
US Nuclear Weapons Transferred To UK Soil For First Time In Over 15 Years
'An American C-17 transport plane visited RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk on Thursday, making a transatlantic journey from Kirtland Air Force base in New Mexico, where the US Air Force (USAF) stores nuclear bombs,' The Telegraph writes Tuesday.
'Analysts said it was likely that the flight contained nuclear bombs, which were last stationed in the UK in 2008, before being removed under the Obama administration,' the report continues.
The British newspaper says that supporting evidence that this is the case includes previously revealed details of an upcoming 'nuclear mission' at Lakenheath.
This mission was first made known in unclassified documents that The Telegraph says were likely published by the US government by mistake, or else it could have been an intentional leak in order to signal Russia.
The logistics of last Thursday's rare US transatlantic flight from New Mexico also suggests a highly sensitive mission to transfer nuclear assets:
The airspace over the base was restricted on Thursday and the aircraft did not immediately return to the US, in what one analyst told The Times appeared to be a 'one-way drop-off'.
The plane also refuelled over the east coast of the US which The Aviationist specialist news website said this was a clue that it was flying a priority mission.
Separately The Times had also reported the story, including the detail that the US military transport plane which flew to Lakenheath had flown from the US with its transponders on, allowing it to be tracked by foreign governments.
One analyst said, 'Flying transpondered C-17s from hot storage in Kirtland to Lakenheath and then returning and not going to a storage facility tells me this is a one-way drop-off flight.'
'Sometimes these particular C-17 flights are flown without transponders. So, the fact that they transpondered, this suggests to me that this has got to be deliberate,' the analyst added.
https://twitter.com/cdrsalamander/status/1947082824013558266
Again, this seems some deliberative 'messaging' to Moscow, coming as President Trump is seeking to pressure the Russian and Ukrainian sides to make progress at the negotiating table. Washington knows it has little leverage, given Kiev forces have remained on a backfoot, and Russia is making slow but steady progress in the east.
The Kremlin says that it is 'monitoring' these reports. Recently Russia's strategic doctrine has been updated, given President Putin a little broader interpretation concerning deployment of nuclear weapons. It is believed that Russian tactical nukes are also still on Belarusian soil, which has greatly alarmed Europe.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Tribune
2 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Trump blames Hamas for Gaza ceasefire collapse
US President Donald Trump accused Hamas yesterday of not wanting to reach a ceasefire deal in Gaza as Israel said it would explore 'alternative options' to rescue hostages after negotiations had collapsed. An Israeli official meanwhile said air drops of aid would resume soon over the Gaza Strip, where aid groups warned of surging numbers of malnourished children as international concern mounted over the deepening humanitarian crisis after more than 21 months of war. After US and Israeli negotiators quit indirect talks with Hamas in Qatar, Trump said that 'it was was too bad. Hamas didn't really want to make a deal. I think they want to die.' The US president argued that the Palestinian group, whose October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the war, was not ready to hand over the remaining captives held in Gaza because 'they know what happens after you get the final hostages'. His special envoy Steve Witkoff accused Hamas of not 'acting in good faith' in the negotiations that ended on Thursday. A senior Hamas official in turn accused Witkoff of distorting the reality of the talks and walking back on agreements that had been reached between the parties. Witkoff 's 'negative statements... run completely counter to the context in which the last negotiations were held', Bassem Naim told AFP, saying the US envoy was looking to 'serve the Israeli position'. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that 'together with our US allies, we are now considering alternative options to bring our hostages home, end Hamas's terror rule, and secure lasting peace for Israel and our region.' Witkoff similarly said Washington would 'consider alternative options' on Gaza, without elaborating on what they could entail. 'Carnage and famine' More than 100 aid and human rights groups warned this week that 'mass starvation' was spreading in Gaza. Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said that a quarter of the young children and pregnant or breastfeeding mothers it had screened at its clinics last week were malnourished, a day after the United Nations said one in five children in Gaza City were suffering from malnutrition. Britain, France and Germany prepared to hold an 'emergency call' yesterday on the deepening humanitarian crisis and to 'discuss what we can do urgently to stop the killing and get people the food they desperately need', British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres yesterday slammed the international community for turning a blind eye to the suffering of starving Palestinians, calling it a 'moral crisis that challenges the global conscience'. Guterres said while he had repeatedly condemned Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel, 'nothing can justify the explosion of death and destruction since.' Italy's top diplomat Antonio Tajani said Rome cannot accept 'carnage and famine' in the Palestinian territory, criticising Israel but stating that his government was not ready to recognise a Palestinian state, like France plans to do. President Emmanuel Macron's announcement on Thursday that France would formally recognise the State of Palestine in September drew a furious rebuke from Israel but was dubbed a 'victory' by Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas.


Gulf Insider
7 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
OPEC Is Playing The Long Game
OPEC is pursuing a long-term strategy to increase its market share and is unwinding production cuts, with oil prices remaining strong due to factors beyond OPEC's direct control. The rise in oil prices is influenced by geopolitical developments, such as U.S.-Chinese trade talks and sanctions against Russia, as well as a decline in new non-OPEC oil discoveries. OPEC's approach is also aimed at restoring group cohesion among its members and capitalizes on the resilience of oil demand, even as some forecasts suggest a peak in consumption. 'There is no peak in oil demand on the horizon,' the head of OPEC, Haitham al Ghais, said last month in Canada. Demand will continue to increase as global population grows, he added. And OPEC will be there to respond with what supply is necessary. OPEC is now playing the long game. Fast-forward a month and Reuters is reporting on 'signs of strong demand more than offset the impact of a higher-than-expected OPEC+ output hike for August', not to mention now chronic worry about Trump's tariffs. In fact, after OPEC+ announced the bigger than expected supply boost, prices rose, not least because not everyone boosting supply was boosting it fast enough. When OPEC+ first said they were going to start unwinding their production cuts, agreed back in 2022, reactions were varied. Some argued it was all about trying to kill U.S. shale again. Others said the Saudis, the biggest cutter, simply had no other choice any longer after the cuts failed to produce significantly higher prices. Yet others claimed OPEC in general and Saudi Arabia specifically are trying to please Trump—by hurting some of his biggest donors. OPEC itself has not endorsed any of these versions of events. The fact remains that OPEC is reversing the cuts, boosting oil supply—but prices are not tanking as so many prominent energy analysts said they would, and are still saying they would, later this year. Of course, this is because of factors unrelated to OPEC, namely geopolitical developments such as U.S.-Chinese trade talks and Canadian wildfires, as well as yet more EU sanctions against Russia. But OPEC certainly wouldn't mind these factors supporting prices, if not more U.S. rig additions. OPEC is playing for market share. This is one of the most popular explanations for the group's latest moves among analysts. After curbing production for a couple of years and surrendering market share in the process, now some of the world's biggest producers want this market share back. This is going to take a while. Bank of America's head of commodities research, Francisco Blanch called it a 'long and shallow' price war. 'It's not a price war that is going to be short and steep; rather it's going to be a price war that is long and shallow,' Blanch told Bloomberg a month ago. He went on to say the target, especially for the Saudis, is U.S. shale, which has become more resilient in recent years but is still vulnerable to lower oil prices because of its higher costs. There is also another aspect to the change in OPEC approach, as detailed by Kpler's Amena Bakr. It's about group cohesion, Bakr wrote in an analysis for The National. With so much non-compliance with the cuts, those that were compliant needed to have their concerns addressed, too. 'To restore a sense of fairness, an orderly plan to return the barrels gradually was needed to avoid a free-for-all situation that would drown the market in supply,' Bakr explained. OPEC doesn't even need to try very hard this time, because geopolitics is working in its favor. Last month, prices climbed immediately on the suggestion that the U.S.-Iran talks could escalate into missile action, after the Iranian defense minister threatened strikes on U.S. bases in the Middle East should the two fail to reach a deal on Iran's nuclear program. U.S. Congress work on fresh sanctions against Russia, targeting specifically its energy industry also served as a driver for higher prices, undeterred by EU plans to try and stop importing even petroleum products made with Russian crude, possibly in light of the EU's track record of success with the anti-Russian sanctions. Yet there is another factor helping OPEC stay on top: non-OPEC supply. The Financial Times reported in mid-June that the international supermajors have not made many new discoveries lately. Since 2020, new non-shale discoveries have averaged 2.5 billion barrels a year, the FT noted, citing a Goldman Sachs report. This is just 25% of the average annual in new discoveries for the three years prior to 2020. In other words, all the talk about non-OPEC swamping OPEC and taking the upper hand on international oil markets may have been a little premature—as may be the case of IEA demand projections. The IEA has been notoriously bearish on oil demand, repeatedly citing rising EV sales, even though these sales in the U.S. are set for a serious decline. In Europe, EV sales are on the rise thanks to the return of subsidies but how long these are going to last is anyone's guess. China is always the country everyone points to when it comes to EVs, and yet China's oil demand is still growing—although peak talk is intensifying there as well, including from its own state oil majors. In this situation, OPEC essentially does not need to do anything but sit and wait. Price-sensitive U.S. shale will slow down, lack of new discoveries will crimp the growth potential of the supermajors, and prices will rise, because peak demand does not mean a sharp drop afterwards. In fact, even if we have reached peak oil demand, the most likely next stage in demand evolution is a plateau at a level that would need to be maintained. OPEC would no doubt be happy to help do that.


Gulf Insider
a day ago
- Gulf Insider
Iranian Helicopter Confronts US Destroyer
Iran has claimed it confronted and warned a US Navy destroyer to alter its course as it neared Iranian territorial waters in the Gulf of Oman. Iranian state media released video and images from the encounter on Wednesday, which if accurate would be the first known direct confrontation between Iranian and American forces since the 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel in June. The footage was taken from a helicopter deployed by the IRGC Navy to intercept the vessel. Surprisingly, the Pentagon did acknowledge the encounter, and described the interaction as 'professional' while saying it had no effect on its the Iranian side described it as an act of aggression by the US military, with state television in Iran accusing the warship USS Fitzgerald of making a 'provocative' move by approaching waters in Iran's own backyard. The video shows a helicopter flying close to the warship, with an Iranian crew member issuing a radio warning in English, demanding that the ship change course as it neared Iran's territorial waters around 10am local time. Iranian media further characterized the event as a tense standoff. The US vessel responded by warning it would fire on the Iranian aircraft if it did not retreat, per the claims of Iranian officials, and the vessel eventually left the area following repeated Iranian warnings. Thus Tehran is saying its Navy chased the US destroyer out of Iranian territorial waters. US Central Command (CENTCOM) has roundly rejected Iran's version of events, instead describing in a statement the following: 'This had no effect on the USS Fitzgerald's mission, and any claims to the contrary are misinformation from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps,' the official said of the exchange which occurred in international waters. Below: watch the standoff as featured in Iranian footage: IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News on Wednesday released footage it claimed showed an Iranian navy helicopter forcing the USS Fitzgerald, a US guided missile destroyer, to alter its course. The report said the warship had approached waters under Iran's supervision in the Sea of Oman. — Iran International English (@IranIntl_En) July 23, 2025 Iran's president just this week said his country will continue enrichment uranium for its peaceful nuclear energy program, and stands ready to take on any future potential Israeli or US attacks. President Trump meanwhile has said he's ready and willing to attack Iran again if it looks like the Islamic Republic is trying to reconstitute its 'destroyed' nuclear program. As for the possibility of resuming talks, according to the latest in Reuters : 'Iran is ready to resume nuclear talks with the United States as long as some principles are respected, deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said on Thursday, a day before a meeting with European powers in Istanbul.' The statement continued: 'The Iranian diplomat said talks could resume as long as Tehran's rights under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty are recognized and Washington builds trust with Tehran and guarantees that negotiations will not lead to renewed military action against Iran.' Also read: Iran Acknowledges That US Airstrikes 'Destroyed' Nuclear Facilities