Use of US bunker-buster bomb looms over Iran conflict
AI- Generated Image
WASHINGTON: A powerful American bunker-busting bomb is the only weapon capable of destroying Iran's deeply buried nuclear facilities, making it President
Donald Trump
's weapon of choice if he chooses to militarily back Israel.
The GBU-57, a 30,000-pound (13,607 kg) warhead capable of penetrating 200 feet (61 meters) underground before exploding, is missing from Israel's arsenal despite its stated goal of preventing Iran from building a nuclear bomb.
Why this bomb?
In less than a week, the Israeli army has taken out Iranian military commanders and damaged numerous surface installations, raising more questions than answers.
"The regime's missile stockpiles, launchers, military bases, production facilities, nuclear scientists, military command and control has taken a very severe beating," said Behnam Ben Taleblu, director of the Iran program at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defence of Democracies (FDD), a conservative-leaning group.
"But there are still outsized questions as to how efficacious of a strike Israel had against the beating hearts of Iran's nuclear program," Taleblu said.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reported no damage at Fordo, a uranium enrichment plant south of Tehran. Unlike the Natanz and Isfahan sites in central Iran, Fordo is buried deep underground, beyond the reach of Israeli bombs.
"All eyes will be on Fordo, which is buried under about 300 feet of rock in central Iran," Taleblu said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
Former US Army lieutenant general and Rand Corporation defence researcher Mark Schwartz insists that "only the United States has the conventional capacity" to destroy such a site.
And by "conventional capacity," he means the non-nuclear GBU-57 bomb.
What are its capabilities?
The US military says the GBU-57 -- also named Massive Ordnance Penetrator -- "is designed to penetrate up to 200 feet underground before exploding," navigating through rock and concrete.
This differs from missiles or bombs that typically detonate their payload near or upon impact.
"To defeat these deeply buried targets, these weapons need to be designed with rather thick casings of steel, hardened steel, to sort of punch through these layers of rock," said Masao Dahlgren, a fellow working on missile defence for the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington-based research centre.
The 6.6-meter-long GBU-57 also has a specialized fuse because "you need an explosive that's not going to immediately explode under that much shock and pressure," Dahlgren said.
Design for this bomb began in the early 2000s, and an order for 20 units was placed with Boeing in 2009.
How is it deployed?
The only aircraft capable of deploying the GBU-57 is an American B-2 Bomber, a stealth aircraft.
Some of these bombers were deployed in early May on Diego Garcia, the site of a joint UK-US military base in the Indian Ocean, but were no longer visible by mid-June, according to AFP's analysis of satellite imagery provided by Planet Labs.
With their long-range capabilities, B-2s departing from the United States "are able to fly all the way to the Middle East to do bombing runs. That's been done before," Dahlgren said.
Each B-2 can carry two GBU-57 bombs, and Schwartz said multiple bombs will likely be needed.
"They're not going to just be one and done," he said.
Schwartz added that the air superiority Israel has established over Iran reduces the risks faced by the B-2 bombers.
What are the consequences?
Such a US intervention would come with "a lot of political baggage for America," Taleblu said, emphasizing that the bunker-buster bomb is not the only way to address Iran's nuclear program.
Without the GBU-57 bombs, and short of a diplomatic solution, Taleblu said Israelis could attack access to underground complexes like Fordo by "trying to hit entrances, collapse what they can, cut electricity" and take other measures that have already been taken at Natanz.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
NIA arrests four more in Tamil Nadu ISIS radicalisation, recruitment case
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Wednesday arrested four more persons in the Tamil Nadu ISIS radicalisation and recruitment case involving Coimbatore-based Kovai Arabic College. With this, NIA has made eight arrests in the case, which is an off-shoot of the Coimbatore car bomb blast case. The arrested have been identified as Ahmed Ali of Thirumarai Nagar at Podanur, Jawahar Sathik of Pullukkadu housing unit near Ukkadam, Raja Abdullah alias 'Mac' Raja, and Sheik Dawood. According to the NIA, the four men had been radicalised by Jameel Basha, the founder of Madras Arabic College, who, along with his associates, was involved in recruiting gullible youth and subtly infusing Salafi -Jihadi ideology into them, in the guise of imparting Arabic language classes in Tamil Nadu. NIA had earlier arrested and charge-sheeted Basha, his associates Irshath, Syed Abdur Rahman and Mohammed Hussain, who had been using the classrooms and social platforms to carry out their anti-national radicalisation and recruitment activities, the agency stated in a release. NIA investigations revealed that the accused had promoted Khilafat ideology and martyrdom through jihad, advocating violence and armed struggle to establish an Islamic state, after removing the democratically-elected government, it stated. According to the agency, the radicalisation and recruitment activities had led to the Coimbatore car bomb blast in October 2022, in which the suicide bomber Jamesha Mubeen carried out a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device attack in front of Sangameswarar temple in Coimbatore. The agency added that it was continuing with its investigation in the Tamil Nadu ISIS radicalisation and recruitment case as part of its efforts to check radical terror activities against the nation.
The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Goyal optimistic about signing first tranche of U.S. trade deal before July 9
As the clock ticks towards U.S. President Donald Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs' to kick in on July 9, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has expressed optimism that India and the U.S. could sign a preliminary or early tranche of a larger trade deal before that date, though he stopped short of confirming a deal would be signed. 'We are in continuous dialogue. I have always been an optimist,' Mr Goyal said in an interview with The Hindu on the fringes of a conference organized by the India Global Forum 2025 in London. Also Read | India-U.S. trade deal faces delays, original fall deadline back on the table 'I'm very confident that, given that the US and India are very friendly countries, trusted partners, both wanting to have resilient, reliable, trusted supply chains, both vibrant democracies, we will be able to come up with a win-win for the businesses of both countries,' Mr Goyal added. Failure to sign such a deal would , as things stand, would result in Indian goods entering the U.S. being tariffed at 26% starting in early July. Also Read | What is the significance of the India-U.K. free trade agreement? Mr Goyal did not comment on whether a deal on the sensitive dairy and agricultural goods sectors would form part of the preliminary tranche of the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) under discussion with the U.S. 'I think negotiations are best left to the negotiators and the negotiating table. We will, of course, inform the media at the right time,' he said. Mr. Goyal also did not want to comment on the impact of the U.S.'s Trade Promotion Authority, which is a process in the U.S. Congress to delegate authority to the U.S. President to negotiate trade deals, including deals that offer below Most Favoured Nation (MFN) tariff rates to some trading partners of the U.S. Earlier, Mr Goyal had participated in a moderated discussion with his U.K. counterpart, Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds. The two countries had announced a free trade agreement on May 6. Mr Goyal said the UK and India were successful in concluding a deal because the sides had agreed to be sensitive to one another's concerns, setting aside issues that could not be negotiated easily. On the India-EU trade talks, Mr Goyal said the sides were looking to conclude a trade deal by the end of this calendar year, when asked whether they would announce a full-scale trade deal or an interim agreement first. 'There's that famous English phrase…since we are in Great Britain …'the air is pregnant with possibilities', he said adding he did not know what size and shape the agreement would have. On weather the Trump administration's return to the White House had impacted the speed and direction of India's trade talks with the E.U., Mr Goyal suggested that third parties did not impact bilateral deals. Last week the E.U.'s foreign minister , Kaja Kallas, had said at a joint press conference with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar that the E.U. was a 'reliable, predictable and credible partner for India'. Countries have been seeking to recalibrate their relationship with the U.S. since the return of U.S. President Donald Trump and his 'America First' philosophy to the White House. 'I don't think there's any impact of any other situation on a negotiation between two countries, because these negotiations are not a short term arrangement. These are like long-term marriages you are negotiating after crystal-gazing … 25 years, 50 years, into the future,' Mr Goyal said. India wants WTO strengthened On the relevance of the World Trade Organization given the change in the U.S. administration and its retrenchment from multilateralism, Mr Goyal said the world trade body had an 'important' role to play and that India believed 'very strongly' in multilateralism. '[ India ] believes we have to strengthen the WTO over the next few years through dialogue and discussions and will continue to play an increasingly important role to promote multilateralism,' he said. Tata Steel Not Discussed with the UK Mr Goyal also said that India had not made an intervention with the U.K. on behalf of Tata Steel which owns the Port Talbot steel plant in south Wales. The plant has had to import raw material from India and Europe following the closure of its blast furnace last year as it prepares to operationalize an electric-arc furnace in 2027. This may mean it runs afoul of the U.S.'s rules on inputs to qualify for any tariff reductions that the U.K. and U.S. agree to. The Trump administration has threatened to fully or partially maintain tariffs of 25% on British steel unless the U.K. provides guarantees on Tata Steel's inputs, as per a report in the Guardian. 'That, the U.K., has to negotiate with the U.S.,' Mr Goyal said.
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Asim Munir to meet Donald Trump at the White House: Lunch date sparks memes, mystery, and a whole lot of buzz
US President Donald Trump met Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir in Washington amid the ongoing Iran-Israel war. The rare closed-door meeting sparked speculation over Pakistan's mediation ambitions, counterterrorism ties, and its support for Iran. India, facing fallout from a Kashmir terror attack, remains wary. Trump claimed Munir helped prevent conflict with India, a statement New Delhi disputes. Meanwhile, social media users mocked the high-stakes summit with Bollywood memes, highlighting the online reaction to serious geopolitical moves. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Pakistan signals mediation role in Iran conflict Counterterrorism and controversy Strategic interests and broader agendas Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Fallout in India Internet reaction: Bollywood memes and cringe In a rare high-level engagement, US President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan 's Chief of Army Staff, Field Marshal Asim Munir , at the White House on Wednesday. The meeting took place in the Cabinet Room and was confirmed in the president's daily schedule. This is the first time since 2001, when General Pervez Musharraf met a US president, that a Pakistani military chief has held such talks with an American backdrop is tense. The Middle East is ablaze with conflict between Iran and Israel, and Washington is weighing its military options. Trump's discussion with Munir came as part of efforts to manage escalating regional tensions—and perhaps explore Pakistan's role in told reporters at the White House, 'I love Pakistan,' adding that Munir was 'extremely influential' in stopping recent fighting between India and Pakistan. However, he did not clarify what he hoped to achieve from their to some media reports, Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir was seen as he arrived at the the White House in Washington, DC to meet the US President Donald has positioned itself as a potential mediator in the Israel-Iran war. Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, speaking in parliament earlier this week, said: 'Our intention was always to see successful negotiations between the United States and Iran.' He added that Iran was open to talks, provided Israel stopped its his Washington visit, Munir reaffirmed Pakistan's support for Iran. At a public event, he stated Pakistan's 'clear and strong' backing for Tehran in the war, while also voicing support for American efforts to de-escalate the Minister Shehbaz Sharif echoed this sentiment in a post on social media, saying he had called the Iranian president 'to express Pakistan's unwavering solidarity with the brotherly people of Iran in the face of Israel's unprovoked aggression.'Pakistan's history with Iran is long and complex. The late Abdul Qadeer Khan, widely considered the father of Pakistan's nuclear programme, was accused of sharing nuclear designs with Iran. These atomic ties have drawn global scrutiny for geopolitics, Munir's US trip included a focus on counterterrorism. According to Dawn, the most concrete outcome of the visit may be a strengthened counterterrorism partnership with the US, especially in combatting Islamic State Khorasan (IS-K), which poses threats across South not everyone welcomed Munir in Washington. Outside a hotel event where he was speaking, overseas Pakistanis protested loudly, chanting slogans like 'Pakistanio ke Qatil,' 'Mass Murderer Asim Munir,' and 'Democracy dies when guns speak.'Political analyst Hassan Askari Rizvi called the White House meeting 'a kind of special gesture given by President Trump.' And it's clear that the symbolism of this meeting was not lost on Pakistan's state-run media either. Pakistan Television called it 'important and historic,' claiming it showed 'growing confidence' in the country's military visit is set to continue with meetings with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to reports from Pakistani outlets. Analysts believe the discussions may go beyond just reported by Bloomberg, Michael Kugelman, a senior fellow at the Asia Pacific Foundation, said, 'The Pakistani army chief is a powerful figure, and this army chief is especially powerful. He has a very large portfolio.' He noted that talks may also touch on crypto policy and critical Bagchi, head of the Delhi-based Ananta Centre, observed, 'The Trump administration is discovering new ways or new reasons to engage the Pakistan army and Pakistan.' Historically, the US has leaned on Pakistan's military to manage regional security threats, from Afghanistan to meeting has raised eyebrows in India, particularly given the fragile state of US-India ties. On 22 April, 26 tourists were killed in a deadly terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir. New Delhi blamed Pakistan, calling it an orchestrated act of terrorism. Islamabad denied any and Pakistan—both nuclear powers—came dangerously close to open conflict in May. Trump later claimed credit for brokering a ceasefire using trade as leverage. India rejected the assertion. In a call with Trump, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi made it clear: 'At no time, at any level, were there any talks on issues like India-US trade deal or mediation between India and Pakistan through America,' Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said in a video had been expected to meet Trump at the G-7 summit in Canada, but Trump cut his trip short, citing urgent developments in the Middle East. Modi, not a G-7 member, had been invited as a guest by Canadian Prime Minister Mark India and the US have maintained strong ties across successive administrations—largely to counter China—the latest developments suggest friction. US-India trade talks have stalled, and New Delhi remains firmly against any US attempt to mediate with diplomats negotiated in hushed rooms, the internet had its own take. Social media erupted with memes mocking the Trump-Munir meeting, comparing it to scenes from vintage Bollywood user posted an image captioned, 'Donald Trump after meeting Asim Munir,' alongside a screenshot from the 1997 film Ishq featuring Sadashiv Amrapurkar. Another likened the encounter to a dramatic father-son showdown from Rishtey (2002).Others shared doctored clips claiming to show 'Donald Trump and Asim Munir's exclusive video from the White House.' The mood online was clear—cynical, irreverent, and steeped in cultural closed-door meeting with Pakistan's army chief reflects shifting priorities as Washington recalibrates its Middle East approach. At the same time, it signals a subtle realignment of regional partnerships—with Pakistan asserting its diplomatic muscle, India hardening its stance, and the US still trying to keep one foot in each tensions high, and alliances fluid, the world is watching. And as memes continue to fly, what happens behind closed doors could shape the next chapter of regional politics.(With inputs from Bloomberg)
