
Pressure Mounts on Israel over its Military Escalation in Gaza
The Israeli government is facing mounting pressures from its allies over its military escalation in Gaza as the Strip's civilian population is enduring catastrophic humanitarian conditions.
The UK, France and Canada have threatened action against Israel, while 23 countries criticized Israeli blockade of aid entry into Gaza, urging Israel not to use humanitarian aid as a political tool to starve the Strip's population.
In response, the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, insisted Israel would press ahead with its military operations in Gaza until total victory was achieved. Israel's Allies Speak Up
In a sharply-worded joint statement, the leaders of the UK, France and Canada spoke out against Israel's expansion of military operations in Gaza, calling it 'wholly disproportionate.' They urged Israel to allow in more humanitarian aid and alleviate the suffering of Palestinian civilians.
'We strongly oppose the expansion of Israel's military operations in Gaza. The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable,' the statement said. 'We call on the Israeli Government to stop its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. This must include engaging with the UN to ensure a return to delivery of aid in line with humanitarian principles. We call on Hamas to release immediately the remaining hostages they have so cruelly held since 7 October 2023,' it added.
Moreover, the three countries' leaders condemned Israeli government officials' remarks regarding the displacement of Gaza's population. 'We condemn the abhorrent language used recently by members of the Israeli Government, threatening that, in their despair at the destruction of Gaza, civilians will start to relocate. Permanent forced displacement is a breach of international humanitarian law,' the statement noted. Concrete Response
Furthermore, the UK, France and Canada threatened to take concrete actions if Israel did not backtrack and allow in more humanitarian aid. 'We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response,' the statement said.
The three countries also expressed opposition to settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank, saying they are 'illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians.' They threatened 'further action, including targeted sanctions.'
Moreover, the leaders of the three countries said they strongly support mediation efforts led by the US, Egypt and Qatar to secure a ceasefire, as well as efforts towards achieving a pathway to a two-state solution, including the high-level Two-State Solution Conference at the UN, which Saudi Arabia and France will co-chair in June. Israeli Escalation in Gaza
Israel on Sunday moved forward with its Operation Gideon Chariots throughout the north and south of Gaza to step up pressure on Hamas to release the remaining hostages. The expanded offensive followed days of heavy airstrikes which have killed more than 400 Palestinians and injured over 1,000 since Thursday, according to a CNN count of Gaza's Health Ministry data.
On Monday, Netanyahu vowed that Israel would take control of the entire Gaza Strip. 'The fighting is intense and we are making progress. We will take control of all the territory of the Strip,' he stated in a video on Telegram.
Meanwhile, the Israeli Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, said that Israel's military would 'wipe out' what remains of Palestinian Gaza, according to The Guardian. 'Now we conquer, cleanse and stay – until Hamas is destroyed. Along the way, what remains of the strip is also being wiped out,' he said during a press conference.
In response to the joint statement of the UK, France and Canada, Netanyahu said that Israel would continue its operations until total victory achieved, accusing the leaders of the three countries with offering a prize to Hamas and encouraging more attacks. 'The leaders in London, Ottawa and Paris are offering a huge prize for the genocidal attack on Israel on October 7 while inviting more such atrocities,' he said. Mounting Pressures
On Sunday, Netanyahu's office said that Israel would allow the entry of a 'basic amount of food' into Gaza to prevent a 'starvation crisis' which could jeopardize its military operation, after international pressure mounted on the Israeli government over a looming famine.
On March 2, 2025, Israel imposed a total blockade on humanitarian aid entry into Gaza, before resuming its military operations in the Strip on March 18, to increase pressure on Hamas to release the remaining hostages. The blockade has forced community kitchens to close due to the lack of supplies and the depletion of food stocks, putting Gaza's population at the risk of famine.
On Monday, Netanyahu acknowledged that his decision to allow a limited amount of aid was a result of pressure from close allies. '[They told me]: 'We cannot accept images of hunger, mass hunger. We cannot stand that. We will not be able to support you,' he said in a video on social media. Aid Delivery Resumption
Following Israel's decision to resume aid entry, around 9 trucks entered Gaza after nearly three months of total blockade, according to The Guardian. However, the UN's humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, warned it was just a 'drop in the ocean of what is urgently needed.'
In a separate joint statement, the Foreign Ministers of 23 countries, including France, Germany, Italy, Australia and the UK, as well as EU representatives, urged Israel to stop politicizing humanitarian aid for starving Gaza's population.
'Whilst we acknowledge indications of a limited restart of aid, Israel blocked humanitarian aid entering Gaza for over two months. Food, medicines and essential supplies are exhausted. The population faces starvation. Gaza's people must receive the aid they desperately need,' the statement noted.
'Humanitarian aid should never be politicized, and Palestinian territory must not be reduced nor subjected to any demographic change,' the statement warned.
The 23 countries urged Israel to immediately resume aid entry into the Strip. 'As humanitarian donors, we have two straightforward messages for the Government of Israel: allow a full resumption of aid into Gaza immediately and enable the UN and humanitarian organizations to work independently and impartially to save lives, reduce suffering and maintain dignity,' the statement noted.
Short link :
Post Views: 18
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Saudi Gazette
an hour ago
- Saudi Gazette
Saudi Crown Prince and Greek PM call for restraint and de-escalation in phone call
Saudi Gazette report JEDDAH — Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman received on Sunday a phone call from Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis. During the call, they discussed the latest developments in the region and the repercussions of the Israeli military operations against Iran. The two leaders underlined the need for restraint, de-escalation, and resolving all disputes through diplomatic means.


Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
A Saudi perspective on security, diplomacy and human dignity
As a Saudi national, I view the Middle East's complex challenges through the lens of my country's commitment to regional stability, Islamic values and Vision 2030's aspirations for sustainable development. The new escalation between Israel and Iran, marked by Israeli airstrikes authorized by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, underscores the urgent need for a balanced approach to security, diplomacy and human dignity. These strikes, ostensibly aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions, risk plunging the region into broader conflict, potentially involving global powers like the US. From a Saudi perspective, fostering sustainable peace requires de-escalation, inclusive dialogue and addressing the root causes of conflict, such as economic disparity and political marginalization. Israel's airstrikes on Iran, justified as a response to Iran's nuclear program reaching 60 percent uranium enrichment, have heightened regional tensions. However, the timing, amid Netanyahu's domestic political struggles and waning support for military operations in Gaza, suggests ulterior motives. Critics argue that these actions may serve to bolster Netanyahu's position, deflecting attention from his legal and political challenges. As a Saudi observer, I see this as a risky gambit that could accelerate Iran's nuclear ambitions rather than deter them, threatening the entire region's stability. Saudi Arabia, alongside other Gulf Cooperation Council nations, has condemned these airstrikes as a violation of Iran's sovereignty and international law. This stance reflects our commitment to regional stability and opposition to actions that undermine mutual respect among nations. The Kingdom's condemnation is not merely rhetorical; it signals a broader call for de-escalation and dialogue to prevent a wider conflict that could destabilize the Middle East and impact global energy markets, a critical concern for Saudi Arabia. Western policies, particularly those of the US, have often prioritized geopolitical dominance over sustainable peacebuilding. The US-Israel relationship, shaped partly by the influential Israel lobby, as described by scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, has aligned American foreign policy with Israel's immediate security concerns. While this partnership has strengthened bilateral ties, it has sometimes overlooked the long-term consequences for regional stability. The US-led invasion of Iraq, for instance, destabilized the region, weakened Arab states and fueled populism and extremism challenges that persist today. From a Saudi perspective, the fragility of many Arab states, compounded by ineffective leadership and rising nationalism, underscores the need for a strategic pivot. The US cannot sustain flawed policies indefinitely, as the human and economic costs of interventions like Iraq demonstrate. Saudi Arabia welcomes recent US restraint, with figures like Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasizing that American priorities lie in protecting its forces rather than endorsing Israel's strikes on Iran. This shift opens space for diplomacy, which Saudi Arabia is well positioned to champion. Saudi Arabia holds a unique position in the Middle East, rooted in its religious significance as the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques and its foreign policy being aimed at fostering stability. The Kingdom's Vision 2030 emphasizes sustainable development and economic diversification, aligning with the broader goal of regional cooperation. In the context of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands, Saudi Arabia has advocated for the Arab Peace Initiative, which offers normalization with Israel in exchange for a two-state solution. This framework reflects our commitment to balancing security with justice and addressing Palestinian aspirations, while fostering regional collaboration. Two peace frameworks merit consideration: the two-state solution and the two-return solution. The two-state solution envisions an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, promoting mutual recognition and security cooperation. The two-return solution, meanwhile, addresses historical grievances by proposing compensation and recognition of both Palestinian and Jewish narratives to facilitate reconciliation. Fostering sustainable peace requires de-escalation, inclusive dialogue and addressing the root causes of conflict. Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed Both approaches face challenges from Israeli settlement expansion, Palestinian governance fragmentation and skepticism about Israel's commitment to peace, but Saudi Arabia's mediation can bridge divides. By promoting adherence to international law and partnering with global stakeholders, the Kingdom can advance a comprehensive approach that integrates humanitarian and economic considerations. Israel's current policies under Netanyahu, including its operations in Gaza and efforts to neutralize Iran's nuclear capabilities, prioritize immediate security but risk long-term consequences. The pursuit of 'total victory' in Gaza and aggressive posturing toward Iran may isolate Israel diplomatically, strain its alliances and impact US interests and Jewish communities worldwide. From a Saudi perspective, sustainable security for Israel and the region requires integrating robust defense with diplomacy that tackles conflict drivers like economic inequality and political marginalization. Netanyahu's actions, driven partly by domestic pressures, risk dragging the region into chaos. As a Saudi national, I join global voices opposing leaders who exploit fear to justify escalation. The Kingdom's condemnation of Israel's airstrikes on Iran reflects our broader stance against unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and stability. Instead, we advocate for dialogue, economic development and countering extremism to create a cooperative framework for the region. The ongoing crisis in Gaza demands urgent attention. The humanitarian toll, marked by significant loss of life and suffering, requires immediate international action focused on de-escalation and relief. Saudi Arabia, in alignment with the other GCC nations, calls for responsible leadership rooted in empathy for both Palestinian and Israeli communities. Breaking cycles of violence hinges on fostering dialogue and trust, addressing not only security concerns but also the human dignity of all stakeholders. Historical conflicts in the region, from Iraq to Syria, highlight the necessity of inclusive partnerships built on mutual respect. Aspirations for peace, echoed by figures like US President Donald Trump, who has positioned himself as a potential peacemaker, depend on balanced collaboration. Saudi Arabia and other Arab states hold strategic leverage to counter foreign interference and extremist threats, aligning with a shared vision of stability and prosperity. The Middle East's future remains uncertain, with the Israel-Iran conflict of 2025 raising more questions than answers. The efficacy of Israel's military actions, the potential for US-Iran negotiations and the political fallout in both nations are yet to be fully understood. What is clear, however, is the need for all stakeholders — Western governments, Israel, Arab states and the international community — to prioritize human dignity and de-escalation. Saudi Arabia's leadership, grounded in its religious and geopolitical influence, seeks to foster dialogue, promote equitable development and reduce external interference. By advocating for frameworks like the Arab Peace Initiative and supporting inclusive peace processes, the Kingdom can help pave the way for a stable and prosperous Middle East. Sustainable peace demands not only strategic restraint but also a shared commitment to cooperation, mutual prosperity and respect for all communities. In conclusion, as a Saudi national, I believe that fostering sustainable peace in the Middle East requires moving beyond military escalation to embrace diplomacy and human dignity. The Kingdom's role as a mediator, coupled with its vision for regional stability, offers hope for a future where dialogue triumphs over conflict and cooperation replaces division. The path forward is challenging, but with collective resolve we can build a Middle East defined by peace and prosperity for all.


Leaders
4 hours ago
- Leaders
EU Powers Offer Immediate Talks with Iran to De-escalate Tensions
Germany, France, and Britain stand prepared to engage in immediate discussions with Iran regarding Tehran's nuclear program, with the aim to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East, according to German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul. During his visit to the region, Wadephul emphasized the importance of constructive dialogue to resolve ongoing conflicts. Hope for Constructive Dialogue Wadephul expressed his hope for renewed negotiations, stating, 'I hope that's still possible.' He spoke to German public broadcaster ARD, highlighting that Germany, alongside France and Britain, is ready to offer Iran immediate negotiations about its nuclear program. He urged Iran to accept this offer, viewing it as crucial for regional stability. Wadephul outlined that a key prerequisite for resolving the conflict involves ensuring that Iran poses no threat to Israel or Europe. He noted, 'This is essential for achieving peace in the region.' He also mentioned that the conflict would only end when all parties exert influence on both Iran and Israel. Wadephul indicated a shared expectation for both sides to make a serious attempt to interrupt the cycle of violence within the next week. He stressed the urgency of this situation, stating that immediate action is necessary to prevent further escalation. When asked about the potential for the Iranian government to fall, Wadephul clarified that he does not believe Israel intends to destabilize the administration in Tehran. This statement reflects a nuanced understanding of the complex geopolitical landscape. Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza Turning his attention to Gaza, Wadephul condemned the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian enclave as unacceptable. He urged Israel to grant unrestricted access to aid organizations, emphasizing the dire need for assistance. 'The hunger, the dying, the suffering of the people in Gaza must come to an end,' he stated. Wadephul also placed blame on Hamas for the ongoing conflict, insisting that the Islamist group must release hostages taken during the October 2023 raid on Israel, underscoring the need for accountability and a resolution to the humanitarian crisis affecting the region. Short link : Post Views: 150