Supermarkets ‘in limbo' over Government action on deforestation in supply chains
Under the proposals, businesses will be prohibited from using or selling goods containing palm oil, cocoa, beef, leather and soy linked to illegal deforestation under the 2021 Environment Act.
But ministers are yet to publish the legislation or set a date for the rules to come into force.
In an open letter to the Government, retailers warned that deforestation presents an increasing risk to supply chain stability as well as food security.
This delay has left UK businesses in limbo; uncertain, and unable to fully respond to these challenges UK supermarkets
The supermarkets said the UK could suffer millions in export losses to the European Union if Government inaction leaves businesses unprepared to comply with the bloc's own deforestation legislation, which is due to come into force at the end of this year.
They also said deforestation rules will help support food security and mitigate the impacts of climate change on their supply chains.
It comes as increasingly volatile and extreme weather across the world has been driving food price inflation, such as recent spikes in cocoa and coffee prices.
'It is concerning that, almost four years after the Environment Act 2021 became law, successive UK Governments have failed to enact the necessary secondary legislation to put its deforestation provisions into effect,' the letter said.
'This delay has left UK businesses in limbo; uncertain, and unable to fully respond to these challenges.'
The supermarkets, which also include Sainsbury's, Morrisons, Waitrose, Aldi, the Co-op, M&S and Ocado, called on ministers to urgently adopt secondary legislation that aligns with the EU rules as much as possible.
They also urged the Government to recognise European standards as being credible evidence of due diligence and ensure supply chain transparency is required within British supply chains after the point of import.
Cocoa is among the commodities that have seen spiking prices in recent months (Steve Parsons/PA)
Nicola Brennan, conversion-free supply chain specialist at WWF-UK, said: 'While the Government has committed to making Britain a clean energy superpower and increasing domestic energy security, it is yet to support the market in eliminating arguably the most easily removable economic contribution of emissions.
'Ending global deforestation and conversion of natural ecosystems is essential to stopping climate change, halting biodiversity loss, and ensuring the long-term security and sustainability of the UK's food and soft commodity supply as well as providing the biggest gains in climate mitigation.
'Forests are home to 80% of the Earth's terrestrial biodiversity – there is simply no way we can fight the climate crisis and species extinction if we don't stop deforestation.'
Will Schreiber, representative of the Retail Soy Group and 3Keel Director, said: 'Being able to prove that British products have not contributed to global deforestation is critical if we are going to be able to continue growing and trading with our largest trading partner.
'This is one of the few pieces of legislation that makes sense across the board if the Government moves forward and implements the secondary legislation we've been calling out for in a thoughtful way.'
PA has contacted the Environment Department (Defra) for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Japan MOF preparing to raise long-term rate estimate in FY2026 budget request, Yomiuri reports
TOKYO, Aug 22 (Reuters) - Japan's Ministry of Finance is preparing to raise its assumed interest rate for long-term government bonds at 2.6% for fiscal 2026/27 budget requests, the highest level in 17 years, the Yomiuri newspaper reported on Friday. The country's assumed bond interest rate was 2.1% during the fiscal 2025 budget request phase before being adjusted to 2.0% in the final budget. The increase for the next budget would lead to higher debt servicing costs, the report also said without citing sources.
Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Army spends £118m on more systems to shoot down missiles and drones
The £118 million move will double the number of British-made Land Ceptor systems available to the British Army. It said they could be deployed both in the UK and overseas. The new equipment will form part of Sky Sabre, a state-of-the-art defence system that can intercept munitions and aircraft. It replaced the previous Rapier system, which had run since the 1970s. The MRAD (medium range air defence) system will be made by manufacturer MBDA in Bolton. The Government said 140 jobs will be supported by the move. The Sky Sabre system replaced the former Rapier short range air defences, pictured during a training exercise in Blackheath ahead of of the 2012 Olympics (PA/Lewis Whyld) Defence minister Luke Pollard said: 'We are delivering on the strategic defence review by equipping our armed forces with state-of-the art equipment to help keep us safe. Doubling our deployable Sky Sabre capability will strengthen the UK's air defences, protect UK forces abroad, and deter our adversaries. 'Through this investment we are supporting over 100 jobs across the UK, with more to come.' The Land Ceptor systems are able to hit a tennis-ball sized object which is travelling at twice the speed of sound. The Sky Sabre operation can control 24 missiles at one time. As part of the system, the Land Ceptors operate alongside radar and a wider command and control centre. However, they are also able to be used on their own. Sky Sabre was recently tested as part of a Nato exercise in the Outer Hebrides, the Ministry of Defence said. It has already been deployed in Poland, as part of Nato operations with on eye on Russia. Commanding Officer of the 16th Regiment Royal Artillery, Lt Col James Boutle, said: 'Sky Sabre represents a step change in the UK's ground-based air defence capability. 'As the Army's most advanced air defence system, it provides a powerful shield against modern airborne threats, from fast jets to precision-guided weapons and drones. 'For 16th Regiment Royal Artillery, operating Sky Sabre is both a privilege and a responsibility – ensuring we are trained and ready to strengthen the UK's contribution to Nato when called upon. 'As part of this, we work hand-in-hand with industry partners, such as MBDA here in the UK, to continuously optimise the system to ensure it remains on the cutting edge – a collaboration that guarantees we stay ahead of adversary technology.'
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Why a capital gains tax raid is the last thing homeowners need
A new tax on the sale of expensive homes would cause the property market to grind to a halt, and would be unlikely to raise much revenue, experts say. The government is said to be considering a shake-up of property taxes in the budget this autumn as it tries to fill a multibillion-pound black hole in the public finances. Many options seem to be under discussion, according to widespread reports this week, but most appear to be aimed at those selling high-value homes. The Times reported on Wednesday that the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, was considering charging capital gains tax (CGT) on the sale of main homes worth £1.5 million or more. This would be on top of stamp duty paid by buyers, which raised £13.8 billion in the 2023-24 tax year. CGT raised £13 billion in that year. Jonathan Brandling-Harris from the London estate agency House Collective said: 'Handing sellers a large CGT bill on sale will simply discourage them from moving.' Geoff Wilford from the estate agency Wilfords London said: 'It would be the single worst decision any government could make for the housing market. It would grind activity to a halt. Instead of boosting Treasury receipts, it would kill them off completely.' At the moment the sale of your main home is exempt from CGT. If it wasn't, the Treasury would make an estimated £31 billion a year. CGT is charged at 24 per cent for higher rate taxpayers and 18 per cent for basic rate taxpayers on the sale of assets including second homes, shares and art, for example. HM Revenue and Customs said that not charging CGT on the sale of main homes costs it £31 billion a year. Heather Powell from the accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg said: 'Abolishing this relief would be hugely controversial and would mean the end of the principle that no tax is payable on the sale of your family home.' Tom Bill from the estate agency Knight Frank said that because CGT is only charged on sales, many homeowners would simply decide to stay put. He said: 'If CGT applied from when the property was last bought, it would divide sellers into two groups: those sitting on a gain and those who are not. 'Anyone with a taxable gain would think twice before selling, which would reduce transaction numbers. That's despite the government seeming to want a predictable flow of revenue that is skewed towards the wealthiest homeowners.' • Ben Wilkinson: This tax policy chaos does not bode well Homes worth more than £1.5 million make up about 1 per cent of the 1.2 million property sales in England every year, and about 5 per cent of the sales in London, according to Hamptons. The average gain on the sale of a £1.5 million-plus home in England and Wales in the past 20 years was £836,219 — a rise of 71 per cent. The CGT bill on that gain for a higher-rate taxpayer would be £199,973. Aneisha Beveridge from the estate agency Hamptons said that when buyers of more expensive homes were last hit by big changes to property taxes, sales fell. Stamp duty moved from a 'slab' system where a single 5 per cent rate was charged to a 'slice' system where bands of the purchase price were taxed at 2 per cent, 5 per cent and 10 per cent. The change left anyone buying a home worth less than £935,000 paying less, but those who bought higher-value homes paying more. Under the old system someone buying a £1.5 million home would have paid 5 per cent across the entire property's value — £75,000. They now pay £93,750. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts In 2014 about 4 per cent of homes sold in London went for more than £1.5 million, according to Hamptons. Last year 2.9 per cent sold at that level, once you accounted for property price inflation, the lowest share on record. Beveridge said: 'What we saw with the stamp duty changes was that demand for those homes at the top end of the market slowed because they became much more expensive, so people did not move as often.' A property sales tax on expensive homes would have a knock-on effect on all those further down a sales chain if the sellers at the top simply decided not to move. Wilford said: 'Imagine finally deciding to move after decades only to be stung with a bigger bill for selling than you would ever have paid for buying. That leaves a very sour taste.' Experts argue that anything that deters older homeowners from downsizing is bad news for the market in general. Some 53 per cent of homes in England and 35 per cent of homes in Scotland have at least two spare bedrooms, according to Nationwide Building Society. Polling of 4,300 people by Barclays suggested that 37 per cent of those with one or more spare bedrooms were over 65. • How could Rachel Reeves reform stamp duty and other property taxes? Barclays said that those who downsize should be given grants or be allowed to offset any moving costs against their stamp duty bill. Brandling-Harris said: 'Downsizers should be helped because every move they make unlocks the housing ladder beneath them — freeing up family homes for those moving up the ladder, and so starter homes for first-time buyers. That's why the focus should be the exact opposite of a sellers' tax: rather than penalising people for moving, we should be encouraging it.' Wilford added: 'Downsizing is already a daunting process. People want to stay near friends, family and their GP yet often suitable homes locally are scarce. 'Add in the emotional attachment to the family home, the slog of clearing out a lifetime of belongings, plus legal fees, removals and surveys, and it is no wonder many decide it is easier to stay put — they just don't want the hassle. Add a seller's tax into the mix and you risk wiping out a whole segment of the market that keeps the housing ecosystem moving.'
