
Go after those who see animal cruelty as a 'sport', but educate the rest: Shanmugam
Reflecting on a spate of high-profile community cat deaths earlier this year – including four incidents in Yishun, Punggol and Tampines – Mr Shanmugam reiterated the government's zero-tolerance approach to animal cruelty.
There is "no question" about the government's position on this, he told CNA in an interview on Tuesday (Jul 8).
Investigations by the National Parks Board (NParks) found that three of the deaths were likely caused by vehicle accidents, with no evidence of deliberate acts of cruelty.
Still, public concern over the incidents prompted Mr Shanmugam, also the MP for Yishun, to speak out in a Facebook post at the time, stating: "This is not who we are as a people."
Just this week, a man convicted of killing cats by throwing them from Housing Board blocks had his jail term doubled after the prosecution appealed.
"We cannot tolerate cruelty," said Mr Shanmugam, who is also the Coordinating Minister for National Security. "We have to take a strong stand, and we cannot let perpetrators go free."
At the same time, he cautioned against over-criminalisation.
There will always be a minority who break the law, he said, emphasising the need for targeted enforcement. "What you want is to go after the people with malice – who go out to be cruel to animals, who think that it's a sport, who think that it's a game," Mr Shanmugam said.
"These animals don't have a voice, and it's incumbent … upon us to make sure that they are protected."
The majority of people in Singapore are law-abiding and most pet owners are "well-meaning", Mr Shanmugam said. For those who make mistakes without cruel intent, a sensible approach must be taken, where levels of culpability and criminality of offences are assessed, he added.
Such people should be guided through education to ensure they know how to look after their pets, he said.
"Otherwise you will be charging a lot of people in court. You also don't want that."
ONLY 6% OF ABUSE CASES SUBSTANTIATED
In 2024, Singapore recorded 961 cases of animal cruelty and welfare concerns – the highest in 12 years – according to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA). The cases involved 2,190 animals, mostly cats.
Under current law, those found guilty of cruelty to animals may face up to 18 months' jail, fines up to S$15,000 (US$11,700), or both. Repeat offenders face harsher penalties of up to three years' jail and S$30,000 in fines.
First-time offenders who fail in their duty of care can be fined up to S$10,000 or jailed for up to a year.
Legislation is under review to raise penalties further – including disqualification orders – and strengthen enforcement powers like arrest and seizure.
The penalties send a clear message that such conduct is not tolerated, said Mr Shanmugam. But he also acknowledged the challenge law enforcement agencies face in finding the culprits due to the absence of cameras and witnesses, which leads to fewer cases being heard in court.
From 2019 to 2024, NParks received an average of 1,200 reports of animal cruelty and welfare cases annually, but only about 6 per cent were substantiated. Egregious cases were prosecuted in court, while other offenders received warning letters or composition fines.
Mr Shanmugam also addressed the role of mental illness in animal abuse. While acknowledging that psychological conditions can sometimes be a factor, he stressed that cruelty should never be excused.
"Certainly it's not a way to suggest that because the person has mental health issues, you should leave him alone. Then he or she will continue doing it to more animals, which we should not tolerate," he said.
"If the person is a threat, that threat has to be removed, usually by removing that person from society," he added. "Unless the experts come out and say a certain type of treatment would help, and the person doesn't need to be incarcerated."
COLLABORATION WITH ANIMAL WELFARE GROUPS
The minister also highlighted the importance of working with animal welfare groups.
He cited the example of the Chong Pang Animal Welfare Forum, set up after he took office in 2011 and later renamed the Nee Soon Public Forum on Animal Welfare Policies. It provided a platform for public feedback, which fed into 24 legislative recommendations – all accepted by the government and many adopted into the Animals and Birds Act.
Mr Shanmugam credited former MP Louis Ng, founder of the Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (ACRES), for his role in shaping policy. With Mr Ng returning to the non-profit sector, Ms Lee Hui Ying, a long-time volunteer and new Nee Soon MP, will now take on that responsibility.
Not all proposals from welfare groups can be adopted, Mr Shanmugam said. But overall, it's a "cooperative effort" between the groups and the government, he said.
Ultimately, Mr Shanmugam added, the government's goal is to ensure that laws stay effective and relevant.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Housing plea for younger adults with disabilities
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox I was heartened to hear Prime Minister Lawrence Wong announce in his National Day Rally speech that more Community Care Apartments (CCAs) would be built over the coming years to benefit seniors aged 65 and above (' Age Well Neighbourhoods will help improve seniors' access to healthcare, social activities ', Aug 18). However, the eligibility criteria excludes younger adults with severe disabilities like myself, who require round-the-clock support to live with dignity. I am turning 30 soon and live with muscular dystrophy, a progressive condition that has left me unable to perform all six activities of daily living, including washing, dressing, feeding and toileting. I recently received a letter from the Central Provident Fund Board informing me that I will be enrolled in CareShield Life when I turn 30. Given my pre-existing severe disability, I will receive monthly payouts for as long as I have severe disability, which is the case for my medical condition. If the Government recognises, through CareShield Life, that people with pre-existing severe disability should receive lifelong support, then housing policy should also reflect this reality. CCAs offer accessible design, on-site emergency assistance, and community services that are just as relevant for younger adults with lifelong disabilities as they are for seniors. Like other young Singaporeans, I would like to get married and live with my partner on my own one day, rather than depend on my family for housing arrangements. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 18 persons nabbed and 82 vapes seized in HSA ops in Raffles Place and Haji Lane Singapore 3 Sengkang Green Primary pupils suspended for bullying classmate, with 1 of them caned: MOE Singapore Woman trapped between train doors: Judge rules SBS Transit '100% responsible' Singapore Religion growing in importance for Singaporeans: IPS study Life Record number of arts patrons in 2024, but overall donation dips to $45.74m Life 'Loss that's irreplaceable': Local film-makers mourn closure of Singapore indie cinema The Projector Singapore Nearly 2 years' jail, caning for man caught with at least 100 sexually explicit videos of children Singapore Grab users in Singapore shocked by fares of over $1,000 due to display glitch I urge the Government to expand CCA eligibility to Singaporeans aged 30 and above who are already covered under CareShield Life and meet the definition of severe disability. This would ensure equitable access to dignified housing for persons with disabilities (PWDs), while making full use of an existing scheme designed to support independent living. Such a move would complement the Age Well Neighbourhoods initiative, by enabling younger PWDs to age well in their communities too. Singapore's ageing population rightly deserves robust support, but we must also remember younger citizens who live with permanent severe disability from birth or childhood. Extending CCA eligibility would close this gap and give us the chance to age well in place, alongside our fellow Singaporeans. Shalom Lim Ern Rong

Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, US judge rules
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Judge Richard Berman said the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. NEW YORK - A US judge denied on Aug 20 the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges, saying the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. Manhattan-based US District Judge Richard Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump has sought to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's decision not to release files of the case. The judge wrote that it would be more logical for the government to directly release the vast amount of information it has collected from its investigation into Epstein than to petition the court to release the more limited grand jury materials, whose secrecy is protected by law. 'The Government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials,' Judge Berman wrote. 'The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Mr Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Mr Trump's supporters. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 18 persons nabbed and 82 vapes seized in HSA ops in Raffles Place and Haji Lane Singapore 3 Sengkang Green Primary pupils suspended for bullying classmate, with 1 of them caned: MOE Singapore Woman trapped between train doors: Judge rules SBS Transit '100% responsible' Singapore Religion growing in importance for Singaporeans: IPS study Life Record number of arts patrons in 2024, but overall donation dips to $45.74m Life 'Loss that's irreplaceable': Local film-makers mourn closure of Singapore indie cinema The Projector Singapore Nearly 2 years' jail, caning for man caught with at least 100 sexually explicit videos of children Singapore Grab users in Singapore shocked by fares of over $1,000 due to display glitch Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. In July, Mr Trump instructed Attorney-General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Justice Department said in a court filing in July. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. On Aug 11, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied a similar request by the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein to abuse. Judge Engelmayer wrote that the public would not learn anything new from the release of materials from Maxwell's grand jury because much of the evidence was made public at her month-long trial four years earlier. The grand jury testimony contained no evidence of others besides Epstein and Maxwell who had sexual contact with minors, Judge Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she has asked the US Supreme Court to review her case. In July, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient. REUTERS


CNA
8 hours ago
- CNA
National Basketball League Div 1 plays on despite 9 arrested for suspected match-fixing
National Basketball League Division 1 matches will continue amid match-fixing allegations. Nine people - including players in the league - were arrested. But the Singapore Basketball Association says there is no concrete evidence that the league has been compromised. Nikhil Khattar with more.