing it in Europe. Vehicle scanning companies defend the technology, and say it makes cars safer by spotting issues like tire wear and undercarriage damage more reliably than human inspectors. Sixt told Daily Mail: 'Our customers value transparency — and we take that seriously. 'We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience to the customer. This experience does not reflect our high service standards.' The Daily Mail asked the company twice if the fees paid by customers are used to fund vehicle repairs rather than boost profits. Sixt didn't respond. Hertz was the first to roll out damage scanners in April. Since then, six customers have told Daily Mail that they've incurred similar charges for minor dents picked up by scanners, which are built by AI startup UVeye. 'It's a shakedown that is extremely off-putting,' Adam Foley, a driver who received a $285 charge for two small spots, said. Unlike Sixt, which employs humans to review all damage scanner fees, when Foley attempted to dispute the charge, Hertz only offered a chatbot. Every Hertz customer has said the chatbot offered lower damage rates if they paid the fine immediately. The AI scanner picked up two small 'dents' on Foley's Buick rental 'This basically seems like a money-grabbing exercise by Hertz,' Neil Saunders, a retail expert at GlobalData, said. 'If there is no way to discuss with a human, then that is also extremely poor customer service.' Foley is not alone. Other drivers received a $440 damage charge for a small scuff on the wheel, $190 charges for minor dents, and $935 for nearly invisible blemishes. Dr Ramnath Chellappa, a technology scholar who coined the term 'cloud computing,' said the AI-based scanners aren't being used ethically. 'If anything, AI should be reducing the human effort in assessment and walk-through with the vehicle,' he said. 'It should end up offering cost savings.' Since July 2, has asked Hertz representatives six times to clarify whether damage charges fund actual repairs or compensate for diminished vehicle value. Hertz declined to comment on the record and did not directly answer whether fees collected from customers are always used to fund repairs. Meanwhile, other major rental firms are testing AI scanners into their vehicle lots. Avis has previously said that a majority of its damage assessments remain 'human-led,' but hasn't explained what that means. The company did not respond to Daily Mail's request for comment. Meanwhile, Enterprise said it does not use computer-powered inspection tools in the US. 'There are some limited instances, such as the Berlin and Munich airports, where this technology is being implemented airport-wide,' a spokesperson told the Daily Mail. 'But we are not utilizing this technology without an internal review of the image capture.'
