Science news this week: 'Dragon Man's' identity and the universe's 'missing matter'
This week's science news reveals the identity of the mysterious "Dragon Man," while also finding clues to the universe's "missing matter."
In 1933, a Chinese laborer in Harbin City discovered a human-like skull with a huge cranium, broad nose and big eyes. Just under 90 years later, experts gave this curious specimen a new species name — Homo longi, or "Dragon Man" — due to its unusual shape and size. But this classification has not gone unchallenged, with many scientists saying this skull belongs not to a new species, but instead to an ancient group of humans called Denisovans. Now, a pair of new studies claim to have finally put the mystery to bed.
Another mystery that we came one step closer to solving this week is where the universe's "missing" matter is hiding. Ordinary or "baryonic" aryonic matter, which is composed of particles like protons and neutrons, makes up just 5% of the universe, but scientists have been able to observe only about half as much of it as they expected. To find the missing matter, researchers search for clues by studying short, extragalactic flashes known as fast radio bursts, which light up the intergalactic space that lies between them and Earth — and they may have just found some.
Although very few long-term studies of psilocybin — the main psychoactive ingredient in magic mushrooms — as a treatment for depression have been conducted to date, new research presented this week at the Psychedelic Science 2025 conference suggests it can alleviate depression for at least five years after a single dose.
The researchers found that 67% of study participants who had suffered from depression half a decade earlier remained in remission after a single psychedelic therapy session, while also reporting less anxiety and less difficulty functioning on a daily basis.
Discover more health news
—Iron deficiency in pregnancy can cause 'male' mice to develop female organs
—The brain might have a hidden 'off switch' for binge drinking
—Ketamine may treat depression by 'flattening the brain's hierarchies,' small study suggests
The world is awash with the color purple — lavender flowers, amethyst gemstones, plums, eggplants and purple emperor butterflies. But if you look closely at the visible-light portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, you'll notice that purple is absent. So does that mean the color doesn't really exist? Not necessarily.
—If you enjoyed this, sign up for our Life's Little Mysteries newsletter
Asking artificial intelligence reasoning models questions on topics like algebra or philosophy caused carbon dioxide emissions to spike significantly.
Specialized large language models (LLMs), such as Anthropic's Claude, OpenAI's o3 and DeepSeek's R1, dedicate more time and computing power to producing more accurate responses than their predecessors, but a new study finds the cost could come at up to 50 times more carbon emissions than their more basic equivalents.
While the study's findings aren't definitive — emissions may vary depending on the hardware used and the energy grids used to supply their power — the researchers hope their work should prompt AI users to think before deploying the more advanced technology.
Read more planet technology news
—This EV battery fully recharges in just 18 seconds — and it just got the green light for mass production
—Hurricanes and sandstorms can be forecast 5,000 times faster thanks to new Microsoft AI model
—China pits rival humanoids against each other in world's first 'robot boxing tournament'
—14,000-year-old ice age 'puppies' were actually wolf sisters that dined on woolly rhino for last meal
—Nobel laureate raises questions about AI-generated image of black hole spinning at the heart of our galaxy
—Enslaved Africans led a decade-long rebellion 1,200 years ago in Iraq, new evidence suggests
—Covering poop lagoons with a tarp could cut 80% of methane emissions from dairy farms
—Satellite coated in ultra-dark 'Vantablack' paint will launch into space next year to help combat major issue
The Colorado River snakes through seven U.S. and two Mexican states, and supplies some 40 million people, including those in Phoenix and Las Vegas, with their water needs. But as supplies of this surface water reach record lows, more and more people have been pumping groundwater from far below the surface.
Stark new satellite data reveal that the Colorado River basin has lost huge amounts of groundwater over the last few decades, with some research suggesting that this groundwater could run out by the end of the century. But is that really the case? And if so, what could be done to prevent that happening?
—How to see the groundbreaking space photos from the world's largest camera [Astronomy]
—Instead of 'de-extincting' dire wolves, scientists should use gene editing to protect living, endangered species [Opinion]
—Crows: Facts about the clever birds that live all over the world [Fact file]
—Best thermal binoculars: Observe nocturnal wildlife after dark [Buying guide]
—Watch David Attenborough's 'Ocean' from anywhere in the world with this NordVPN deal — and grab an Amazon voucher just in time for Prime Day [Deal]
A massive eruption at Indonesia's Mount Lewotobi Laki-laki volcano sent giant plumes of ash spewing more than 6 miles (10 kilometers) into the skies on Tuesday (June 17), followed by a second eruption just a day later.
This incredible mushroom-shaped cloud could be seen over 95 miles (150 km) away, and was accompanied by rumbling, lightning and thunder, typical of explosive eruptions that spew enormous amounts of material — much of which showered over nearby villages.
Warning signs at Lewoboti Laki-laki prompted officials to raise the eruption alert to the highest level on Tuesday, according to a statement, and fortunately at time of writing there have been no reports of casualties.
Want more science news? Follow our Live Science WhatsApp Channel for the latest discoveries as they happen. It's the best way to get our expert reporting on the go, but if you don't use WhatsApp we're also on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Flipboard, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky and LinkedIn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Perseid meteor shower 2025: Best times and locations for viewing
The much-anticipated Perseid meteor shower, one of nature's most dazzling sky shows, is set to peak Tuesday night into early Wednesday morning, lighting up skies across the Northern Hemisphere. "The Perseids are caused by Earth running into trails of debris left behind by Comet Swift-Tuttle," Bill Cooke, lead for NASA's Meteoroid Environments Office, told ABC News. The shower has been captivating humans since it was first recorded by Chinese astronomers in 36 A.D., nearly 2,000 years ago. For the best view of this celestial spectacle, timing is everything. "The best time to see the Perseids would be in the wee hours of [Wednesday] morning, around 2 to 4 a.m.," Cooke said. If you want to catch the show you won't need a telescope, Cooke said. "You definitely do not want to use a telescope or binoculars, as the best way to see a meteor shower is to take in as much sky as possible," Cooke advised. "Just use your eyes and enjoy the show!" While this year's display will be affected by moonlight, determined sky-watchers can still catch plenty of meteors. "The average person under dark skies could see somewhere between 40 and 50 Perseids per hour," Cooke said. "Instead, you're probably going to see 10 to 20 per hour or fewer." These "shooting stars" are actually space debris from Comet Swift-Tuttle, which last visited our cosmic neighborhood in 1992, according to NASA press release. (The comet is named for the two scientists who discovered the comet in 1862, Lewis Swift and Horace Tuttle). When these pieces hit Earth's atmosphere, they create brilliant streaks of light across the night sky. The shower gets its name because the meteors appear to shoot out from near the Perseus constellation, NASA said. For the best viewing experience, find a safe, dark spot away from city lights with a wide view of the sky. The shower will remain active until Sept. 1, though Tuesday night offers peak viewing opportunities. Just remember to dress warmly, bring a comfortable chair and give your eyes about 30 minutes to adjust to the darkness. "You're not going to see Perseids around suppertime," Cooke said. "You're going to have to go out later."
Gizmodo
4 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Researchers Made a Social Media Platform Where Every User Was AI. The Bots Ended Up at War
Social platforms like Facebook and X exacerbate the problem of political and social polarization, but they don't create it. A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands put AI chatbots in a simple social media structure to see how they interacted with each other and found that, even without the invisible hand of the algorithm, they tend to organize themselves based on their pre-assigned affiliations and self-sort into echo chambers. The study, a preprint of which was recently published on arXiv, took 500 AI chatbots powered by OpenAI's large language model GPT-4o mini, and prescribed to them specific personas. Then, they were unleashed onto a simple social media platform that had no ads and no algorithms offering content discovery or recommended posts served into a user's feed. Those chatbots were tasked with interacting with each other and the content available on the platform. Over the course of five different experiments, all of which involved the chatbots engaging in 10,000 actions, the bots tended to follow other users who shared their own political beliefs. It also found that users who posted the most partisan content tended to get the most followers and reposts. The findings don't exactly speak well of us, considering the chatbots were intended to replicate how humans interact. Of course, none of this is truly independent from the influence of the algorithm. The bots have been trained on human interaction that has been defined by decades now by how we behave online in an algorithm-dominated world. They are emulating the already poison-brained versions of ourselves, and it's not clear how we come back from that. To combat the self-selecting polarization, the researchers tried a handful of solutions, including offering a chronological feed, devaluing viral content, hiding follower and repost figures, hiding user profiles, and amplifying opposing views. (That last one, the researchers had success with in a previous study, which managed to create high engagement and low toxicity in a simulated social platform.) None of the interventions really made a difference, failing to create more than a 6% shift in the engagement given to partisan accounts. In the simulation that hid user bios, the partisan divide actually got worse, and extreme posts got even more attention. It seems social media as a structure may simply be untenable for humans to navigate without reinforcing our worst instincts and behaviors. Social media is a fun house mirror for humanity; it reflects us, but in the most distorted of ways. It's not clear there are strong enough lenses to correct how we see each other online.
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
China may have more engineers, but it still lacks a culture of innovation
China announced last month a $100 billion push into artificial intelligence, intensifying what is already a fierce race for global tech dominance. Policymakers in Washington are watching with concern, and rightly so. China graduates more than 1.38 million engineers each year, about seven times more than does the U.S. The numbers sound alarming and suggest we're falling behind. But that's not the full story. While engineering degrees are critical, they don't guarantee technological leadership. What really drives innovation is not how many people you train, but how you train them. And here, China faces a deeper, cultural problem that raw output can't solve. The Chinese education system is highly structured and built for scale. But it's also rigid, top-down and deeply rooted in deference to authority. In most classrooms, memorization takes precedence over questioning and the teacher's word is rarely challenged. Correcting a professor's mistake could cause them to 'lose face,' a cultural breach that most students won't risk. This environment produces excellent test-takers but not risk-takers. It produces technical workers who are strong on facts but weak on critical thinking. They can follow a formula, but they struggle to break new ground. This is a key reason China, despite its massive engineering workforce, has yet to deliver the kind of world-changing breakthroughs we've seen from the U.S., from the microprocessor to the iPhone to mRNA vaccines. These innovations didn't come from rote learning. They came from interdisciplinary research, unorthodox thinking and cultures that reward questioning everything. Even when it comes to research output, China's surge in published papers masks a more complex reality. While China now leads the world in scientific publishing volume, scholars like Ming Xia have pointed out that much of this work lacks the originality, rigor and theoretical depth typical of Western scholarship. Plagiarism and fabrication remain persistent problems, even at top institutions. At Tsinghua University, one professor felt compelled to reassure students that if they wrote something publishable, he wouldn't steal it and submit it under his own name. The root issue is systemic. Many Chinese academics were trained in the same system they now uphold, one that prizes metrics and obedience over ideas and inquiry. As a result, scholarship often becomes descriptive, not theoretical. It explains what exists but rarely asks why it matters or how to build something new from it. Contrast that with American higher education. Our universities aren't perfect — they can be chaotic, expensive and uneven, but they're designed to cultivate thinkers, not just technicians. Students are encouraged to disagree with their professors, to explore across disciplines and to challenge the conventional wisdom. The freedom to question isn't a side effect of our system. It's the whole point. Yes, China has closed gaps in recent years by acquiring Western technology through joint ventures, forced transfers and even cyber espionage. But copying isn't creating. Without a culture that fosters original thought, China may scale existing tech but it won't lead the next wave of innovation. That doesn't mean the U.S. can relax. We need to double down on what works, investing in universities, supporting fundamental research and attracting the best minds from around the world. At the same time, we must protect critical technologies and intellectual property from exploitation. Still, we should remember what gives America an edge: a culture that values curiosity, dissent and the freedom to think differently. That's the foundation of every breakthrough we've ever made. In the long run, engineering dominance isn't just about how many degrees a country prints. It's about whether those engineers are trained to challenge the status quo and imagine something better. If the U.S. keeps leaning into its strengths of diversity, openness and academic freedom, we won't just keep pace with China. We will continue to lead.
