
Dog home boss mauled by rescued American bulldog SUES charity for £200k
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A DOG home boss is suing for more than £200,000 after being savaged by a rescued American Bulldog in a violent attack at a rehoming centre.
Karla Haines, 34, says she was left traumatised and permanently scarred after the Bulldog , named Jester, suddenly latched onto her arm and wouldn't let go during an incident at a Dogs Trust rehoming centre.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
4
Ms Haines alleges that safety protocols were not followed — and that she was effectively exposed to danger in the line of duty
Credit: Champion News Service
4
The horror unfolded at the charity's Harefield site in west London, where Ms Haines was working as assistant operations manager
Credit: Dogs Trust
4
The court will now decide whether Ms Haines is entitled to the full amount she's seeking — or whether the payout will be reduced
Credit: Dogs Trust
The horror unfolded at the charity's Harefield site in west London, where Ms Haines was working as assistant operations manager.
She had been called in to help deal with the misbehaving rescue dog when the shocking attack happened on 3 July 2021.
Despite requesting that the dog be put on a lead, court papers say Jester – described as a 'fierce and mischievous' American Bulldog cross – sank its teeth into her right arm, causing multiple puncture wounds and lasting nerve damage.
Ms Haines, who holds a degree in animal behaviour and welfare, says the injuries have left her with long-term sensitivity in her arm and PTSD-like symptoms, including anxiety and flashbacks.
She is now taking legal action against her former employer, claiming Dogs Trust failed to properly manage and restrain the aggressive animal, despite being aware of the risks.
Her lawyers argue the dog should have been kept in a secure area or tied to a fixed lead point to prevent attacks on staff.
The Harefield centre, which is set in 16 acres of countryside, houses up to 150 dogs at a time in swanky kennels fitted with underfloor heating, exercise paddocks and a sensory garden.
But behind the scenes, Ms Haines alleges that safety protocols were not followed — and that she was effectively exposed to danger in the line of duty.
Court documents state: 'The dog is and was of a fierce and mischievous disposition and/or was likely, unless restrained, to bite anyone on the defendant's premises or to cause severe injury when defending what it regarded as its own territory.'
Although Dogs Trust has admitted a breach of duty through its insurers, the charity disputes the full amount of damages being claimed and says the extent of Ms Haines' injuries are 'not admitted'.
Veterinarian Reveals the Worst Dog Breeds to Own
The Trust also insists that Ms Haines was on Jester's 'safe list' — a group of approved staff members considered capable of handling the animal without issue.
In a legal response, their solicitor Chrissie Paphitis said: 'It is averred that Jester had been placed on a lead prior to the claimant entering the compound.
'It is admitted that Jester nevertheless grabbed onto the claimant's arm and bit her.'
But she added: 'No admissions are made in respect of causation, and the claimant is put to strict proof in relation to any and all allegations of loss and damage.'
Which dog breeds are banned in the UK?
THERE are specific regulations in place that prohibit certain dog breeds from being owned or bred in the UK.
So what are the illegal dogs in the UK and why are they illegal? Here's what we know.
Which dog breeds are illegal in the UK?
People tend to think of large, vicious dogs when they imagine being bitten by one.
But the truth is that many types of dogs are known to bite humans, whether provoked or not.
However, it's important to remember that just because a breed tends to bite humans, that doesn't mean that they all do.
British law determines five breeds of dog are illegal to own, breed, sell or give away.
These are an XL Bully, Pit Bull Terrier, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino and Fila Brasileiro.
Ms Haines' legal team originally valued the claim at around £60,000, but this has since ballooned to more than £200,000 as the extent of her physical and psychological injuries became clearer.
A judge at a brief pre-trial hearing earlier this month confirmed the full trial will go ahead unless a settlement is reached before then.
It's understood the case is being closely watched by other animal welfare professionals, who say it raises serious concerns about staff safety when working with rescue dogs that may have violent histories.
Dogs Trust, which was founded in 1891, is the UK's largest dog welfare charity and rehomes thousands of dogs each year. It has not commented publicly on the legal claim.
The court will now decide whether Ms Haines is entitled to the full amount she's seeking — or whether the payout will be reduced.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
21 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Multiple people shot in Montana business as FBI called to Granite County to hunt for active shooter in ‘tie dyed shirt'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MULTIPLE people have been shot at a Montana bar and the gunman is on the loose, police said. Residents are warned to stay inside as police chase the suspect after he fled the scene on Friday afternoon, prompting a manhunt involving SWAT teams and the FBI. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 The shooting broke out at Owl Bar in Anaconda, Montana, on Friday afternoon Credit: Google Maps 2 SWAT teams were seen racing through Anaconda, Montana Credit: NBC Montana Police warned people to avoid the area of Anaconda in southwestern Montana while they hunt for an armed suspect, according to the Granite County Sheriff's Office. Multiple people were shot at a local business, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. It's unclear if anyone was injured in the shooting. The shooter is wearing a tie-dyed shirt, blue jeans, and an orange bandana, police said. A SWAT team cleared the suspect's house in Anaconda after the shooting, according to GCSO. NBC affiliate KTVM reported he opened fire at Owl Bar in Anaconda on Friday afternoon. The Montana Highway Patrol warned just before 1 pm local time, "There is a heavy law enforcement presence west of Anaconda near Stumptown Road and Anderson Ranch Loop Road. Police initially stopped a White F-150, but determined it wasn't the suspect, GCSO said. Cops said that there's no threat to Granite County citizens at this time. "Authorities are searching for a suspect believed to be armed. Please avoid the area." Montana Governor Greg Gianforte said he's "closely monitoring the situation involving an active shooter in Anaconda." Cops have yet to say what led to the shooting. The FBI is responding to the shooting, FBI's Salt Lake City office spokesperson Sandra Barker told the Associated Press. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun


Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Pensioner, 76, charged with ‘child cruelty offences' after eight kids & adult ‘poisoned' at summer camp
Kids were enjoying summer holidays when they fell ill CAMP HORROR Pensioner, 76, charged with 'child cruelty offences' after eight kids & adult 'poisoned' at summer camp Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A PENSIONER has been charged with "child cruelty offences" at a summer camp after eight kids and one adult were rushed to hospital. The victims were enjoying the summer holidays at Stathern Lodge in Leicestershire when they reported feeling ill. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Jonathon Ruben, 76, was arrested by cops and has now been charged 4 Eight children were taken to hospital while at a summer camp Credit: SWNS Police arrested Jonathon Ruben, 76, following the horror on Sunday and he has now been charged. The pensioner was charged with three offences of "wilful ill treatment of a child" relating to three boys. Ruben has been remanded into custody and will appear at Leicester Magistrates' Court tomorrow. Janine McKinney, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS East Midlands, said: 'The Crown Prosecution Service has authorised the prosecution of a 76-year-old man with child cruelty offences following a police investigation into a summer camp held at Stathern Lodge, Leicestershire. "This decision has been made after reviewing a file of evidence from Leicestershire Police. 'Jonathon Ruben, will be charged with three offences of wilful ill treatment of a child relating to three boys. He will appear at Leicester Magistrates' Court on Saturday, 1 August. 'This has been an extremely upsetting and shocking moment for the community, and especially for the children and parents most directly affected. 'We would like to remind all concerned that there are now active criminal proceedings against Mr Ruben, and he has the right to a fair trial. There must be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online that may in any way prejudice these proceedings." Officers and the East Midlands Ambulance Service - including an air ambulance - swarmed the Christian camp on Monday. "Distressed" parents were reportedly unable to see their kids "for hours" as they were taken to a makeshift triage centre nearby. One witness reported seeing parents "screaming" at officers as they demanded to see their kids. A total of eight children - who were all boys aged between eight and 11 - were taken to hospital as a precaution and later discharged. One adult was also taken to hospital as a precaution and was also discharged, said cops. A resident who lives near the hall said: 'It was pretty chaotic, with emergency workers running around everywhere. "I saw a few children in tears as they walked into the hall. It's like every parent's worst nightmare." Leicester Police has now referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), who have launched a probe. It comes as officers admitted it received a report on Sunday of children feeling unwell but did not visit the camp until Monday. The lodge is owned by Christian charity the Braithwaite Gospel Trust, which provides holiday clubs. An IOPC spokesperson said: "We received a conduct referral on Tuesday (July 29) from Leicestershire Police relating to their handling of concerns passed to them over the wellbeing of a group of children. "Our assessment team has examined all available evidence and concluded the matter should be independently investigated by the IOPC. "The investigation will look at whether there were any breaches of professional behaviour - namely a failure to carry out duties and responsibilities - that resulted in a delay in Leicestershire Police's response to what was later declared a critical incident." 4 Police have charged a pensioner with murder Credit: PA


Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
I could get £10,000 back due to car finance scandal despite judges landmark ruling – but I'm devastated for others
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PIZZA delivery worker Roy Turner could be set to get £10,000 back in car finance compensation despite a landmark Supreme Court ruling in favour of banks. Roy, 57, from Tayport, bought a BMW 118D in 2016 to help his disabled wife, Elaine, with her mobility issues. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Roy Turner bought a car in 2016 to help his wife Elaine with her mobility issues Credit: Supplied He is one of millions who could still be due back cash as part of the car finance scandal as banks will still be liable to pay out claims for those hit with excessive interest, which dealers earned commission from. The UK's highest court was considering an appeal against a Court of Appeal ruling made in October last year, which were about three different claims from people who had each bought a car on credit. In each case, the car dealer made a profit on the sale of the car but also made commission for introducing the business to them - which the three people claimed they did not know about. These were known as "commission disclosure complaints" and could apply up to 99% of car finance loans. The Court of Appeal ruled in October that the firms broke the law by not telling borrowers about 'secret' commission payments. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, challenged the ruling in April, calling it a "egregious error". Today, the Supreme Court overturned the ruling in two of the cases but it does not entirely close down the path for compensation for drivers. Firstly, it upheld the judgement in the case of Mr Johnson, who was an extreme example of where excessive interest had been charged. But the UK's highest court ruled that banks are not liable for so-called secret commission payments. However, they will still be liable for discretionary commission arrangements, which applied to 40% of car finance deals. The city watchdog - The Financial Conduct Authority - has been considering a financial redress scheme for drivers over PCP and hire purchase agreements from before 2021. It is where brokers and dealers could increase the amount of interest they charge without telling them. If they did, they got increased commission. The Supreme Court ruling had put these claims on hold - but now the FCA is set to reveal within six weeks whether it will launch an industry wide compensation scheme. It is deciding whether this scheme will involve automatic compensation refunds or whether drivers will have to "opt-in". It is also looking at the interest rates for compensation payments. Payouts could have been as high as £44billion for the scandal in total if the Court of Appeal decision had been upheld, but now they are now expected to be around £20billion. This will be a big win for the banks and disappointing for affected drivers - but you could still get cash. Roy had a discretionary commission arrangement for his car, so could still get a payout. Commenting on the ruling, he said: "These companies have been robbing the poor to benefit the rich. I'm devastated for others." Roy bought his car for £8,650, but the cost of the credit was an eye-watering £9,356, bringing his total bill to £17,996. He said the car dealer, John Clark Aberdeen, did not do an affordability check to see if he could afford the monthly repayments, even though he had a bad credit rating. The monthly repayments were £157 a month, and he was charged an interest rate of 39.1% APR. The term of the loan was five years. Roy said that he cannot remember having a conversation about any commission he would have to pay for. 'It's been stressful - it was hard to afford the car loan,' he said. 'I was struggling to afford phone bills. If the car needed repair work or an MOT, I would need to borrow money from friends. It was very embarrassing. 'I wish I never took it out because of the interest rate.' Roy decided to ring legal firm Courmac Legal after watching an advert on television about the mis-selling scandal. The firm has put in a claim on his behalf, and says that while his lender, Advantage Finance, has not disclosed the level of commission charged, his claim could be worth as much as £10,000. 'I feel disgusted,' Roy said. 'I was completely misled by the dealer and lender when I took out a loan to buy my car. 'The financial impact on my family of the hidden commission was considerable and I've been fighting to get the compensation I'm owed. 'I felt like a fool for paying all that money for a car.' Roy's local MP, Wendy Chamberlain, said she was 'shocked' to hear about Roy's case. She said: 'Loans must be transparent practices, not riddled with hidden commissions for those who sell them at the expense of honest people's hard-earned money.' Advantage Finance and John Clark Aberdeen were contacted for comment. Who can claim? That has not been confirmed but anyone who had a car, van or motorbike on PCP or hire purchases before January 28 2021 could be due back £1,000s. More than 23million people believe they could be in line for compensation, polling by consumer law firm Slater and Gordon suggests. Consumer groups have estimated that motorists took out more than 30million car loans over those years. The FCA will decide who and how this will work within six weeks of today's judgement. It has said it may even do it without the need for people to reclaim, with firms ordered to make automatic refunds. It is likely that you won't be able to complain about agreements taken out before April 6 2007, as this is when the Financial Ombudsman took over motor finance complaints, but the exact rules are still being worked out. DCAs were banned after January 2021, so anyone who took out an agreement after this time wouldn't be able to claim. How to claim While we wait for the FCA to reveal it's plans you can still lodge a claim. If you think you should be compensated, consumer finance website has a free email template to help you complain to your finance provider. You can also complain directly to your provider without using the template. Anyone who took out car finance and could be eligible should file a claim, even if their previous one was denied. In your complaint, ask whether you were overcharged due to your broker receiving a commission and ask the company to rectify this if it happened. If you are not happy with the company's response then you can escalate your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service for free. You have until July 29, 2026, or up to 15 months from the date of the company's final response letter to do so, whichever is longer.