
Brother of freed Israeli hostage says Hamas captors ate full meals and laughed as he was starved
Held hostage in a tunnel under Gaza for nearly 500 days, Or Levy – starved of sunlight, unable to stand up straight, not knowing whether his wife was dead or alive – would often watch, hungry, as his Hamas captors ate the food he was denied.
'He was starved. All of them (hostages) were starved. They barely ate, they barely drank,' Michael Levy, Or's brother, told CNN in an interview.
The captors ate 'chicken, meat – they had everything,' while his brother and the others he was held alongside 'were getting nothing,' Michael said. The Hamas fighters 'even laughed when they saw them looking' at their meals, he added.
After emerging from the tunnels as part of a ceasefire deal earlier this month, Israelis were shocked by the skeletal state of Or Levy, Ohad Ben Ami and Eli Sharabi. Gaunt and haggard, the appearance of the recently released detainees, as well as their testimonies, have raised fears about the wellbeing of those remaining in Gaza, as the first phase of the ceasefire nears its end and the next remains uncertain.
Or, 33 on the day of his capture, was dancing with his wife, Einav, at the Nova music festival on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led gunmen poured over the border into southern Israel. Einav was killed in the rampage – something Or had long suspected, but did not know for sure until his release 16 months later.
Over that time, Israel has laid waste to Gaza, in an offensive it said was aimed to free the remaining hostages and render Hamas incapable of governing the enclave or posing a military threat. Israel has been criticized by rights groups of stemming the flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza, leaving Palestinian children to die of starvation. United Nations experts also warned of famine in the strip, before the ceasefire deal helped get some aid to the 2.1 million people living there.
Asked whether his brother may have been denied food because of shortages in Gaza, Michael said this did not explain why the Hamas captors ate well.
'They were intentionally starved. It's as simple as that. The terrorists next to them ate all the time,' he said, relating what his brother had told him about his time in the tunnels. Hamas laughed when the unfed hostages looked at their full meals.
Michael said the water his brother was given was rarely clean enough to drink, the tunnel was not tall enough for him to stand up in, and there was no natural light. 'Those are the most horrific conditions that you can imagine,' he said.
In a statement to CNN, Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem said the group 'dealt with the prisoners in accordance with international law' and had 'provided them with food at a time when there was a famine in the Strip.'
The spokesman said Or Levy's was 'a special case due to special security circumstances, and we must look at the rest of the cases that were in excellent health despite the circumstances.'
Also starved of news from the outside world, Or only learned of Einav's death after he was released. 'He did not know. He assumed, and asked, and we told him,' Levy's mother, Geula, told Israeli media.
While the couple were at the Nova festival, Einav's parents were caring for their son, Almog, who was two years old at the time. Michael said they wanted to reintroduce Almog to his father slowly – first a phone call, then a video one, before meeting face-to-face.
'We were worried that he might be scared, or he won't recognize him or something like this – but it was like they were never apart,' Michael said.
Almog asked his dad what had taken him so long to come back. Or 'just hugged him, he couldn't really respond to it. I mean, how can you respond to it?'
Or Levy's ordeal was entwined with that of Hersh Goldberg-Polin, an Israeli-American who became one of the most recognizable hostages held by Hamas. The two men hid with nearly 30 others in a bomb shelter on October 7, before Hamas gunmen began to lob grenades inside.
Goldberg-Polin, then 23, threw out the grenades one by one, before one detonated in his hand, blowing his arm off from the elbow down. Along with Levy and others, he was marched into a pickup truck and driven to Gaza.
Despite a high-profile campaign by his parents to free the hostages, Goldberg-Polin was murdered in August by his captors in Gaza, according to the Israreli military, which found his body shortly after he had been shot dead.
Michael Levy said his brother had a 'meaningful' conversation with Rachel and Jon Goldberg-Polin, Hersh's parents. 'He wanted to tell them a few things that they probably didn't know about their son,' he said, without going into detail.
The Goldberg-Polins launched a fresh appeal to US President Donald Trump's administration to hasten efforts to free the remaining hostages, saying they were spurred to do so after seeing the condition of Or Levy and the two others released with him.
Each weekend of hostage releases has become a grim propaganda exercise, with the freed Israelis paraded on stage and some presented with certificates and Hamas-branded gift bags.
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which is responsible for receiving the hostages from Hamas and handing them over to the Israeli military, has said it is 'increasingly concerned about the conditions surrounding release operations' and urged all parties to 'ensure that future releases are dignified and private.'
The stage-managed releases have also been used to inflict further distress on some hostages themselves, as well as wider Israeli society. On Saturday, Hamas released a heavily edited propaganda video showing two unreleased hostages, Eviatar David and Guy Gilboa-Dalal, watching the release of fellow Israelis from a vehicle – before being taken back into hiding.
David and Gilboa-Dalal, friends since they were infants, were also captured at the Nova festival.
In an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper, a brother of each of the hostages decried the 'mental torture' Hamas was subjecting them to.
'They look sick, terrified, pale, almost yellow. They were begging for us to save them,' said Ilay David, Eviatar's brother, after watching the Hamas video.
Gal Gilboa-Dalal, Guy's brother, said for Hamas to show the hostages daylight for potentially the first time in 15 months, 'to make them see what freedom might look like for them, and then close the door and drag them back to hell – it's awful.'
A recently freed female hostage said she was overwhelmed by the number of people who had gathered in Gaza to watch her release.
'I knew there would be plenty of people, but I didn't expect that amount,' Agam Berger, an Israeli soldier, told Israel's Kan Radio in her first interview since she was released.
Whilst in captivity, Berger said she was fed two meals a day, mostly made of rice, and that she would occasionally be allowed to watch the news, including Al Jazeera, and listen to Kan Radio, Israel's public broadcaster.
'We also had food and conditions that, for the most part, were okay – considering what it could have been,' she said. 'In that moment, you think, what is there not to be grateful for? But when you really think about it, these weren't human conditions.'
Over the rounds of hostage releases, male captives have generally appeared more emaciated than the women, suggesting the men were worse fed.
Berger said that, on the day of her release, Hamas fighters 'literally dressed me themselves to make sure I didn't take anything at all,' making her leave behind sketchbooks she had filled with drawings, letters for her family and a prayer book.
She added that she was made to wear a hijab on the way to the handover venue, and that the militants forced her 'to record videos in the car, saying 'thank you' and all that nonsense.'
CNN's Eugenia Yosef, Nadeen Ebrahim and Ibrahim Dahman contributed reporting.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Cuts Send FEMA Into 'Unheard of' Chaos During Crucial Time
Chaos in the White House is preventing federal disaster relief from reaching its recipients, sparking fears that the government may face more delays and lapses during the upcoming hurricane season. The Trump administration issued millions of dollars in relief to Virginia in early April after the state was battered by severe winter storms, but in doing so, the West Wing failed to alert a key player responsible for actually distributing the relief: the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Unidentified FEMA officials told CNN Wednesday that they only knew of the order thanks to newspaper headlines. Direct and official communication from the White House, according to the sources, did not reach FEMA for another four days. That left Old Dominion communities waiting an extra week for direly needed assistance. Officials at FEMA claim that this is just one instance in a troubling pattern of miscommunication between the disaster relief agency and the Trump administration. Typically, FEMA advises the White House as to which sites around the nation require federal assistance. That's been true for practically every other administration, as well as Donald Trump's first term. But since the MAGA leader has returned to the Oval Office, that relationship has been flipped. 'This is more than just who gets to tell who,' one longtime FEMA official told CNN. 'There are regulatory timelines, especially for individual assistance, that are in play, and these delays do affect the delivery of assistance. It is very frustrating to the state and local partners because they think we should be doing things, but without the paperwork we cannot execute on the declaration.' A similar slipup happened in early May, when the Trump administration failed to notify FEMA officials that it had reversed course on Arkansas's aid request, approving distribution to the state. That stalled the process for an additional five days. 'A five-day lag is unheard of, as it prevents FEMA from fulfilling its statutory roles,' another longtime FEMA official told CNN. 'It feels like a way to make it look like FEMA is being slow when we're not yet authorized to act.' Exactly who receives FEMA aid—and when they receive it—is no longer a guarantee under Trump's direction. In April, FEMA rejected North Carolina's application for an emergency aid extension as the state grappled with recovery efforts in the wake of Hurricane Helene, a Category Four storm that killed 250 people in September. It was the deadliest hurricane in state history. Even Trump's voting base has been left in the lurch. Months into his presidency, residents of devastated communities are still begging the president to send relief. Since Helene, Trump and his allies have spread unfounded conspiracies that the lead response agency had run out of money, and that the Biden administration had diverted funds from FEMA to assist undocumented immigrants enter the country. (FEMA administrators have fervently and repeatedly denied this.) Conservatives, at the time of the storm, claimed that working with the Biden White House to expedite disaster relief 'seemed political' and even conspiratorially suggested that the hurricanes were a government manipulation. Days after his inauguration, Trump pitched that it would be better to do away with FEMA altogether in favor of handing the money directly to the states, though that plan never seemed to gain traction. Since then, Trump has actively worked to dismantle the agency. The administration has blocked states across the nation, including California and Michigan, from accessing pre-approved relief. A coalition of Democratic-led states have sued the federal government, claiming that 'hundreds of millions of dollars in FEMA grants' are still inaccessible.


Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
45 Years Ago, CNN Changed The World. Then The World Changed CNN.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MAY 15: Mark Thompson Chairman and CEO of CNN Worldwide speaks onstage during ... More Warner Bros. Discovery Upfront 2024 on May 15, 2024 in New York City. (Photo byfor Warner Bros. Discovery) Here's a thought experiment for you: The U.S. has suddenly found itself at war, and the first shots of the conflict are being fired at this exact moment. What TV news channel would you turn on to learn more: CNN? Perhaps Fox, or your local news? Would you even turn on a TV at all? And if I'd asked you this question, say, five years ago — would you have a different answer? For decades, the answer to that first question — for millions of Americans, and much of the world — was CNN. It was the network people reached for in such moments of uncertainty, crisis, and global significance as the Challenger explosion, the Gulf War, 9/11, election nights, and presidential debates. CNN made its name by being on when no one else was, delivering live news around the clock and across the globe. It wasn't just the first 24-hour news network; it was a public utility during moments of chaos. Forty-five years ago this week, at 5 pm Eastern Time on June 1, 1980, CNN went live for the very first time. For its viewing audience, tuning in would eventually become a kind of Pavlovian response to breaking news — and to anything major unfolding anywhere in the world. The network's promise was the world's headlines, at all hours of the day, right from your TV set. On that score, CNN founder Ted Turner fundamentally 'changed the way people get their news,' network anchor Wolf Blitzer tweeted on Sunday. To mark the anniversary, some CNN employees across the organization this week have shared photos of red cupcakes, the tops of which were decorated with the words 'CNN: Celebrating 45 Years.' Many of the network's anchors and journalists, like Blitzer, opened the X app and dashed off their respective ruminations — journalists like international correspondent Larry Madowo ('When CNN says 'go there,' I'm always like: say less. And I've gone all around the world representing, bearing witness.') and anchor/correspondent Kristie Lu Stout ('...with technology and audiences ever on the move, you can find our reporting on linear, digital, social, streaming and audio. The revolution is not over yet.). That's the tendency, when arriving at such milestones — to celebrate the past, and the distance traveled. Alongside all the nostalgia, however, it's also worth noting an important truth that points toward the CNN of the next 45 years: The cable news network that changed the world, the one that acclimated everyone to the idea of always-on TV news and broadcasts filled with talking heads, has itself been changed by the world it helped to usher in. Consider: The traditional TV sector in the US lost $12 billion in subscription and advertising revenue in 2024, according to one report. Cable TV subscriptions are also projected to decline from 34.7 million in 2023 to 27.1 million by 2028, continuing a shift away from traditional cable services. CNN, like its rival networks, has dealt with declining viewership in cable news by cutting production costs where possible and laying off employees (several hundred over the past three years), but none of that can alter the trajectory that the cable news business is on. Pricey cable news subscriptions have all but gone the way of the printed newspaper, as mobile screens and personalized social feeds command an ever-growing share of their users' time — which is to say, news is now something most people scroll past as opposed to sitting down for. And as consumers get accustomed to getting headlines in 15-second bursts, often algorithmically tailored to their worldview, the idea of TV news feels increasingly out of sync with how people engage with the world today. Cable news is besieged on one side by changing user behavior and on the other by unforgiving economics — one eroding attention, the other bleeding resources. To put it bluntly, this is an alternately weird and unsettling time to be in the news business — especially so for the cable news business. Those of us who cover it are having to expand our vocabulary to include the emergence of new companies with strange names like Noosphere and Versant. Veteran cable news broadcast personalities like CNN's own Jim Acosta have decamped to new media platforms like Substack. The economics are such that CNN back in the fall even felt compelled to launch a paywall for by far the largest digital news in the US. The talk-heavy nighttime lineup of Fox News, meanwhile, consistently trounces CNN in the ratings, a trend that shows no sign of abating. I say all that not to bash CNN, but to reiterate that the network today is far different from the one that emerged 45 years ago. If anything, it's a more cost-conscious business these days, and its influence is no longer a product of simply platforming the loudest voices on cable. If covering the network's important journalism and interviewing its talent over the years has taught me anything, however, it's that no one will be writing its obituary anytime soon — never mind the daunting challenges ahead. By the end of the year, for example, CNN will have launched a standalone weather app, CNN Weather, as well as a new subscription product that the network says 'will provide a simple and centralized way for audiences to experience CNN's journalism and original programming. Subscribers will be able to choose from a selection of live channels, catch-up features and video-on-demand programming, across all platforms.' Both moves are part of CEO Mark Thompson's ongoing digital transformation effort that's still underway. CNN also in recent weeks announced major new hires including Choire Sicha, who joined CNN Worldwide as Senior Vice President of Features Editorial (Sicha came from Vox Media, where he served as Editor at Large for New York magazine). These aren't just survival tactics; they're signs of a network still evolving, still experimenting. Forty-five years in, the network that once defined what breaking news looked like is no longer the only voice in the room. But for its workforce of journalists, of course, the instinct to bear witness is one thing that hasn't changed. And that instinct will keep the network moving forward. Happy birthday, CNN.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Israeli officials object to expected UN Security Council ceasefire resolution
Israeli officials are speaking out against a draft resolution that is set to go before the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday. The resolution, which has the support of Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Pakistan, Panama, the Republic of Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and Somalia, calls for a renewed ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, the return of the hostages and the lifting of restrictions on humanitarian aid. The United Nations has issued a litany of criticisms of Israel's handling of the war as Palestinians in Gaza struggled under the blockade that was reinstated after the ceasefire collapsed in March. Israel lifted restrictions on humanitarian aid in May. Huckabee Condemns Efforts To Erase Jewish History To The Holy Land As 'Absurd' Israeli officials warn that the drafr resolution "undermines" humanitarian aid efforts while leaving Hamas in power. "This resolution doesn't advance humanitarian relief. It undermines it. It ignores a working system in favor of political agendas. It ignores the one party still endangering civilians in Gaza: Hamas. The group that hijacks trucks and stockpiles the aid to their benefit," Israeli U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon said ahead of the vote. Israeli Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Oren Marmorstein told Fox News Digital that the resolution does not do enough to link the release of hostages to the establishment of a ceasefire. The Israeli official also said the resolution would allow Hamas to stay in power. Read On The Fox News App "So basically, what this proposal is favoring or offering to do is to enable Hamas to come up with another October 7th massacre," Marmorstein told Fox News Digital. He added that Hamas said it would carry out another violent attack like the one on Oct. 7, 2023. Us-backed Gaza Aid Group Pauses Food Distribution After Days Of Violence The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a U.S. and Israel-backed aid organization, paused its aid distribution operations on Wednesday following days of deadly incidents near its sites. "GHF is actively engaged in discussions with the IDF to enhance its security measures beyond the immediate perimeter of GHF sites," a GHF spokesperson told Fox News Digital. "We have asked the IDF to: introduce measures that guide foot traffic in a way that minimizes confusion or escalation risks near IDF military perimeters; develop clearer IDF-issued guidance to help the population transit safely; enhance IDF force training and refine internal IDF procedures to support safety." If passed, the draft resolution would be legally binding—unlike those that come out of the U.N. General Assembly. It is unclear, however, what impact it would have on Israel's current operations or policy. The U.S. Mission to the U.N. did not respond to a Fox News Digital request for article source: Israeli officials object to expected UN Security Council ceasefire resolution