
The family farm brought to its knees by Labour
The Frazer farm in Poppleton, just outside of York, has been in the family since 1967.
However, arable farmer Andrew Frazer has said that the 'constant knocking' from Labour's policies on inheritance tax and net zero, as well as its U-turn on green support, may see it broken up.
His father, Douglas, bought the 650-acre farm and still owns the majority of the business.
But at 87, the family fears he has run out of time to pass the land on to Mr Frazer without incurring a vast inheritance tax under changes introduced by Rachel Reeves in last year's Budget.
That is likely to lead to the breakup of the farm, denting its profitability.
'We're in for a £1 million-plus bill when my father is no longer, which will be just impossible to pay,' Mr Frazer said. 'I'll have to sell land off.'
There had been a 'glimmer of light' in the prospect that he could cover some of the bill by selling some less efficient land at a decent price to developers after Poppleton was named as a prospective location for one of Labour's proposed new towns.
But he fears that plan has been killed off by Labour's strengthening of compulsory purchase orders – meaning the land could more easily be bought by the council at its agricultural value, rather than its value as land for development.
'That's kind of the kick,' Mr Frazer said. 'I'd be losing land for the basic price, which wouldn't cover the bill anyway. So I would have to sell decent farmland to pay the bill. It's pretty bad.'
'Can't plan when rules change overnight'
Amid this turmoil, Mr Frazer has been hit by a new hole in his budget after the Government suspended new applications for one of its agricultural payment schemes, the sustainable farming incentive (SFI).
The SFI is one of three schemes brought in by the Government to replace the EU-era common agricultural policy (CAP), which paid direct subsidies to farmers based on the amount of land they had in production.
The new schemes are intended to pay farmers for producing public goods such as cleaner water, better habitats for nature and improved soils.
Mr Frazer was hoping to secure around £15,000 in support for actions on his farm, including testing the soil health and creating new grasslands, for which he had already purchased the seed.
But last month, the Government halted the scheme with no warning, days before Mr Frazer was due to send in his application, after it maxed out the £1.05 billion budget set aside for 2024 to 2026.
The Country Land and Business Association (CLA) says 40 per cent of its 26,000 members were planning to apply for SFI but now cannot.
'This will cause a major cash flow crisis for thousands of businesses who have already been hit hard by other policy changes, but perhaps even more fundamentally, will stall progress in reversing nature decline and climate change,' said Joe Evans, the CLA vice-president.
Victoria Vyvyan, the CLA president, said farmers were facing difficulties on multiple fronts.
'Inheritance tax is forcing families to sell their land. New compulsory purchase rules create more doubt. And now the SFI scheme has been 'paused' without warning — cutting off income for the more complex environmental schemes that were preparing to apply,' she said.
'No farmer can plan for an environmentally sustainable farming future when rules change overnight.
'Trust must be rebuilt and the new SFI must be negotiated quickly. The future of sustainable farming depends on it.'
The scheme is expected to return at a much-reduced scale after taking a cut in the June spending review. For Mr Frazer, that will be too late.
'The carpet was pulled from under our feet,' he said. 'It's all useful money, because every year we're trying to scrape a profit together. So even £15,000 is a big deal for us.'
Mr Frazer compares his approach on the farm to some of his neighbours who, instead of trying to integrate greener farming onto their land, have simply switched to rewilding in their fields.
'When you sit down and do the sums, it's probably a good idea, because it does add up if you do a huge amount of land,' he said. 'But then us farmers naively think that we've got to do a hard working year to earn our money.'
Mr Frazer blames the delay in submitting his application on the final kick he has taken from Government policies: net zero.
The farm is host to electricity pylons, giving the National Grid access rights. Last year, workers came onto the farm after the National Grid said it needed to redirect the electricity lines as part of its upgrades for net zero.
The ' Great Grid Upgrade ' promises to be the largest overhaul of the electricity network in generations, helping to connect offshore wind turbines to homes. But landowners like Mr Frazer are caught in the middle.
'We haven't been able to plan properly in the autumn because they keep saying, oh, we need to put a road here,' said Mr Frazer. 'They have these compulsory rights now.
'We must have had 200 wagon loads of limestone creating new roads across fields on the farm, and it was all done over winter at the wettest time.
'It's made decision-making more difficult and basically put a kibosh on the SFI situation. It caused the delay, which meant we missed the boat.'
Mr Frazer is now exploring his options to limit the impact of the inheritance tax changes and mitigate the lost SFI payments.
'I will look at my options, but I think there aren't many really' he said. 'We will just have to swallow it.'
A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) spokesman said: 'The Government's commitment to farmers remains steadfast.
'That's why £5 billion is being invested into farming over two years, the largest budget for sustainable food production in our country's history.
'Our agricultural property relief reforms mean three-quarters of estates will continue to pay no tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half what most people would pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. This is a fair and balanced approach which helps fix the public services we all rely on.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
27 minutes ago
- ITV News
Trump: 'It's hard to ask Israel to stop' as he rebukes EU's talks with Tehran
Donald Trump has said Europe can't help in brokering an end to the conflict between Iran and Israel, just after UK and EU foreign ministers failed to make progress in a meeting with Tehran's top diplomat. The foreign secretaries of the UK France, Germany and the EU's High Representative met with Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi on Friday. The meeting ended with no future negotiations planned and Araghchi said his country would not consider negotiations while being attacked by Israel. Trump said it is a "very hard" request to ask Israel to stop. He added: "It's a little bit hard to get somebody to stop," saying, "Israel's doing very well in terms of war, and I think you would say that Iran is doing less well." He said Iran "doesn't want to speak to Europe" and that the country "wants to speak to us". He adds: "Europe is not going to be able to help at this point". Hopes weren't high ahead of the meeting, but all parties insisted a negotiation was the only way to end the conflict. In a joint written statement issued after the talks ended, the three European nations and the EU said that they 'discussed avenues towards a negotiated solution to Iran's nuclear program.' They reiterated their concerns about the 'expansion' of the nuclear program, adding that it has 'no credible civilian purpose.' Trump has been weighing whether to attack Iran by striking its well-defended Fordo uranium enrichment facility, which is buried under a mountain and widely considered to be out of reach of all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. He said on Wednesday that he'll decide within two weeks whether the US military will get directly involved in the war given the 'substantial chance' for renewed negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said he believed the two-week window Trump has given would give enough time for more negotiation and urged Tehran to "take that off ramp." Just before meeting the European diplomats, Araghchi made a brief appearance before the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. He said that Israel's 'attacks on nuclear facilities are grave war crimes,' and insisted that 'we are entitled … and determined to defend our territorial integrity, national sovereignty and security with all force.' Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is peaceful, though it was the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. The three European countries played an important role in the negotiations over the original 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers. But they have repeatedly threatened to reinstate sanctions that were lifted under the deal if Iran does not improve its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog.


Powys County Times
33 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Lammy urges Iran and US to keep talking as Middle East conflict continues
David Lammy has urged Iran to carry on negotiations with the US as he continued to seek a diplomatic solution to the Middle East conflict. The Foreign Secretary met his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Geneva on Friday alongside foreign ministers from France and Germany and the EU's foreign policy chief. Following the meeting, Mr Lammy said the Europeans were 'keen to continue ongoing discussions and negotiations with Iran, and we urge Iran to continue their talks with the United States'. He added: 'We were clear: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' Friday's meeting followed Donald Trump's statement that he would delay a decision on whether the US would join Israeli strikes against Iran for two weeks, raising the prospect of a negotiated solution to the crisis. German foreign minister Johann Wadephul said the group had left the room 'with the impression that the Iranian side is fundamentally ready to continue talking about all important issues'. Speaking to broadcasters after the meeting, Mr Lammy described the situation as 'perilous' and urged Iran to 'take that off ramp' and 'be serious about the diplomacy that is required at this moment'. He added that the US and Europe were pushing for Iran to agree to zero enrichment of uranium as a 'starting point' for negotiations. But Mr Araghchi said Iran would not negotiate with the US as long as Israel continued to carry out airstrikes against the country. Tel Aviv's campaign continued on Friday, with Israel saying its aircraft had hit military targets including missile-manufacturing facilities as it continues to attack locations connected with Iran's nuclear programme. Iran insists its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful. Meanwhile, the UK Government has announced it will use charter flights to evacuate Britons stranded in Israel once the country's airspace reopens. Number 10 said on Friday morning the situation remains 'fast-moving' and it will continue to be monitored closely. A spokesman added: 'We are advising British nationals to continue to register their presence in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories, to be contactable with further guidance on these flights.' Mr Lammy said work is under way to provide the flights 'based on levels of demand' from UK citizens who want to leave the region. 'The UK will provide charter flights for British nationals from Tel Aviv when airspace reopens,' he said. 'The safety of British nationals remains our top priority.' According to the Israeli government, some 22,000 tourists are seeking to board evacuation flights. It is unclear how many of these may be UK citizens. Government advice for British nationals in the country remains to follow local guidance, as well as to let officials know about their presence within Israel or the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Land routes out of Israel remain open and British staff are on hand to support UK nationals who have crossed the border, he added. The move follows criticism of the Foreign Office's initial response, which saw family members of embassy staff evacuated while UK citizens were not advised to leave and told to follow local guidance. The Government said the move to temporarily withdraw family members had been a 'precautionary measure'.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: Treasury is a hurdle for growth
Britain has an overload of budgetary data. As the IMF noted in its recent annual inspection, too frequent fiscal events mean constant policy changes to meet targets. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is victim of her own rules in her determination not to be Liz Truss, who ruined the UK's reputation for probity. The rush to get on top of borrowing and debt was responsible for the ill-fated attack on winter fuel payments which is being reversed. Similarly, the Government is now under pressure from the backbenches to pull back on welfare reforms, introduced in the spring statement. The latest public sector borrowing data shows that in the first two months of the current financial year borrowing is not far off target. At £37.7billion it was less than the Office for Budget Responsibility predicted. It would be terrific if one could say this is down to growing GDP. Reality is that Reeves swingeing increase to employers' national insurance contributions brought in 22 per cent more to the Government coffers in May than a year earlier. Early months of the year often give a misleading reading. Tax receipts are boosted by the timing of capital gains payments. Spending by government departments has yet to ramp up. The full impact of the Government's interest rate bill is not felt. It is too soon for anyone in Whitehall to predict victory. The corollary of the stabilised public finances is May retail sales. The slump is a result of higher shop prices and rising uncertainty about jobs. The real worry for a government backing a growth agenda is that it is not happening. The just-published public spending review and infrastructure plans show that capital spending will climb to a peak of 3.9 per cent of output by 2027-28 but then fall back. It is unlikely to produce the transformation that Labour wants before the next election. The Treasury is spellbound by the public finances. That reflects a history of crisis management dating back to the 1976 sterling collapse and refreshed by the 2008 great financial crisis and the Truss episode. I recall during the banking crisis being called by a senior Treasury official who cautioned against big bailouts because it might trigger a run on the pound. The growth agenda doesn't sit easily at the Treasury. The Department for Business ought to be an expansion engine. It is hampered by a reputation as a parking space for sub-octane Cabinet ministers. Incumbent Jonathan Reynolds is no more than a cypher for Downing Street where real polices are set. The long delays in launching an industrial-tech strategy are a case in point. One must reach back to the Harold Wilson government of the 1960s to find a model for industrial innovation with the Department of Economic Affairs headed by George Brown. It eventually collapsed in a heap like its heavy drinking founder. A growth agenda, building on science, tech and AI excellence, needs a powerhouse department of growth and secretary of state capable of resisting Treasury orthodoxy. That person may not exist in a Labour government bereft of commercial experience and top-notch economic thinkers. Andy Burnham, in exile in Manchester, shows signs of the kind of bravery required. That's probably why political rivals would prefer he were not empowered.