
Trump administration takes hundreds of migrant children out of their homes, into government custody
The Trump administration is taking hundreds of migrant children already residing in the United States out of their homes and into government custody, at times separating them from their families and making it more difficult for them to be released, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.
President Donald Trump and his top aides have repeatedly cited the influx of children who arrived at the US southern border under the Biden administration without a parent or guardian as a critique of his predecessor and his handling of border security. Trump officials argue that hundreds of thousands of those children went unaccounted for — and are in potentially dangerous situations.
While former Biden officials contend that the surge of kids in 2021 placed tremendous pressure on the federal system, they and several experts in the field refute claims that there are large numbers of children missing from the system.
Still, the notion that there are thousands of such children has served as the impetus for a major campaign by the Trump administration to set up a makeshift 'war room' to pore over sensitive data and deploy federal authorities to children's homes nationwide.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has taken around 500 children into government custody following so-called welfare checks since Trump returned to the White House, according to three sources familiar with the matter, either because their situations were deemed unsafe or because of immigration enforcement actions against sponsors, the majority of whom are the kids' parents or other family members. That number is more than previously known and an unprecedented departure from previous years when such occurrences were rare.
The FBI has been involved in some of the welfare checks, frustrating some at the bureau who expressed concerns that the effort is more targeted at finding children's relatives who law enforcement otherwise has no pretext to investigate or arrest, according to a law enforcement official.
An FBI spokesperson confirmed in a statement that the agency is assisting other agencies in conducting welfare checks on migrant children. 'Protecting children is a critical mission for the FBI and we will continue to work with our federal, state, and local partners to secure their safety and well-being,' the spokesperson said.
The administration has also put in place additional vetting procedures that have made it all-but-impossible for some parents and guardians to retrieve children in government custody, according to advocates, experts and former Health and Human Services officials.
'They're trying to suffocate the program, which only hurts the children we're statutorily and legally mandated to serve,' one source familiar with the discussions told CNN.
Migrant children who arrive in the US alone are placed into the care of a federal agency within the Health and Human Services Department, known as the Office of Refugee Resettlement, which operates shelters nationwide to house kids until they can be released to a parent or guardian sponsor already residing in the United States.
Currently, there are more than 2,500 children in the custody of ORR, according to federal data. Migrant children are also staying in government custody much longer on average than they were previously.
Internally, agency officials have acknowledged that children may languish in facilities amid new policy guidelines making it harder to release kids to people in the US. They've also discussed the toll it's taking on children in custody, some of whom are reporting that they're depressed, according to a source familiar with discussions.
In Trump's first term, his administration sparked controversy by separating families at the US southern border as part of its 'zero tolerance' policy. In this term, children are being removed from sponsors, many of whom are family members, over potential wellbeing concerns.
But advocates, experts and former Health and Human Services officials point to post-release services and programs already in place to check in on children. They warn the latest actions by the administration stand to hurt, not help, children.
Trump officials maintain the steps they've taken are for the safety of the children and are necessary ones, casting the Biden administration's handling of migrant children as scrambled and mishandled.
'DHS is leading efforts to conduct welfare checks on these children to ensure they are safe and not being exploited. These welfare checks have resulted in arrests of some sponsors of these unaccompanied minors and as a result the children have been placed in the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) custody,' Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement.
The Department of Homeland Security cited two examples in a statement, including a Guatemalan migrant with a criminal record who was approved to care for a 14-year-old family member in 2023, and a man who arranged for a child to be smuggled into the US and transported to Virginia at a steep cost. DHS didn't provide additional details on the cases.
Health and Human Services Department spokesperson Andrew Nixon told CNN in a statement that ORR is 'restoring' the agency's mission, claiming that it was 'abandoned' under the previous administration.
'Let's be clear: no child should ever be placed with someone who can't meet basic safety standards. If it's 'impossible' for a sponsor to clear those standards, then they have no business caring for a child,' Nixon said.
A 2024 Health and Human Services inspector general report identified some vulnerabilities in the ORR release process, finding that while ORR 'generally conducted all steps for sponsor screening for most children' in their sample, 16 percent of cases lacked documentation that safety checks were done.
Dozens of children who were released to sponsors have been visited at their homes by immigration enforcement officers who, upon arriving, have asked the kids a range of questions, according to legal service providers who work with them. Topics have included their journey to the US southern border, school attendance and immigration hearings.
While there have been cases of trafficking and extortion of unaccompanied children that have been documented, the approach — sending an immigration enforcement officer, instead of a child welfare expert — to check in on kids is concerning to providers who work with children.
'It's scaring people, and it's unnecessary,' said Laura Nally, program director of the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights Children's Program, referring to the way the administration was conducting it's check ins.
Migrant children already go through multiple steps before being released to a person, like a parent or relative in the United States, who has been thoroughly vetted. In recent years, the agency charged with their care has expanded post-release services to check on children after they leave government custody.
'What the post release services do is provide help when children and their sponsors need help with school enrollment, health needs, links to other services in the community,' said Mark Greenberg, a former senior HHS official who served multiple administrations. The post-release service provider is also directed to alert any concerns to child welfare authorities or law enforcement authorities as appropriate, Greenberg said.
'To the extent the goal is to determine children are in danger or in need of help, this isn't a good way to go about doing that because it places children in a situation where they have to be fearful that anything they say could be used against their parent or family member,' he added, referring to the ICE welfare checks.
A family who went to a US Citizenship and Immigration Services office for a routine appointment was picked up by ICE—the parents were taken into ICE custody, while their three young children were taken into ORR custody, according to a source familiar with the incident. In another instance, a child was in the passenger seat of a vehicle during a traffic stop and was sent back into ORR custody, the source said.
'We're seeing the warning signs right now,' Nally said. 'There's a concern that these welfare check ins could turn into the mass detention of sponsors and mass return of kids to ORR.'
Experts say it's unusual for children to be swiftly sent back into ORR custody, but their concerns extend beyond that, arguing that additional guidelines for releases make it more difficult for those kids to leave custody again and fast-track deportation proceedings could put them at risk of removal. The average length of care for children in custody has jumped from 67 days in December 2024 to 170 days in April 2025 as guidelines to release kids have become more stringent.
Under Trump, the agency has placed additional checks on sponsors that include income requirements, stringent ID requirements and DNA tests. Those steps, which are layered on top of already-existing background checks, are particularly chilling for sponsors who are undocumented, which is often the case, former HHS officials say.
A recent lawsuit argued that 'collectively, these policy changes have resulted in children across the country being separated from their loving families, while the government denies their release, unnecessarily prolonging their detention.'
The guidelines have halted reunifications that were already set to take place for children in government custody.
Two brothers, ages 7 and 14, were detained at a transitional foster care program in California. They have not been able to be released 'to their mother because she's been is unable to provide documents required' as part of the new policy guidance, according to the lawsuit.
'The steps that they have taken are ones that are not about child safety but rather about making it more difficult or impossible for undocumented parents and relatives to be able to be united or reunited with a child,' Greenberg told CNN.
Within days of Trump taking office, a conference room in the Health and Human Services Department's Washington, DC, headquarters was transformed into a 'war room' for the purpose of tracking down migrant children, according to multiple sources.
That room has become the centralized place where multiple federal agencies have gathered to pore over sensitive data about children who crossed the US southern border alone and share that information with the Department of Homeland Security. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. visited the war room last month to get briefed on the work there, according to one of the sources.
According to multiple sources, Immigration and Customs Enforcement now has access to the Office of Refugee Resettlement portal, which contains sensitive information about children, including the basis for their immigration relief, like asylum, details about their sponsor placement and protected medical information.
ORR has been responsible for unaccompanied migrant children for more than two decades, since former President George W. Bush signed legislation moving the care of kids out of an immigration enforcement agency. The agency's mandate is to place children 'in the least restrictive setting that is in the best interest of the child,' usually with a family member.
In the early days of the Trump administration, the White House moved a senior ICE official, Melissa Harper, to oversee ORR, sending a message that, like his first term, immigration enforcement would be folded into an agency primarily focused on child welfare, according to three sources familiar with the matter.
'The message was clear that this was going to be a very enforcement-oriented regime and almost immediately people were being questioned and prodded on what was being done to protect children from traffickers, what was done to ensure children weren't released to dangerous sponsors,' said Mary Giovagnoli, who led ORR's ombudsman's office before she was terminated last month.
Harper's short tenure — the outcome of internal disagreements, sources familiar said—later paved the way for Angie Salazar to take the helm. According to sources, Salazar, who also came from ICE, talks to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller frequently and has directed agency officials to quickly approve policy changes.
Trump officials haven't provided evidence for their contention that hundreds of thousands of children are unaccounted for but appear to be basing that on a Homeland Security inspector general report stating that nearly 300,000 unaccompanied migrant children were not given notices to appear in court. That, however, doesn't mean they're missing, according to former officials.
The DHS IG last August found that ICE didn't serve notices to appear, a document that instructs people to appear before an immigration judge, to more than 291,000 children. But it didn't explain whether that was, for example, a capacity issue or because addresses were missing.
In a House panel hearing in May, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told lawmakers, 'President Trump has made it a priority of every Cabinet secretary and agency to make sure those children are located, that they're returned to safety. … The refugee program and sponsors were greatly abused in the previous administrations. The department of HHS is bringing some integrity back to the program.'
Jen Smyers, a former ORR deputy director who served under Biden, told CNN that rushing is never appropriate, but that there are multiple checks sponsors have to go through to ensure quality control.
'There was rigorous vetting of all sponsors,' Smyers said, adding that sponsors went through Justice Department public records checks and sex offender registry checks. 'There's a difference between the vetting and what happens afterward. No amount of vetting is a predictor of the future.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

33 minutes ago
Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud
WASHINGTON -- As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was similarly optimistic. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is keeping his distance from Elon Musk even after the billionaire's extraordinary public rebuke of President Trump and the GOP's domestic agenda. Asked Friday if Musk's bitter break from Trump presents Democrats with an opportunity to form a strange-bedfellows alliance with the tech titan, Jeffries shifted the conversation immediately to the Democrats' efforts to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The opportunity that exists right now is to kill the GOP tax scam,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'It's legislation that we have been strongly opposed to, and uniformly opposed to, from the very beginning. … It rips health care away from millions of people. It snatches food out of the mouths of hungry children. And it rewards billionaires and [GOP] donors in ways that are fiscally irresponsible.' Pressed on whether Musk should be 'welcomed back' to the Democratic Party after the high-profile split from Trump, Jeffries punted again. 'Same answer,' he said. Jeffries's cautious remarks demonstrate the limits of the old adage that the enemy of one's enemy is one's friend. They also highlight the potential difficulties Democrats would face if they embraced a polarizing and nationally unpopular figure in Musk — one they've spent most of the last year bashing for heavy spending on Trump's campaign and, more recently, for his role in heading Trump's efforts to gut the federal government. Still, some Democrats say Musk's influence is significant enough that Democrats should make the effort to try to court him to their side amid the Trump feud. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents parts of Silicon Valley, is leading the charge. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' Khanna posted Thursday on social platform X, which is owned by Musk. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' referring to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Jeffries isn't going nearly so far. But he has welcomed Musk's attacks on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the Republicans who voted for it. And he aligned Democrats with Musk's sentiments that the package piles too much money onto the federal debt, a figure the Congressional Budget Office estimated to be $2.4 trillion. 'To the extent that Elon Musk has made the same point that everyone who has voted for this bill up until this moment should be ashamed of themselves, we agree,' Jeffries said. 'And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the point that the bill is a 'disgusting abomination,' we agree. And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the observation about the GOP tax scam — that it is reckless and irresponsible to explode the deficit by more than $3 trillion, and that potentially could set our country on a path toward bankruptcy — we agree.' 'These are arguments that Democrats have been making now for months.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vance Sucks Up to Trump to Deny He's Part of Musk Coup Plot
J.D. Vance was forced to reaffirm his allegiance to President Trump after Elon Musk backed a call for the vice president to replace his boss. A spat between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big beautiful bill,' which the Tesla CEO denounced as a 'disgusting abomination,' has blown up into an all-out MAGA civil war, with Musk and Trump dramatically trading blows in public. On Thursday, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO replied 'Yes' to a post by an X user who asked: 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and Vance should replace him.' Musk publicly mused about starting a political party, and told his followers in a bombshell allegation that Trump was named in the Epstein files, signing off by saying: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' He added in a follow-up post, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Vance also features in a conspiracy theory called 'Dark Enlightenment' or Dark MAGA" that suggests a secretive cabal of tech titans is plotting to blow up the government and rule as a giant corporation with a CEO instead of a president. The Silicon Valley plotters, including Musk, chose Vance as the person who would take over when Trump is toppled, according to the theory. Trump has yet to address the latest allegations personally. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a statement saying: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted.' As the drama escalated, Vance posted a picture teasing a Friday appearance on the podcast of Trump-friendly comedian Theo Von. 'Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?' Vance joked. In a follow-up post, the vice president added: 'President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him.' Musk and Trump's alliance began to unravel after the GOP-controlled House of Representatives narrowly passed Trump's flagship budget proposal last month. Before that, Musk had pushed Trump's agenda by leading his so-called Department of Government Efficiency, an initiative within the administration tasked with cutting government spending and jobs. Musk publicly attacked Trump's bill on the grounds that it would undermine his work with DOGE by adding trillions to the U.S. budget deficit. But on Thursday, Trump claimed that Musk was really upset about the effect the bill will have on his electric vehicle company, Tesla. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' the president added.