2020 Delhi riots: 30 men acquitted in four cases within a week due to lack of proof
Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala of the Karkardooma Court passed the four acquittal orders within a week on May 13, May 14, May 16 and May 17, the legal news outlet reported.
The men were accused of being involved in several crimes during the 2020 Delhi riots.
In one case, the complaint had alleged that his medical shop was looted and set on fire during the riots.
The other three cases were pertaining to the murder of three men. One case was related to the killing of Shahbaz, who was allegedly beaten severely and burned alive. Another was related to Akil Ahmed, who died from a head injury caused by blunt force. The third case was about the killing of Aamir Ali.
All three cases were filed based on statements given by an assistant sub-inspector, Live Law reported.
On May 13, Pramachala acquitted 14 men of all charges related to the murder of Aamir Ali, finding them not guilty of rioting, unlawful assembly and murder. However, one of the suspects, Lokesh Kumar Solanki, was convicted under sections of the Indian Penal Code for inciting enmity among groups and public mischief by spreading rumours.
In the other three cases, all persons were acquitted after the prosecution failed to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, Live Law reported.
Clashes had broken out in North East Delhi in February 2020 between supporters of the Citizenship Amendment Act and those opposing it. The violence left 53 dead and hundreds injured.
The Delhi Police has claimed that the violence in February 2020 was part of a larger conspiracy to defame the Narendra Modi government and was plotted by those who organised the protests against the contentious citizenship law.
However, a fact-finding committee constituted by the Delhi Minorities Commission said that the riots were sparked by inflammatory remarks by Bharatiya Janata Party leaders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
SC dismisses AAP MP's plea against UP government shutting 105 primary schools
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a petition filed by Aam Aadmi Party MP Sanjay Singh challenging the Uttar Pradesh government's decision to shut down 105 primary schools, Live Law reported. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih noted that the matter is pending before the Allahabad High Court. It agreed to Singh's request to direct the High Court to hear the matter expeditiously. In June, the Uttar Pradesh government had ordered the closure of the schools after finding that they had either zero or very few students enrolled. The state government had said that they would be 'paired' with other institutions. In his petition, Singh had argued that the state government's decision was 'arbitrary, unconstitutional and legally impermissible'. He added that it would negatively affect the access to education of many children in the state. Singh also said that the order violated children's right to education under Article 21A of the Constitution and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The MP told the court that the Right to Education Rules require the establishment of a primary school within one kilometre of every habitation with at least 300 residents. The Uttar Pradesh government has defended the move as part of a policy restructuring and alignment with the National Education Policy 2020, arguing that sustaining schools with negligible student strength was inefficient, the Hindustan Times reported.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
MP Mohan Delkar's death: Supreme Court upholds quashing of FIR against UT administrator Praful Patel, others
The Supreme Court Monday upheld a Bombay High Court order quashing the FIR against Dadra and Nagar Haveli administrator Praful Khoda Patel and others in connection with the death of MP Mohan Delkar on February 22, 2021. The bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria, which heard the matter, said it was confirming the September 8, 2022, order of the high court and dismissing the appeal against it. The detailed order is awaited. Delkar, 58, a seven-term parliamentarian from Dadra and Nagar Haveli (DNH), was found dead in a room at a hotel in Mumbai's Marine Drive. On March 9, 2021, the police registered a First Information Report (FIR) on charges of abetment to suicide and other relevant provisions after Delkar's family members lodged a complaint on behalf of his son Abhinav. The complaint was filed against Patel, then DNH district collector Sandeep Kumar Singh, then superintendent of police Sharad Darade, then deputy collector Apurva Sharma, sub-divisional officer Manasvi Jain, police inspector (Silvassa) Manoj Patel, DNH administrative department official Rohit Yadav, political leader Fattesingh Chauhan, and then talathi of Silvassa Dilip Patel for allegedly having abetted the suicide by 'misusing their posts and powers and intentionally conspiring and planning against Delkar'. The FIR had alleged that the MP was under pressure for a year prior to his death and that the DNH administration was harassing him to gain control over his institute, SSR College of Pharmacy and Management, and prevented him from contesting further elections. In September 2022, however, the high court held, '…we find merit in petition and substance in submissions by petitioners and it is a fit case for the court to exercise its power under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to prevent an abuse of process of law. The FIR filed by Abhinav Delkar is thus quashed and set aside.' The accused were booked for offences punishable under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 306 (abetment to suicide), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 120B (criminal conspiracy), along with provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why Delhi Police find it difficult to crack cases involving bomb threat emails to schools, other institutions
The Delhi Police are facing a tough time dealing with the ongoing situation of continuous bomb threat emails sent to schools and other institutions. Last year, the National Capital witnessed 25 such cases, and this year, schools have already received bomb threat emails five times. As per police records, only a few of the cases were solved last year, and just one so far this year. On Monday, over 20 schools in Delhi received bomb threats again, prompting authorities to shut them down, send students back home, and put the police and administration on high alert. An officer stated that nothing suspicious was found in any of the schools, and the threat was later declared a hoax. Bomb threats to schools via emails or messages are not new. In 2022, a private school in Sadiq Nagar received such a threat, and in 2023, similar threats were sent to different schools on three separate occasions. In all these cases, the police discovered that school students were behind the emails. They were later caught and given counselling. The students said they mainly sent such bomb threats to avoid examinations, get a day off, or simply as a prank. The main issue, however, began last year in May when over 200 schools and other institutions received bomb threat emails. Since the emails were sent in bulk, the agencies rushed to register a First Information Report (FIR) under sections pertaining to conspiracy and other relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). A specialised unit of the Special Cell's Counter-Intelligence (CI) was tasked with conducting the probe. The email threats continued in June, August, October, and November, triggering concern in several schools, colleges, hospitals, airlines, and several other government institutions. The police decided to club all these cases under the initial FIR registered by the CI unit. A senior police officer said that the cases that remain to be solved involve emails sent via a VPN (Virtual Private Network) proxy server – an encrypted connection over the Internet which helps the sender hide their identity. Last December, the police had zeroed in on a student who had emailed a bomb threat to his school to avoid an examination. The student had simply used an email ID without VPN, making it easier for the police to track him. The child was counselled and allowed to go. In July this year, an investigation allegedly revealed that a 12-year-old boy had sent fake threats to two educational institutions — Delhi University's St Stephen's College and St Thomas School in Dwarka. He was briefly detained and released after counselling. During the counselling session, the Class 8 student of a private school revealed that he wanted schools to be shut down and had randomly added the email IDs of the institutions. In this case too, the boy had not used a VPN, an officer said. The officer said that when the servers are based abroad, they seek assistance from central agencies to collect details. 'Over the past few months, in most cases, the domains used in emails were traced to European countries. However, accessing the IP (Internet Protocol) addresses or other sender details is nearly impossible, as they are encrypted and masked using VPN or proxy servers,' he added. The officer added, 'If we try to understand VPN as a layman…when we are talking to each other, it is direct connectivity, but if we are connected through a VPN, we communicate via multiple domain servers.' Cyber expert Shashank Shekhar, who is the co-founder of the thinktank FCRF, tracing the location of a person using a VPN is inherently challenging because VPNs are designed to mask the user's real IP address by 'routing their traffic through multiple servers across different countries.' 'Advanced VPN services also implement features like multi-hop routing and no-log policies, which further obscure digital footprints. When threat actors send emails using such anonymised networks—often coupled with encrypted email services or compromised accounts—it significantly limits the ability of law enforcement to pinpoint the true origin,' Shekhar said. 'In recent cases involving threat emails sent to schools in Delhi, the attackers have leveraged such techniques, creating multiple layers of obfuscation that delay or derail attribution efforts, especially when international cooperation is required to access logs or trace traffic,' he added. Shekhar said most of these VPN service providers are headquartered outside India and often refuse to share user data or logs with Indian law enforcement agencies, citing privacy policies or foreign jurisdiction, and pointed out that it is imperative to establish regulatory frameworks mandating data sharing and log retention by such providers to assist probe agencies.
