logo
45 Years Ago, CNN Changed The World. Then The World Changed CNN.

45 Years Ago, CNN Changed The World. Then The World Changed CNN.

Forbes2 days ago

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MAY 15: Mark Thompson Chairman and CEO of CNN Worldwide speaks onstage during ... More Warner Bros. Discovery Upfront 2024 on May 15, 2024 in New York City. (Photo byfor Warner Bros. Discovery)
Here's a thought experiment for you: The U.S. has suddenly found itself at war, and the first shots of the conflict are being fired at this exact moment. What TV news channel would you turn on to learn more: CNN? Perhaps Fox, or your local news? Would you even turn on a TV at all? And if I'd asked you this question, say, five years ago — would you have a different answer?
For decades, the answer to that first question — for millions of Americans, and much of the world — was CNN. It was the network people reached for in such moments of uncertainty, crisis, and global significance as the Challenger explosion, the Gulf War, 9/11, election nights, and presidential debates. CNN made its name by being on when no one else was, delivering live news around the clock and across the globe. It wasn't just the first 24-hour news network; it was a public utility during moments of chaos.
Forty-five years ago this week, at 5 pm Eastern Time on June 1, 1980, CNN went live for the very first time. For its viewing audience, tuning in would eventually become a kind of Pavlovian response to breaking news — and to anything major unfolding anywhere in the world. The network's promise was the world's headlines, at all hours of the day, right from your TV set. On that score, CNN founder Ted Turner fundamentally 'changed the way people get their news,' network anchor Wolf Blitzer tweeted on Sunday.
To mark the anniversary, some CNN employees across the organization this week have shared photos of red cupcakes, the tops of which were decorated with the words 'CNN: Celebrating 45 Years.' Many of the network's anchors and journalists, like Blitzer, opened the X app and dashed off their respective ruminations — journalists like international correspondent Larry Madowo ('When CNN says 'go there,' I'm always like: say less. And I've gone all around the world representing, bearing witness.') and anchor/correspondent Kristie Lu Stout ('...with technology and audiences ever on the move, you can find our reporting on linear, digital, social, streaming and audio. The revolution is not over yet.).
That's the tendency, when arriving at such milestones — to celebrate the past, and the distance traveled. Alongside all the nostalgia, however, it's also worth noting an important truth that points toward the CNN of the next 45 years:
The cable news network that changed the world, the one that acclimated everyone to the idea of always-on TV news and broadcasts filled with talking heads, has itself been changed by the world it helped to usher in.
Consider: The traditional TV sector in the US lost $12 billion in subscription and advertising revenue in 2024, according to one report. Cable TV subscriptions are also projected to decline from 34.7 million in 2023 to 27.1 million by 2028, continuing a shift away from traditional cable services. CNN, like its rival networks, has dealt with declining viewership in cable news by cutting production costs where possible and laying off employees (several hundred over the past three years), but none of that can alter the trajectory that the cable news business is on.
Pricey cable news subscriptions have all but gone the way of the printed newspaper, as mobile screens and personalized social feeds command an ever-growing share of their users' time — which is to say, news is now something most people scroll past as opposed to sitting down for. And as consumers get accustomed to getting headlines in 15-second bursts, often algorithmically tailored to their worldview, the idea of TV news feels increasingly out of sync with how people engage with the world today.
Cable news is besieged on one side by changing user behavior and on the other by unforgiving economics — one eroding attention, the other bleeding resources.
To put it bluntly, this is an alternately weird and unsettling time to be in the news business — especially so for the cable news business. Those of us who cover it are having to expand our vocabulary to include the emergence of new companies with strange names like Noosphere and Versant. Veteran cable news broadcast personalities like CNN's own Jim Acosta have decamped to new media platforms like Substack. The economics are such that CNN back in the fall even felt compelled to launch a paywall for CNN.com, by far the largest digital news in the US.
The talk-heavy nighttime lineup of Fox News, meanwhile, consistently trounces CNN in the ratings, a trend that shows no sign of abating. I say all that not to bash CNN, but to reiterate that the network today is far different from the one that emerged 45 years ago. If anything, it's a more cost-conscious business these days, and its influence is no longer a product of simply platforming the loudest voices on cable.
If covering the network's important journalism and interviewing its talent over the years has taught me anything, however, it's that no one will be writing its obituary anytime soon — never mind the daunting challenges ahead. By the end of the year, for example, CNN will have launched a standalone weather app, CNN Weather, as well as a new subscription product that the network says 'will provide a simple and centralized way for audiences to experience CNN's journalism and original programming. Subscribers will be able to choose from a selection of live channels, catch-up features and video-on-demand programming, across all platforms.'
Both moves are part of CEO Mark Thompson's ongoing digital transformation effort that's still underway. CNN also in recent weeks announced major new hires including Choire Sicha, who joined CNN Worldwide as Senior Vice President of Features Editorial (Sicha came from Vox Media, where he served as Editor at Large for New York magazine).
These aren't just survival tactics; they're signs of a network still evolving, still experimenting. Forty-five years in, the network that once defined what breaking news looked like is no longer the only voice in the room. But for its workforce of journalists, of course, the instinct to bear witness is one thing that hasn't changed. And that instinct will keep the network moving forward. Happy birthday, CNN.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices
Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

CBS News

time28 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

Desire Godfrey said it was time for a vehicle upgrade. The Lancaster mother had her eye on a Lexus. "I had a baby, so I'm looking for something reliable for me and a baby," Godfrey said. She searched online and found what she thought was the right vehicle at The Reserve Auto Group in The Colony. She described the sales process in May 2024 as a positive experience. Warranty and GAP insurance issues But an unexpected oil change six months later changed everything. Godfrey, 33, said a Lexus dealership informed her the vehicle was not under warranty. She also discovered her GAP insurance policy didn't exist. "They (Reserve Auto Group) never paid the warranty company the money they were supposed to pay to activate this warranty and this GAP insurance," she said. Car loan charges continue Godfrey said the costs were included in her car note. She filed a report with The Colony Police Department — and she's not alone. Police said they received their first complaint on Jan. 31. According to a news release, police have been investigating multiple fraud claims connected to the dealership since 2023. The business shut down in December 2024, but complaints continue to come in. Alleged auto fraud pattern Investigators said customers were allegedly instructed to write separate checks for aftermarket warranties or GAP insurance policies. Those payments were supposed to go to third-party providers, but police said the dealership allegedly cashed the checks and never forwarded the money — leaving customers without coverage. Another victim comes forward A second alleged victim, who spoke to CBS News Texas anonymously, said she and her husband also bought a Lexus from the dealership. She provided a non-activation letter from DOWC Administrative Services LLC, a company that offers GAP insurance and warranties. The letter stated: "Please be advised that Reserve Auto has failed to remit payment to Us as the Administrator and Provider for your Contract. Consequently, the Contract was not activated in our system." Investigation still ongoing Police have not made any arrests or publicly identified anyone associated with the allegations. Officers said they are continuing to vet additional alleged victims. CBS News Texas is not naming the person listed as the dealership's owner, as police have indicated he did nothing wrong. He spoke briefly by phone, saying he wanted to schedule an appointment to discuss the claims further because he believed "we did not have all the facts." When asked for clarification, he said he didn't have time to explain. Legal team responds Two emails followed the call, and attorneys from Herrin Law introduced themselves. "We have no comment at this time. Thank you for your interest in our client's side of the story," attorney Benjamin Palatiere said. He requested that all future inquiries be directed to him. Buyer left without coverage Meanwhile, Godfrey said the vehicle itself has not had any issues. But she continues to pay for a warranty and insurance that don't exist. "So nobody wants to refinance the loan. Nobody wants to give me GAP insurance," she said. "It's just more so like I'm going to take it or leave it. If I wreck the car, then I would have to figure out a way to pay that car off." Godfrey said she hopes to recover the money one day.

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel
Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

CBS News

time38 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday halted lower court orders that required the White House's Department of Government Efficiency to turn over information to a government watchdog group as part of a lawsuit that tests whether President Trump's cost-cutting task force has to comply with federal public records law. The order from the high court clears DOGE for now from having to turn over records related to its work and personnel, and keeps Amy Gleason, identified as its acting administrator, from having to answer questions at a deposition. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. "The portions of the district court's April 15 discovery order that require the government to disclose the content of intra–executive branch USDS recommendations and whether those recommendations were followed are not appropriately tailored," the court said in its order. "Any inquiry into whether an entity is an agency for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act cannot turn on the entity's ability to persuade. Furthermore, separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal executive branch communications." The Supreme Court sent the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for more proceedings. Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily paused the district court's order last month, which allowed the Supreme Court more time to consider the Trump administration's bid for emergency relief. A district judge had ordered DOGE to turn over documents to the group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, by June 3, and for Gleason's deposition to be completed by June 13. The underlying issue in the case involves whether DOGE is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. CREW argues that the cost-cutting task force wields "substantial independent authority," which makes it a de facto agency that must comply with federal public records law. The Justice Department, however, disagrees and instead claims that DOGE is a presidential advisory body housed within the Executive Office of the President that makes recommendations to the president and federal agencies on matters that are important to Mr. Trump's second-term agenda. DOGE's agency status was not before the Supreme Court, though the high court may be asked to settle that matter in the future. Instead, the Trump administration had asked the justices to temporarily halt a district court's order that allowed CREW to gather certain information from DOGE as part of its effort to determine whether the task force is an advisory panel that is outside FOIA's scope or is an agency that is subject to the records law. The judge overseeing the dispute, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, had ordered DOGE to turn over certain documents to the watchdog group by June 3 and to complete all depositions, including of Gleason, by June 13. Mr. Trump ordered the creation of DOGE on his first day back in the White House as part of his initiative to slash the size of the federal government. Since then, DOGE team members have fanned out to agencies across the executive branch and have been part of efforts to shrink the federal workforce and shutter entities like the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Institute of Peace. DOGE has also attempted to gain access to sensitive databases kept by the Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration and Office of Personnel Management, prompting legal battles. In an effort to learn more about DOGE's structure and operations, CREW submitted an expedited FOIA request to the task force. After it did not respond in a timely manner, CREW filed a lawsuit and sought a preliminary injunction to expedite processing of its records request. The organization argued that DOGE was exercising significant independent authority, which made it an agency subject to FOIA. Cooper granted CREW's request for a preliminary injunction in March and agreed that FOIA likely applies to DOGE because it is "likely exercising substantial independent authority much greater than other [Executive Office of the President] components held to be covered by FOIA." He then allowed CREW to conduct limited information-gathering, which the watchdog group said aimed to determine whether DOGE is exercising substantial authority that would bring it within FOIA's reach. A federal appeals court ultimately declined to pause that order, requiring DOGE to turn over the documents sought by CREW. In seeking the Supreme Court's intervention, Solicitor General D. John Sauer said CREW is conducting a "fishing expedition" into DOGE's activities. He warned that if Cooper's order remains in place, several components of the White House, such as the offices of the chief of staff and national security adviser, would be subject to FOIA. "That untenable result would compromise the provision of candid, confidential advice to the president and disrupt the inner workings of the Executive Branch," Sauer wrote. "Yet, in the decisions below, the court of appeals and district court treated a presidential advisory body as a potential 'agency' based on the persuasive force of its recommendations — threatening opening season for FOIA requests on the president's advisors." But lawyers for CREW told the Supreme Court in a filing that the Justice Department's position "would require courts to blindly yield to the Executive's characterization" of the authority and operations of a component of the Executive Office of the President. They said adopting the Trump administration's approach to DOGE would give the president "free reign" to create new entities within the Executive Office of the President that exercise substantial independent authority but are shielded from transparency laws. "Courts would be forced to blindly accept the government's representations about an EOP unit's realworld operations, unable to test those representations through even limited discovery," CREW's lawyers wrote. "It is that extreme position, not the discovery order, that would 'turn[] FOIA on its head.'"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store