Barron Trump's best friend claims he got ICE to detain world's biggest TikTok star Khaby Lame
One of Barron Trump's supposed best friends has claimed he's responsible for getting the world's biggest TikTok star deported out of the United States.
Bo Loudon, a Gen Z MAGA influencer who's previously been pictured with Barron and Donald Trump, said he reported Khaby Lame to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Loudon's first post on X came June 6 when he wrote that Lame is an 'illegal alien ' in all caps before proclaiming that he has 'been working with the patriots at President Trump's DHS' to deport the Senegal-born influencer.
ICE already confirmed Lame was detained at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas on June 6, the same day Loudon made his supposed involvement public.
Lame, who has over 162 million TikTok followers, overstayed his visa after entering the country on April 30, according to an ICE spokesperson. He was granted 'voluntary departure', a bureaucratic euphemism for being kicked out.
'Serigne Khabane Lame, 25, a citizen of Italy, was detained… for immigration violations,' the spokesperson confirmed in a statement. 'Lame was granted voluntary departure… and has since departed the US.'
Loudon, 18, claimed that Lame was detained at Henderson Detention Center, southeast of Las Vegas proper, though its unclear how long he may have been in custody before leaving.
ICE has not confirmed whether Loudon was involved in reporting Lame to authorities. DailyMail.com has approached immigration officials for comment but did not immediately respond.
Loudon has continued to celebrate his alleged role in the TikToker's removal.
He made a post Wednesday afternoon denouncing various media outlets' coverage of this incident, who reportedly called him a 'rat' and a 'rat extraordinaire'.
'Why? Because I helped President Trump's DHS deport TikTok's biggest star, Khaby Lame, for being in the U.S. illegally,' he added.
'I wish Khaby well and hope he returns as a LAW-ABIDING citizen.'
Loudon also did an interview with Dylan Page, another popular TikToker who has been the 'News Daddy.'
In that sit-down, Loudon said he became aware of Lame's immigration status because 'he had worked with a few of my friends and business partners' who said his visa expired years ago.
'I called some people in the administration and they said "we're gonna get on this right quick,"' Loudon said.
Lame is best known known for his dead-pan skits reacting to other content on the social media site.
Loudon admitted that he doesn't watch much of Lame's content but said Lame has posted videos expressing a 'hatred' for Trump.
'I'm sure he hates him much more now, which is why I posted "far-left" TikToker,' he said.
Lame has not commented on his detainment or his removal from the US and has continued to post videos as if nothing happened.
As recently as May 5, Lame attended the Met Gala in New York City, where he wore a three piece suit with well over a dozen timepieces attached to his vest.
Loudon, from Palm Beach, Florida, is the son of Dr. Gina Loudon, a conservative pundit and former co-chair of Women for Trump in 2020.
His father, John Loudon, was a Republican Missouri state senator until 2008.
Loudon and Barron Trump were instrumental convincing Donald Trump that it was a strategic advantage to appear on various podcasts popular with young me, including Adin Ross' show.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Global nuclear arms spending up 11% in 2024, campaign group says
GENEVA, June 13 (Reuters) - Spending on nuclear weapons by the world's nine nuclear-armed nations rose by 11% in 2024, a report by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons said on Friday. The $10 billion annual increase to $100.2 billion went towards modernising and in some cases expanding nuclear arsenals, according to ICAN, a global civil society coalition that seeks the total elimination of atomic weapons. "Nuclear-armed countries could have paid the United Nations' budget 28 times with what they spent to build and maintain nuclear weapons in 2024," the report said. The U.S. recorded the largest annual increase in nuclear spending in 2024, rising by $5.3 billion, the report said. Its total expenditure of $56.8 billion exceeded the combined spending of all other nuclear-armed states, it said. China spent $12.5 billion, followed by Britain at $10.4 billion, which was an increase of $2.2 billion, ICAN said. It said the other nuclear-armed states were France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan and Russia. 'In terms of kind of the increase in spending in the UK and France, I think we certainly have seen, at least in the rhetoric of political leaders, a reference to the ongoing war in Ukraine, to the tensions, and that could be playing a role,' Alicia Sanders-Zakre, a policy and research coordinator at ICAN, told reporters at a briefing in Geneva. Britain and other allies in NATO now regard Russia as the main security threat to Europe and some have rolled out plans to devote a higher percentage of GDP to defence spending. However, Sanders-Zakre said the increase in nuclear expenditure has been more driven by the costs of servicing long-term contracts and the growing expense of developing nuclear delivery systems than by current security concerns.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Tennessee judge to hear arguments about releasing Kilmar Abrego Garcia from pretrial detention
A Tennessee judge is scheduled to hear arguments Friday about whether Kilmar Abrego Garcia can be released from jail pending the outcome of a trial on human smuggling charges. In a motion asking U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes to order Abrego Garcia detained, Acting U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee Rob McGuire described him as both a danger to the community and a flight risk. Abrego Garcia's attorneys disagree. They point out that he was already wrongly detained in a notorious Salvadoran prison thanks to government error, and argue that due process and 'basic fairness' require him to be set free. Abrego Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador who had been living in the United States for more than a decade before he was wrongfully deported in March. The expulsion violated a 2019 U.S. immigration judge's order that shielded him from deportation to his native country because he likely faced gang persecution there. His case quickly became a rallying point for opposition to President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda. While the Trump administration described the mistaken removal as 'an administrative error,' officials have continued to justify it by insisting that Abrego Garcia was a member of the El Salvadoran gang MS-13. His wife and attorneys have denied the allegations, saying he is simply a construction worker and family man. The motion for detention pretrial accuses Abrego Garcia of trafficking people, drugs and firearms and of abusing the women he transported, among other claims. It states that human smuggling was Abrego Garcia's actual job, not construction. It even accuses him of taking part in a murder in El Salvador. However, none of those allegations are part of the charges against him, and at Abrego Garcia's initial appearance June 6, Judge Holmes warned prosecutors that she can not detain someone based solely on allegations. One of Abrego Garcia's attorneys last week called the claims 'preposterous,' characterizing them as a desperate attempt by the Trump administration to justify the mistaken deportation three months after the fact. 'There's no way a jury is going to see the evidence and agree that this sheet metal worker is the leader of an international MS-13 smuggling conspiracy,' private attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg said last week. In a Wednesday court filing, Abrego Garcia's public defenders argued the government is not even entitled to a detention hearing — much less actual detention — because the charges against their client are not serious enough. Although the maximum sentence for smuggling one person is 10 years, and Abrego Garcia is accused of transporting hundreds of people over nearly a decade, his defense attorneys point out that there is no minimum sentence. The average sentence for human smuggling in 2024 was just 15 months, according to court filings. Ohio State University law professor César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández said he would not be surprised if the judge releases Abrego Garcia because he's too well-known to pose a flight risk. 'The thought that this is somebody who can disappear or who might violate the law without anyone noticing seems farfetched,' García Hernández said. But even if Abrego Garcia is released on the criminal charges, Immigration and Customs Enforcement might immediately move to detain and deport him, García Hernández said. Most people in ICE custody who are facing criminal charges are deported, he said, and the idea that ICE would take Abrego Garcia to his court proceedings in Tennessee is 'next to unheard of.' 'This is an unusual situation in that most criminal defendants are not household names in the Oval Office,' García Hernández said. 'I would hope the folks in the Trump administration have thought this through.' The decision to charge Abrego Garcia criminally prompted the resignation of Ben Schrader, who was chief of the criminal division at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Tennessee. He posted about his departure on social media on the day of the indictment, writing, 'It has been an incredible privilege to serve as a prosecutor with the Department of Justice, where the only job description I've ever known is to do the right thing, in the right way, for the right reasons.' He did not directly address the indictment and declined to comment when reached by The Associated Press. However, a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter confirmed the connection. Although Abrego Garcia lives in Maryland, he is being charged in Tennessee based on a May 2022 traffic stop for speeding in the state. The Tennessee Highway Patrol body camera video of the encounter that was released to the public last month shows a calm exchange between officers and Abrego Garcia. It also shows the officers discussing among themselves their suspicions of human smuggling before sending him on his way. One of the officers says, 'He's hauling these people for money.' Another says Abrego Garcia had $1,400 in an envelope. Abrego Garcia was not charged with any offense at the traffic stop. Attorney Sandoval-Moshenberg said in a statement after the video's release that he saw no evidence of a crime in the footage. Meanwhile, the lawsuit over Abrego Garcia's mistaken deportation isn't over. Abrego Garcia's attorneys have asked a federal judge in Maryland to impose fines against the administration for contempt, arguing that it flagrantly ignored court orders forseveral weeks to return him. The Trump administration said it will ask the judge to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that it followed the judge's order to return him to the U.S. —- Finley reported from Norfolk, Virginia.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Closing arguments: Is Karen Read's murder trial a tale of love gone wrong or a police coverup?
Lawyers in the murder trial of Karen Read are set to give their closing arguments Friday after weeks of testimony in a highly divisive case in which the prosecution's theory of jaded love turned deadly is countered by a defense claim that a cast of tight-knit Boston area law enforcement killed a fellow police officer. Read, 45, is accused of fatally striking her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, 46, with her SUV and leaving him to die in the snow outside a house party where other local police and a federal agent were closing out a night of drinking in 2022. She's charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene in Canton, outside Boston. Read's defense has suggested she was the victim of a wide-ranging conspiracy that included planting evidence and using her as a convenient scapegoat for her boyfriend's death. The first Read trial ended July 1 in a mistrial due to a hung jury, and several jurors came out after to say that the panel had unanimously agreed that Read was not guilty of the most serious charge of second-degree murder. Prosecution has focused on the scene of death The state's case was led by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who called fewer witnesses than prosecutor Adam Lally, who ran the first trial against Read. Brennan has referenced Read's statement about the possibility that she backed into O'Keefe, which the defense has pointed out came not from police reports but from a voluntary interview she did for a documentary series. In the television interview, Read said, 'I didn't think I hit him,' but acknowledged she could have 'clipped him.' In the first trial, the state called Michael Proctor, the lead investigator in the case. Proctor would later be fired after a disciplinary board found he sent sexist and crude text messages about Read. Proctor was asked to read the texts aloud in court during the first trial, but in the second, the prosecution relied on others to read the offensive comments. The defense called one of Proctor's friends to read more texts that suggested he had focused on Read early in the investigation. During the first trial, Proctor acknowledged being friends with Kevin Albert, a Canton police officer who is the brother of the owner of the home where the party was held. Prosecutors this time focused on evidence from the scene, and tried to make the point that broken pieces of Read's taillight show she struck O'Keefe with her vehicle. The defense has argued that the taillight was actually damaged when Read was backing out of O'Keefe's house and hit his car. They have suggested Proctor and others could have colluded to plant the pieces of broken plastic near O'Keefe's body after they took the vehicle back to the police department. Experts called by the prosecutors testified that data on O'Keefe's phone matched with it being located near a flagpole on the lawn, near the street, where his body was found. There was also no phone activity after that and the phone's battery temperature dropped considerably, the specialist said. Another specialist used GPS and phone data to place Read's vehicle at the scene around the same time. Another expert testified that Read's vehicle reversed more than 50 feet (15 meters) at about 23 mph (37 kph). Andre Porto, a forensic scientist who works in the DNA unit of the Massachusetts State Police Crime Lab, detailed various items he tested, including the broken rear taillight and pieces of a broken cocktail glass found in the yard. Only O'Keefe was a likely match for both. A hair found on Read's vehicle was a match for O'Keefe. Traces of DNA from three people, O'Keefe and two unknown individuals, were on the outside of Read's taillight and O'Keefe's clothing, Porto said. Prosecutors called a neurosurgeon who testified that O'Keefe suffered a 'classic blunt trauma injury' associated with falling backward and hitting his head. The broken cocktail glass found at the scene is another key piece of evidence, prosecutors have said, because O'Keefe was holding it when Read dropped him off. The prosecution pointed out that Read and O'Keefe were fighting. Voicemails recovered from Read's phone in which she said, 'I (expletive) hate you,' to O'Keefe were played in court. That voicemail would have arrived while he was lying in the snow. The defense's strategy in the second trial Read's defense team has cast doubt on the state's case by suggesting Read was framed. The defense has painted a picture of a deceitful web of people in O'Keefe's social network who saw Read as a scapegoat for his death. The network includes federal agent Brian Higgins, who exchanged flirtatious text messages with Read, leading the defense to question if that led to a fatal confrontation. Higgins was present at the party on the night of O'Keefe's death. Defense attorneys presented a different view of how Read's taillight was cracked. They have attempted to show, via witnesses, surveillance video and photographs, that Read may have damaged her taillight the morning after O'Keefe's death when she backed out of his driveway and bumped his car with her own. Nicholas Barros, a police officer at a department where Read's car was impounded, testified that he saw only a small crack in Read's taillight when the car first arrived. The defense has pointed out that the taillight later looked much more damaged, arguing it could have been tampered with. A crash expert who testified for the defense said, based on every test he performed, the damage to Read's taillight and O'Keefe's clothing was inconsistent with her SUV striking an arm or body at the speed described by the prosecution. The defense has also questioned why investigators never entered the home where the party took place, although witnesses from the scene and prosecutors have said O'Keefe never went inside. Dr. Elizabeth Laposata, a former medical examiner called by the defense, said O'Keefe's injuries were consistent with blunt force trauma to the back of the head, but that his eye wounds were not consistent with being hit by the rear of Read's SUV. She testified she did not think O'Keefe was hit by the SUV at all. The defense also questioned Jennifer McCabe, who was at the house party and is the sister-in-law of the host, retired Boston police officer Brian Albert. McCabe made a misspelled web search, 'hos long to die in cold,' after O'Keefe's death. The timing of the search has been in question. The defense argued that McCabe made the search at about 2:30 a.m. and helped cover for the real killer. The prosecution claims she searched after O'Keefe's body was found later in the morning. The defense called into question the actions of others who were at the party the night O'Keefe died. The party happened at the home of Albert, and after O'Keefe's death, the Alberts rehomed their dog Chloe — who the defense claims bit O'Keefe — and refurbished their basement before selling their home at a loss. Dr. Marie Russell, a retired emergency medicine physician, testified that the wounds on O'Keefe's arms were the result of a dog attack, injuries the prosecution attributes to being struck by Read's vehicle. The judge in the case did not allow medical examiner Laposata to testify specifically about potential dog bite wounds, but did allow her to testify that some of O'Keefe's arm injuries were consistent with an animal bite, not with wounds from a broken taillight. The defense introduced phone records that showed unanswered calls between Albert and Higgins in the early morning hours after O'Keefe's death. They both later destroyed their phones, with Higgins testifying in the first trial that he obliterated his phone's SIM card and disposed of it at a military base. The defense also introduced records from McCabe that showed she repeatedly called O'Keefe after midnight, calls she described as 'butt dials.' Read faces a maximum penalty of a life sentence if convicted.
