&w=3840&q=100)
Losing a pregnancy in the US might get you in legal trouble; here's why
In the US state of West Virginia, a law meant to restrict abortions is now stirring fears that women could face criminal investigations for miscarriages.
The Unborn Child Protection Act, passed in 2022, bans most abortions in the state, allowing exceptions only in extreme cases—rape, incest, fatal fetal anomalies, or if the mother's life is at risk. Women themselves are explicitly shielded from prosecution for seeking an abortion under the law.
But legal experts warn that this protection may not be enough.
The real confusion lies in what happens when a woman experiences a miscarriage, or involuntary abortion. How she handles that loss—whether she flushes fetal remains, buries them, or disposes of them in any other way—could potentially trigger felony charges under state criminal code, according to Raleigh County Prosecuting Attorney Tom Truman.
'The kind of criminal jeopardy you face is going to depend on a lot of factors. What was your intent? What did you do? How late were you in your pregnancy?' Truman told WVNS 59News.
Truman clarified that he personally would be unwilling to prosecute women for such actions. But his statement emphasises the ambiguity in the law—and the immense discretion left to local prosecutors. It's also unclear whether family members or others who assist a woman during a miscarriage could face legal consequences.
At the heart of the issue is the law's vague wording. It doesn't define what counts as acceptable handling of fetal remains, or how intent should be interpreted. As a result, even actions taken in confusion, panic, or grief could fall under legal scrutiny.
This is more than just a theoretical concern. Across the US, women have already been charged or jailed following pregnancy loss. According to news site Metro, states such as South Carolina, Georgia, Arkansas, Texas, California, Mississippi, and Ohio have all seen cases where women were prosecuted for miscarriages or stillbirths.
Even in California, widely seen as a progressive state, two women were jailed over stillbirths before laws were passed to explicitly ban criminal charges related to pregnancy loss. Now, experts say West Virginia appears to be stepping into the same murky legal waters.
Though no one has yet been prosecuted in the state for a miscarriage, the fear of being investigated, interrogated, or arrested could have a chilling effect. Women might hesitate to seek emergency medical care, or fear reporting complications to doctors. And that hesitation could have deadly consequences.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
15 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi govt defines ‘emergency' tree removal norms, issues SOP
Delhi environment minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa on Friday issued a detailed Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) under Section 8 of the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act (DPTA), 1994 — formally defining what qualifies as an 'emergency' in which trees may be pruned or felled without prior permission, and laying out compliance requirements to prevent misuse. The move, Sirsa said, seeks to enable swift action in genuine cases of public risk while creating a transparent system. However, environmental groups warned that the provision has historically been misused to justify indiscriminate tree removal under vague pretexts. To be sure, Section 8 of the DPTA mandates no tree shall be felled, removed, or disposed of without prior permission from the Tree Officer. However, it provides an exception for emergency cases – where a tree poses immediate danger to life, property, or such situations, residents' welfare associations (RWAs), land-owning agencies, individuals or civic agencies may act without prior approval, provided they report the action to the tree officer within 24 hours. Sirsa on Friday said the government had defined the 'exceptions', where immediate pruning or removal of tree may be warranted. 'For the first time, we have laid out clear parameters for what qualifies as an emergency — such as trees obstructing roads, bridges, drains, or sewer lines; damaging buildings or heritage structures; interfering with Metro or railway infrastructure; or those that are dead, dried, or leaning dangerously,' Sirsa said. In such circumstances, Sirsa said the agency concerned, RWA or individual may take immediate remedial action but must furnish evidence without delay. 'This must be reported within 24 hours by uploading photographs from at least three different angles, geo-coordinates, a written justification for the action, and post-action images on the DPTA e-Forest portal,' the minister said. He added that tree officers will treat such submissions as valid compliance under the law. 'They are also empowered to initiate action on their own if similar threats are observed during inspections or field visits.' While Section 8 is not new to the DPTA, this is the first time the government has formally codified its application through an SOP. Sirsa emphasised that the objective is to strike a balance between public safety and environmental responsibility. 'We are committed to protecting both — our people and our trees. These SOPs ensure that urgent action is not delayed in genuine emergencies, while creating a transparent and accountable system to prevent misuse. Any violation or attempt to exploit these provisions will invite strict legal consequences,' he said. Environmental activist Bhavreen Kandhari said that while the SOP may seem balanced on paper, Section 8 has long served as a loophole for indiscriminate pruning and felling. 'We've seen overhanging branches conveniently labelled as hazards. Once again, the emphasis is on removal rather than revival,' she said, urging the government to invest instead in tree ambulances and better care. 'Most trees in the city remain concretised and are still choking,' she added.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
Cabinet clears two DAs, Metro, Manmohan varsity & more
HYDERABAD: The state Cabinet meeting, chaired by Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy, on Thursday approved the release of two pending Dearness Allowances (DA) for government employees and accepted several key demands raised by employee unions. Deputy Chief Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka, addressing the media after the meeting, said one DA will be released immediately, while the second will be disbursed after six months. Welfare of employees To support employee welfare, the Cabinet approved the establishment of a Health Trust with the chief secretary as chairman. The government will contribute Rs 500 per employee, matching the employee contribution, to provide comprehensive health benefits. Metro expansion and infrastructure boost The Cabinet approved the expansion of the Metro Rail network at an estimated cost of Rs 19,579 crore. I&PR Minister Ponguleti Srinivasa Reddy said expansion will cover three corridors — Shamshabad to Future City (39.6 km), JBS to Medchal (24.5 km) and JBS to Shamirpet (22 km) — totalling 86.1 km. The proposals will be forwarded to the Union government for approval, Vikramarka disclosed. He also revealed that the Cabinet okayed proposals for construction of 5,190 km of Roads and Buildings (R&B) roads and 7,947 km of Panchayat Raj roads under the Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM), to be completed over the next two and a half years. The government has allocated Rs 16,780 crore for Panchayat Raj roads, and Rs 16,414 crore for R&B roads. University to be named after Manmohan Singh In another decision, the Cabinet resolved to name the upcoming Earth Science University in Kothagudem after former prime minister Dr Manmohan Singh. State to clear employee dues in phased manner It also approved the formation of Medical Invalidation Committees at the district level for employee-related health evaluations. Vikramarka further said that the Cabinet has decided to clear pending employee dues in a phased manner, releasing at least Rs 700 crore per month. It also approved a 12.5% quota for employees in Secretariat posts, as demanded by unions and sanctioned the grading system for panchayat staff.
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
Losing a pregnancy in the US might get you in legal trouble; here's why
In the US state of West Virginia, a law meant to restrict abortions is now stirring fears that women could face criminal investigations for miscarriages. The Unborn Child Protection Act, passed in 2022, bans most abortions in the state, allowing exceptions only in extreme cases—rape, incest, fatal fetal anomalies, or if the mother's life is at risk. Women themselves are explicitly shielded from prosecution for seeking an abortion under the law. But legal experts warn that this protection may not be enough. The real confusion lies in what happens when a woman experiences a miscarriage, or involuntary abortion. How she handles that loss—whether she flushes fetal remains, buries them, or disposes of them in any other way—could potentially trigger felony charges under state criminal code, according to Raleigh County Prosecuting Attorney Tom Truman. 'The kind of criminal jeopardy you face is going to depend on a lot of factors. What was your intent? What did you do? How late were you in your pregnancy?' Truman told WVNS 59News. Truman clarified that he personally would be unwilling to prosecute women for such actions. But his statement emphasises the ambiguity in the law—and the immense discretion left to local prosecutors. It's also unclear whether family members or others who assist a woman during a miscarriage could face legal consequences. At the heart of the issue is the law's vague wording. It doesn't define what counts as acceptable handling of fetal remains, or how intent should be interpreted. As a result, even actions taken in confusion, panic, or grief could fall under legal scrutiny. This is more than just a theoretical concern. Across the US, women have already been charged or jailed following pregnancy loss. According to news site Metro, states such as South Carolina, Georgia, Arkansas, Texas, California, Mississippi, and Ohio have all seen cases where women were prosecuted for miscarriages or stillbirths. Even in California, widely seen as a progressive state, two women were jailed over stillbirths before laws were passed to explicitly ban criminal charges related to pregnancy loss. Now, experts say West Virginia appears to be stepping into the same murky legal waters. Though no one has yet been prosecuted in the state for a miscarriage, the fear of being investigated, interrogated, or arrested could have a chilling effect. Women might hesitate to seek emergency medical care, or fear reporting complications to doctors. And that hesitation could have deadly consequences.
