Crypto Asset Management Market Trends and Investment Opportunities 2025-2030 - Growth in DeFi and Tokenization Drives Demand for Crypto Asset Management Tools in Decentralized Markets
Key opportunities lie in technological advancements like AI, heightened institutional interest, evolving regulations, and emerging crypto financial products
Crypto Asset Management Market
Dublin, June 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Crypto Asset Management - Global Strategic Business Report" has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.The global market for Crypto Asset Management was valued at US$2 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach US$2.5 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 4% from 2024 to 2030. This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of market trends, drivers, and forecasts, helping you make informed business decisions. The report includes the most recent global tariff developments and how they impact the Crypto Asset Management market.
The growth in the crypto asset management market is driven by the rising adoption of digital assets, advancements in secure technology, regulatory developments, and an expanding ecosystem of financial products. As more individuals and institutions invest in cryptocurrencies and other digital assets, the need for specialized management solutions is increasing to help investors navigate the complexities of this market. Regulatory developments are also accelerating market growth, as governments and regulatory bodies establish frameworks for digital asset management, creating a more structured environment that appeals to institutional investors.Technological advancements, particularly in blockchain, AI, and secure wallet technology, have further fueled the adoption of crypto asset management solutions. These technologies enhance security, streamline portfolio management, and provide insights for better decision-making, which is essential in a high-risk market like crypto. Additionally, the diversification of digital financial products, such as DeFi, NFTs, and cryptocurrency-based exchange-traded funds (ETFs), has expanded the range of assets that require specialized management. Together, these factors contribute to the strong growth of the crypto asset management market, reflecting the broader trend of digital assets becoming a mainstream component of investment portfolios.
Key Insights:
Market Growth: Understand the significant growth trajectory of the Android segment, which is expected to reach US$2 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of a 6.6%. The iOS segment is set to decrease at -2.4% CAGR over the analysis period.
Regional Analysis: Gain insights into the U.S. market, valued at $518.8 Million in 2024, and China, forecasted to grow at an impressive 11.1% CAGR to reach $742.1 Million by 2030. Discover growth trends in other key regions, including Japan, Canada, Germany, and the Asia-Pacific.
Key Questions Answered:
How is the Global Crypto Asset Management Market expected to evolve by 2030?
What are the main drivers and restraints affecting the market?
Which market segments will grow the most over the forecast period?
How will market shares for different regions and segments change by 2030?
Who are the leading players in the market, and what are their prospects?
Report Features:
Comprehensive Market Data: Independent analysis of annual sales and market forecasts in US$ Million from 2024 to 2030.
In-Depth Regional Analysis: Detailed insights into key markets, including the U.S., China, Japan, Canada, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East, and Africa.
Company Profiles: Coverage of players such as Altpocket, Amberdata, Anchorage, Bakkt, Binance and more.
Complimentary Updates: Receive free report updates for one year to keep you informed of the latest market developments.
Some of the 33 companies featured in this Crypto Asset Management market report include:
Altpocket
Amberdata
Anchorage
Bakkt
Binance
Bitgo
Blox
Coinbase
Coinstats
Cointracker
The report analyzes the Crypto Asset Management market in terms of units by the following Segments, and Geographic Regions/Countries:
Segments: Mobile Operating System (Android, iOS); Application (Mobile, Web-based); End-Use (Enterprise, Individual)
Geographic Regions/Countries: World; United States; Canada; Japan; China; Europe (France; Germany; Italy; United Kingdom; Spain; Russia; and Rest of Europe); Asia-Pacific (Australia; India; South Korea; and Rest of Asia-Pacific); Latin America (Argentina; Brazil; Mexico; and Rest of Latin America); Middle East (Iran; Israel; Saudi Arabia; United Arab Emirates; and Rest of Middle East); and Africa.
This edition integrates the latest global trade and economic shifts as of June 2025 into comprehensive market analysis. Key updates include:
Tariff and Trade Impact: Insights into global tariff negotiations across 180+ countries, with analysis of supply chain turbulence, sourcing disruptions, and geographic realignment. Special focus on 2025 as a pivotal year for trade tensions, including updated perspectives on the Trump-era tariffs.
Adjusted Forecasts and Analytics: Revised global and regional market forecasts through 2030, incorporating tariff effects, economic uncertainty, and structural changes in globalization. Includes historical analysis since 2015.
Strategic Market Dynamics: Evaluation of revised market prospects, regional outlooks, and key economic indicators such as population and urbanization trends.
Innovation & Technology Trends: Latest developments in product and process innovation, emerging technologies, and key industry drivers shaping the competitive landscape.
Competitive Intelligence: Updated global market share estimates for 2025, competitive positioning of major players (Strong/Active/Niche/Trivial), and refined focus on leading global brands and core players.
Expert Insight & Commentary: Strategic analysis from economists, trade experts, and domain specialists to contextualize market shifts and identify emerging opportunities.
Complimentary Update: Buyers receive a free July 2025 update with finalized tariff impacts, new trade agreement effects, revised projections, and expanded country-level coverage.
Key Attributes
Report Attribute
Details
No. of Pages
89
Forecast Period
2024-2030
Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2024
$2 Billion
Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2030
$2.5 Billion
Compound Annual Growth Rate
4%
Regions Covered
Global
MARKET OVERVIEW
Influencer Market Insights
Tariff Impact on Global Supply Chain Patterns
Global Economic Update
Crypto Asset Management - Global Key Competitors Percentage Market Share in 2025 (E)
Competitive Market Presence - Strong/Active/Niche/Trivial for Players Worldwide in 2025 (E)
MARKET TRENDS & DRIVERS
Rising Adoption of Cryptocurrency Investments by Retail and Institutional Investors Drives Growth in Crypto Asset Management Solutions
Expansion of Blockchain Technology in Financial Services Propels Need for Secure and Scalable Crypto Asset Management Tools
Demand for Diversified Portfolios with Digital and Traditional Assets Expands Market for Hybrid Asset Management Solutions
Growth in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and Tokenization Drives Demand for Crypto Asset Management Tools in Decentralized Markets
Advances in AI and Machine Learning Enhance Risk Management and Predictive Analytics Capabilities in Crypto Asset Management
Rising Need for Secure Custody Solutions for Digital Assets Strengthens Market for Custodial Crypto Asset Management Services
Increased Adoption of Digital Wallets by Institutional Investors Spurs Demand for Integrated Asset Management Platforms
Expansion of Trading and Exchange Platforms with API Integration Supports Demand for Comprehensive Crypto Asset Management
Growing Popularity of Staking, Yield Farming, and Earning Platforms Propels Demand for Crypto Management with Yield Tracking
Demand for Real-Time Market Analytics and Price Tracking Tools Boosts Adoption of Crypto Asset Management Solutions
Increasing Focus on Tax Compliance and Reporting for Digital Assets Expands Demand for Crypto Management Solutions
Rising Interest in Tokenized Real Estate and Commodities Enhances Need for Crypto Asset Management in Diversified Portfolios
For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/6xd7tp
About ResearchAndMarkets.comResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.
Attachment
Crypto Asset Management Market
CONTACT: CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.com Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@researchandmarkets.com For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WIRED
36 minutes ago
- WIRED
No One Is in Charge at the US Copyright Office
Jun 27, 2025 10:20 AM During a wild time for copyright law, the US Copyright Office has no one at the helm—and no one knows when that will change. A sign is displayed at the entrance to the U.S. Copyright Office on June 13, 2025, in Washington, DC. Photograph:It's a tumultuous time for copyright in the United States, with dozens of potentially economy-shaking AI copyright lawsuits winding through the courts. It's also the most turbulent moment in the US Copyright Office's history. Described as 'sleepy' in the past, the Copyright Office has taken on new prominence during the AI boom, issuing key rulings about AI and copyright. It also hasn't had a leader in more than a month. In May, Copyright Register Shira Perlmutter was abruptly fired by email by the White House's deputy director of personnel. Perlmutter is now suing the Trump Administration, alleging that her firing was invalid; the government maintains that the executive branch has the authority to dismiss her. As the legality of the ouster is debated, the reality within the office is this: There's effectively nobody in charge. And without a leader actually showing up at work, the Copyright Office is not totally business-as-usual; in fact, there's debate over whether the copyright certificates it's issuing could be challenged. The firing followed a pattern. The USCO is part of the Library of Congress; Perlmutter had been appointed to her role by Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden. A few days before Perlmutter's dismissal, Hayden, who had been in her role since 2016, was also fired by the White House via email. The White House appointed Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who had previously served as President Trump's defense attorney, as the new acting Librarian of Congress. Two days after Pelmutter's firing, Justice Department official Paul Perkins showed up at the Copyright Office, along with his colleague Brian Nieves. According to an affidavit from Perlmutter, they were carrying "printed versions of emails" from Blanche indicating that they had been appointed to new roles within the Copyright Office. Perkins, the email said, was designated as Acting Register of Copyrights. In other words, he was Perlmutter's replacement. But was Blanche actually the acting Librarian, and thus able to appoint Perkins as such? Within the Library of Congress, someone else had already assumed the role—Robert Newlen, Hayden's former second-in-command, who has worked at the LOC since the 1970s. Following Hayden's ouster, Newlen emailed LOC staff asserting that he was the acting Librarian—never mentioning Blanche—and noting that 'Congress is engaged with the White House' on how to proceed. In her lawsuit, Perlmutter argues that only the Librarian of Congress can fire and appoint a new Register. In a filing on Tuesday, defendants argued that the president does indeed have the authority to fire and appoint the Librarian of Congress, and that his appointees then have the ability to choose a new Copyright Register. Neither the Department of Justice nor the White House responded to requests for comment on this issue; the Library of Congress declined to comment. Perkins and Nieves did not enter the USCO office or assume the roles they purported to fill the day they showed up. And since they left, sources within the Library of Congress tell WIRED, they have never returned, nor have they assumed any of the duties associated with the roles. These sources say that Congress is in talks with the White House to reach an agreement over these personnel disputes. A congressional aide familiar with the situation told WIRED that Blanche, Perkins, Nieves had not shown up for work 'because they don't have jobs to show up to.' The aide continued: 'As we've always maintained, the President has no authority to appoint them. Robert Newlen has always been the Acting Librarian of Congress.' If talks are happening, they remain out of public view. But Perlmutter does have some members of Congress openly on her side. 'The President has no authority to remove the Register of Copyrights. That power lies solely with the Librarian of Congress. I'm relieved that the situation at the Library and Copyright Office has stabilized following the administration's unconstitutional attempt to seize control for the executive branch. I look forward to quickly resolving this matter in a bipartisan way,' Senator Alex Padilla tells WIRED in a statement. In the meantime, the Copyright Office is in the odd position of attempting to carry on as though it wasn't missing its head. Immediately after Perlmutter's dismissal, the Copyright Office paused issuing registration certificates 'out of an abundance of caution,' according to USCO spokesperson Lisa Berardi Marflak, who says the pause impacted around 20,000 registrations. It resumed activities on May 29th, but it is now sending out registration certificates with a blank spot where Perlmutter's signature would ordinarily be. This unusual change has prompted discussion amongst copyright experts as to whether the registrations are now more vulnerable to legal challenges. The Copyright Office maintains that they are valid: 'There is no requirement that the Register's signature must appear on registration certificates,' says Berardi Marflak. In a motion related to Perlmutter's lawsuit, though, she alleges that sending out the registrations without a signature opens them up to 'challenges in litigation,' something outside copyright experts have also pointed out. 'It's true the law doesn't explicitly require a signature,' IP lawyer Rachael Dickson says. 'However, the law really explicitly says that it's the Register of Copyright determining whether the material submitted for the application is copyrightable subject matter.' Without anyone acting as Register, Dickson thinks it would be reasonable to argue that the statutory requirements are not being met. 'If you take them completely out of the equation, you have a really big problem,' she says. 'Litigators who are trying to challenge a copyright registration's validity will jump on this.' Perlmutter's lawyers have argued that leaving the Copyright Office without an active boss will cause dysfunction beyond the registration certificate issue, as the Register performs a variety of tasks, from advising Congress on copyright to recertifying organizations like the Mechanical Licensing Collective, the nonprofit in charge of administering royalties for streaming and download music in the United States. Since the MLC's certification is up right now, Perlmutter would ordinarily be moving forward with recertifying the organization; as her lawsuit notes, right now, the recertification process is not moving forward. The MLC may not be as impacted by Perlmutter's absence as the complaint suggests. A source close to the MLC told WIRED that the organization does indeed need to be recertified, but that the law doesn't require the recertification process to be completed within a specific time frame, so it will be able to continue operating as usual. Still, there are other ways that the lack of a boss is a clear liability. The Copyright Claims Board, a three-person tribunal that resolves some copyright disputes, needs to replace one of its members this year, as a current board member, who did not reply to a request for comment, is leaving. The job posting is already live and says applications are being reviewed, but as the position is supposed to be appointed by the Librarian of Congress with the guidance of the Copyright Register, it's unclear how exactly it will be filled. A source familiar at the Library of Congress tells WIRED that Newlen could make the appointment if necessary, but 'we expect there to be some kind of greater resolution by then.' As they wait for the resolution, it remains an especially inopportune time for a headless Copyright Office. Perlmutter was fired just days after the office released a hotly-contested report on generative AI training and fair use. That report has already been heavily cited in a new class action lawsuit against AI tools Suno and Udio, even though it was technically a 'pre-publication' version and not finalized. But everyone looking to see what a final report will say—or what guidance the office will issue next—can only keep waiting.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Got $5,000? These 3 Artificial Intelligence Stocks Are Absurdly Cheap Right Now.
The stocks listed here have all benefited from opportunities related to artificial intelligence. There is still much more room for these businesses to rise in value due to growth in the tech sector. Moreover, these stocks all trade at low earnings multiples and look incredibly cheap now. 10 stocks we like better than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing › If you have $5,000 to invest in the market, one way to make the most of that money is to invest in stocks that have a lot of room for long-term growth, such as those involved in artificial intelligence (AI). Another way you can expand the potential of your investment is to focus on stocks that are also trading at cheap valuations, since they may be undervalued and possess even greater potential to generate significant returns. Three stocks that check off both boxes are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM), Alibaba Group Holding (NYSE: BABA), and Dell Technologies (NYSE: DELL). With their modest valuations and plenty of exposure to AI, these can be excellent stocks to buy with $5,000 today. A big player in the chipmaking world is Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, or TSMC. The company is responsible for making the vast majority of the advanced chips in the world, supplying 90% of them. These include AI chips. And this leadership position makes it a crucial company for AI's present and future growth. Through the first three months of this year, sales totaled $25.5 billion, up 35% year over year. It generates high profit margins of around 40% as low-cost production in Taiwan gives it an advantage over chipmakers in North America. And the expertise it has developed over the years and economies of scale make its operations highly efficient. TSMC is an integral player in the AI world, and it would be hard to replace its production. As AI spreads, the company is likely to experience a significant uptick in demand. The stock currently trades at less than 23 times its future earnings (based on analyst estimates), which is an absurdly cheap valuation given that's roughly about the same multiple of the average S&P 500 stock. But TSMC is not an average stock, and it arguably deserves much more of a premium given its huge growth potential due to AI. Given the possible upside, this can be a great place to invest $5,000. China-based Alibaba Group is another tech company in the same part of the world that can make for a compelling AI investment. It has a broad business in China that encompasses cloud computing, e-commerce, digital media, and entertainment. Revenue for the first three months of 2025 rose by 7% to $32.6 billion. That growth rate may look unimpressive, but certain segments are growing much faster than others. Its cloud computing business, for example, rose by 18%. And its international digital commerce expanded by 22%. The company says AI has accelerated its growth, and for a seventh straight quarter, revenue related to the technology grew by triple digits. It was reported earlier this year that Alibaba had partnered with Apple to help the iPhone maker develop AI features. The stock is even cheaper than TSMC's shares, at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of less than 12. Although it's up more than 30% this year, there is still plenty of room for the stock to move even higher. Alibaba has a diverse business, and with AI injecting more growth into its operations, this can be an underrated stock to invest $5,000 into right now. Rounding out this list of underrated AI stocks is Dell Technologies. The company is known for making personal computers, but its business has been experiencing a lot of growth due to high demand for its AI-optimized servers. In its most recent quarter, ended May 2, revenue totaled $23.4 billion, up by a modest 5% year over year. But in its servers and networking business, the increase was much higher at 16% and totaled $6.3 billion. For the current year, the company is projecting AI system sales of about $15 billion. One area to watch is on the consumer side, however. That business experienced an 19% drop in revenue during the quarter but that may present an attractive growth opportunity since AI-powered PCs are in their early innings and may be in hot demand later on. Unfortunately, due to a challenging economy, consumers aren't eager to upgrade to an expensive computer, even if it has cutting-edge technologies. But that could change. Dell can benefit from AI-powered growth in multiple segments of its business, which makes it a compelling place to invest $5,000 and just sit and wait. The stock trades at a forward P/E of less than 13, making this another absurdly cheap growth stock to add to your portfolio for the long haul. Before you buy stock in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $687,731!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $945,846!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 818% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends Alibaba Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Got $5,000? These 3 Artificial Intelligence Stocks Are Absurdly Cheap Right Now. was originally published by The Motley Fool
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Denmark plans to thwart deepfakers by giving everyone copyright over their own features
The Danish government is planning to tackle the issue of AI-generated deepfakes by granting citizens property rights over their likeness and voice. The proposed legislation would mean that people who find that their features have been used to create a deepfake would have the right to ask the platforms that host the content to take it down, Danish Culture Minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt told CNN on Friday. Engel-Schmidt believes that 'technology has outpaced legislation' and the proposed law would help to protect artists, public figures and ordinary people from digital identity theft, which he said is now possible with just a few clicks thanks to the power of generative AI. 'I think we should not accept a situation where human beings can be run through, if you would have it, a digital copy machine and misused for all sorts of purposes,' he said. He cited the example of musical artists who have discovered songs online purporting to be theirs, but which have in fact been made using AI clones of their voice. One such case involves Canadian singer Celine Dion, who in March warned fans about AI-generated content featuring her voice and likeness that was circulating online. And in April 2024, more than 200 artists, including Billie Eilish, Kacey Musgraves, J Balvin, Ja Rule, Jon Bon Jovi, the Jonas Brothers, Katy Perry and Miranda Lambert, signed an open letter speaking out against AI-related threats in the music industry. Engel-Schmidt says he has secured cross-party support for the bill, and he believes it will be passed this fall. Once the legislation is passed, Engel-Schmidt believes a second step would be to introduce more legislation that could impose fines on companies that do not comply with requests to remove content featuring an AI-generated deepfake. 'We are champions of freedom of speech, we would like everyone to be heard, but we also believe that human beings have the right to say yes and no to them being used by generative AI,' he said. As for whether he has discussed the proposed legislation with tech companies, Engel-Schmidt said: 'Not yet, but I'm looking forward to it. I think it's in their interest as well to make AI work for humanity, not against, you know, artists, popular figures and ordinary people.' Athina Karatzogianni, a professor of technology and society at the University of Leicester, England, told CNN that the Danish proposal is one of hundreds of policy initiatives around the world looking to reduce the possible harms associated with the misuse of generative AI. 'Deepfakes can have both individual and social impact, because they can both harm individual rights and also (have) sociopolitical impacts, because they undermine the values that are fundamental to a democracy, such as equality and transparency,' said Karatzogianni.
