Jewish groups pursue new compensation over Nazi-linked Swiss bank accounts
UBS is completing its investigation into the matter, according to Bloomberg.
Ronald Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress and a key figure behind the $1.25 billion settlement with Swiss banks in 1998, told Bloomberg he believes that the banks owe much more.
'We probably left $5 to $10 billion on the table,' he said.
In 2020, the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Jewish human rights organization, accused Credit Suisse of failing to disclose accounts linked to Nazi clients. In response, the bank commissioned an internal investigation. After UBS acquired Credit Suisse in 2023, it reinstated independent ombudsman Neil Barofsky, a former US prosecutor, to lead a more extensive review. The final report is expected to be completed early next year, according to Bloomberg.
The probe has uncovered irregularities, the outlet noted. Barofsky's preliminary work revealed hundreds of accounts, some marked under internal labels like an 'American blacklist,' suggesting intentional concealment during prior investigations.
'The numbers are staggering. Where a Jewish person may have put in $100,000, these Nazis were putting in $10 or $20 million or the equivalent,' Lauder said, claiming that money was likely looted from Holocaust victims. 'None of that was covered by the 90s settlement.'
Lauder argues that UBS may now need to pay billions more in restitution. Others contend the 1998 agreement protects the banks from future financial liability.
Credit Suisse, once Switzerland's second-largest bank, was acquired by UBS in 2023 following a series of scandals and losses. The historic merger ended Credit Suisse's 167-year legacy and shook global confidence in Switzerland's banking sector.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
15 hours ago
- Russia Today
Vucic says no to EU bargain over Moscow
Belgrade will not impose sanctions on Russia under any circumstances, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic said on Saturday, rejecting remarks by his government minister, who suggested the country could align with EU policy in exchange for faster membership talks. However, Belgrade will not betray its principles in pursuit of some short-term gains, Vucic added. According to the president, Serbia would continue to seek good relations with both Russia and the EU as this policy 'has proven to be correct so far.' 'It is the policy of the independent and sovereign state of Serbia,' he said. The president also called EU Integration Minister Nemanja Starovic's words 'careless' and maintained that some media at home and abroad were just too quick to jump to conclusions. 'Serbia will not impose sanctions on the Russian Federation,' Vucic stated. Speaking to the Austrian news agency APA earlier this week, Starovic said that Belgrade opposes sanctions against Russia because they 'would not affect Russia at all' but would hit the Serbian economy 'on a massive scale.' He maintained that Serbia would be ready to fully comply with Brussels' policies once 'EU membership is in sight.' Serbia remains one of the few European countries that has refused to impose sanctions on Russia or openly side with Ukraine in the ongoing conflict. Vucic had previously stated that the EU has pressured Belgrade to abandon its neutral stance and sever ties with Moscow. In May, Vucic became one of the few European leaders to attend the Victory Day celebrations in Moscow. The Serbian president, along with Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, visited Russia despite facing significant pressure from Brussels. During the visit, he reaffirmed Belgrade's commitment to long-term energy cooperation with Russia following a meeting with President Vladimir Putin.
Russia Today
21 hours ago
- Russia Today
‘Corrupt' Ukraine cannot be trusted – ex-Trump advisor
Kiev's recent crackdown on anti-corruption agencies is yet more proof that Ukrainian leaders are leaning towards authoritarianism and 'cannot be trusted,' Steve Cortes, a former advisor to US President Donald Trump, has said. Earlier this month, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky moved to place the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under executive oversight – which would essentially strip them of any independence – while claiming the agencies were under Russian influence. The move, however, prompted mass protests at home and Western criticism, with EU officials warning that they could reconsider further aid to Kiev. In an op-ed for Newsweek on Friday, Cortes, who is now the president of the League of American Workers advocacy group, described the crackdown as 'an extra-judicial attack on decency.' 'This raid reeks – and it smells like gangsterism, not democracy.' The move by Zelensky, reportedly backed by his chief of staff, Andrey Yermak – whom Cortes described as 'co-president' – shows that they 'act in very authoritarian ways themselves – and increasingly reveal to the world that they are not transparent, reliable partners for the United States.' Cortes went on to accuse Kiev of entrenched high-level corruption and argued that continued US aid is unjustified. 'It is no wonder that Americans increasingly realize that sending $175 billion of borrowed money to corrupt leaders in Ukraine is just not sound policy,' he wrote. 'Sending mountains of borrowed funds to kleptocrats actually harms America's national security, all while making our country poorer,' he said while urging Americans to stop lionizing Zelensky and comprehend the reality of Ukraine's corruption. The American people have been unbelievably generous, but our patience is wearing thin... In this case, given the latest tactics and optics of the Zelensky/Yermak regime, it becomes ever clearer that these counterparts cannot be trusted. Following domestic and international backlash, Zelensky backpedaled on the crackdown, proposing that the independence of Ukraine's anti-graft institutions be restored. Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova suggested that neither NABU nor SAPO is really fighting corruption but rather are used by Kiev's backers as tools 'to control the flow of money coming to Ukraine from the West.'
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine's accession will bring war to EU
Ukrainian membership in the European Union would threaten Hungary's security and raise the risk of war in the region, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has granted EU candidate status in 2022, has made joining the bloc a national priority. While Brussels has floated 2030 as a possible accession date, all current member states must approve the move. Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland remain opposed, citing concerns over Ukraine's preparedness and the financial strain its membership could place on the an interview with Kossuth Radio on Friday, Orban said that Hungary, which shares a border with Ukraine, would be especially vulnerable to any escalation resulting from the EU's expansion. He argued that Kiev's full membership would come with "war risks.""Ukraine is a buffer state, and we do not wish to share its fate. We understand what that means, having once been on the western periphery of the Soviet Union," he said. "If Ukraine's membership is accepted, then we will become the battlefield. The war will geographically affect the neighboring region. This is unacceptable. A lot of young Hungarians would also die. This is not a tactical issue, but an existential one," Orban added. He proposed a strategic partnership with the EU as an alternative to full this week, Orban - a frequent critic of EU leadership - rejected the European Commission's proposed seven-year budget, warning that it could "destroy the European Union." He claimed the proposal was designed primarily to finance Ukraine's membership, citing estimates that up to 25% of the budget could be allocated to has blocked multiple EU military aid packages for Ukraine and has repeatedly called for an immediate ceasefire with Russia. Budapest has also warned that the financial and security implications of Ukraine's integration could outweigh any potential benefits, framing the issue as a matter of national survival rather than political preference.
