How South Africa's Youth Month aims to empower young people through skills development
Minister in the Presidency, responsible for Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities, Sindisiwe Chikunga, and her deputy, Mmapaseka "Steve" Letsike, led the launch of the Youth Month programme for the year in Soweto on Tuesday.
Image: Supplied
Skills development and an inclusive and youth-oriented economy were some of the big talking points at the launch of this year's Youth Month programme in Soweto.
The Minister in the Presidency responsible for women, youth and people with disabilities, Sindisiwe Chikunga, her deputy, Mmapaseka "Steve" Letsike, and City of Joburg Mayor, Dada Morero, led a multi-pronged programme to kick-off Youth Month during a ceremony held at the Hector Peterson Memorial and Uncle Tom's Hall in Orlando West, Soweto.
Reflecting on the historical significance of the uprisings, renowned activist Seth Mazibuko, who is one of the few remaining faces of the uprising, announced plans from his foundation to commemorate the pivotal moment in South Africa's Struggle for freedom.
Activities will include a significant march involving eight schools that participated in the uprising, as well as the unveiling of "50 untold stories of June 16".
"Indeed, there will be a march that will celebrate the 50th anniversary of the June 16 uprising, which will involve eight schools that took part in the uprisings. There is also a plan to launch the 50 untold stories of June 16, which will be stories told by some of the unsung heroes of the June 16 massacre. These include people who are not necessarily from Soweto but other parts of the province and country," Mazibuko said.
Speaking to the media ahead of the launch programme, Chikunga said preparations for the celebration, developing a skilled South African youth, is an important aspect of ensuring that young people feel included in the skills and economic endeavours to ensure they are well-prepared for the future.
"What we are going to be doing, from June this year to June next year, is to look at skills development for the future because some of the current skills may become redundant. We need to revitalise some of the skills so that young people with skills that are no longer in demand in terms of the market need, something can be done for those individuals . We have all these companies that are here who are displaying and exhibiting what they can do for young people," she stated.
The minister's sentiments were echoed by Morero, who stressed the importance of improving the city's economy in order to create jobs and business opportunities for young people.
"The generation of 1976 fought so that you and I can be free, so that we can celebrate free education in our lifetime, and we must ensure that education is free in the true sense of the word so that we can empower future generations and ensure that we have the necessary skills for young people to contribute to economic growth and generate economic growth for South Africa," Morero stated.
[email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
44 minutes ago
- IOL News
Operation Dudula under fire for campaign to ban foreign children from public schools in 2026
Operation Dudula vows to block undocumented foreign children from public schools, prioritising South African children first, citing constitutional resource limits. Legal foreign children will only be admitted after all locals are enrolled. Image: Tumi Pakkies/Independent Newspapers Operation Dudula's organisational leader, Zandile Dabula, has announced that the organisation will launch a campaign at the end of December 2025, continuing into the first week of January 2026, aimed at preventing foreign children, particularly those without legal documentation, from enrolling in public schools in South Africa. But Equal Education (EE) and the Equal Education Law Centre (EELC) are pushing back calling the proposed campaign a violation of South Africa's Constitution and a precedent setting High Court ruling. The issue of foreign nationals in South Africa, particularly undocumented migrants, has been contentious and ongoing, sparking public debates, protests, and policy discussions for years. Concerns over access to limited resources such as housing, healthcare, and education have fueled tensions between local communities and foreign nationals. According to Dabula, members of Operation Dudula will be stationed at schools to enforce the policy. 'No foreign child will be attending school in a public school,' she said. 'They can rather take them to private schools, we don't care, but public schools are going to be reserved for South African children only.' When asked whether the campaign targets all foreign children or only those without legal documentation, Dabula said, 'I'm talking about illegal foreigners who will definitely not be accepted, but those who claim to be legal. We have Home Affairs, bogus Home Affairs, and we've seen a lot of them. You also know about these bogus Home Affairs.' She emphasised that all foreign nationals would need to be thoroughly vetted, including the legal status of their parents. 'They must be checked, thoroughly checked, because how did they come to this country? Are their parents documented?' Speaking to IOL News, Equal Education (EE) and the Equal Education Law Centre (EELC) sharply criticised Operation Dudula's campaign as unlawful, unconstitutional, and deeply harmful to children. 'South Africa has a long history of dispossession, unequal resources for our communities, and unequal laws. Thirty years since the dawn of democracy, we remember this history because many of those living in South Africa still look forward to service delivery that gives our families access to basic resources such as health, education, and adequate housing. The poor access to these resources can mostly be attributed to poor government planning, corruption, wasteful expenditure, and poor political will.' 'Children should never be collateral damage of the failures of those in power.' EE and EELC highlighted the protections guaranteed to all children, saying: 'The Constitution of South Africa, in Section 29(1)(a) and Section 9, gives everyone an equal right to basic education and prohibits discrimination against any child in accessing this right. No child may be excluded from attending a public school, regardless of their documentation status or nationality. This was confirmed in the Department of Basic Education Circular 1 of 2020, a response to the judgment of the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court in Centre for Child Law & Others v Minister of Basic Education and Others ,which restated the obligation of Provincial Education Departments and schools to admit all learners, and undocumented learners in particular.' EE and EELC said denying any learner access to school perpetuates inequality and undermines democratic values. Denying children access to their right to education can be very traumatising. 'Any interference with the enjoyment of the right to equal education will constitute a grave constitutional violation and is condemned by Equal Education and the Equal Education Law Centre in the strongest terms. ''All learners in South Africa are entitled to an education, and we must make sure that this right is protected and upheld to build the equitable society envisioned by our democracy.' Further condemning the campaign, Section27 said: 'Operation Dudula's campaign is unlawful and unconstitutional. Children must be protected, and all state departments and individuals have a constitutional obligation to act in the best interests of children.' Section27 referenced Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (Phakamisa judgment), in which the court confirmed that all children, regardless of immigration status, are entitled to education under Section 29(1)(a) of the Constitution. 'Our courts have held that all children, despite their immigration status, are entitled to basic education,' Section27 said. 'The court in the Phakamisa judgment interrogated the constitutionality of a circular by the Eastern Cape Department of Basic Education, which provided that undocumented learners would not be enrolled at schools. The High Court found that such a circular infringed learners' rights and was not in the best interests of the child.' The South African Schools Act (SASA), as amended by the Basic Education Law Amendment Act 32 of 2024, now codifies this legal protection. Section 5(1A) of SASA mandates that undocumented learners must be allowed admission into schools and may provide an affidavit containing the learner's details. In addition, Section 3(7) of SASA outlines legal consequences for those who interfere with schooling: 'If any person unlawfully or intentionally disrupts or hinders educational activities, they are guilty of an offence and liable, on conviction, to a fine or imprisonment for up to 12 months, or both.' 'Operation Dudula's campaign to prevent undocumented learners from being enrolled at schools or entering school grounds is intentional, and the disruption of school activities is an infringement of the right to basic education in terms of Section 29(1)(a) of the Constitution and the South African Schools Act,' said Section27. [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News
IOL News
44 minutes ago
- IOL News
‘It's our death sentence': SA couple pleads to stay in Australia amid safety fears
Charné-Lee Gunning, 31, and Ivan Strauss, 37, are facing an anxious wait in Western Sydney, Australia, as their application for protection visas hangs in the balance. Image: / Screengrab Charné-Lee Gunning, 31, and Ivan Strauss, 37, are facing an anxious wait in Western Sydney, Australia, as their application for protection visas hangs in the balance. The South African couple claim they face a "death sentence" if they are forced to return to South Africa. Gunning and Strauss arrived in Australia on visitor visas in December 2018 after fleeing South Africa due to fears of racial violence. Now, seven years later, they are pleading with the federal government not to deport them, alleging that their lives would be at risk if they were to return to their home country. According to them, they would be targeted for being white. Gunning stated that returning would be "our death sentence, especially with what's going on in South Africa at the moment. It has gotten a lot worse since we left". The couple revealed they had been victims of crimes from an early age into their adulthood. They note that this contrasts with Australia, where they can drive with windows open. Gunning added: "The nightmares are still there, but I have a sense of safety here that I've never had before". Despite their protection visa application being initially denied, they have appealed and are currently awaiting a decision from the Administrative Review Tribunal. If their appeal is rejected, they would have only five weeks to leave Australia. The couple say they are willing to relocate anywhere in Australia, even to the most remote places, to remain in the country. The couple's case followed months after former US President Donald Trump fast-tracked visas for white South African farmers, claiming they were victims of "genocide". This claim was rejected by President Cyril Ramaphosa, who stated that "People who do get killed, unfortunately through criminal activity, are not only white people, majority of them are black people". This case brings Australia into the spotlight of whether the country should adopt a similar stance to the US and consider white South Africans as refugees from violence. Shadow Immigration Minister Paul Scarr has emphasised that asylum and humanitarian visa applications should be assessed equally, regardless of the applicant's origin. A spokesperson for the Department of Home Affairs declined to comment on individual cases due to privacy reasons. TikTok user Edlin (edlin1344) shared the couple's plight on the social media platform, igniting a heated debate online, drawing comments of mockery while others acknowledged the crime rate. Many comments expressed strong scepticism and denial of the couple's claims. Some also accused the couple of dishonesty, suggesting they should be upfront about simply wanting to stay in Australia for "great career opportunities" rather than "acting like you are hunted". Others speculated they might be "running away from their debts". The claim of a "death sentence" was often met with disbelief or mockery. While many disputed the extreme nature of the couple's fears, some acknowledged high crime rates in South Africa, but reminded the internet community that it as a universal issue or one disproportionately affecting poorer communities. IOL NEWS
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
South Africa braces for hefty 30% export tariff from the US
South Africa will be hit with a 30% tariff on all its exports to the United States from August 1, following a formal letter from US President Donald Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa demanding action on trade imbalances and long-standing market restrictions. Image: Lee Rondganger/IOL South Africans are bracing themselves for the ramifications of the hefty 30% export tariff to the US that is expected to come into effect on Friday. South Africa exports billions of rands' worth of goods to the US each year, including fruit, vegetables, meat, and wine. These sectors employ thousands of workers, and the 30% tariff will render their products uncompetitive in the American market, placing immense pressure on producers and exporters. South Africa has been trying to negotiate a trade deal with the US since May but is yet to agree on terms. The US tariffs are a stress test for South Africa's economic resiliency. Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) said it remains committed to the cause and awaits substantive feedback from the US on the final status of the country's framework deal. The department said it has been in a period of intense negotiations with the US and had signed a condition precedent document and 'have readied our inputs for entry into the template which is to follow from the US'. 'Despite the challenges that have been presented by this period, we have put our best foot forward, bringing together the subject specialists within our ranks that have dug deep to ensure that our country is adequately prepared for a number of potential scenarios,' DTIC said. According to estimates, the tariffs will add roughly $3.5 billion (R63bn) to the cost of exports to the US, based on South Africa's 2023 export value. The DTIC's proposed deal features a number of areas, including importing 750-100 petajoules of Liquified Natural Gas for a 10 year period, unlocking $12 billion; and enabling agricultural market access by simplifying US poultry exports under the 2016 tariff rate quota and unlocking approximately $91m million in trade. South African firms committed to invest $3.3bn in US industries such as mining and metals recycling, while both governments agreed to pursue joint investment in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals and agri-machinery. Thys van Zyl, CEO of Everest Wealth Advisory, said South Africa was facing severe economic consequences without any formal agreement in place with its second-largest bilateral trading partner. 'It is almost unthinkable that, on the eve of such far-reaching tariffs, we still do not have a formal agreement – or even a timeline for when one can be expected. This is not only deeply concerning – it is negligent,' Van Zyl said. Despite discussions between the relevant stakeholders, there are no confirmed exemptions, no concessions, and no sign of progress in negotiations with the US government. The government has denied claims of a trade imbalance between South Africa and the US, maintaining that the 30% reciprocal tariff was not an accurate representation of available trade data. Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau, this week said they were working with other government departments on a response plan that also focuses on demand side interventions in the impacted industries. Meanwhile, Foord Asset Management portfolio manager Farzana Bayat said a 30% tariff wall on South African exports to the US would be catastrophic and escalate trade risk. 'That would be a seismic shock. Even traditional US allies like the EU and Japan have negotiated reduced 15% tariffs - South Africa may not be so lucky,' Bayat said. She said the stakes were high as the expiry of the African Growth and Opportunity Act in 2025 was already clouding the medium-term trade outlook. Bayat said the immediate risk was acute as the South African Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago recently warned that up to 100 000 jobs were at risk, and the automotive and citrus industries were especially exposed. Car exports to the US have already collapsed by more than 80% due to earlier tariff pressures. 'This economic stress comes at a time when South Africa is already contending with low growth, power insecurity, and shaky investor confidence,' Bayat said. 'Losing preferential access to the US - our third-largest trading partner - could be devastating.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
