logo
Attacking Iran, Israel brazenly defies ‘man of peace' Trump

Attacking Iran, Israel brazenly defies ‘man of peace' Trump

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu (right) defied Donald Trump's advice by unleashing a 'preemptive' strike on Iran's nuclear programme. (AP pic)
WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump on Thursday implored Israel not to attack Iran and declared once again his goal was to be a peacemaker.
Hours later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, one of Trump's closest international allies, brazenly defied his advice by unleashing a major military campaign described as a 'preemptive' strike against Iran's nuclear programme.
The attack marks only the latest setback for Trump's lofty goal set out at the start of his second term of being a 'man of peace.'
Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom Trump has also boasted a warm relationship, has rebuffed his overtures on a ceasefire with Ukraine.
And Israel resumed another massive offensive in Gaza after talks bogged down on extending a ceasefire with Hamas reached with Trump's support at the end of his predecessor Joe Biden's term.
Trump's friend and roving envoy Steve Witkoff – who has negotiated in all three crises – had been set to meet Iranian officials again Sunday in Oman.
Secretary of state Marco Rubio in a statement made clear the US was not involved in attacking Iran and warned Tehran not to retaliate against US troops in the region.
Rubio said that Israel advised that it attacked out of 'self-defence,' but conspicuously did not say if the US agreed. Trump, hours before the strikes, doubled down with a social media post saying he remained 'committed to a diplomatic resolution' on Iran.
Netanyahu has described Iran's cleric-run government, which backs Hamas, as an existential threat and already last year ordered strikes that knocked out its air defenses.
'We've clearly seen a fork in the road in the American and Israeli approaches to this problem set,' said Dana Stroul, a former senior Pentagon official who is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
'These strikes are going to disrupt and delay and degrade Iran's nuclear programme. The question, I think, is whether or not the US and Israel in the future are going to work together on what to do to maximise the time that's put back on the clock,' she said.
Stroul noted that rifts had been building between Israel and Trump, who last month agreed to remove sanctions on Syria after former Islamist guerrilla Ahmed al-Sharaa swept into power.
Trump embraced the new Syrian leader after appeals on a tour of Gulf Arab monarchies – which have also backed diplomacy on Iran.
In Qatar last month, Trump said after meeting the emir that he believed a deal was in sight with Iran and that there would be no 'nuclear dust' over the region.
Despite growing disagreements, Israel enjoys robust support in Trump's right-wing base.
The Trump administration in recent days has again taken lonely positions to back Israel, with the US casting one of the only votes at the UN General Assembly against a Gaza ceasefire resolution and criticizing top allies, including Britain, for imposing sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers.
Justin Logan, director of defence and foreign policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Israeli attack will 'destroy US diplomatic efforts' on Iran and called for Trump to reject any US military role in protecting Israel from retaliation.
'Israel has the right to choose its own foreign policy. At the same time, it has the responsibility to bear the costs of that policy,' he said.
But lawmakers in Trump's Republican Party quickly rallied behind Israel. Senator Tom Cotton said that the US should 'back Israel to the hilt, all the way,' and topple Iran's Islamic Republic if it targets US troops.
Trump's Democratic rivals, who mostly backed his diplomacy on Iran, were aghast at Israel's action on the eve of new US-Iran talks.
'Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence,' said Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Forces Committee.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow
Crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow

New Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow

THE crude oil market's rather sanguine reaction to the United State s' threats to India over its continued purchases of Russian oil is effectively a bet that very little will actually happen. President Donald Trump cited India's imports of Russian crude when imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India on Aug 6, which is due to take effect on Aug 28. If the new tariff rate does come into place, it will take the rate for some Indian goods to as much as 50 per cent, a level high enough to effectively end US imports from India, which totalled nearly US$87 billion in 2024. As with everything related to Trump, it pays to be cautious given his track record of backflips and pivots. It's also not exactly clear what Trump is ultimately seeking, although it does seem that in the short term he wants to increase his leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, and he's using India to achieve this. Whether Trump follows through on his additional tariffs on India remains uncertain, although the chances of a peace deal in Ukraine seem remote, which means the best path for India to avoid the tariffs would be to acquiesce and stop buying Russian oil. But this is an outcome that simply isn't being reflected in current crude oil prices. Global benchmark Brent futures have weakened since Trump's announcement of higher tariffs on India, dropping as low as US$65.81 a barrel in early Asian trade on Monday, the lowest level in two months. This is a price that entirely discounts any threat to global supplies, and assumes that India will either continue buying Russian crude at current volumes, or be able to easily source suitable replacements without tightening the global market. Are these reasonable assumptions? The track record of the crude oil market is somewhat remarkable in that it quickly adapts to new geopolitical realities and any price spikes tend to be shortlived. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent crude prices hurtling towards US$150 a barrel as European and other Western countries pulled back from buying Russian crude. But within four months, the price was back below where it was before Moscow's attack on its neighbour as the market simply rerouted the now discounted Russian oil to China and India. In other words, the flow of oil around the globe was shifted, but the volumes available for importers remained much the same. But what Trump is proposing now is somewhat different. It appears he wants to cut Russian barrels out of the market in order to put financial pressure on Moscow to cut a deal over Ukraine. There are effectively only two major buyers for Russian crude, India and China. China, the world's biggest crude importer, has more leverage with Trump given US and Western reliance on its refined critical and other minerals, and therefore is less able to be coerced into ending its imports of Russian oil. India is in a less strong position, especially private refiners like Reliance Industries, which will want to keep business relationships and access to Western economies. India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler. About 90 per cent of its Russian imports came from Russia's European ports, mainly Urals grade. There are some Middle Eastern grades of similar quality, such as Saudi Arabia's Arab Light and Iraq's Basrah Light, but it would likely boost prices if India were to seek more of these crudes. If Chinese refiners were able to take the bulk of Russian crude given up by India, it may allow for a reshuffling of flows, but that would not appear to be what Trump wants. Trump and his advisers may believe there is enough spare crude production capacity in the US and elsewhere to handle the loss of up to two million bpd of Russian supplies. But testing that theory may well lead to higher prices, especially for certain types of medium crudes which would be in short supply. For now, the crude oil market is assuming that the Trump/India/Russia situation will end as another TACO, the acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. The writer is from Reuters

Palestinian mother ‘destroyed' after image used to deny Gaza starvation
Palestinian mother ‘destroyed' after image used to deny Gaza starvation

Malay Mail

time4 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Palestinian mother ‘destroyed' after image used to deny Gaza starvation

MONTREAL, Aug 13 — Palestinian-Canadian Faiza Najjar was able to leave Gaza last year, but could not bring her four adult daughters with her. She watched from a distance as food shortages in the territory worsened. From Canada, where she lives with her six other children, Najjar pursued a months-long effort to get those she had left out of Gaza. She finally embraced her daughters and seven grandchildren when they arrived at Toronto's airport last month. But when clips of the emotional reunion were posted on social media, pro-Israeli accounts mocked her physical appearance saying it disproved claims of starvation in Gaza. 'As a mother it just destroyed me,' Najjar, 50, told AFP. Najjar did not claim that she went hungry while in Gaza. But as recently as this past weekend a post viewed more than 300,000 times across multiple platforms ridiculed her, erroneously implying she had just left Gaza. 'Did you see what that woman looked like?' the poster said, pointing out Najjar does not look undernourished. United Nations agencies have warned that famine was unfolding in Gaza, with Israel severely restricting the entry of aid. Images of sick and emaciated Palestinian children have drawn international outrage. The allegation has been denied by Israel. 'There is no starvation in Gaza,' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said last month. The ridicule Najjar faced is part of a broader trend. Israeli anchors on the country's right-wing Channel 14 -- sometimes described as the Hebrew Fox News—have laughed at 'obese' mothers, alleging they steal their children's food. For Najjar, the fact that her family's reunion got caught up in a misinformation campaign was devastating. 'After all the suffering, and losing everything, and nearly dying, some people still had the heart to mock them,' she said, referring to her family. 'My daughters lived there and their children went to sleep bombs outside their tents,' Najjar said. Pro-Israeli commentators online also focused on her grandchildren's apparently healthy appearance. Najjar told AFP they received medical treatment, including renourishment, at a hospital in Jordan before flying to Canada. Deflecting attention Mert Can Bayar, a postdoctoral fellow at the Centre for an Informed Public at the University of Washington, said the posts targeting Najjar are 'just one little piece' of a misleading online narrative. Toronto's Mayor Olivia Chow removed a video she had posted on Instagram in which she welcomed arriving Palestinians because of abusive comments directed at the family. Comments on Chow's video also cited the family's physical appearance to broadly dismiss claims of starvation in Gaza. X's chatbot Grok also misidentified a 2025 AFP photo of an emaciated child in Gaza, incorrectly saying it was taken in Yemen seven years ago, fuelling further claims that reports of starvation in Gaza have been fabricated. Valerie Wirtschafter, a fellow at the Brookings Institution think-tank, said the claims were reminiscent of falsehoods that emerged weeks into the war alleging Palestinians had posed as so-called crisis actors and staged their injuries. Wirtschafter said the hoax narrative 'deflects from the real humanitarian harms that are happening right now.' 'Denial' Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,430 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, figures the United Nations deems reliable. Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel, which triggered the war, resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Forty-nine of the 251 hostages taken by Hamas are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. When Najjar left Gaza last year, her daughters—all in their 20s—did not have Canadian citizenship. With the family separated, she lived with crippling fear at the prospect of receiving word that they had been killed. While her daughters now have citizenship and are in Canada with their children, her sons-in-law remain in Gaza, where the UN's Integrated Food Security Phase Classification says 'widespread starvation, malnutrition, and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths.' 'I just want the world to know the crisis is real,' Najjar told AFP. 'Denial is deadly.' — AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store