Killer whales use seaweed as tools to groom each other
A baby orca named L125, swims with its mother, L86, in this undated handout photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO, Dave Ellifrit, Center for Whale Research
Killer whales are known for exceptional intelligence, displaying complex social structures and sophisticated communication.
New research provides fresh evidence for this, documenting how these marine mammals use stalks of seaweed as tools to groom each other - as in, 'You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours.'
Using drones to observe a population of killer whales in the Salish Sea, part of the Pacific Ocean between Washington state and British Columbia, researchers noticed that these predators engaged in a behaviour they named 'allokelping,' one of the few known examples of tool use by marine mammals.
The killer whales find large stalks of a type of seaweed called bull kelp, either attached to the seabed or floating at the surface. They then bite off the end of the stalk, position it between themselves and another killer whale and roll the kelp between their bodies.
The researchers hypothesize that the behavior promotes skin health while strengthening social bonds. Other populations of killer whales have been observed rubbing their bodies on smooth stone beaches, possibly to remove dead skin.
'Most examples of tool use in animals involve solving ecological problems, such as gaining access to food. For example, chimpanzees use sticks to fish for termites. What's remarkable about this discovery is that the tool - the kelp - is used not to obtain food but to facilitate social interaction,' said marine biologist Darren Croft of the University of Exeter in England, co-author of the study published this week in the journal Current Biology.
'This kind of socially motivated tool use is extremely rare in non-human animals and has previously only been observed in a small number of primates, usually in captivity,' added Croft, executive director of the Center for Whale Research, a scientific organization based in Washington state that has studied this population of killer whales since the 1970s.
The researchers documented the behavior among both male and female killer whales of all ages. It likely plays an important role in their social lives, Croft said.
There are some other examples of tool use among marine mammals. Sea otters use rocks and other hard objects to crack open shells to get at the meat inside. And certain dolphins use marine sponges to protect their snouts and stir up the seabed while foraging. The researchers said the behaviour by the killer whales goes one step further because they modify an object for use as a tool.
'While this is not the first documented case of cetacean or marine mammal tool use, it is - as far as we know - the first case of cetacean tool manufacturing with tool use. The whales are not just finding perfect lengths of kelp in the environment, but rather actively modifying larger intact stalks of kelp to create the pieces they are using for allokelping,' said study co-author Rachel John, a University of Exeter graduate student studying killer whale behaviour.
'Another key part of what makes this behaviour so unique is the fact that they are manipulating the kelp cooperatively with a partner without the use of hands or any hand-like appendages. They use their mouth to position the kelp initially, but after that they only use the momentum and pressure of the core of their bodies to maintain contact with each other and the kelp between them,' John added.
The behaviour is known only among this killer whale population.
'We found that individuals with more visible peeling skin were more likely to engage in allokelping, suggesting that the behavior may serve a skin-care function. Brown seaweeds like kelp are known to have antibacterial properties, so it's plausible that rubbing with kelp helps improve skin health,' Croft said.
'Second, we think this behavior likely plays a role in maintaining social bonds. Physical contact is known to be important for social cohesion in many species, including humans. Just as we might hug a friend we haven't seen in a while, it's possible that allokelping serves to reinforce social relationships among whales,' Croft added.
This kelp grows in cold and nutrient-rich coastal and intertidal waters and thrives off the western coast of North America, which includes the home range of these killer whales.
This population is at grave risk of extinction, Croft said, with only 73 individuals counted in the latest census. They are highly specialized salmon hunters, particularly reliant on Chinook salmon. As salmon populations have declined, in part due to dam-building on spawning rivers, the whales have struggled to find enough food.
'In short, they are starving,' Croft said.
By Will Dunham
(Reporting by Will Dunham in Washington, Editing by Rosalba O'Brien)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
21 hours ago
- CBC
A shot at $1,000 or a guaranteed 10 cents? UBC study suggests choice could up recycling rates
Social Sharing A study from the University of B.C.'s department of psychology says recycling rates in B.C. and Alberta could be enhanced if people returning containers were able to choose between reclaiming the 10-cent deposit or, instead, having a small chance at winning $1,000. "Often when we're looking at such a small reward like 10 cents, people don't really care about it too much and we'd rather go for that larger chance at a larger reward," said Jade Radke, a UBC PhD student and the lead author on the study. "We have more excitement with those things, higher hope. It's kind of just like playing the lottery. You kind of do it for fun a little bit as well." The research paper, Probabilistic refunds increase beverage container recycling behaviour in British Columbia and Alberta, was published in the latest version of Waste Management and co-authored by UBC's Jiaying Zhou, who is well known for her studies on behaviour and waste reduction. The findings come as waste continues to choke landfills or end up as litter despite sophisticated recycling programs in places like Canada. Information from the World Economic Forum and the International Aluminum Institute says around two trillion beverage containers are produced globally every year, but only 34 per cent of glass bottles, 40 per cent of plastic bottles and 70 per cent of aluminum cans are recycled. UBC's Radke and Zhou, along with student Stella Argentopoulos and professor Elizabeth Dunn, devised experiments in food courts and at a food festival in Alberta where they encouraged people with beverage containers to return them and make a choice between a 100 per cent chance of getting $0.10, a 10 per cent chance of getting $1, a one per cent chance of getting $10, a 0.1 per cent chance of getting $100, or a 0.01 per cent chance of getting $1,000. More than a quarter of respondents in one part of the study chose the $1,000 gamble — the most selected choice out of the options — and reported higher anticipatory happiness. WATCH | How betting on $1,000 could increase recycling rates: Would you prefer a chance to win $1,000 if you recycle, or guaranteed 10 cents? 8 hours ago Duration 2:34 Ten cents a container. That's the deposit you get back if you return a beverage can or bottle to a depot in B.C. But would you instead choose a small chance to win $1,000 over the guaranteed money? As Chad Pawson reports, a new paper out of the University of B.C.'s psychology department says adding a lottery system choice to container returns could increase happiness and recycling rates. Generally, their study found that, "a probabilistic refund is preferred over the certain refund with the same expected payoff, is associated with an immediate boost in anticipatory happiness, and can increase recycling behaviour." The recycling lottery choice is something that's been in place in Norway since 1997. Combined with strong environmental values and the convenient locations of recycling machines in the country, the lottery choice is contributing to Norway's total beverage container recycling rate of 96.7 per cent, the UBC study authors said. In B.C. and Alberta, the same rates are 79.6 per cent and 84.9 per cent, respectively, according to the UBC study, making them leaders within Canada. The study's authors are working with provincial return-it systems to study the lottery option more and determine if it could be implemented to get recycling rates on par with Norway's. "Adding a probabilistic refund option might be able to close the gap," said Radke. Would 'binners' gamble? Something the study didn't consider is what impact a lottery option would have on individuals who return beverage containers for income — people known in Vancouver as binners. The paper's authors said they plan to include them in future work. Jutta Gutberlet with the University of Victoria's Community-based Research Laboratory has studied binners for 20 years, though, and said their activities are a low-barrier way to earn wages. "The first motivation is economic," she said, adding that it's unclear if they would select a lottery option on their high-volume of returns over the guaranteed 10 cents per item. Gutberlet said her research has generally found that binners would prefer a higher deposit, such as 25 cents, to make the containers more valuable and reflect, "the work and also the environmental contribution of returning these materials into the circular economy."
CTV News
a day ago
- CTV News
BC Cancer rolls out state-of-the-art scanner
Vancouver Watch BC Cancer has rolled out a new diagnostic tool that it says is the fastest and most advanced of its kind in Canada.
CBC
2 days ago
- CBC
New paper continues debate over link between lice from salmon farms and B.C. wild salmon
A new paper on sea lice from fish farms and wild salmon in B.C. shows a significant relationship between the two and critics say that contradicts a report from the federal government, which regulates the fish farms. Bob Chamberlin, elected chief of Kwikwasut'inuxw Haxwa'mis First Nation in B.C. and chair of the First Nation Wild Salmon Alliance, a political advocacy group on wild salmon protection, said the paper shows industry has too much influence on science advice at Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). "It shows that the initial work by the Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat hadn't a foundation in terms of objectivity, or free of conflict of interest, and I don't think that the DFO has a leg to stand on," said Chamberlin. The new paper, published in Aquaculture Environment Interactions on June 5 and co-authored by the same scientists as the DFO report, shows a significant relationship between sea lice infestations at fish farms and sea lice on wild salmon through a method of statistical modelling. In January 2023, a report by DFO concluded there was no statistically significant association between parasitic sea lice on salmon farms and sea lice on wild salmon. Jaewoon Jeong, a research scientist with Ohio State University, contributed both to the DFO report and was the head author on the paper published June 5. He said the report and the paper are not the opposite of one another. He said the interest on the relationship between infestations at fish farms and on wild salmon is more about "the level" rather than a "yes or no." "This paper in a peer-reviewed journal is supposed to be more scientific, so I explored more statistical analysis between the sea-lice abundance on salmon farms and sea-lice infection on wild salmon," said Jeong. The paper used the same data as the DFO report, he said, plus two additional years of recent data and considers other environmental factors in a deeper way. "The relation between the salmon lice from salmon farms and infestation on juvenile wild salmon quite varies, depending on the regions and times, so it cannot be generalized," Jeong said. Scientists critical of DFO report The 2023 DFO report was criticized in a letter to the minister signed by 16 professors and research scientists from Canadian and American universities. Sean Godwin, an assistant professor at University of California, Davis, in the department of environmental science, said the 2023 report underscored already present criticisms of the integrity of DFO's "dual mandate" to safeguard both wild salmon and the farmed salmon industry. "The processes that DFO used to produce that science advice are not up to the standard of the rest of the world. They're not transparent, they're not evidence based, they're not impartial, and they're not independently reviewed," said Godwin. DFO did not respond to a request for comment before time of publishing. Open net-pen salmon aquaculture in B.C. waters will be banned by 2029, the federal government announced last year. Wild salmon stocks are in decline across B.C. and Yukon and face significant compounding challenges that include aquaculture, climate change and industrial development, according to a 2024 report by the Pacific Salmon Foundation, a non-profit environmental organization. Causation not proven The B.C. Salmon Farmers Association said the paper is not proof salmon farms cause sea lice on wild salmon, and that there is no scientific evidence showing that. "Although this research concluded a positive trend, it does not conclude that it is causational," a spokesperson wrote in a statement. The B.C. Salmon Farmers Association has said its analysis shows the province could lose up to $1.17 billion in economic activity annually and 4,560 full-time jobs if open-net salmon farming is no longer allowed. Isaiah Robinson, deputy chief councillor of Kitasoo Xai'xais Nation and a spokesperson for the Coalition of First Nations for Finfish Stewardship (comprising 17 First Nations that have agreements with finfish aquaculture companies), said he hopes Prime Minister Mark Carney's government changes that decision. The First Nation holds six salmon farm tenures leased and operated by Mowi Canada West, one of Canada's Norwegian-based salmon producers, Robinson said. "People understand there needs to be an economy… There needs to be bread in every household," he said. Debate on inherent rights Robinson said like other industries, aquaculture is a matter of rights and title and economic sovereignty for First Nations. "There's tons of these First Nations that are saying that we shouldn't be doing our own fish farms that are supporting oil and gas," said Robinson. "I think there's bigger discussions we should be having on how we can help rejuvenate the wild stock rather than looking for a smoking gun." Chamberlin said "economic reconciliation lies downstream of accommodation of Aboriginal rights." "If the salmon that were being affected only stayed in the territories where the fish farms are operating, then by all means, they can make any decision that they wish," said Chamberlin. "But the fact is, 90 per cent of the Fraser River salmon migrate up the Johnstone Strait past the fish farms that are on the east coast of Vancouver Island, and that represents an infringement of rights across British Columbia. "We need to look after salmon, or we're going to lose the strength of genetic diversity from across the province."
