Bombshell as Webjet is hit by a HUGE fine for misleading customers in landmark court ruling
The case run by the ACCC, saw the online travel agency admit between 2018 and 2023 it made false or misleading statements when it advertised airfares that excluded compulsory fees.
The statements were made on its website, and in promotional emails and social media posts.
Webjet also admitted that between 2019 and 2024 it provided false or misleading booking confirmations to 118 consumers for flight bookings which had not actually been confirmed.
Webjet later asked for additional payments, of up to $2,120 from consumers to complete the booking. Webjet has refunded these consumers.
The ACCC started its investigation after a consumer complained about an airfare advertised as 'from $18', which cost almost three times that price after Webjet added its compulsory fees.
'We took this case because we considered that Webjet used misleading pricing by excluding or not adequately disclosing compulsory fees in its ads,' ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.
'Seeking to lure in customers with prices that don't tell the whole story is a serious breach of the Australian Consumer Law.'
The Webjet fees comprised the 'Webjet servicing fee' and 'booking price guarantee' fee which ranged from $34.90 to $54.90 per booking, depending on whether the flights were domestic, to New Zealand and the Pacific, or other international destinations.
While Webjet's website, app and most emails contained information about the additional fees, some users had to scroll to the fine print near the bottom of the screen to see them. In its social media posts, Webjet didn't disclose the additional fees at all.
'Retailers must ensure their advertised prices are accurate. They should clearly disclose additional fees and charges,' Ms Cass-Gottlieb said.
The Webjet fees represented 36 per cent of Webjet's total revenue in the period from 1 November 2018 to 13 November 2023.
Webjet co-operated with the ACCC, admitted liability and agreed to make joint submissions to the Court about orders, including the penalty.
The Court also made declarations and other orders proposed, including that Webjet review its compliance program and pay a contribution to the ACCC's costs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Despite $22bn promise, Adani has paid zero corporate tax in Australia and experts think it won't ever pay a cent
More than three years after Adani started extracting coal from its Queensland mine, the Indian conglomerate has paid zero corporate tax from its Australian project – and tax experts say it may 'never pay a cent'. Adani pledged just over a decade ago to plough $22bn in taxes and royalties into the Australian economy. Industry groups supporting the coal company had also claimed Adani's controversial plans would fund schools, hospitals and other infrastructure for 'almost a century'. Guardian Australia analysis also found that the Abbot Point port, operated by an Adani entity under a 99-year lease signed in 2011, rarely pays tax. Over a 10-year period, it paid company tax on port income on just one occasion, of less than $4m. Adani's Carmichael mine, and rail and port operations, are among the most politically divisive projects in Australia. While critics usually raise environmental concerns, there's also a question over its economic benefits for Australia. Despite recording strong revenue, Adani's Australian assets regularly report annual losses, in large part due to large annual payments to related parties for interest and lease expenses. It also pays for services conducted by other Adani entities as the coal moves through the logistics chain from mine to export. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Jason Ward, the principal analyst at the Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research, says the level of related-party transactions at Adani's Australian operations is 'pretty unprecedented'. 'My judgment on this is that this company is absolutely set up to never make taxable profit,' Ward says. 'The related-party transactions are so big and wild and all over the map that this company will never make a profit on paper and will never pay a cent of tax.' Adani's most recent accounts for the Carmichael coal operations, for the year ended 31 March 2025, record $1.27bn in revenue. This gets dialled down to a $461.7m loss after various expenses, resulting in no tax payable. Details of the 2024-25 accounts were first published by the Australian Financial Review. Adani Mining's immediate parent company is in Singapore, which has a low corporate tax rate. Its ultimate parent is the India-based Adani Enterprises. Ward says similar structures are used at other multinationals, and there is no suggestion Adani has acted illegally. But he says governments rarely hold companies to account for promises of how their operations will benefit the public purse. 'In the future, approvals should be on the basis of fulfilling promises made, with clawback mechanisms that can be put into contracts,' Ward says. Adani's Australian mining business is branded Bravus Mining and Resources. A spokesperson for Bravus says the company complies with the corporate tax system, which he said was designed so corporations pay tax on profits made after deducting operating costs, interest expenses, previous years' tax losses and other allowable deductions such as depreciation on capital investment. 'Corporate income tax is just one part of Australia's complex taxation system, and it is misleading to focus solely on corporate tax paid and ignore the contribution to the Queensland and Australian economies of the millions of dollars in combined GST, payroll tax, superannuation, royalties and more we paid in FY25,' the spokesperson said. 'Our operations make a significant ongoing economic and social contribution to both the people who do the work and earn the money, and to the prosperity of their home towns in regional Queensland where they spend their wage.' The accounts show Adani Mining paid a $78.6m royalty during the last 12-month reporting period. Royalties are payments made to governments to extract state-owned minerals. It also paid a $36m royalty to a related party. Guardian Australia analysis of company accounts and disclosures from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) found the mining project has not paid corporate tax since opening in 2021. Adani's accounts show that even though revenue has been rising from the Carmichael operations, it has enough interest on related-party loans and other expenses to keep reporting losses. ATO disclosures for the Abbot Point terminal business, now named North Queensland Export Terminal Holdings, between 2013 and 2023 showed just one record of the Adani entity paying tax, which was for $4m in 2017-18. The port regularly generates annual income of between $300m and $550m. Tim Buckley, a former investment banker and the director of Climate Energy Finance, says that given Adani has not paid tax during recent periods of surging coal prices, it probably never will. 'If not now, when?' Buckley says. 'Adani has an extremely complex, opaque corporate structure in Australia. I'm comfortable saying they never will pay tax, given the state of the balance sheet.' In 2014, the then head of Adani Mining, Jeyakumar Janakaraj, said the Australian operations would deliver $22bn in taxes and royalties to be invested 'right back into frontline services'. Adani's contested coal proposal was supported by various representative bodies, including the Australian Resources and Energy Employer Association which said in 2017 the project would 'provide taxation and royalties that will fund schools, hospitals and other community infrastructure for almost a century'. The Minerals Council of Australia said in 2018 that 'through mining taxes and royalties, the Carmichael mine will generate billions of dollars for taxpayers over decades to fund nurses, teachers, police, hospitals, roads and other services and infrastructure for Queensland families and communities'.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Four alternatives to Spotify: swapping is easier than you think
How do you switch over from Spotify to another music service? What are the options? The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. The music industry has long held mixed feelings about Spotify's extensive influence over artists – and these feelings have intensified amid ongoing controversy over Spotify's chief executive, Daniel Ek, leading a €600m (A$1.07bn) investment in Helsing, a German defence technology company specialising in AI-driven autonomous weapon systems. Ek is also chair of Helsing, having joined the board in 2021 when his investment fund Prima Materia put €100m into the then-startup. In response to Ek's investment, artists and listeners have been seeking alternatives. 'Fuck Spotify,' the prolific Australian psychedelic rock group King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard said in a social media post on Saturday, announcing that they would be removing their catalogue from the streaming service. They followed US bands Xiu Xiu and Deerhoof, who made the same decision in recent weeks. Whether you're motivated by joining artists in leaving Spotify, or you're just interested in seeing the alternatives, it can seem daunting to make the switch after years of being with the service. But it is really easy. Streaming services tend to not have lock-in contracts, so if you're looking to switch, the first step would be cancelling your existing subscription through the account settings. Depending on when you subscribed, you'll be able to keep the premium features until the next payment is due. So what are the options? When Apple Music launched, it felt clunky and limited. But it has come a long way in the past few years, with vast improvements to its functionality, music selection (over 100m songs), radio, playlists and other features like music videos which Spotify doesn't have. The user experience now seems much closer to Spotify. Apple also has launched lossless and spatial audio for a better listening quality. Lossless audio is something Spotify promised in 2021 but has not launched. If you're already in the Apple ecosystem this is definitely the best option, but there is also an Android app. Apple offers one month for free to new users but after that subscriptions are A$12.99 (£10.99) a month, with family plans at A$19.99 (£16.99) a month. There are also bundled subscription deals with Apple's other services, such as iCloud storage and Apple TV+. If you pay for a YouTube premium subscription – A$16.99 (£12.99) a month – you get YouTube Music for free. It has over 100m songs and you get access to ad-free YouTube videos along with it. It also has playlists and radio stations and other features you would see elsewhere. As with Apple Music and its ecosystem, if you're already an Android user, this is an easier option for you. Amazon Music is included in Amazon Prime for A$9.99 (£8.99) a month. This tier comes with over 100m songs, podcasts and playlists, but users who want a more deluxe experience may opt for the pricier category, Amazon Music Unlimited, for A$12.99 (£11.99), separate from Prime membership. Unlimited comes with lossless and spatial audio tracks. If you want to avoid giving three of the largest tech companies your money, though, there are a growing number of other options. Tidal has always been pitched as the service that compensates artists the best and offers the highest audio quality. Like the other services, it has a catalogue of over 100m tracks. Pricing is A$12.99 (£10.99) a month, with an optional add-on for DJs offering stem separation for tracks. In addition to high-quality audio and all the expected features, Tidal has more than 650,000 videos and concert live streams. Other non-major companies offering music listening alternatives include Bandcamp, Napster (yes, the former peer-to-peer filesharing service has gone legal), Qobuz and Pandora. The biggest issue for people looking to switch is transferring your long-curated playlists. This is made easier through third-party services. If you want it to be fast you'll have to pay but if you don't have many to transfer or have the time, you can usually convert one playlist at a time for free. Popular options include the app SongShift (although it is only available on iOS) and Soundiiz (which runs in a web browser). You'll need to give whichever app you choose access to the accounts you are switching over but you can remove access once you are done. The services will usually flag if a song on the playlist can't be found. Sometimes it's as simple as a mismatch with the exact name of the song and it can be found as a different mix or title. The companies tend to keep the information about how much they pay artists for each stream a closely guarded secret but a report from industry blog Trichordist in 2020 gives us a picture of the rough payments artists can expect. According to the report, Spotify pays US$0.00348 a stream, Apple Music pays US$0.00675 a stream, Amazon pays US$0.00426, Google pays US$0.00554, and Tidal pays US$0.00876. Surprisingly, the fitness company Peloton comes out on top of the list, paying US$0.03107 a stream. Napster also rates higher than others at US$0.00916. But if you want to support artists more directly, you can buy vinyl, or digital copies of the music through iTunes or similar services, or pay directly through Bandcamp or SoundCloud.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Indebted homeowners cry out for relief but RBA won't be rushed as key inflation data looms
Consumer price figures released on Wednesday will determine whether a cautious Reserve Bank of Australia will give millions of mortgaged Australians a rate cut next month, economists say. The RBA board earlier this month shocked the market and experts when, in a split decision, it decided to hold its key cash rate at 3.85%, defying near-unanimous predictions of a move to lower it. Two weeks away from the board's next meeting on 11-12 August, slightly chastened investors and analysts are once again assuming a rate cut is a done deal – with only one caveat. 'Unless this [week's inflation report] is a surprise … then almost certainly we will get a rate cut,' said Jonathan Kearns, chief economist at investment firm Challenger and a former senior RBA official. The message from ANZ's head of Australian economics, Adam Boyton, was the same: a high consumer price number could 'derail an August rate cut'. Based on consensus forecasts and assuming no surprises, the Australian Bureau of Statistics's consumer price report will show the annual pace of inflation dropping to 2.2%, from 2.4% in March. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Which begs a broader question: If inflation is already below the mid-point of the central bank's 2% to 3% target range – and if the RBA believes monetary policy is slowing the economy – then why are we even still in this 'will-they-won't-they' discussion? The Australian Bureau of Statistics's consumer price report will show inflation eased further to 2.2% in the year to June, from 2.4% in June, according to the median analyst forecast. Inflation has dropped in almost every quarter since it peaked at 7.8% at the end of 2022. It's no surprise then that the message from Michele Bullock, the central bank's governor, is that interest rates are on the way down. But as much as indebted homeowners are crying out for the relief rate cuts bring, the message is also that the RBA will not be rushed. In deciding to hold rates at the last meeting, the majority of board members decided there was merit in 'waiting for a little more information to confirm that inflation remains on track to be at 2.5% on a sustainable basis'. Monthly price figures, which offer only a partial picture, suggested there were still some lingering worries inflation was not dropping as quickly as hoped, Bullock has said. There are also the ongoing worries that Donald Trump will announce a major new escalation in his trade aggression. And the fact that billions of dollars in taxpayer-funded subsidies have provided an artificial tailwind in the race to bring inflation back under control. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Household electricity bills, for example, would be 26% higher today were it not for temporary rebates from federal and state governments. As these handouts end, inflation will drift back towards 3% by the end of the year, according to the RBA's May forecasts, and then it will take 18 months to get back to 2.6%. As is its usual practice, the central bank focuses on an underlying measure of inflation that strips out more volatile price movements, such as for electricity and petrol, to get a clearer picture. Using a 'trimmed mean' measure rather than the 'headline' rate, inflation has only just returned to the target band, at 2.9% in the year to March. It is this core inflation rate that economists will be focused on come Wednesday at 11:30am. Kearns said a 'surprise' result would be consumer prices rising 'materially' faster than the anticipated 0.7% increase in the underlying figure in the three months to June. A rise of 0.9% – which would push the annual rate to 3% – or more 'would certainly' give the RBA board pause for thought, he said. Boyton said he expected the quarterly underlying inflation figure would come in at 0.6%, or 2.7% year-on-year. That said, even a 0.8% quarterly increase would 'present a challenge for the board'.
