&w=3840&q=100)
India's Gen Z billionaires lose interest in legacy family businesses
Piramal isn't the only aging businessperson to have run out of successors: 'Today among the scions of some of the most affluent families of India, someone is an artist, someone wants to be a sportsman, someone wants to run a small restaurant. There's nothing wrong in that. It's the modern trend, people want to do their own things.'
Two hundred years ago, that 'modern' trend among young people used to be enterprise. That's when families like Piramal's began to spread out of the Marwar region in land-locked northern India to take advantage of British-controlled trading opportunities in the port cities of Bombay and Calcutta — now Mumbai and Kolkata. Cotton, jute, and opium sold to China provided the seed capital to the Marwari business community for everything from textile mills to cement factories.
By the early 20th century, these emerging industrial empires were large enough to challenge the colonial masters and their commercial interests. The likes of Ghanshyam Das Birla openly supported Mahatma Gandhi's campaign for independence, even as they outran rivals like Andrew Yule & Co. The Birla House in Delhi, a prominent hub for the freedom movement, was also where Gandhi was assassinated. As the sway of family firms continued after India's 1947 independence, it was believed that newer generations would always be available to take over the reins.
Below the surface, however, the link between ownership and management has been weakening for some time. Piramal's daughter, Radhika, a Harvard University MBA, was the chief executive officer for a few years before quitting in 2017 and relocating with her spouse to London. Her same-sex marriage is not legally recognized in India. The luggage maker was back to being in the care of professional managers, a double-edged sword considering that a rival firm set up by a former managing director is now three-fifths bigger than VIP by market value.
The heirs of prominent business families — millennial and Gen Z billionaires — are setting their own life goals. It's the sensible thing to do. In a labor-surplus economy, access to capital through clan networks and strategic marital alliances was family-run firms' core advantage. But via public markets and private equity, finance is now available to a much wider section of entrepreneurs. Risk-taking has been democratised.
That frees up younger members of business dynasties to try new things. Someone recently asked the singer-songwriter Ananya Birla on social media if she was from the family behind India's largest-selling cement brand. She is indeed the great-great-granddaughter of Ghanshyam Das Birla. But from financial inclusion among rural women to a recently launched beauty brand, the 31-year-old Oxford graduate has her own interests that are independent of the sprawling commodities behemoth led by her father.
Though they're from Tamil Nadu in southern India, and not Marwar in Rajasthan, it's the same for philanthropist Roshni Nadar Malhotra, the chair of HCL Technologies Ltd., a $48 billion outsourcing powerhouse founded by her dad. He gifted her the family's controlling stake in March. Running the tech firm's day-to-day operations is someone else's job. Nadar is passionate about wildlife conservation, among other things.
Piramal is retaining 20 per cent of VIP. But that's just a financial investment in a publicly traded security. He'll pare it down. Owners of unlisted firms are proceeding more slowly. A few months ago, the family behind Haldiram's, a 90-year-old Indian snacks brand, parted with a minority stake to Singapore's Temasek Holdings Pte and other global investors. Media reports put the firm's valuation at $10 billion.
A scenario where India's business elite is basically a bunch of rich financiers, living off accumulated wealth, doesn't appeal to everyone. 'What concerns me is that many in this generation are taking the easy way out, especially in the post-Covid world,' says billionaire Uday Kotak, who retired two years ago as managing director of Kotak Mahindra Bank, which he founded in the 1980s as a finance company. 'They claim to be managing family offices and investments, trading in the stock market, allocating funds to mutual funds, and treating it as a full-time job.'
But they are probably just smart to realise that they're sandwiched. On one hand, access to capital is no longer their abiding advantage. On the other, real economic power is concentrating in fewer hands. Viral Acharya, a former central bank deputy governor, has shown in his research that India's top five nonfinancial groups have expanded their share of total assets by 8 percentage points in 30 years, whereas the next five business groups' sway has shrunk by roughly the same amount.
From cement, steel, autos, power, and paints to retail, telecom, media, finance, and aviation, a handful of powerful conglomerates are pouncing on every new opportunity. No wonder the successors of tycoons like Mukesh Ambani, Gautam Adani and Sajjan Jindal are closely involved in management. Children from middling business families probably don't see the point of entering a new field only to see it being disrupted by a startup — or dominated by a bigger player.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
India tops US smartphone supply in June quarter as Apple shifts from China
India has emerged as the top supplier of smartphones to the US, primarily due to Apple's strategic shift of manufacturing from China amidst trade uncertainties. This transition led to a significant decrease in US smartphone shipments assembled in China, with India capturing a substantial portion of that decline. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India became the leading supplier of smartphones sold in the United States for the first time, in the June quarter, largely driven by Apple's accelerated shift of its manufacturing activities to India from China amidst tariff uncertainties, research firm Canalys uncertain outcome of negotiations between Washington and Beijing over a trade deal has accelerated the supply chain reorientation, it share of US smartphone shipments assembled in China shrank from 61% in Q2 2024 to 25% in Q2 of this decline was captured by total volume of India-made smartphones to the US grew 240% on-year, accounting for 44% of shipments imported into the US in Q2 2025, up from 13% of the total smartphone shipments a year research firm said US smartphone shipments grew 1% on-year in the June quarter as vendors continued to frontload inventories amid tariff concerns.'India became the leading manufacturing hub for smartphones sold in the US for the very first time in Q2 2025, largely driven by Apple's accelerated supply chain shift to India amid an uncertain trade landscape between the US and China,' said Sanyam Chaurasia, principal analyst at added that while Apple has scaled up its supply from India as part of its China Plus One strategy , and even manufacturing and exporting the more complex Pro models from India, it is still dependent on manufacturing bases in China for scaled supply of its Pro models to the the base models, however, India became the largest supplier to the US in the June quarter. Apple has opted to dedicate most of its export capacity in India to supply to the US market in and Motorola have also scaled up supply from India, although their shifts are significantly slower and smaller in scale than Apple's."Motorola, similar to Apple, has its core manufacturing hub in China, whereas Samsung relies mainly on producing its smartphones in Vietnam,' Chaurasia to data from Canalys, iPhone exports from India to the US peaked in March ahead of the Trump administration's announcement of reciprocal tariffs on its trade partners, which eventually got deferred to Cupertino-based company exported 97.6% of all iPhone exports in March to the US, up from 81.9% in the three months to February, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence. Exports ramped up 219% in March as the company looked to preempt higher tariffs on imports from (Hon Hai), and Tata Electronics are the leading manufacturers of iPhones in India, while Samsung has its own factory and Motorola exports to the US through its contract manufacturer, Dixon Technologies


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Google Waymo chooses Violence…Continues to threaten vehicle with aggressive forward maneuver, says post on Twitter; Elon Musk responds: But what do I …
Elon Musk Tesla CEO Elon Musk responded sarcastically to a viral video showing a Waymo autonomous vehicle attempting what appeared to be a head-on collision while blocking traffic in Austin, Texas. "But what do I know about technology," Musk posted on X, reigniting the long-standing debate between LiDAR-based and vision-only autonomous driving systems. The incident, captured on July 6, 2025, showed the Waymo robotaxi making "aggressive forward maneuvers" while threatening an exiting vehicle. "@Cyber_Trailer" posted the footage, writing: "Waymo chooses violence. Blocked traffic lane while attempting head on collision with exiting vehicle. Continues to threaten vehicle with aggressive forward maneuver." Vision-Only systems outperform LiDAR in recent tests The Austin incident has provided fresh ammunition for critics of LiDAR technology , particularly Tesla supporters who advocate for camera-based systems. Ray, a Tesla enthusiast (@ray4tesla), used the moment to highlight broader concerns about sensor fusion approaches. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo "Elon famously said 6 years ago that LiDAR is a fool's errand and many at the time were skeptical about his claim," Ray posted. "Now it's becoming increasingly clear that Elon is right about the use of LiDAR. Sensor fusion is not optimal for autonomous driving, as evidenced by countless incidents of Waymo blocking intersections, getting stuck in traffic for no reason, getting confused in construction zones and even worse going in the lane of opposing traffic." The debate extends beyond individual incidents, with major autonomous vehicle companies reconsidering their sensor strategies. Chinese tech giants Baidu and Xpeng are reportedly transitioning toward vision-only approaches, following Tesla's lead in relying primarily on camera systems and neural networks. "Separately, CEO Robin Li recently alluded to Baidu's transition to vision-only approach while Xpeng is in the early stage to phase out Lidars," the user noted, suggesting a broader industry trend away from expensive LiDAR sensors toward more software-dependent solutions. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
‘No reason in waiting': Trump warns Russia with new deadline of 10 to 12 days over Ukraine
US President Donald Trump has issued a fresh ultimatum to Russia, giving President Vladimir Putin just 10 to 12 days to show progress in ending the war in Ukraine or face renewed sanctions and tariffs. read more On Monday, US President Donald Trump set a fresh ultimatum of 10 or 12 days for Russia to make progress towards resolving the war in Ukraine or suffer repercussions, highlighting his dissatisfaction with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the 3-1/2-year conflict. Trump has warned sanctions against both Russia and its export buyers unless progress is made. The new deadline shows that the US president is willing to carry forward with such threats despite past reservations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking in Scotland, where he is meeting with European leaders and playing golf, Trump expressed disappointment with Putin and shortened a 50-day deadline he set earlier this month. 'I'm going to make a new deadline of about … 10 or 12 days from today,' Trump told reporters during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'There's no reason in waiting… We just don't see any progress being made.' There was no immediate comment from the Kremlin. Ukraine welcomed the statement. Andriy Yermak, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's chief of staff, thanked Trump in a social media post for 'standing firm and delivering a clear message of peace through strength.' Trump, who has expressed annoyance also with Zelenskyy, has not always followed tough talk about Putin with action, citing what he deems a good relationship that the two men have had previously. On Monday, Trump indicated he was not interested in more talks with Putin. He said sanctions and tariffs would be used as penalties for Moscow if it did not meet Trump's demands. 'There's no reason to wait. If you know what the answer is going to be, why wait? And it would be sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs,' Trump said. 'I don't want to do that to Russia. I love the Russian people.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukraine had proposed a summit between Putin and Zelenskyy before the end of August, but the Kremlin has said that timeline was unlikely and that a meeting could only happen as a final step to clinch peace. Russia's foreign ministry said on Saturday that if the West wanted real peace with Ukraine, it would stop supplying Kyiv with weapons. Trump has repeatedly voiced exasperation with Putin for pursuing attacks on Ukraine despite US efforts to end the war. Trump has played up successes in other parts of the world where the United States has helped to broker peace agreements and has been flattered by some leaders who suggest he should be given the Nobel Peace Prize. 'I'm disappointed in President Putin,' Trump said on Monday. 'I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen.' Trump, who is also struggling to achieve a peace deal in Gaza, has touted his role in ending conflicts between India and Pakistan as well as Rwanda and Congo. Before returning to the White House in January, Trump campaigned on a promise to end Russia's conflict with Ukraine in a day. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever,' Trump said. 'And I say that's not the way to do it.'