Concern over Japan CO₂ storage deal
From Dr Cecilia Anthonysamy
PSM expresses serious concern over a report published by FMT revealing that carbon emissions from Japanese industries are expected to be injected into depleted gas fields in Malaysian waters.
The project – reportedly involving Mitsui & Co, Kansai Electric Power, and Petronas – is said to be formalised by the end of this year.
However, no environmental impact assessment (EIA) or public safety documentation has been made publicly available. If such assessments exist, they must be disclosed immediately.
Despite government assurances, PSM questions whether this project is truly safe.
Why isn't Japan storing its carbon on its own soil? Why export its emissions to a country that contributes only 0.73% to global carbon emissions?
PSM calls on the natural resources and environmental sustainability ministry, or the economy ministry, to immediately:
Disclose the full EIA related to this cross-border carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) project.
Reveal who the consultants are, how they are funded, and whether they operate independently.
Clarify whether independent Malaysian scientific experts are involved in reviewing the EIA.
Allow public scrutiny and feedback before any final agreement is signed.
In our experience, most EIAs are conducted by consultants hired by the project owners, raising serious concerns about objectivity and credibility.
Without independent, peer-reviewed science, Malaysians cannot be expected to trust the claim that such projects are safe.
Globally, among the 150 CCUS projects:
3 have experienced subsurface leakage (2%)
2 have suffered borehole leakage (1.3%)
1 involved direct geological leakage (0.7%)
1 case posed potential danger to human life (0.7%)
(Source: Jason Eleson, Senior CCUS Geologist, 2023)
While these may appear as low percentages, a single incident could have catastrophic consequences, especially in a country with limited disaster response capacity.
Research findings include:
First-time injections into reservoirs pose the highest risk due to geological uncertainty (Benson, 2007).
Over a 10,000-year period, there's a 50% chance of measurable leakage, even under ideal conditions (Alcalde et al, 2018).
Studies have flagged concerns over toxic trace elements (e.g., arsenic, selenium), the lack of long-term monitoring, and inadequate modelling under fault conditions (Gholami et al., 2021; Bin Li et al., 2025).
These findings are well documented and must not be dismissed. Clear, simplified summaries should be made public, with full references available for expert review.
Key logistical questions remain unanswered:
How will carbon from Japan reach Malaysian waters – via undersea pipeline or pressurised shipping?
Are any transit countries involved or consulted?
Does the project comply with maritime and environmental regulations under UNCLOS?
These are not minor details. A leak during transit could be disastrous. The public deserves clear answers.
Even if Petronas stands to earn billions and generate thousands of jobs, these economic benefits do not justify:
The absence of a public EIA
The withholding of risk disclosures
Malaysia's lack of disaster preparedness
Development without safety is reckless, not progressive.
If Japan's carbon is to be stored at the Kasawari or Lang Lebah fields off Sarawak's coast, PSM strongly urges civil society groups, scientists, and indigenous communities in Sarawak to demand full disclosure and consultation.
The people of Sarawak must have a voice in deciding whether foreign carbon can be buried beneath their seafloor for centuries to come.
PSM calls for an urgent town hall meeting hosted by the natural resources and environmental sustainability ministry or the economy ministry involving:
Independent geologists and environmental scientists
Civil society organisations
Affected coastal communities
The general public
We must not base national environmental decisions on vague assurances like 'projects must align with climate goals'.
What we need is action, transparency, and informed public consent, not just corporate partnerships and ministerial pledges.
PSM fully supports rigorous, peer-reviewed science and is not opposed to technological innovation.
But without full public disclosure, independent assessment, and transparent governance, Malaysia risks becoming a carbon dumping ground for industrialised nations.
Climate justice must prioritise people over profit, sovereignty over subservience, and science over spin.
The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Dr Cecilia Anthonysamy is a member of PSM's environmental, climate crisis & indigenous peoples bureau.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Shahriman denies ‘blowing hot and cold' over collateral for Sapura tower
Shahriman Shamsuddin wants the High Court to wind up Sapura Holdings Sdn Bhd citing a breakdown of mutual trust with elder brother Shahril. KUALA LUMPUR : Sapura Holdings Sdn Bhd director Shahriman Shamsuddin today insisted he was not inconsistent as regards using the group's Sapura@Mines property as collateral to fund its business ventures. Testifying in his petition to wind up Sapura Holdings on grounds of a breakdown of mutual trust with elder brother Shahril, Shahriman said he had objected to using the property as collateral for the development of the group's flagship office tower. In his petition, Shahriman had claimed that his 'strained relationship' with Shahril had been 'exacerbated' by the differing opinions they voiced over Project Apex at a special board meeting of Sapura Resources Bhd (SRB) on Jan 31, 2023. Project Apex was the codename given by SRB for its joint venture with KLCC Holdings Sdn Bhd to develop Permata Sapura, a 52-storey office building in the KL city centre. Lawyer S Rabindra, representing Shahril, then referred Shahriman to the minutes of that meeting. Rabindra: At various board meetings and in relation to loan proposals that we've already gone through, you voiced strong concerns and protested the use of Sapura@Mines as collateral for Sapura Holdings' financial assistance, particularly for Permata. Correct? Shahriman: Yes, for Permata. Rabindra: Yet, at the board meeting on Jan 31, 2023, you were comfortable with Sapura Resources using Sapura@Mines as collateral for new projects. Is that correct? Shahriman: For other projects that were going to yield (returns). Rabindra: So there was a risk, according to you, that using Sapura@Mines as collateral for Permata could lead to a loss of the property, but here, you were quite happy to suggest using the same property for new ventures, despite the same risk. Correct? Shahriman: Not correct. Rabindra: But it is the same risk. There is still the possibility of losing the property. Shahriman: We know the negative risk of Permata. But there were other projects that we could have gone into. Rabindra: I suggest to you that you were blowing hot and cold with respect to the use of the Sapura@Mines property as collateral. Shahriman: I disagree. Shahriman also agreed that, in essence, he had wanted SRB to exit Project Apex, while Shahril wanted to remain in it. Rabindra: I'm suggesting to you that this was a difference of opinion between two directors of a public-listed company about what they see as being in the best interest of the company. Do you agree? Shahriman: Agree. That was a difference of opinion. Rabindra: And this was openly discussed at the Jan 31 board meeting. Correct? Shahriman: Yes. Rabindra: So it essentially came down to a commercial disagreement between two directors on a matter of business judgement based on what is best for SRB? Shahriman: On a matter of business judgement, a difference of opinion, yes. Sapura Holdings is the parent entity of over 40 subsidiaries valued at RM832 million, including the publicly-listed SRB. Both Shahril and Shahriman hold a 48% stake each in Sapura Holdings, with the remaining 4% owned by Rameli Musa. In the petition filed last September, Shahriman claims that an irreparable breakdown of mutual trust and confidence between him and Shahril necessitated the dissolution of Sapura Holdings. However, Sapura Holdings, Shahril and Rameli, all named as respondents, oppose the petition, contending that the company was never intended to be a family business and that dissolution would be neither just nor equitable. The hearing before Justice Leong Wai Hong continues.
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
81% of vape-related poisonings linked to ‘magic mushroom' flavour
National Poison Centre pharmacist Fadhli Razali warned that the synthetic cannabinoids found in 'magic mushroom' vapes can trigger violent or erratic behaviour. PETALING JAYA : A staggering 81% of vape-related poisoning cases handled by Universiti Sains Malaysia's poison centre involved products branded as 'magic mushroom' vapes, most of which were used by teenagers and young adults. The National Poison Centre (PRN) said it had seen a sharp rise in such cases since 2022, with many users experiencing seizures, hallucinations, vomiting, and behavioural changes after just one or two puffs. 'These are not harmless vapes. Most samples that we tested did not even contain real psilocybin, but synthetic drugs that can cause serious harm or death,' the centre's pharmacist Fadhli Razali said in a statement. He said between 2020 and 2024, the centre recorded 76 calls involving suspected illicit vape exposure. In 2022 alone, 65% of cases involved such vapes (17 cases), followed by 79% in 2023 (27 cases) and 68% so far this year (26 cases). PRN said the problem had increased among young people, with 41% of cases involving teens aged 15 to 19, and 53% involving those in their early 20s. 'These vapes are easily manipulated to include dangerous substances. Without strict control, it becomes an open door to drug abuse,' he said. Fadhli also warned that the synthetic cannabinoids found in these vapes could trigger violent or erratic behaviour, causing harm to users and those around them. He said these products, often sold online and marketed as trendy or exotic, were now considered a public health threat by PRN. 'We urge all state governments to act urgently and uniformly in banning vape sales, and the federal government must begin enforcing its laws immediately,' he said. He said PRN fully supported the current move by state governments to outlaw vape products and called for a nationwide ban to protect youths from a 'hidden but dangerous drug epidemic'.
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Perak needs further study on use of vapes, e-cigarettes
Perak menteri besar Saarani Mohamad said the study will cover health concerns and the potential impact of a ban on traders and other stakeholders. IPOH : The Perak government is looking into the possibility of banning the sale of vapes and electronic cigarettes in the state. Menteri besar Saarani Mohamad said this was discussed at a recent state executive council meeting, but further study is needed before a decision can be made. He said state human resources, health, Indian community affairs and integration committee chairman A Sivanesan has been tasked with leading the review. 'I've spoken to Sivanesan as this requires a thorough health assessment. However, we must also consider other factors,' he said at a press conference after launching the Perak Digital Economy Action Plan 2030 and Perak Smart Cities Blueprint 2040 today. Saarani said the state has received a request for a meeting from the vape traders' association, which will also be taken into account. The findings of the review, which will cover health concerns and the potential impact on traders and other stakeholders, are expected to be presented at the next exco meeting. Saarani had earlier said a decision on the vape ban was expected at the May 28 exco meeting. Several other state governments have banned vape sales or are considering it.
