Top 5 Countries For Studying Abroad Compared: Visas, Job Opportunities
Study Abroad 2025: Choosing the right country to study is as important as selecting the right course or university. With many options available, students opt to study abroad because of the perceived quality of the international degrees, global living experience or some other reason. Countries like the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada are popular choices among students, offering a high quality education, multicultural society, and a low cost of tuition. However, knowing the advantages and disadvantages of a country are essential as studying abroad typically means living there for at least a year or more.
Here are some of the most sought-after countries for international students and why they would be the right fit for them.
1. United States (US)
US is home to many top ranking universities like the MIT, Stanford and Harvard. A F-1 visa is typically required for students looking to study here and the cost of tuition and living costs might be higher as compared to other countries. Optional Practical Training (OPT) allows one to three years of work after graduation (STEM advantage)
United States is best for students :
Who want to study in top-tier universities with well experienced professors,
Looking for a course in STEM programs.
Who want long term career opportunities.
2. United Kingdom (UK)
Graduate Route Visas allows two years (three years for PhDs) of post study work. Being cheaper than US, but more expensive than Canada and Germany makes it suitable for students seeking a prestigious degree in a shorter duration with historical institutions. UK provides top quality education through its well known universities like the Oxford, the Cambridge, the Imperial College and London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
3. Canada
Canada, being more affordable than USA and UK has various globally recognized universities like the UBC, University of Toronto and McGill. Students with Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) can stay up to three years for work after graduation.
Canada is best for students who are:
Looking for quality education.
Looking for immigration opportunities in a multicultural society.
4. Australia
Australia is known for providing best courses in Engineering, Medicine, and Environmental Studies. Proof of funds and GTE (Genuine Temporary Entrant) are required to study here. Germany provides two to four year post study work visa depending on the course. It is best for students looking for work-life balance, nature-rich living, and Permanent Residency (PR) options.
5. Germany
Germany is highly known for providing tuition free education at their public universities to all students irrespective of their nationality. Germany offers courses with strong foundation in Engineering, Robotics, and Applied Sciences. It is best suitable for budget-conscious students and those pursuing technical fields like engineering or automotive.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
One in four international students in US were from India: At 4.2 lakh Indian students, fuelled surge in numbers during 2024
The total number of active F-1 and M-1 international student SEVIS records in the US were a whopping 15.8 lakh in 2024, marking a 5.3% increase over the previous calendar year. According to a report released by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) – 'SEVIS by the Numbers 2024', while international students hailed from more than 229 countries, this growth was substantially fuelled by students from India. Asia had the largest number of active international student records in the US, nearly 11 lakh students from this continent accounted for nearly 72% of the total foreign student population. Nearly 4.2 lakh Indian students represented an increase of 11.8% compared to 2023, while the 3.2 lakh foreign student records from China, which is the other major source country, represented a small decrease of 0.25 percent compared to 2023. Indian students constitute nearly 27% of the total foreign student population in 2024, followed by Chinese at 20%. The data in this report is drawn from the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), a web-based system that the Department of Homeland Security uses to maintain and manage information on foreign students and exchange visitors. While the F-1 visa is held by those undergoing academic study courses, the M-1 visa is given to students undergoing vocational programs. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo According to the ICE-report, more than 90% or to be precise 14.3 lakh international students were enrolled in higher education degree programs, California enrolled the largest number of foreign students at 2.37 lakh, followed by New York at 1.72 lakh. attracted the maximum number of international students While this ICE-report is based on data for 2024, the recent trends are not as rosy. Chris R. Glass, a professor and higher education specialist at Boston College analysed SEVIS data between March 2024 to March 2025. According to him, 'The overall decline of -11.3% from March 2024 (with 11.53 lakh active students) to March 2025 (with 10.22 lakh active students) is remarkable in both scale and speed.' His study shows that the number of students from India declined by nearly 28% from 3.54 lakh in March 2024 to 2.55 lakh a year later. The number of Chinese students rose marginally by 3.28% to stand at 2.63 lakh as of March 2025. Glass points out that 'The current year-over-year decline is a reflection of an enrollment cycle that began under the Biden administration, so the March 2025 numbers have yet to reflect any impacts of policies implemented under the second Trump administration.' Anecdotal evidence suggests that US is losing its lustre as an attractive study destination for Indian students owing to a multitude of factors such as: The arbitrary termination of SEVIS records and/or F1 visas of international students – which led many to self deport, while others stayed back to battle it out in courts; the uncertainty relating to continuity of the extended optional practical training program (OPT) for STEM students, the temporary suspension of consulate interviews pending release of a social-media scrutiny policy and mass layoffs in corporate America. Thus, the numbers for March 2026 could be much lower. Indian students dominate the STEM field: While international students are eligible for a one year OPT, those from the Science, Technology, Mathematics and Engineering (STEM) fields, post their graduation, get an additional two years of work experience under the OPT program. There were 1.94 lakh OPT students with both an employment authorization document (EAD) and who reported working for an employer in 2024, compared to 1.60 lakh 2023. This marks a 21.1 percent increase from 2023 and the fourth year of consecutive growth, states the ICE-Report. In 2024, nearly 1.65 lakh international students participated in the STEM-OPT extension program. The ICE-report points out that Indian students are particularly prominent in the post-completion OPT- STEM extension program, accounting for a substantial 48.0% of participants. and 20.4% from China.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
6 hours ago
- First Post
Trump's campus crackdown an opportunity for India to create its own Ivy League but it has a rival
With Trump's stricter US immigration policies, experts see India as a potential global education hub. Top universities are improving but face challenges like low funding and limited academic freedom read more As US President Donald Trump intensifies his tough stance on international students, experts say India has a unique opportunity to position itself as a global education hub—though it faces stiff competition from China. According to The Economist, India is home to nearly half of the world's college-age population. Its top universities are improving and gaining recognition, even as the country struggles with low public spending on education and limited academic freedom. Trump's immigration and education policies have made the US a less welcoming destination for foreign students. This shift has opened the door for countries like India to attract global talent—students and researchers who may now be reconsidering their academic futures in the United States. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's top colleges have a lot working in their favour. In fact, admission rates at the country's most prestigious institutions can dip as low as 0.2%, compared to Ivy League acceptance rates of 3–9%. English language proficiency, a deeply ingrained culture of academic ambition, and a vast youth population give India a competitive edge. Half of the world's university-age population resides in India. Parents instill a strong sense of ambition in their children, and India has an advantage due to its broad English language competence. However, India is currently not listed in the top 100 worldwide league rankings. China, on the other hand, now holds the top spot in numerous polls despite only making it into the worldwide top 100 in the 2010s. China is already actively working to recruit global talent as part of a years-long strategy. To entice Chinese scholars back from the West, China has lavished money on one-time incentives and large research grants during the last decade. When the Trump administration said it would work to 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students in 'critical fields', Chinese institutions have moved quickly to capitalise. Universities in Hong Kong and Xi'an have announced that they will simplify admissions for Harvard transfer students. An ad from a body affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences welcomed 'talents who have been dismissed by the U.S. NIH,' or National Institutes of Health. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India, by contrast, has the demographic advantage and a growing higher education sector. If it can address key issues in its education system, it has the potential to build its own Ivy League and compete globally in higher education. Money has a significant role in the issue. India has allocated 4.1% to 4.6% of its GDP on education over the last decade. China's spending as a percentage of GDP may be comparable, but its GDP per person is five times that of India. China's intellectual charm offensive is outmatched by India's shortage of rupees. In recent years, more scientists have returned to China, driven in part by government recruiting schemes that promise millions of dollars in financing, as well as housing subsidies and other benefits. China's spending on R&D is currently second only to the United States. Chinese schools such as Tsinghua and Zhejiang University are now consistently ranked among the top in the world for science and technology. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Another concern is intellectual freedom. Indian academics teach from a government-mandated syllabus and are overseen by the University Grants Commission. When planning a conference with overseas colleagues, researchers must obtain authorisation from central ministries, as well as government permission to travel abroad for work. Hiring at public colleges is subject to the whims of the ruling party, as the government monitors top-level selections. India's best shot at building a globally competitive higher education system may lie in the rise of private universities. Two decades ago, fewer than 20 private universities existed; today, there are more than 400, accounting for around a quarter of total enrolment. Many of these are backed by major industrial houses, boast world-class campuses, and are increasingly attracting international faculty. Experts believe these private institutions are poised to outperform their public counterparts, largely due to their greater autonomy. Freed from extensive affirmative action mandates and political interference in faculty appointments, private universities can hire top talent more freely and respond faster to global academic trends. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If the Indian government can find a way to support private universities without overstepping, India may finally be able to create its own Ivy League, and emerge as a serious player in global higher education.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 hours ago
- Business Standard
More ex-federal workers in US face job hunt as grants & contracts vanish
By Eileen Sullivan and Lydia DePillis After Matt Minich was fired from his job with the Food and Drug Administration in February, he did what many scientists have done for years after leaving public service. He looked for a position with a university. Minich, 38, was one of thousands swept up in the mass layoffs of probationary workers at the beginning of President Trump's second administration. The shock of those early moves heralded more upheaval to come as the Department of Government Efficiency, led by the tech billionaire Elon Musk, raced through agency after agency, slashing staff, freezing spending and ripping up government contracts. In March, about 45 minutes after Minich accepted a job as a scientist in the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, the program lost its federal grant funding. Minich, who had worked on reducing the negative health impacts of tobacco use, observed that he had the special honor of 'being DOGE-ed twice.' 'I'm doubly not needed by the federal government,' he said in an interview. He is still hunting for work. And like hundreds of thousands of other former civil servants forced into an increasingly crowded job market, he is finding that drastic cuts to grants and contracts in academia, consulting and direct services mean even fewer opportunities are available. Some states that were hiring, another avenue for former federal government employees, have pulled back. So, too, have the private contractors typically seen as a landing place. The situation is expected to worsen as more layoffs are announced, voluntary departures mount and workers who were placed on administrative leave see the clock run out. With Musk's time in Washington now done, a fuller picture of just how completely he and Trump have upended the role of government is coming into view. Federal tax dollars underpin entire professions, directly and indirectly, and the cuts led by Musk's operation have left some workers with nowhere to go. In Washington DC, and the surrounding area, the disruption has the hallmarks of the collapse of an industrial cluster, not unlike the disappearance of manufacturing jobs in the upper Midwest during the 2000s. Except this time, it is moving at lightning speed. In January, just as Trump was taking office, the civilian federal work force across the country had reached a post-World War II peak of 2.3 million, not including the Postal Service. Few agencies have publicly stated how many people have been fired or voluntarily resigned, but a rough count shows that federal agencies have lost some 135,000 to firings and voluntary resignation, with another 150,000 in planned reductions. Contracted and grant-funded workers — which the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta estimated to be as many as 4.6 million people — are harder to track in official data. The first contractor layoffs began in February with organisations that received funding from the US Agency for International Development, like Chemonics and FHI360. As more grants and contracts that were under review across government are terminated, job cuts have gained steam. Booz Allen Hamilton, the sprawling consulting firm based in Northern Virginia that gets 98 percent of its revenue from the federal government, announced that it was cutting 7 per cent of its 36,000-person staff. Even providers of Head Start, the low-income preschool program, have issued layoff notices because funding has been in doubt. While the national labor market remains stable, job loss is starting to become notable in the capital region. Unemployment rates in the District of Columbia and most of its surrounding counties have been on the rise since December. The number of people receiving unemployment insurance has been elevated in Virginia and DC over the past several months. Job postings in Washington have dropped across the board, according to the hiring platform Indeed, including in opportunities for administrative assistance, human resources and accounting. Local government agencies around Washington are hosting dozens of hiring events, and most of them are packed. Elaine Chalmers of Woodbridge, Va., was among 750 people who attended a recent resource fair in Arlington, Va., just outside Washington. The event offered free consultation for updating résumés, as well as professional headshots and workshops, including one on managing personal finances during a transition in employment. It was the fourth one she attended in the month since she left the Agriculture Department, where she had worked for 20 years, most recently in the division that ensured equal access to grants for rural communities. She resigned to escape the stress and uncertainty created by new mandates, such as erasing words like 'equity' and 'diversity' from department communications. 'It just became almost a character question for myself,' said Chalmers, 53. 'I couldn't honorably stay.'
